OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Urban Dream review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£25Screen size:1.32 inchBattery life:5 daysDisplay type:IPS LCD

Urban Dream Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 1 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Urban Dream
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components

35%

5.7

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.7

Reviews score

10%

10

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 61% of smartwatches
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 56%
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

24%

6.9

Health

21%

5.2

Fitness

16%

3.6

Battery

14%

7.7

Smart features

12%

4.2

Connectivity

9%

5.7

Display & Design

4%

7.8

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 65%
5.7

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models

5.7

Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

8.1

Average grade

20%

5.0

Popularity

Grades by review (1)
1 review: 9.0/10. We use 5 reviews; the 4 missing count as the category's typical 8.0: (9.0 × 1 + 8.0 × 4) ÷ 5 = 8.2. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 76%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • urban-dream
urban-dream
Where to buy
    N/A~ £25
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What owners say about the Urban Dream

Based on 195 owners sharing their experience in online comments

58%positive17%mixed25%negative

Owners praise its natural, glowy finish and comfortable feel, but shade matching and wear problems are common frustrations.

What owners dislike

  • The lightest shades often look too dark, yellow or orange, so many owners mix two shades to get a good match.22
  • Wears off, creases or separates after a few hours on some skin, especially oily skin, in heat, or when applied over sunscreen.20
  • Some owners say it caused breakouts and red bumps after wearing it, particularly those with sensitive or oily skin.11
  • Some owners find it turns oily or greasy by the afternoon, especially on combination or oily skin, and can look dewy in an unflattering way.10
  • On dry skin it can cling to dry patches, feel drying, and crack or settle into lines, even after adding a hydrating primer.9
  • It can look cakey, settle into lines and emphasise texture, especially after a few hours or when applied with a sponge.7
  • If it gets near the eyes, the SPF can sting and cause burning or watering, so owners avoid applying it close to the eye area.6
  • Owners say it gives less coverage than expected, barely covering blemishes or redness, and needs layering for more coverage.5
  • Owners with sensitive skin say the alcohol content left their skin red, dry or irritated after wearing it.5
  • The sunscreen smell is strong when first applied, and some owners find it unpleasant, though it fades after a while.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Urban Dream

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components:

24%

6.9

Health

21%

5.2

Fitness

16%

3.6

Battery

14%

7.7

Smart features

12%

4.2

Connectivity

9%

5.7

Display & Design

4%

7.8

Hardware

5.7
Reviews score
5.7
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.7
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 49.5% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 71.3% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support distance tracking. 96.4% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
5 days
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 5 days on a charge, which is shorter than 65.9% of Smartwatches and the same as 6.1% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
11 h
Market range: <6 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 11 h on a charge, which is shorter than 68.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.7% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
235 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 235 mAh battery, which is smaller than 77.6% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.4% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
150 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 150 min, which is slower than 88.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 7.4% of Smartwatches.
Show more
Operating system
Proprietary OS
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS, which is less advanced than the system in 54.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 42% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
?
Third-party app support
no
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 59.8% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
Screen size
1.32 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.32 inch screen, which is smaller than 63.2% of Smartwatches and the same as 3.7% of Smartwatches.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartwatch uses IPS LCD, which is less advanced than the screen in 70.4% of Smartwatches and equal to 5.9% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
360x 360
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 360x360 which is higher than that of 47% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.1% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
386 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 386 ppi, which is higher than 65.6% of Smartwatches and equal to 0.8% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
600 nits
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch has a screen brightness of 600 nits, which is lower than 52.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 13.1% of Smartwatches.
Show more
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Urban Dream vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 21.8% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
    Measurements are for wellness guidance, not medical diagnosis.
  • Temperature sensing
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.9% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Fall detection
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 23% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 44.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • 33.3% higher sentiment score
    10.0 vs 7.5
  • 33.3% higher sentiment score
    10.0 vs 7.5
  • 4.4x cheaper
    Urban Dream is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£25 vs £110).
    £25 vs £110
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 21.8% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
    Measurements are for wellness guidance, not medical diagnosis.
  • Temperature sensing
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.9% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • Water intake tracking
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44.1% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 2 years newer
    This smartwatch was released more recently than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    August 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • 60 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (386 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    386 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Fall detection
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 23% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 44.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No GPS support
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 59.7% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No elevation tracking
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 48.8 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1.2 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.2 m vs 50 m
  • No pace tracking
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 80.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • 18.6% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models

