OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Amazfit Bip Max review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£?Screen size:2.07 inchBattery life:20 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Amazfit Bip Max Review: Compare 127 technical specifications, 28 expert and video reviews and 3 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Amazfit Bip Max
8.2/10

Overall score

Score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components

35%

8.0

Technical score

30%

8.2

List score

25%

8.4

Reviews score

10%

8.7

Sentiment score

★Better than 90% of smartwatches
?

Value for money

Value for money
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

Overall score

30%

?

Price

Price not known yet
8.0

Technical score

Technical score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 83% of models
Score components

24%

7.6

Health

21%

9.5

Fitness

16%

8.5

Battery

14%

7.1

Smart features

12%

6.6

Connectivity

9%

8.6

Display & Design

4%

5.7

Hardware

▲Better than 83%
8.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 84% of models

80%

8.3

Average grade

20%

8.6

Popularity

Grades by review (28)
8 reviews + 20 videos, average 8.4/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 84%
8.2

List score

List score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (3)
List score: in 3 of 71 lists (4%)
▲Better than 87%
  • amazfit-bip-max
  • amazfit-bip-max
  • amazfit-bip-max
  • amazfit-bip-max
  • amazfit-bip-max
  • amazfit-bip-max
  • amazfit-bip-max
  • amazfit-bip-max
amazfit-bip-max
amazfit-bip-max
amazfit-bip-max
amazfit-bip-max
amazfit-bip-max
amazfit-bip-max
amazfit-bip-max
amazfit-bip-max
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Amazfit Bip Max

Technical score
Technical score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 83% of models
Score components:

24%

7.6

Health

21%

9.5

Fitness

16%

8.5

Battery

14%

7.1

Smart features

12%

6.6

Connectivity

9%

8.6

Display & Design

4%

5.7

Hardware

8.0
Reviews score
8.4
List score
8.2
Value for money
Value for money
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components:

70%

8.2

Overall score

30%

?

Price

8.8
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
?
HRV tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports HRV tracking. 54.9% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
?
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
20 days
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch lasts 20 days on a charge, which is longer than 90.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.4% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
40 h
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 40 h with GPS on, which is longer than 83% of Smartwatches and the same as 3.4% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
550 mAh
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a 550 mAh battery, which is larger than 95.2% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.1% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Zepp OS
This smartwatch runs Zepp OS, which is more advanced than the system in 58.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 7% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
?
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.6% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 56.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
2.07 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a 2.07 inch screen, which is larger than 98.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.4% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
432x 514
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 432x514 which is higher than that of 74.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.4% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
324 ppi
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 324 ppi, which is lower than 56.3% of Smartwatches and equal to 0.7% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
3,000 nits
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch has a screen brightness of 3,000 nits, which is higher than 93.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 6.3% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
0.06 GB
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 0.06 GB of RAM, which is less than 95.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 0.9% of Smartwatches.
Internal storage
4 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 25.5% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Amazfit Bip Max vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 13 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (20 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    20 days vs 7 days
  • Readiness score
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 19.8% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • 19 h longer GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (40 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    40 h vs 21 h
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
  • 2,250 nits brighter screen
    This smartwatch has a brighter screen than the average smartwatch (3000 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    3,000 nits vs 750 nits
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • 0.67 inch larger display
    This smartwatch has a larger screen than the average smartwatch (2.1 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    2.07 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • 20.0% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 84% of models

