OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Mobvoi TicWatch C2 20mm review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£180Screen size:1.30 inchBattery life:1.5 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Mobvoi TicWatch C2 20mm Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 29 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Mobvoi TicWatch C2 20mm
6.6/10

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

35%

5.2

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.0

Reviews score

10%

5.2

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 65% of smartwatches
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

â–¼Worse than 69%
5.2

Technical score

Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

24%

2.7

Health

21%

8.0

Fitness

16%

3.2

Battery

14%

6.5

Smart features

12%

5.7

Connectivity

9%

6.8

Display & Design

4%

2.8

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 81%
8.0

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models

80%

7.9

Average grade

20%

8.4

Popularity

Grades by review (29)
16 reviews + 13 videos, average 7.9/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 51%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-c2-20-mm
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-c2-20-mm
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-c2-20-mm
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-c2-20-mm
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-c2-20-mm
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-c2-20-mm
mobvoi-ticwatch-c2-20-mm
mobvoi-ticwatch-c2-20-mm
mobvoi-ticwatch-c2-20-mm
mobvoi-ticwatch-c2-20-mm
mobvoi-ticwatch-c2-20-mm
mobvoi-ticwatch-c2-20-mm
Where to buy
    N/A~ £180
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Mobvoi TicWatch C2 20mm

Based on 15 · 12

Reviewers love the elegant design and handy contactless payments, but performance lags, audio disappoints and battery life divides opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Mobvoi TicWatch C2 20mm

Technical score
Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components:

24%

2.7

Health

21%

8.0

Fitness

16%

3.2

Battery

14%

6.5

Smart features

12%

5.7

Connectivity

9%

6.8

Display & Design

4%

2.8

Hardware

5.2
Reviews score
8.0
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

7.5
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 69.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports HRV tracking. 54.9% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
1.5 days
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 1.5 days on a charge, which is shorter than 86.2% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.2% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
4 h
Market range: <6 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 4 h on a charge, which is shorter than 94.9% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.2% of Smartwatches.
Up to 2 day battery life in non-training mode.
Battery life with GPS on
5 h
Market range: <6 h – >46 h
This smartwatch lasts 5 h with GPS on, which is shorter than 92.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.4% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
350 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 350 mAh battery, which is larger than 60.7% of Smartwatches and the same as 2% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
90 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 90 min, which is quicker than 64.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 9.9% of Smartwatches.
Approximate value from reported charging range: 90 minutes.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
This smartwatch runs Wear OS, which is more advanced than the system in 80.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 15.8% of Smartwatches.
OS detail: Wear OS (2.1).
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Screen-only assistant responses; no speaker.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.3 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.3 inch screen, which is smaller than 67.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 10.8% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
360x 360
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 360x360 which is higher than that of 47% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.1% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
392 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 392 ppi, which is higher than 66.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 2.5% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
1 GHz
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 1 GHz which is faster than that in 30.1% of smartwatches and equal to that in 30.1% of smartwatches.
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 2100
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 2100 processor model.
RAM
0.5 GB
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 0.5 GB of RAM, which is less than 71.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 22.7% of Smartwatches.
512 MB RAM
Internal storage
4 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 25.5% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Mobvoi TicWatch C2 20mm vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (2.1).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • 30 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (90 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 90 minutes.
    90 min vs 120 min
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • 14.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 51% of models

    80%

    7.9

    Average grade

    20%

    8.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (29)
    16 reviews + 13 videos, average 7.9/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.0 vs 7.0
  • 14.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 51% of models

