OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

LG Watch Urbane 2 review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£440Screen size:1.38 inchBattery life:1 daysDisplay type:OLED

LG Watch Urbane 2 Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 20 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

LG Watch Urbane 2
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

35%

6.3

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

6.3

Reviews score

10%

8.3

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 55% of smartwatches
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 85%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components

24%

3.5

Health

21%

9.2

Fitness

16%

4.3

Battery

14%

7.1

Smart features

12%

8.2

Connectivity

9%

6.5

Display & Design

4%

6.0

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 51%
6.3

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models

6.3

Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.5

Average grade

20%

8.1

Popularity

Grades by review (20)
10 reviews + 10 videos, average 7.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 65%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • lg-watch-urbane-2
  • lg-watch-urbane-2
lg-watch-urbane-2
lg-watch-urbane-2
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the LG Watch Urbane 2

Based on 10 · 9

Reviewers praise the strong connectivity and bright display, but find it big, heavy and uncomfortable; battery opinions are split.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the LG Watch Urbane 2

Based on 26 owners sharing their experience in online comments

54%positive0%mixed46%negative

Owners value its polished design and useful calling, while strap failures and frustrating repairs weigh heavily.

What owners dislike

  • Repairs are slow and costly: one owner paid for a screen fix that failed within weeks, and the charger melted the strap and back, with service refusing a free fix.4
  • The strap feels weak and can come loose: one owner's band broke off because it is held by only two small nubs with little contact, and the rubber strap smells.4
  • Phone connection and call alerts fail: the Bluetooth link drops after a few minutes of inactivity, and incoming calls are sometimes not notified on the watch.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch LG Watch Urbane 2

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components:

24%

3.5

Health

21%

9.2

Fitness

16%

4.3

Battery

14%

7.1

Smart features

12%

8.2

Connectivity

9%

6.5

Display & Design

4%

6.0

Hardware

6.3
Reviews score
6.3
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

7.2
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 69.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
1 day
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 1 day on a charge, which is shorter than 88.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 8.1% of Smartwatches.
1.5 with features like always-on.
Battery life in training mode
36 h
Market range: <6 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 36 h on a charge, which is longer than 80.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.9% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
4 h
Market range: <6 h – >46 h
This smartwatch lasts 4 h with GPS on, which is shorter than 95.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.9% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
490 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 490 mAh battery, which is larger than 88.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.3% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 120 min, which is quicker than 13.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 44.6% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
This smartwatch runs Wear OS, which is more advanced than the system in 80.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 15.8% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
occasional
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 54% of smartwatches and equal to that of 40.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
yes
This smartwatch includes a cellular module. 83.5% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
1
Market range: <0 – >5
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
Nano-SIM
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.38 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.38 inch screen, which is smaller than 60.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.7% of Smartwatches.
Display type
OLED
This smartwatch uses OLED, which is less advanced than the screen in 53.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 9.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
480x 480
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 480x480 which is higher than that of 98% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
492 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 492 ppi, which is higher than 98.4% of Smartwatches and equal to 0.1% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
1.2 GHz
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 1.2 GHz which is faster than that in 61% of smartwatches and equal to that in 4.6% of smartwatches.
Processor model
Snapdragon 400
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon 400 processor model.
RAM
0.75 GB
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 0.75 GB of RAM, which is less than 67.7% of Smartwatches and equal to 3.6% of Smartwatches.
Internal storage
4 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 25.5% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

LG Watch Urbane 2 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Built-in cellular module
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 16.6% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • 16 h longer training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (36 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    36 h vs 20 h
  • More frequent updates
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • 16 h longer training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (36 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    36 h vs 20 h
  • 185 mAh larger battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a larger battery than the average smartwatch (490 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    490 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • Built-in cellular module
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 16.6% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • 166 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (492 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    492 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Higher resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 480x480, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    480x480 vs 360x360
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • More frequent updates
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • 17 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (4 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    4 h vs 21 h
  • 49 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 6 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (1 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    1.5 with features like always-on.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • No swim mode
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 76.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 10.0% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models

