OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Agptek Smart Watch LW31 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Screen size:1.69 inchBattery life:8.5 daysDisplay type:LCD

Agptek Smart Watch LW31 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 4 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

70%

5.1

Technical score

30%

7.5

Review score ( 0 · 4)

Review score 30% · 7.5 · based on 4 videos
4 videos count as 1.5 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–¼Worse than 81% of smartwatches
5.1

Technical score

Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

24%

6.0

Health

21%

5.7

Fitness

16%

5.1

Battery

14%

4.9

Smart features

12%

2.5

Connectivity

9%

5.0

Display & Design

4%

5.4

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 84% of smartwatches
7.5

Review score

Review score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Grades by review (4)
Video reviews 3

10%

9.0

AMTR

10%

8.0

Family Pop TV

5%

8.0

BestProducts

estimated from the review
4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 62% of smartwatches
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw31
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw31
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw31
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw31
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw31
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw31
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw31
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw31
agptek-smart-watch-lw31
agptek-smart-watch-lw31
agptek-smart-watch-lw31
agptek-smart-watch-lw31
agptek-smart-watch-lw31
agptek-smart-watch-lw31
agptek-smart-watch-lw31
agptek-smart-watch-lw31

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Agptek Smart Watch LW31

Technical score
Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components:

24%

6.0

Health

21%

5.7

Fitness

16%

5.1

Battery

14%

4.9

Smart features

12%

2.5

Connectivity

9%

5.0

Display & Design

4%

5.4

Hardware

5.1
Review score
Review score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Grades by review (4)
Video reviews 3

10%

9.0

AMTR

10%

8.0

Family Pop TV

5%

8.0

BestProducts

estimated from the review
4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.5
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

60%

5.8

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.1
Brand name
Agptek
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
Gyroscope
no
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 70% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Distance tracking may depend on phone GPS/app on some models.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
8.5 days
Battery life
8.5 days
â–² Better than 59% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 8.5 days which is longer than that of 59.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.7% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
260 mAh
Battery power
260 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 260 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 66.1% of smartwatches and equal to those in 2.8% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.69 inch
Screen size
1.69 inch
â–² Better than 80% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.69 inch which is larger than the screens of 79.7% of smartwatches and equal to those of 2.7% of smartwatches.
Display type
LCD
Display type
LCD
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
This smartwatch uses a LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 90.1% of smartwatches and the same as that of 7.4% of smartwatches.
Resolution
240x 280
Resolution
240x 280
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x280 which is lower than that of 70.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.6% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
218 ppi
Pixel density
218 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 218 ppi which is lower than that of 86% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
700 nits
Display brightness
700 nits
â–² Better than 54% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 700 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 54.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.9% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
8 GB
Internal storage
8 GB
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 8 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 67.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 12.1% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Agptek Smart Watch LW31 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
    Measurements are for wellness guidance, not medical diagnosis.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • 0.29 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.69 inch
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.7 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.69 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 1.6 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    10.00 mm
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (10 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    10.00 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 1.5 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    8.5 days
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 8.5 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    8.5 days vs 7 days
  • 5.2x cheaper
    Agptek Smart Watch LW31 is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£25 vs £130).
    £25 vs £130
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 5.2x cheaper
    Agptek Smart Watch LW31 is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£25 vs £130).
    £25 vs £130
  • 57.6% more popular
    Agptek Smart Watch LW31 has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (9.64 vs 6.1).
    9.64 vs 6.12
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
    Measurements are for wellness guidance, not medical diagnosis.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 1.5 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    8.5 days
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 8.5 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    8.5 days vs 7 days
  • 0.29 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.69 inch
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.7 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.69 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 1.6 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    10.00 mm
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (10 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    10.00 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 100 nits higher display brightness
    Display brightness
    700 nits
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has higher display brightness than the average smartwatch (700 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    700 nits vs 600 nits
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch uses LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    LCD vs AMOLED
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No pace tracking
    Pace tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 78.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • 6.4% worse value for money
    Agptek Smart Watch LW31 has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.07 vs 7.5).
    7.07 vs 7.52
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No pace tracking
    Pace tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 78.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • 69 fewer exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    11
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (11 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 11 exercise modes.
    11 vs 80
  • No achievement tracking
    Achievements
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This smartwatch does not support achievements, the average smartwatch does. 85.8% of smartwatches support achievements.
  • No voice feedback
    Voice feedback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 61.9% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • No low-power mode
    Low power mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a low power mode, the average smartwatch does. 92.5% of smartwatches include a low power mode.
  • 40 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    260 mAh days
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (260 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    260 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch uses LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    LCD vs AMOLED
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 108 ppi lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    218 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a lower pixel density than the average smartwatch (218 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    218 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 8 g heavier weight
    Weight
    53.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (53 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    53.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • Lower resolution
    Display type
    240 x 280
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x280, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    240x280 vs 352x430
  • Less practical form
    Form
    rectangular
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • No call controls
    Call control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This smartwatch does not offer call control, the average smartwatch does. 90.9% of smartwatches offer call control.
  • No passcode
    Passcode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 67.8% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • No calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch does not support calendar sync, the average smartwatch does. 94.8% of smartwatches support calendar sync.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No widget support
    Widget support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartwatch does not support widgets, the average smartwatch does. 83.1% of smartwatches support widgets.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
AMTR
≈ estimated
14/06/2021
Hands-on review · features, battery and app
Verdict
Agptek Smart Watch LW31 is a budget model with a stylish build, colourful screen and long battery life.
8.0
BestProducts
≈ estimated
18/10/2021
Unboxing · feature overview
Verdict
Agptek Smart Watch LW31 is an attractive, functional smartwatch, though it lacks built-in GPS.
Not graded
Brand video
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 0 · 4

Reviewers love the design, display and fitness tracking, but agree the GPS is a real letdown.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Agptek Smart Watch LW31

  • Excellent battery life (7-10 days of use, 30 days standby)
  • Elegant and stylish design with a high-quality zinc alloy finish
  • Large, bright 1.69-inch HD touch screen suitable for outdoor viewing
  • Comprehensive basic health tracking (heart rate, sleep, steps, blood oxygen)
  • Good value for money as an entry-level fitness tracker
  • IP68 water resistance suitable for swimming and daily use

What we don't like about Agptek Smart Watch LW31

  • Limited smart features: cannot answer calls or reply to messages directly
  • The companion 'OnWear' app receives mixed reviews for syncing and reliability
  • Lack of advanced connectivity like Wi-Fi, NFC, or built-in GPS
  • Some reports of long-term durability issues, such as the screen failing after months
  • No automatic brightness adjustment (must be changed manually)
  • Considered slightly bulky by some users despite its slim profile

Verdict

The AGPTEK Smart Watch LW31 is a budget-friendly wearable featuring a 1.69-inch HD full-touch color screen with a 240x280 resolution, housed in a zinc alloy body with an IP68 waterproof rating. It serves as a comprehensive fitness tracker by supporting 11 sports modes and 24-hour health monitoring for heart rate, sleep quality, blood oxygen levels, and female-specific health metrics. Key advantages include an impressive battery life of 7–10 days on a single 2-hour charge, high compatibility with iOS 10.0 and Android 5.0 or above via Bluetooth 5.0, and a lightweight, premium design with over 100 customisable watch faces. However, notable drawbacks include the inability to directly answer calls or reply to text messages from the watch, the lack of built-in GPS, and occasional reports of intermittent Bluetooth connectivity or charging issues.

Compare Agptek Smart Watch LW31 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Agptek Smart Watch LW31 and other Smartwatches

No results found