OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£180Screen size:1.30 inchBattery life:1 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 23 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus
6.2/10

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

35%

5.4

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.4

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.8, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 81% of smartwatches
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

â–¼Worse than 85%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

24%

2.7

Health

21%

8.4

Fitness

16%

3.9

Battery

14%

6.1

Smart features

12%

7.3

Connectivity

9%

6.2

Display & Design

4%

2.8

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 73%
5.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models

5.4

Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.7

Average grade

20%

8.2

Popularity

Grades by review (23)
11 reviews + 12 videos, average 7.7/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 81%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-c2-plus
mobvoi-ticwatch-c2-plus
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus

Based on 11 · 12

Reviewers like the solid design and comfortable straps, but the speaker and calls disappoint, while display and battery opinions are split.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components:

24%

2.7

Health

21%

8.4

Fitness

16%

3.9

Battery

14%

6.1

Smart features

12%

7.3

Connectivity

9%

6.2

Display & Design

4%

2.8

Hardware

5.4
Reviews score
5.4
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components:

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

7.2
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 69.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 49.5% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
1 day
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 1 day on a charge, which is shorter than 88.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 8.1% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
24 h
Market range: <6 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 24 h on a charge, which is longer than 56.5% of Smartwatches and the same as 4.7% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
4 h
Market range: <6 h – >46 h
This smartwatch lasts 4 h with GPS on, which is shorter than 95.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.9% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
400 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 400 mAh battery, which is larger than 70.9% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.5% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
100 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 100 min, which is quicker than 62.5% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.1% of Smartwatches.
Approximate value from reported charging range: 100 minutes.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
This smartwatch runs Wear OS, which is more advanced than the system in 80.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 15.8% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Screen-only assistant responses; no speaker.
Show more
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.6% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 56.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.3 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.3 inch screen, which is smaller than 67.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 10.8% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
360x 360
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 360x360 which is higher than that of 47% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.1% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
392 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 392 ppi, which is higher than 66.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 2.5% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
500 nits
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch has a screen brightness of 500 nits, which is lower than 73.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 13.6% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
4x 1.2 GHz
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.2 GHz which is faster than that in 85.3% of smartwatches and equal to that in 3.1% of smartwatches.
Derived from core-count and per-core clock notation
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 2100
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 2100 processor model.
RAM
1 GB
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM, which is more than 34.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 41.8% of Smartwatches.
Internal storage
4 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 25.5% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.6% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • 20 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (100 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 100 minutes.
    100 min vs 120 min
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass vs mineral glass
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • 20 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (100 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 100 minutes.
    100 min vs 120 min
  • 95 mAh larger battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a larger battery than the average smartwatch (400 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    400 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • 4 h longer training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (24 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    24 h vs 20 h
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.6% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass vs mineral glass
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • 2 mm slimmer strap
    This smartwatch has a slimmer strap than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch has a 22 mm strap.
    20.0 mm vs 22 mm
  • Better band material
    This smartwatch uses silicone, leather for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, leather vs silicone
  • 66 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (392 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    392 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Faster CPU speed
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.2 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    Derived from core-count and per-core clock notation
    4x1.2 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.9% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • 17 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (4 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    4 h vs 21 h
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No pace tracking
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 80.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No sleep tracking
    This smartwatch does not support sleep tracking, the average smartwatch does. 93.8% of smartwatches support sleep tracking.
  • 48.5 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 22.9% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models

    5.4

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.7

    Average grade

    20%

    8.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (23)
    11 reviews + 12 videos, average 7.7/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.4 vs 7.0
  • 7.7% worse value for money
    Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.21 vs 7.8).
    7.21 vs 7.76
  • 63.6% more expensive
    Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£180 vs £110).
    £180 vs £110
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.9% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No sleep tracking
    This smartwatch does not support sleep tracking, the average smartwatch does. 93.8% of smartwatches support sleep tracking.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 1 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2020 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    June 2020
    2,020 vs 2,021
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No pace tracking
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 80.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No route support
    This smartwatch does not support route support, the average smartwatch does. 54.4% of smartwatches support route support.
  • No voice feedback
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 17 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (4 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    4 h vs 21 h
  • 6 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (1 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No compass
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Less current Bluetooth version
    This smartwatch uses a less current Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (4.1 vs 5).
    4.1 vs 5.0
  • 48.5 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No ambient light sensor
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 250 nits dimmer screen
    This smartwatch has a dimmer screen than the average smartwatch (500 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    500 nits vs 750 nits
  • 0.1 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.30 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • 1 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.7 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    12.70 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 60% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No call controls
    This smartwatch does not offer call control, the average smartwatch does. 91.2% of smartwatches offer call control.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
New Stuff TV
≈ estimated
10/09/2020
Hands-on review · style, battery and notifications
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus is a comfortable Wear OS watch that blends in well, though it is thick and has no speaker.
4.0
9to5Google
≈ estimated
11/08/2020
Hands-on review · performance, battery and features
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus has a pleasant design, but the dated chipset and short battery make it one to skip.
8.0
Tech Spurt
≈ estimated
23/06/2020
Unboxing and review · about a week of daily use
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus is a dependable budget smartwatch that does the job, though screen sensitivity and battery life fall short.
9.0
Chigz Tech Reviews
≈ estimated
23/06/2020
Hands-on review · health tests, screen-on and apps
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus is one of the best Wear OS watches, especially at this price point.
8.0
TechMishka
≈ estimated
23/06/2020
Two-week review · daily use and charging tests
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus is a stylish, well-built Wear OS watch best suited to Google-service users, but battery life is a clear weakness.
9.0
retroCombs
≈ estimated
27/09/2020
First use · unboxing, setup and Wear OS tour
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus is fast and responsive, a strong pick for anyone curious about Wear OS.
8.0
Ab113 Tech
≈ estimated
18/03/2021
Unboxing · first look at design, straps and features
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus has plenty of features and suits both sports and office use, a strong watch overall.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