    6.3

    Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.5

    Average grade

    20%

    8.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (20)
    10 reviews + 10 videos, average 7.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.3 vs 7.0
  • 4x more expensive
    LG Watch Urbane 2 is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£440 vs £110).
    £440 vs £110
  • 7.1% worse value for money
    LG Watch Urbane 2 has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.25 vs 7.8).
    7.25 vs 7.76
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 5 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2016 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    March 2016
    2016 vs 2021
  • No swim mode
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 76.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • 17 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (4 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    4 h vs 21 h
  • 6 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (1 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    1.5 with features like always-on.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • Less current Bluetooth version
    This smartwatch uses a less current Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (4.1 vs 5).
    Bluetooth Low Energy support is indicated.
    4.1 vs 5
  • 49 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 47.7 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (92.7 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    92.7 g vs 45 g
  • Weaker ingress protection
    This smartwatch has weaker ingress protection than the average smartwatch (IP67 vs IP68).
    IP67 vs IP68
  • More basic display
    This smartwatch uses a more basic screen than the average smartwatch (OLED vs AMOLED).
    OLED vs AMOLED
  • 2.5 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (14.2 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    14.2 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • 0.02 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.4 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.38 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No widget support
    This smartwatch does not support widgets, the average smartwatch does. 84.4% of smartwatches support widgets.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Hayes Tech
≈ estimated
29/05/2018
Hands-on review · several days of daily use
Verdict
LG Watch Urbane 2 is a cheap used companion watch that handles calls, messages and apps well.
9.0
Tech with Jerad (How I Use This)
≈ estimated
01/06/2016
Hands-on review · LTE calling and battery tests
Verdict
LG Watch Urbane 2 is a durable, well-built watch with standalone LTE calling, but its large case does not suit small wrists.
4.0
The Verge
≈ estimated
31/05/2016
Short review · cellular model and offline use
Verdict
LG Watch Urbane 2 is an interesting preview of cellular Android Wear, but it is too expensive now, so wait for Android Wear 2.0.
8.0
Tech Reviews & Tips
≈ estimated
15/12/2015
Unboxing · first impressions and SIM setup
Verdict
LG Watch Urbane 2 is a likable LTE watch, but battery life can't be judged until after the first week.
4.0
TechGuy SmartBuy
≈ estimated
05/08/2016
Short review · design, price and cellular use
Verdict
LG Watch Urbane 2 has an attractive design, but it is too expensive right now, so wait for a price drop.
7.0
Pocketnow
≈ estimated
01/10/2015
First look · hardware and features, no software tests
Verdict
The LG Watch Urbane 2 is a rugged, feature-packed watch with a 4G radio, but it suits only a narrow group of buyers.
Overview video
Overview video
Overview video
Overview video
Hands-on video, no verdict
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.5
theverge.com
✓ explicit
31/05/2016
Hands-on review · Cellular smartwatch
Verdict
The LG Watch Urbane 2 previews cellular smartwatches by working without a phone, but it is thick, heavy and limited until Android Wear 2.0 arrives.
6.0
techguysmartbuy.com
≈ estimated
08/08/2016
Hands-on review · LTE calling
Verdict
The LG Watch Urbane 2 LTE has a strong screen and all-day battery, but phone-free calling depends on your carrier, so a newer model may be the better buy.
8.0
pocketnow.com
≈ estimated
16/11/2015
First impressions · Standalone Android Wear
Verdict
The LG Watch Urbane 2 is a strong Android Wear watch with a sharp screen, but its phone-free features feel limited for now.
9.0
chip.de
≈ estimated
04/07/2016
Lab test · SIM-card smartwatch
Verdict
The LG Watch Urbane 2 3G has a long feature list, including phone calls through its SIM slot, but battery life falls short in testing.
6.0
nextpit.de
≈ estimated
16/06/2016
Hands-on test · Calls and data
Verdict
The LG Watch Urbane 2 3G handles calls and texts on its own, but mobile data needed a different SIM card to work in testing.
4.0
frandroid.com
✓ explicit
16/06/2016
Hands-on test · Battery and comfort
Verdict
The LG Watch Urbane 2 has the best Android Wear screen and works without a phone, but its bulk and stiff strap make it uncomfortable.
7.8
01net.com
✓ explicit
01/08/2016
Hands-on test · Full connectivity
Verdict
The LG Watch Urbane 2 has full connectivity and a sharp screen, but its bulky design and Android Wear 1.5 software hold it back until Android Wear 2.0 arrives.
6.0
lesnumeriques.com
✓ explicit
06/07/2016
Hands-on test · 3G smartwatch
Verdict
The LG Watch Urbane 2 3G is a capable, well-built watch with two days of battery, but its size, weight and slow standalone apps hold it back.
9.0
webbar.fr
≈ estimated
30/10/2025
Opinion review · Short on testing
Verdict
The LG Watch Urbane 2 offers phone-free calls and a sharp screen, but this review has no test results to back up its claims.
8.5
andreagaleazzi.com
✓ explicit
23/05/2016
Hands-on review · Calls and battery
Verdict
The LG Watch Urbane 2 is the best Android Wear watch tried so far, thanks to its phone calls and two-day battery, but it lacks a light sensor.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about LG Watch Urbane 2

  • Standalone LTE connectivity allows for making calls and sending texts without a paired phone
  • High-resolution P-OLED display (348ppi) is praised for its clarity, vibrant colours, and being 'best-in-class' for its time
  • Smooth performance powered by 768MB of RAM, which was higher than most contemporary competitors
  • Three physical side buttons provide quick, intuitive access to contacts, apps, and health tracking
  • Solid build quality featuring a 316L stainless steel case and IP67 water and dust resistance
  • Improved battery life compared to the first generation, often lasting a full day even with heavy LTE usage

What customers don't like about LG Watch Urbane 2

  • Extremely bulky and thick design (14.2mm) that many users find too large or 'ridiculous' on smaller wrists
  • Non-replaceable watch bands because they house the LTE antennas, limiting customisation and repairability
  • Initial hardware 'quality issue' led to a temporary recall shortly after its first launch in 2015
  • Lack of an ambient light sensor requires users to adjust screen brightness manually for different environments
  • LTE functionality often incurs additional monthly carrier fees and can significantly drain battery in areas with poor signal
  • The rubberised band is described by some as stiff and uncomfortable

Verdict

The LG Watch Urbane 2nd Edition LTE is a pioneering Android Wear smartwatch distinguished by its standalone cellular connectivity, featuring a circular 1.38-inch P-OLED display with a high-resolution 480x480 (348 ppi) output. Encased in 316L stainless steel with an IP67 rating, it is powered by a 1.2GHz Snapdragon 400 chipset, 768MB of RAM, and a substantial 570mAh battery. Main pros include its sharp screen, built-in GPS, and the ability to make calls and send texts without a phone; however, its primary cons are its bulky 14.2mm thickness and the stiff, non-replaceable rubber straps that house the LTE antennas.

Compare LG Watch Urbane 2 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of LG Watch Urbane 2 and other Smartwatches

No results found