OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (4GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£700RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:12 inchesChipset:Intel Core i3-4020Y

Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1/10

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components

90%

5.8

Technical score

10%

8.5

User score

â–¼Worse than 54% of tablets
6.3

Value for money

Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

6.8

Price

â–¼Worse than 87%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

5.5

Display

16%

5.8

Camera

14%

5.3

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

8.4

Software & Features

5%

5.2

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 58%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

9.3

Number of reviews

â–²Better than 82%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £700
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 128GBCheck price8GB + 256GBCheck price
Other versions:
4GB + 64GB8GB + 512GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components:

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

5.5

Display

16%

5.8

Camera

14%

5.3

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

8.4

Software & Features

5%

5.2

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

5.8
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

9.3

Number of reviews

8.5
Popularity
Popularity
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Popularity:
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (4GB + 64GB) has a user popularity of 9.3 points, which is lower than 87.4% of Tablets.
9.3
Value for money
Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components:

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

6.8

Price

6.3
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
22 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 22 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 57.5% of tablets and equal to the node used in 7.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
817 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 817 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 53.1% of tablets.
Chipset
Intel Core i3-4020Y
This tablet uses the Intel Core i3-4020Y chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 66.7% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2160×1440
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2160×1440 which is higher than that of 67.8% of tablets and equal to that of 0.9% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
216 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 216 ppi which is lower than that of 52.1% of tablets and equal to that of 3.8% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 5 MP which is lower than that of 63.6% of tablets and equal to that of 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.4 which is narrower than that of 69.8% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,547 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 5,547 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 60.3% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
36 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 36 W which is faster than in 79.3% of tablets and equal to speeds in 0.6% of tablets.
Battery life
9 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 9 hours, which is shorter than that of 62.7% of tablets and equal to that of 6.8% of tablets.
web browsing
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
800 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 800 g which is heavier than 94.8% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
45 ms
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 45 ms, which is higher than that of 97.7% of tablets and equal to that of 1.4% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i3-4020Y chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i3-4020Y vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 1.9 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • 2x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (36 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    36 W vs 18 W
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Includes stylus
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • 92.9% more popular
    Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (4GB + 64GB) is more popular than the average tablet (9.28 vs 4.8).
    9.28 vs 4.81
  • 6.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Microsoft Surface Pro 3
    the average tablet
    Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (4GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (8.51 vs 8.000).
    8.51 vs 8
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i3-4020Y chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i3-4020Y vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 16 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (20 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    20 vs 4
  • 43% higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (21.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    21.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 1.9 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2160×1440 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2160×1440 vs 1920×1200
  • 200 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (200 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    Below 48% brightness only.
    200 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • 2x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (36 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    36 W vs 18 W
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Includes stylus
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 63.3% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (800 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    800 g vs 490 g
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No touch autofocus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • 2.69x more expensive
    Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (4GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£700 vs £260).
    £700 vs £260
  • 12.3% worse value for money
    Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.32 vs 7.1).
    6.32 vs 7.1
  • 25% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57.1% larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (22 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    22 nm vs 14 nm
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 30 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (371 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    371 nits vs 401 nits
  • 29 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (371 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    371 nits vs 400 nits
  • 3.6% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (216 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    216 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No touch autofocus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 1 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (9 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    web browsing
    9 hours vs 10 hours
  • 15.7% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (5,547 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    5,547 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • 63.3% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (800 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    800 g vs 490 g
  • 36 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (45 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    45 ms vs 9 ms
  • 3 points lower iFixit repairability score
    This tablet has a lower repairability score than the average tablet (1 points vs 4 points). The average tablet repairability score is 4 points.
    1 points vs 4 points
  • 1.1 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9.1 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    9.1 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 5 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2014 vs 2019).
    2014 vs 2019
  • 26 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (201.3 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    201.3 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
ParchiTech
≈ estimated
02/03/2020
Long-term review · six years of use, performance and display tests
Verdict
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 is still a solid device for basic work and a good choice if you cannot afford a newer one.
7.0
Unicorn Reviews
≈ estimated
22/06/2018
Long-term review · almost four years of daily use
Verdict
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 shows many problems over time, but its usability and keyboard still hold up well.
9.0
Editors Keys
≈ estimated
08/09/2014
Hands-on review · business, creative and battery tests
Verdict
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 is a great tablet for students, business users and creatives, though its keyboard cover is pricey.
8.0
Adam Savage’s Tested
≈ estimated
13/08/2014
Long-term test · one month of daily use
Verdict
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 should keep most buyers happy, though it is expensive and slows down under long workloads.
4.0
Linus Tech Tips
≈ estimated
03/07/2014
Hands-on review · build, keyboard and laptop use
Verdict
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 is not recommended: the touchpad, Windows scaling and tablet use hold it back.
9.0
MobileTechReview
≈ estimated
23/06/2014
In-depth review · several days of use and tests
Verdict
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 is not perfect, but it is a strong, nearly laptop-like tablet, especially for its display and pen.
4.0
Unboxio
≈ estimated
09/02/2026
Review of an older tablet · performance, battery and ports
Verdict
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 is not recommended today: its performance is weak and it does not support Windows 11.
8.0
MobileTechReview
≈ estimated
07/06/2014
First look · pen, display and drawing app tests
Verdict
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 is an attractive tablet with a sharp display and a responsive pen, though drawing apps show pressure problems.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cnet.com
22/05/2014
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 review: The best Surface yet is more than a tablet, less than a laptop
P
pcmag.com
22/05/2014
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Review
T
theverge.com
20/05/2014
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 hands-on: bigger, thinner, faster
T
time.com
11/07/2014
Summary of the review
Surface Pro 3 Review: In Defense of the 2-in-1 PC - TIME
I
ign.com
18/07/2014
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
06/08/2014
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 review
M
mobiletechreview.com
07/07/2014
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Review
R
reviewed.com
12/06/2014
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (Core i5) Laptop Review
T
t3.com
11/08/2014
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 review
T
techwalls.com
12/11/2014
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Review - Can the Best Hybrid Replace Your Laptop?
V
voices.britishschool.nl
16/03/2017
Summary of the review
Surface Pro 3 Review
P
photographylife.com
12/11/2015
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Review: Photography and Writing Are you looking for reviews of the original accessories like the Type Cover or the Surface Pen...
T
theverge.com
23/05/2014
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 review | The Verge
T
techadvisor.com
22/01/2016
Summary of the review
Surface Pro 3 UK review - Tech Advisor
S
stuff.tv
31/07/2014
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 review - Stuff
C
cnet.com
21/06/2014
Summary of the review
The Microsoft Surface Pro 3: Bigger is better
C
cnet.com
30/07/2014
Summary of the review
Microsoft's Surface Pro 3 wins plaudits for display, says researcher
U
uk.pcmag.com
22/05/2014
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Review - Tablets - PCMag.com
H
huffingtonpost.co.uk
21/08/2014
Summary of the review
Surface Pro 3 Review: Microsoft Finally Nails Its Post-Laptop...
E
engadget.com
29/05/2014
Summary of the review
Ditching the MacBook Air for Microsoft's Surface Pro 3 Would you like more reviews from specific regions or technical focus areas?