    80%

    7.9

    Average grade

    20%

    8.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (29)
    16 reviews + 13 videos, average 7.9/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.0 vs 7.0
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • 30 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (90 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 90 minutes.
    90 min vs 120 min
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • Better band material
    This smartwatch uses leather for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    leather vs silicone
  • 2 mm slimmer strap
    This smartwatch has a slimmer strap than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch has a 22 mm strap.
    20 mm vs 22 mm
  • 66 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (392 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    392 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel, plastic for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel, plastic vs polycarbonate
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (2.1).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No elevation tracking
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • 16 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (5 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    5 h vs 21 h
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 16 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (4 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    Up to 2 day battery life in non-training mode.
    4 h vs 20 h
  • 30.7% lower sentiment score
    5.2 vs 7.5
  • 3.8% worse value for money
    Mobvoi TicWatch C2 20mm has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.47 vs 7.8).
    7.47 vs 7.76
  • 63.6% more expensive
    Mobvoi TicWatch C2 20mm is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£180 vs £110).
    £180 vs £110
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No sleep tracking
    This smartwatch does not support sleep tracking, the average smartwatch does. 93.8% of smartwatches support sleep tracking.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No inactivity alerts
    This smartwatch does not support inactivity alerts, the average smartwatch does. 92.6% of smartwatches support inactivity alerts.
  • 3 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2018 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    December 2018
    2018 vs 2021
  • No elevation tracking
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No swim mode
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 76.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • No voice feedback
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 16 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (5 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    5 h vs 21 h
  • 16 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (4 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    Up to 2 day battery life in non-training mode.
    4 h vs 20 h
  • 5.5 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (1.5 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    1.5 days vs 7 days
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No compass
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Less current Bluetooth version
    This smartwatch uses a less current Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (4.1 vs 5).
    4.1 vs 5
  • 48.5 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No ambient light sensor
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 0.1 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • 1 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.7 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    12.7 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 60% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 50% less RAM
    This smartwatch has less RAM than the average smartwatch (0.5 GB vs 1 GB). The average smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM.
    512 MB RAM
    0.5 GB vs 1 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Naresh Lal
≈ estimated
03/01/2020
Long-term review · about one month of daily use
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch C2 is a classic-looking Wear OS watch that handles notifications well, but its battery falls short of the claimed two days.
8.0
Naresh Lal
≈ estimated
13/12/2019
Hands-on review · design, app and heart rate tests
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch C2 20mm has a classic look and smooth notifications, but its claimed two-day battery life is optimistic.
9.0
Ian Dixon
≈ estimated
11/01/2019
Hands-on review · design, apps, Google Pay and battery
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch C2 20mm is a strong pick at a very good price for anyone getting into Android Wear.
9.0
Chigz Tech Reviews
≈ estimated
23/12/2018
Hands-on review · design, GPS, battery and speaker tests
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch C2 20mm is very satisfying to wear and use, and a strong fitness and design pick for Wear OS.
9.0
9to5Google
≈ estimated
17/12/2018
Short review · design and first impressions
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch C2 is one of the best Wear OS watches right now, with a minimalist design and a battery that is solid for its class.
9.0
Digital Trends
≈ estimated
24/10/2018
First look · hands-on impressions and design
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch C2 is a stylish smartwatch that balances design, materials and value for money well.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded
Overview video
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
06/12/2018
Full review · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The TicWatch C2 is a solid Wear OS watch with NFC and full GPS, but its outdated internals and lack of the Pro's second screen hold it back.
6.0
stuff.tv
✓ explicit
06/12/2018
Full review · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The TicWatch C2 is a stylish, well-rounded Wear OS watch that tracks fitness reasonably, but not well enough for serious athletes.
8.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
26/12/2018
Design-focused review · Everyday smartwatch
Verdict
The TicWatch C2 is a clean, understated all-round watch with built-in GPS and NFC, but its leather strap feels less premium than the case.
7.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
22/01/2019
Multi-week test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The TicWatch C2 is a stylish, comfortable Wear OS watch, but its heart rate readings run about 20 beats low, so it suits casual fitness only.
8.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
03/12/2019
Full review · Wear OS smartwatch
Verdict
The TicWatch C2 is a stylish Wear OS watch with NFC and GPS, but its dated chip, lack of speaker and 1–2 day battery hold it back.
5.0
medium.com
≈ estimated
16/08/2021
User review · Everyday use
Verdict
The TicWatch C2 looks nice with a steel case and NFC, but in this owner's experience its 13-hour battery and laggy menus made it hard to keep.
7.0
digitaltrends.com
✓ explicit
23/08/2019
Hands-on review · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The TicWatch C2 is a sleek Wear OS watch with accurate GPS and about a day of battery, best suited to Android users.
9.0
androidauthority.com
≈ estimated
14/02/2019
Hands-on review · Classic Wear OS watch
Verdict
The TicWatch C2 is a classic-looking Wear OS watch with GPS, NFC and heart-rate tracking, held back by an aging chip and average battery life.
7.0
smartzone.de
≈ estimated
24/01/2019
Running test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The TicWatch C2 is a good Wear OS watch with a stylish design and solid battery, but its GPS and heart-rate readings are too imprecise for sports tracking.
8.0
connect.de
≈ estimated
25/10/2018
Hands-on test · Classic round Wear OS
Verdict
The TicWatch C2 is a classic-looking round Wear OS watch with GPS and NFC payments, suiting people new to smartwatches, though its processor is dated.
8.0
entwickler.de
≈ estimated
31/01/2019
Three-week test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The TicWatch C2 is a slim, minimalist Wear OS watch that suits smaller wrists and health tracking, but without a speaker it cannot make phone calls.
7.0
frandroid.com
✓ explicit
20/09/2023
Full review · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The TicWatch C2 is a stylish Wear OS watch whose battery lasts about 28 hours, but its old chip makes apps slow to open.
4.0
clubic.com
✓ explicit
04/04/2019
Hands-on test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The TicWatch C2 tells the time and comfortably lasts a full day, but a slow chip and low-detail screen hold it back.
8.0
techprincess.it
≈ estimated
17/09/2019
Two-week review · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The TicWatch C2 is a stylish Wear OS watch with NFC payments and IP68 protection, held back by an old chip and a battery that struggles with always-on display.
9.0
tuttoapp-android.com
≈ estimated
16/04/2026
Hands-on review · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The TicWatch C2 is a metal-cased Wear OS watch that suits people new to Wear OS, with NFC payments and GPS, but no speaker and an occasional hitch.
8.0
androidworld.nl
≈ estimated
07/03/2019
Hands-on review · Lifestyle watch
Verdict
The TicWatch C2 is a solid steel lifestyle watch with a useful extra button, but its older chip stutters and its battery lasts a day under heavy use.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Mobvoi TicWatch C2 20mm

