OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Garmin Forerunner 70 review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£?Screen size:1.2 inchBattery life:13 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Garmin Forerunner 70 Review: Compare 127 technical specifications, 18 expert and video reviews and 3 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Garmin Forerunner 70
8.1/10

Overall score

Score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 88% of models
Score components

35%

7.6

Technical score

30%

8.2

List score

25%

8.4

Reviews score

10%

8.9

Sentiment score

▲Better than 88% of smartwatches
?

Value for money

Value for money
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.1

Overall score

30%

?

Price

Price not known yet
7.6

Technical score

Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 74% of models
Score components

24%

8.5

Health

21%

9.3

Fitness

16%

6.7

Battery

14%

8.0

Smart features

12%

5.6

Connectivity

9%

8.1

Display & Design

4%

1.0

Hardware

▲Better than 74%
8.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 84% of models

80%

8.5

Average grade

20%

8.1

Popularity

Grades by review (18)
6 reviews + 12 videos, average 8.6/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 84%
8.2

List score

List score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (3)
List score: in 3 of 71 lists (4%)
▲Better than 87%
  • garmin-forerunner-70
  • garmin-forerunner-70
  • garmin-forerunner-70
  • garmin-forerunner-70
  • garmin-forerunner-70
  • garmin-forerunner-70
  • garmin-forerunner-70
  • garmin-forerunner-70
garmin-forerunner-70
garmin-forerunner-70
garmin-forerunner-70
garmin-forerunner-70
garmin-forerunner-70
garmin-forerunner-70
garmin-forerunner-70
garmin-forerunner-70
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Smartwatches model ranking

Ranked #97 of 777 models in Smartwatches (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Garmin Forerunner 70

Technical score
Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 74% of models
Score components:

24%

8.5

Health

21%

9.3

Fitness

16%

6.7

Battery

14%

8.0

Smart features

12%

5.6

Connectivity

9%

8.1

Display & Design

4%

1.0

Hardware

7.6
Reviews score
8.4
List score
8.2
Value for money
Value for money
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components:

70%

8.1

Overall score

30%

?

Price

8.7
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
?
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 49.5% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports HRV tracking. 54.9% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
?
Gyroscope
no
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 71.3% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 67.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
13 days
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch lasts 13 days on a charge, which is longer than 73.2% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.5% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
23 h
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 23 h on a charge, which is longer than 55.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.5% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
23 h
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 23 h with GPS on, which is longer than 55.6% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.5% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
226 mAh
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a 226 mAh battery, which is smaller than 80.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.1% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Garmin OS
This smartwatch runs Garmin OS, which is more advanced than the system in 70.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 9.2% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
occasional
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 54% of smartwatches and equal to that of 40.2% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.6% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 56.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
Garmin Forerunner 70 does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.2 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.2 inch screen, which is smaller than 84.6% of Smartwatches and the same as 8.1% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
390x 390
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 390x390 which is higher than that of 56.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
460 ppi
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 460 ppi, which is higher than 80.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 4.8% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0.5 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 0.5 GB of internal storage, which is less than 64.3% of Smartwatches and equal to 1.2% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Garmin Forerunner 70 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Crash detection capability
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 14% of smartwatches support crash detection.
  • Readiness score
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 19.8% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 44.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • 6 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (13 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    13 days vs 7 days
  • More frequent updates
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    occasional vs ended
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • 20.0% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 84% of models