    80%

    8.3

    Average grade

    20%

    8.6

    Popularity

    Grades by review (28)
    8 reviews + 20 videos, average 8.4/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.4 vs 7.0
  • 12.9% better value for money
    Amazfit Bip Max has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.76 vs 7.8).
    8.76 vs 7.76
  • 16.0% higher sentiment score
    8.7 vs 7.5
  • Readiness score
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 19.8% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • 5 years newer
    This smartwatch was released more recently than the average smartwatch (2026 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    2,026 vs 2,021
  • 60 more exercise types
    This smartwatch includes more exercise types than the average smartwatch (150 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    150 vs 90
  • 13 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (20 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    20 days vs 7 days
  • 19 h longer GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (40 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    40 h vs 21 h
  • 245 mAh larger battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a larger battery than the average smartwatch (550 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    550 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
  • Galileo satellite support
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • More current Bluetooth version
    This smartwatch uses a more current Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.3 vs 5).
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • 2,250 nits brighter screen
    This smartwatch has a brighter screen than the average smartwatch (3000 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    3,000 nits vs 750 nits
  • 0.67 inch larger display
    This smartwatch has a larger screen than the average smartwatch (2.1 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    2.07 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • Higher resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 432x514, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    432x514 vs 360x360
  • 0.77 mm slimmer
    This smartwatch is slimmer than the average smartwatch (10.9 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    10.93 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 7.6 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (52.6 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    52.6 g vs 45.0 g
  • 4.58 mm taller case
    This smartwatch has a taller case than the average smartwatch (49.6 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch is 45.0 mm tall.
    49.58 mm vs 45.0 mm
  • 94% less RAM
    This smartwatch has less RAM than the average smartwatch (0.1 GB vs 1 GB). The average smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM.
    0.06 GB vs 1 GB
  • Less practical form
    This smartwatch uses a square form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    square vs round
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 7.6 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (52.6 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    52.6 g vs 45.0 g
  • 4.58 mm taller case
    This smartwatch has a taller case than the average smartwatch (49.6 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch is 45.0 mm tall.
    49.58 mm vs 45.0 mm
  • Less practical form
    This smartwatch uses a square form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    square vs round
  • 94% less RAM
    This smartwatch has less RAM than the average smartwatch (0.1 GB vs 1 GB). The average smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM.
    0.06 GB vs 1 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Smartwatch Specifications
≈ estimated
08/08/2026
Pedometer test · indoor walking step count
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Max's step count came out close to the real total, so accuracy looks good so far.
7.0
Tech, Gadgets and Other Great Ideas
≈ estimated
31/07/2026
Full review · living with the watch
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Max is good value with offline maps, but it is bulky, occasionally laggy and missing NFC.
7.0
Austin Reviews
≈ estimated
25/07/2026
Long-term test · one month of daily use
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Max offers strong value for the money, but it is too bulky for everyday wear unless you have larger wrists.
9.0
The Quantified Scientist
≈ estimated
02/07/2026
Hands-on review · GPS, heart rate and app tests
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Max offers good value for the money, though its GPS is sensitive to interference and the watch is bulky.
9.0
Fred's Reviews58
≈ estimated
05/06/2026
Long-term test · one week of daily use and GPS comparison
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Max is a strong budget watch for the price, though its GPS logs slightly less distance than rivals.
9.0
Fred's Reviews58
≈ estimated
28/05/2026
Hands-on review · hike, mapping and call tests
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Max is a really good watch overall; the hard-to-fit band is its only real issue.
9.0
TechMishka
≈ estimated
27/06/2026
Hands-on review · weeks of daily use and sensor tests
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Max is an easy pick for budget buyers, though its large case suits only larger wrists.
8.0
HardReset.Info
≈ estimated
27/06/2026
Unboxing and first look · hands-on impressions
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Max is good value for the price with excellent battery life, but it cannot replace a full smartwatch.
7.0
Smartwatch Specifications
≈ estimated
12/06/2026
Unboxing · technical details, design and interface overview
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Max has a sporty design with a metallic finish, though it is quite big.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Overview video
Hands-on video, no verdict

What reviewers agree on

Based on 8 · 12

Reviewers love the big, sharp display and long battery life, but many find it too large and miss contactless payments.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
digitalreviews.net
≈ estimated
06/08/2026
Real-world test · Oura Ring comparison
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Max is a comfortable, large-screen tracker whose sleep and daily activity matched an Oura Ring 5 closely, though step counts sometimes drifted.
7.3
wearablesarena.com
✓ explicit
08/07/2026
Hands-on test · Big-screen fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Max is a large-screen watch with offline maps and long battery life, but its exposed glass and bulky body are its weak points.
7.0
smartzone.de
≈ estimated
20/07/2026
Three-week test · Large-screen fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Max is a well-equipped fitness watch with a bright, sharp screen and reliable voice replies, but its bulky case suits larger wrists better.
8.4
nerdsheaven.de
✓ explicit
22/07/2026
Hands-on test · Battery-focused fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Max is a bright, long-lasting big-screen watch for fitness and notifications, but its large case looks out of place on slim wrists.
9.0
frandroid.com
✓ explicit
04/07/2026
Hands-on test · Big-screen smartwatch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Max is a large-screen watch that lasts over a week per charge, though its bulky body and heat-trapping strap suit wider wrists better.
8.0
begeek.fr
✓ explicit
13/07/2026
Hands-on test · Large-screen fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Max is a big-screen watch with long battery life for fitness and notifications, but its bulky case suits buyers with larger wrists.
9.0
tecnorecensioni.com
≈ estimated
03/07/2026
Hands-on test · Smart fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Max has a bright 2.07-inch screen and 10 to 15 days of battery, but the lack of third-party apps and NFC holds it back.
8.5
4news.it
✓ explicit
23/07/2026
Hands-on test · Fitness tracker
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Max tracks workouts and sleep well with 10 to 12 days of battery, but its stress readings are too optimistic.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Amazfit Bip Max

  • The 2.07 inch screen shows a lot of information at once.
  • The screen at 3000 nits stays readable in direct sunlight.
  • The battery is rated for 20 days and lasts about 10 to 15 days in tests.
  • Strava and TrainingPeaks sync automatically once linked.
  • Offline maps can be loaded onto the watch.
  • There are 150 workout modes and a training calendar.

What we don't like about Amazfit Bip Max

  • There is no rotating crown, so long lists are harder to scroll.
  • The vibration is loud and rough, with no setting to soften it.
  • There is no NFC, so the watch cannot pay at checkout.
  • At 49.58 mm tall, the case is oversized on slim wrists.
  • Music cannot be stored on the watch, so playback needs a phone.

Verdict

A 2.07 inch screen is the thing to know about the Amazfit Bip Max, a big-faced fitness watch for people who want stats at a glance. It puts alerts and a route on screen without you raising the wrist to your face, and the display at 3000 nits is readable in direct sunlight. The battery is rated for 20 days, and in tests it lasted about 10 to 15 days with heart tracking on. There are 150 workout modes, a readiness score and offline maps you can load onto the watch. The trade-off is the size: the case is 49.58 mm tall, which looks out of place on slim wrists. It suits a buyer who wants clear stats, sleep and training data in one place, and who can live without NFC payments.

Compare Amazfit Bip Max with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit Bip Max and other Smartwatches

No results found