  • Understated and stylish stainless steel design that feels more premium than its budget-friendly price point.
  • Comprehensive feature set for the price, including integrated GPS, heart-rate monitoring, and NFC for Google Pay.
  • Compact and lightweight 43mm casing that is suitable for both large and small wrists.
  • Standard 20mm lug size allows users to easily swap out the included leather strap for third-party silicone or metal bands.
  • Bright 1.3-inch AMOLED display with a 360 x 360 resolution that provides a crisp viewing experience in most lighting conditions.

What customers don't like about Mobvoi TicWatch C2 20mm

  • Powered by the outdated Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2100 chipset, which can lead to laggy performance in heavy apps.
  • Limited battery life typically lasting only 1 to 2 days, requiring almost nightly charging for most users.
  • Lacks a built-in speaker, meaning it cannot play local music or handle phone calls directly from the wrist.
  • Not suitable for swimming despite its IP68 rating, as Mobvoi does not officially recommend submerging it for long periods.
  • Absence of an ambient light sensor requires users to manually adjust the screen brightness when moving outdoors.

Verdict

The Mobvoi TicWatch C2 20mm is a classic Wear OS smartwatch featuring a 1.3-inch AMOLED display (360x360), a stainless steel front casing, and 20mm interchangeable genuine leather straps. Powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2100 with 512MB RAM and 4GB storage, it includes built-in GPS, NFC for Google Pay, a 24-hour heart rate monitor, and an IP68 water resistance rating. Main pros include its premium minimalist design, smooth notification handling, and comprehensive sensor suite at an affordable price point. Notable cons include an aging processor that can lead to occasional lag, a lack of built-in speakers for calls, and a battery life that typically only lasts one to two days.

Compare Mobvoi TicWatch C2 20mm with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Mobvoi TicWatch C2 20mm and other Smartwatches

No results found