    80%

    8.5

    Average grade

    20%

    8.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (18)
    6 reviews + 12 videos, average 8.6/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.4 vs 7.0
  • 18.7% higher sentiment score
    8.9 vs 7.5
  • 11.9% better value for money
    Garmin Forerunner 70 has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.69 vs 7.8).
    8.69 vs 7.76
  • Readiness score
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 19.8% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • 5 years newer
    This smartwatch was released more recently than the average smartwatch (2026 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    2,026 vs 2,021
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 41.9% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44.1% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • Perspiration monitoring
    This smartwatch tracks perspiration, the average smartwatch does not. 15.1% of smartwatches track perspiration.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Cadence tracking
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • 6 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (13 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    13 days vs 7 days
  • 3 h longer training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (23 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    23 h vs 20 h
  • Supports ANT+
    This smartwatch supports ANT+, the average smartwatch does not. 13% of smartwatches support ANT+.
  • Galileo satellite support
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • 134 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (460 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    460 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses chemically strengthened glass display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    chemically strengthened glass vs mineral glass
  • 2 mm slimmer strap
    This smartwatch has a slimmer strap than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch has a 22 mm strap.
    20 mm vs 22 mm
  • Crash detection capability
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 14% of smartwatches support crash detection.
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 44.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • More frequent updates
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    occasional vs ended
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No gyroscope
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 71.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 0.2 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.2 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.2 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 79 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery than the average smartwatch (226 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    226 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No gyroscope
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 71.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 79 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery than the average smartwatch (226 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    226 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • 0.2 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.2 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.2 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • 87.5% less internal storage
    This smartwatch has less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0.5 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage.
    0.5 GB vs 4 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
CNET
≈ estimated
04/08/2026
Hands-on review · two weeks of use and GPS trail test
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 70 is good value for its price, but the Forerunner 170 offers a fuller experience for a little more.
9.0
The Quantified Scientist
≈ estimated
25/07/2026
Data-led review · GPS tests on bike commutes and running routes
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 70 is the best value among Garmin running watches, a solid pick for everyday runners and cyclists.
8.3
AbbyBReviewing
✓ explicit
15/07/2026
Long-term review · several weeks of daily use
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 70 is strong value for money and recommended, though its weak spots are the sensor, incident detection and durability.
9.0
The Product Reviewer
≈ estimated
14/07/2026
Hands-on review · GPS, battery and sleep tests
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 70 is a very complete running and fitness watch for the price, though it lacks music, a barometer and multiband GPS.
8.0
Insert Name Here Running
≈ estimated
13/06/2026
Long-term test · 3 to 4 weeks of running
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 70 is recommended for runners, but its phone connection problems are a real concern.
9.0
The Run Testers
≈ estimated
08/06/2026
Full review · run tests and rival comparison
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 70 is a good-value running watch with reliable tracking, though battery life is its main drawback.
7.0
Austin Reviews
≈ estimated
05/06/2026
Hands-on review · health tracking, software and value
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 70 is a good watch for runners, but at this price it is hard to recommend as a first choice.
9.5
DC Rainmaker
≈ estimated
12/05/2026
Hands-on review · running, cycling and hiking use
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 70 is a feature-packed watch that could be the default buy for runners at this price.
9.0
Chase the Summit
≈ estimated
12/05/2026
First look · feature and battery comparison with the 170
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 70 is still a good option at its price, especially for lightweight runners new to Garmin.
6.0
HardReset.Info
≈ estimated
25/07/2026
Unboxing · first impressions and setup
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 70 is light and easy to handle, but its charging cable is the weak point.
Shop video
Hands-on video, no verdict

What reviewers agree on

Based on 6 · 12

Reviewers like the solid training tools, easy-to-read display and decent battery, but smart features feel thin and the altimeter disappoints.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.6
the5krunner.com
✓ explicit
28/08/2026
Hands-on test · Entry-level running watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 70 is an accurate entry-level running watch with strong recovery guidance, though its setup is fiddly and it has no barometric altimeter.
8.2
01net.com
✓ explicit
21/09/2026
Hands-on test · Entry-level GPS watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 70 is a compact, reliable running watch with a bright AMOLED screen and long battery life, but it skips maps, contactless payment and music.
9.0
run-evasion.fr
≈ estimated
20/08/2026
Four-week test · Running watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 70 is a strong pick for running beginners who want a clear AMOLED screen and detailed running dynamics, though trail runners will miss maps.
9.0
dday.it
≈ estimated
24/08/2026
Hands-on test · Entry-level running watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 70 suits new and keen amateur runners, with Training Status and Training Readiness, but it can't play music.
8.0
global.techradar.com
✓ explicit
15/07/2026
Full review · Running watch upgrade
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 70 is a clear upgrade on the Forerunner 55, with strong tracking and smartwatch features, though it feels mid-range.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Garmin Forerunner 70

  • 13 days of battery life means fewer trips to the charger.
  • 23 h of GPS battery covers several long outdoor sessions.
  • The 460 ppi AMOLED screen is sharp and easy to read in sunlight.
  • Heart rate, HRV and VO2 max give a clear view of your training.
  • Crash detection and an emergency SOS add a safety net on solo runs.
  • A readiness score shows when to train hard and when to rest.

What we don't like about Garmin Forerunner 70

  • The 1.2 inch screen is small for detailed workout pages.
  • Battery life falls short for ultra-distance races.
  • There is no gyroscope.
  • There is no contactless payment, since the watch has no NFC chip.
  • Elevation comes from GPS alone, so trail climbs are less exact.

Verdict

The main draw of the Garmin Forerunner 70 is a battery that lasts 13 days in everyday wear. With GPS on, it runs for 23 h, enough for several long outdoor sessions on one charge. The AMOLED screen is bright and sharp at 460 ppi, so it stays easy to read in sunlight. The display is small at 1.2 inch, and the 226 mAh battery is modest, so it is not the pick for ultra races. Heart rate, sleep, HRV and VO2 max are all tracked, and the watch warns you about irregular heartbeats. Crash detection and an emergency SOS button add a safety net on solo runs. There is no gyroscope and no contactless payment. It suits a runner who wants a clear screen, long battery life and useful training data without the extras.

Compare Garmin Forerunner 70 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Garmin Forerunner 70 and other Smartwatches

No results found