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (4GB + 64GB)

  • High-resolution 12-inch display (2160x1440) with excellent clarity and sharp text
  • Versatile, infinitely adjustable full-friction kickstand
  • Pressure-sensitive Surface Pen included for natural writing and note-taking
  • Strong performance for productivity tasks and casual usage
  • Lightweight and thinner design compared to previous Surface Pro generations
  • Impressive front and back webcams for video calls

What customers don't like about Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (4GB + 64GB)

  • Type Cover keyboard is sold separately and is considered an essential but expensive accessory
  • Limited connectivity with only one USB 3.0 port
  • Poor gaming and heavy video editing performance due to integrated graphics
  • Can be bulky and heavy for one-handed use as a standalone tablet
  • Kickstand design can be uncomfortable or unstable when used on a lap
  • Inconsistent internet connectivity and reported software bugs
  • Flimsy integrated pen storage (pen loop)

Verdict

The Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (4GB RAM, 64GB SSD) is a versatile 2-in-1 hybrid powered by a 4th generation Intel Core i3-4020Y processor and a 12-inch ClearType Full HD Plus touchscreen with a 2160 x 1440 resolution and 3:2 aspect ratio. Encased in a lightweight magnesium body weighing 800g, it features a multi-position friction hinge kickstand, a full-size USB 3.0 port, a Mini DisplayPort, and 5MP front and rear cameras capable of 1080p video. Main pros include its premium build, sharp and bright display, and excellent portability for a full Windows machine; however, cons include limited performance for intensive tasks due to the entry-level i3 CPU and 4GB of RAM, high screen reflectivity, and the fact that the essential Type Cover keyboard is typically sold separately.

Compare Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found