5.0
xda-developers.com
≈ estimated
20/07/2020
Review · Wear OS fitness watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus has a clean look and performs well enough, but offline music and some workouts still need your phone.
7.0
androidcentral.com
✓ explicit
21/07/2020
Full review · Workout-tracking watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus looks good, feels snappy and detects workouts automatically, but it lacks a speaker, light sensor and sleep tracking.
5.0
9to5google.com
≈ estimated
11/08/2020
Extended test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus is a stylish, simple Wear OS watch, but its older Snapdragon Wear 2100 chip makes it hard to recommend.
7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
24/08/2020
Full review · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus is a well-built, minimalist Wear OS watch that runs snappier than the C2, but offers little to get excited about.
6.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
11/09/2020
Hands-on test · Fitness tracking
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus runs fast and has a bright screen, but its slow GPS and unreliable heart rate sensor make the TicWatch Pro 2020 the better choice.
7.0
womanandhome.com
✓ explicit
26/11/2020
Hands-on test · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus suits anyone who wants fitness tracking throughout daily life, with a stylish design and plenty of features, though it's heavy and takes time to set up.
8.0
fudzilla.com
≈ estimated
21/10/2021
Review · Stylish smartwatch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus is a stylish, traditional-looking Wear OS watch with up to two days of battery, but its lack of an ambient light sensor is the main drawback.
8.0
mobiflip.de
✓ explicit
16/08/2020
Hands-on test · Wear OS update
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus is a smoother C2 with double the RAM, a sensible pick for first-time Wear OS owners who don't mind setting brightness by hand.
8.0
china-gadgets.de
≈ estimated
07/08/2020
Hands-on test · Design-focused watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus is a light, classic-looking steel watch with a sharp AMOLED screen, though the leather strap and Google Pay setup hold it back a little.
9.0
today.it
≈ estimated
16/09/2020
Hands-on review · Elegant fitness watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus is a light, elegant Wear OS watch with nearly two days of battery and fairly accurate fitness data, but it skips blood-pressure and sleep tracking.
7.0
fenit.nl
≈ estimated
12/09/2023
Personal review · Health-tracking watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus is an attractive, comfortable watch whose heart-rate and sleep tracking suit everyday health monitoring, but short battery life and no GPS hold it back.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus

  • Sleek and stylish minimalist design that resembles a traditional watch
  • Improved performance and 'snappy' interface navigation thanks to 1GB of RAM
  • Includes both a genuine leather and a silicone strap in the box
  • Vibrant and sharp AMOLED display with good indoor visibility
  • Compact size that is comfortable for smaller wrists, especially the 18mm Rose Gold variant
  • Features built-in GPS and NFC for contactless payments via Google Pay

What customers don't like about Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus

  • Uses the outdated Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2100 chipset
  • Lacks a built-in speaker, preventing voice calls or audio feedback from Google Assistant
  • Poor outdoor visibility in direct sunlight due to the lack of an ambient light sensor
  • Short battery life, typically requiring daily charging with moderate to heavy use
  • Native sleep tracking is not included; requires third-party applications
  • Inconsistent GPS connection times and heart rate monitoring accuracy during high-intensity exercise

Verdict

The Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus is a refined Wear OS smartwatch featuring a 1.3-inch AMOLED display (360x360), a classic stainless steel case, and an IP68 water resistance rating. Key internal upgrades include 1GB of RAM paired with 4GB of ROM, which significantly improves the responsiveness of the older Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2100 chipset. Its primary pros include a premium minimalist design, built-in GPS/GLONASS/Beidou for accurate tracking, and NFC for Google Pay, all supported by a 400mAh battery that provides 1–1.5 days of use. Notable cons are the lack of a built-in speaker for taking calls, the absence of an ambient light sensor for automatic brightness adjustment, and a reliance on an aging processor compared to newer models.

Compare Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Mobvoi TicWatch C2 Plus and other Smartwatches

No results found