    5.7

    Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    5.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (1)
    1 review: 9.0/10. We use 5 reviews; the 4 missing count as the category's typical 8.0: (9.0 × 1 + 8.0 × 4) ÷ 5 = 8.2. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.7 vs 7.0
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No smart scale support
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No elevation tracking
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No pace tracking
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 80.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No distance tracking
    This smartwatch does not support distance tracking, the average smartwatch does. 96.3% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
  • No route tracking
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 77% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No gyroscope
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 71.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No route support
    This smartwatch does not support route support, the average smartwatch does. 54.4% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 9 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (11 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    11 h vs 20 h
  • 30 min slower charging
    This smartwatch charges more slowly than the average smartwatch (150 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    150 min vs 120 min
  • 2 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (5 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    5 days vs 7 days
  • 70 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery than the average smartwatch (235 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    235 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • No GPS support
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 59.7% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • 48.8 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1.2 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.2 m vs 50 m
  • More basic display
    This smartwatch uses a more basic screen than the average smartwatch (IPS LCD vs AMOLED).
    IPS LCD vs AMOLED
  • No ambient light sensor
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 0.08 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.32 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • 150 nits dimmer screen
    This smartwatch has a dimmer screen than the average smartwatch (600 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    600 nits vs 750 nits
  • 5 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (50 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    50 g vs 45 g
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No widget support
    This smartwatch does not support widgets, the average smartwatch does. 84.4% of smartwatches support widgets.
  • No gesture control
    This smartwatch does not support gesture control, the average smartwatch does. 79.6% of smartwatches support gesture control.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
thehansindia.com
≈ estimated
20/09/2023
Review · Women's stainless smartwatch
Verdict
The Urban Dream is a stainless-steel women's watch that makes calls from the wrist and lasts almost a week on a charge, though calling drains it faster.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Urban Dream

  • Elegant and premium design featuring a ceramic body and stainless steel finish
  • Lightweight and comfortable for long-term wear
  • Bright 1.32-inch HD display with good visibility under sunlight
  • Long-lasting battery life, typically around 5 days with standard use
  • Comprehensive health tracking including 24/7 heart rate, SpO2, and blood pressure monitoring
  • Smooth Bluetooth calling with a noise-isolating microphone and speaker
  • Extensive customisation with over 100-150 watch faces available

What customers don't like about Urban Dream

  • Higher price point compared to some budget competitors
  • Mobile app (Da Fit or Mibro Fit) may contain distracting advertisements
  • Lacks advanced wireless charging support (requires magnetic charging)
  • Blood pressure monitoring accuracy may be less precise than medical-grade devices
  • Limited contact storage (only up to 10 contacts) on the watch
  • Does not support third-party apps or advanced coaching features

Verdict

The Urban Dream is a women-centric luxury smartwatch featuring a 1.32-inch ultra-bright HD IPS display (600 nits) housed in a premium ceramic and stainless steel body with a dual-color metal strap. Key characteristics include high-quality Bluetooth calling with a noise-isolating mic, an AI voice assistant, and a health suite offering 24/7 monitoring of heart rate, SpO2, blood pressure, and dedicated menstruation cycle tracking. Main pros are its elegant, lightweight design (50g), 150+ customizable watch faces, over 100 sports modes, and a battery life of up to 7 days. Notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS, no Always-On Display (AOD) support, and an IP53 water resistance rating that is lower than many sport-focused alternatives.

Compare Urban Dream with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Urban Dream and other Smartwatches

No results found