OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Amazfit Falcon Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£440Screen size:1.28 inchBattery life:14 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Amazfit Falcon Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 14 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

7.6

Overall score

Score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

Technical score

30%

7.6

Review score ( 6 · 8)

Review score 30% · 7.6 · based on 14 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
â–²Better than 77% of smartwatches
7.6

Technical score

Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Score components

24%

7.4

Health

21%

9.8

Fitness

16%

6.6

Battery

14%

6.5

Smart features

12%

7.1

Connectivity

9%

8.7

Display & Design

4%

5.0

Hardware

â–²Better than 79% of smartwatches
7.6

Review score

Review score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Grades by review (14)
6 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 8 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
2

10.3%

8.5

mtwatches.com

10.3%

8.0

cyclingweekly.com

≈ estimated
2

10.3%

8.0

androidcentral.com

10.3%

6.0

androidauthority.com

Video reviews 4

5.1%

8.0

Matt LeGrand

5.1%

7.0

DesFit

5.1%

6.0

Chase the Summit

2.6%

8.0

Peter Herget & Gadgets Anonymous

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 55% of smartwatches
  • amazfit-falcon
  • amazfit-falcon
  • amazfit-falcon
  • amazfit-falcon
  • amazfit-falcon
  • amazfit-falcon
  • amazfit-falcon
  • amazfit-falcon
  • amazfit-falcon
amazfit-falcon
amazfit-falcon
amazfit-falcon
amazfit-falcon
amazfit-falcon
amazfit-falcon
amazfit-falcon
amazfit-falcon
amazfit-falcon

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Amazfit Falcon

Technical score
Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Score components:

24%

7.4

Health

21%

9.8

Fitness

16%

6.6

Battery

14%

6.5

Smart features

12%

7.1

Connectivity

9%

8.7

Display & Design

4%

5.0

Hardware

7.6
Review score
Review score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Grades by review (14)
6 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 8 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
2

10.3%

8.5

mtwatches.com

10.3%

8.0

cyclingweekly.com

≈ estimated
2

10.3%

8.0

androidcentral.com

10.3%

6.0

androidauthority.com

Video reviews 4

5.1%

8.0

Matt LeGrand

5.1%

7.0

DesFit

5.1%

6.0

Chase the Summit

2.6%

8.0

Peter Herget & Gadgets Anonymous

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Popularity:
Amazfit Falcon has a popularity of 7 points, which is higher than 58.3% of smartwatches.
7.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Score components:

60%

7.6

Overall score

40%

8.2

Price

7.8
Brand name
Amazfit
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
Cadence sensor
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
14 days
Battery life
14 days
â–² Better than 77% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 14 days which is longer than that of 76.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 9.2% of smartwatches.
Up to 30 days in battery saver.
Battery life in training mode
21 h
Battery life in training mode
21 h
â–² Better than 54% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 21 h in training mode which is longer than 54.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.9% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
21 h
Battery life with GPS on
21 h
â–² Better than 53% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on which is longer than 52.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.4% of smartwatches.
Up to 50 hours depending on GPS mode.
Battery power
500 mAh
Battery power
500 mAh
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 500 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 93.1% of smartwatches and equal to those in 1% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Zepp OS
Operating system
Zepp OS
â–² Better than 60% of models
This smartwatch runs Zepp OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 60.2% of smartwatches and the same as that in 6.5% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
â–² Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
Voice assistant support
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 67.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.28 inch
Screen size
1.28 inch
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.28 inch which is smaller than the screens of 78.2% of smartwatches and equal to those of 5.2% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
416x 416
Resolution
416x 416
â–² Better than 75% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 416x416 which is higher than that of 74.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.1% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
460 ppi
Pixel density
460 ppi
â–² Better than 79% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 460 ppi which is higher than that of 79.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 5% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
1,000 nits
Display brightness
1,000 nits
â–² Better than 59% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 1,000 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 59.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.5% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
2 GB
Internal storage
2 GB
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 2 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 60.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.9% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Amazfit Falcon vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 7 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 14 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 30 days in battery saver.
    14 days vs 7 days
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    sapphire
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
    Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
    Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
    Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
  • 70 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    150
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (150 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 150 exercise modes.
    150 vs 80
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • 7 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 14 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 30 days in battery saver.
    14 days vs 7 days
  • 200 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    500 mAh days
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (500 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Up to 30 days in battery saver.
    500 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    sapphire
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
    Rugged design supported by MIL-STD/military-grade durability claim.
  • 400 nits higher display brightness
    Display brightness
    1,000 nits
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has higher display brightness than the average smartwatch (1000 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    1,000 nits vs 600 nits
  • Better case material
    Case material
    titanium
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    This smartwatch uses titanium for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    titanium vs polycarbonate
  • 150 m deeper water resistance
    Waterproof depth rating
    200 m
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a deeper waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (200 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    200 m vs 50 m
  • 134 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    460 ppi
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (460 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    460 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    416 x 416
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 416x416, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    416x416 vs 352x430
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Zepp OS
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 19 g heavier weight
    Weight
    64.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (64 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    64.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 0.12 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    1.28 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.28 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 3.38x more expensive
    Amazfit Falcon is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£440 vs £130).
    £440 vs £130
  • 1.35 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.95 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (13 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.95 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • No voice feedback
    Voice feedback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 61.9% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 4.5 mm taller watch height
    Height
    49.5 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (49.5 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    49.5 mm vs 45 mm
  • 3.38x more expensive
    Amazfit Falcon is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£440 vs £130).
    £440 vs £130
  • No voice feedback
    Voice feedback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 61.9% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 19 g heavier weight
    Weight
    64.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (64 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    64.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 0.12 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    1.28 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.28 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 1.35 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.95 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (13 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.95 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 4.5 mm taller watch height
    Height
    49.5 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (49.5 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    49.5 mm vs 45 mm
  • 5.2 mm wider watch width
    Width
    47.2 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (47.2 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    47.2 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Matt LeGrand
≈ estimated
07/04/2023
Long-term test · 100 days, heart rate and GPS checks
Verdict
Amazfit Falcon is flawed on heart rate and GPS, but it is good value next to pricier Garmin rivals for buyers who accept those flaws.
7.0
DesFit
≈ estimated
29/01/2023
Hands-on review · sports, GPS and heart rate tests
Verdict
Amazfit Falcon is durable and long-lasting, but its heart rate sensor lets it down, so only specific buyers should consider it.
6.0
Chase the Summit
≈ estimated
20/10/2022
Initial review · heart rate and navigation tests
Verdict
Amazfit Falcon has a premium build, but inconsistent heart rate readings and uncertain firmware support hold it back for creators.
8.0
Peter Herget & Gadgets Anonymous
≈ estimated
29/10/2022
First look · unboxing and first setup
Verdict
Amazfit Falcon makes a good first impression on looks and comfort; the full verdict waits for more testing.
Not graded yet
Not graded
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 6 · 8

Reviewers praise the solid build, battery and GPS, but find it bulky and fault phone features, training tools and heart rate.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
androidauthority.com
≈ estimated
22/01/2023
18-day test · Titanium multisport watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Falcon is a rugged, titanium-cased sports watch with accurate GPS and about a week of battery, but it has few apps and no microphone.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Amazfit Falcon

  • Premium titanium unibody and sapphire glass construction providing high durability
  • Exceptional battery life lasting up to 14 days on a single charge
  • Highly accurate dual-band GPS performance for outdoor activities
  • Bright and sharp 1,000-nit AMOLED display
  • Support for external training hardware like heart rate belts and power meters
  • Smooth and responsive software interface (Zepp OS)

What we don't like about Amazfit Falcon

  • Inconsistent heart rate sensor accuracy, especially during high-intensity training
  • High price point that is difficult to justify over the similar but cheaper T-Rex 2
  • Relatively small 1.28-inch screen with large surrounding bezels
  • Bulky and heavy design that may be uncomfortable for some users
  • Lack of essential smartwatch features like a microphone, speaker, and NFC payments
  • Limited third-party app ecosystem compared to Wear OS or Apple Watch

Verdict

The Amazfit Falcon is a premium, rugged multisport watch featuring a TC4 titanium unibody and a 1.28-inch AMOLED display protected by sapphire crystal with a 1,000-nit peak brightness. Key technical specifications include a 500mAh battery offering up to 14 days of typical usage, dual-band (L1 and L5) circular-polarized GPS for precise tracking, and an exceptional 20 ATM water-resistance rating suitable for high-speed water sports. It supports over 150 sport modes, including advanced AI-powered training via Zepp Coach and the ability to connect to external sensors like heart rate belts. Pros include its military-grade durability (MIL-STD-810G), accurate dual-band positioning, and high-quality build materials. However, notable cons include its relatively bulky 49mm design, the lack of a built-in speaker or microphone for calls, and some reports of variable heart rate sensor accuracy during high-intensity training.

Compare Amazfit Falcon with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit Falcon and other Smartwatches

No results found