OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

vivo X200 Ultra (16GB + 1TB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£940RAM capacity:16 GBInternal storage:1 TBScreen size:6.82 inchesMain camera megapixels:200 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP

vivo X200 Ultra (16GB + 1TB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

9.0/10

Overall score

Score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

90%

9.0

Technical score

10%

?

User score

★Better than 99% of smartphones
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 83% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

Overall score

30%

5.6

Price

▲Better than 83%
9.0

Technical score

Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

25%

9.3

Performance & Hardware

18%

9.4

Camera

15%

9.5

Display

15%

8.8

Battery

10%

8.4

Software

10%

8.0

Connectivity

4%

8.6

Audio

3%

7.6

Design

★Better than 99%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £940
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone vivo X200 Ultra (16GB + 1TB)

Technical score
Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components:

25%

9.3

Performance & Hardware

18%

9.4

Camera

15%

9.5

Display

15%

8.8

Battery

10%

8.4

Software

10%

8.0

Connectivity

4%

8.6

Audio

3%

7.6

Design

9.0
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
vivo X200 Ultra (16GB + 1TB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 63.9% of smartphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 83% of models
Score components:

70%

9.0

Overall score

30%

5.6

Price

7.9
Brand name
vivo
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite processor which is faster than processors in 95.2% of smartphones and equal to processors in 2% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 16 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 83.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 12% of smartphones.
Internal storage
1 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 1 TB which is larger than the storage of 94.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.6% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
4.32 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 4.32 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 96.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 15
Android version
Android 15
This smartphone runs Android version Android 15 which is newer than that found in 70.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 25.1% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
200 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 200 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP which is higher than that of 99.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.7 & f/2.0 & f/2.3
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.7 & f/2.0 & f/2.3 which is wider than that of 86.7% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
74.4 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 74.4 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 94.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.5% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1.22 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1.22 µm which is larger than in 88.8% of smartphones and equal to the size in 3% of smartphones.
2.44 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.82 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.82 inches which is larger than the screens of 89.7% of smartphones and equal to those of 0.7% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1440x 3168 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1440x3168 px which is higher than that of 95.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.6% of smartphones.
Pixel density
510 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 510 ppi which is higher than that of 94% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
6,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 6,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 73.2% of smartphones and equal to those in 6.9% of smartphones.
Charging speed
90 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 90 W which is faster than in 86.6% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 3.5% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
?
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
?
Show more
Height
163.1 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 163.1 mm which is shorter than 56.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.1% of smartphones.
Width
76.8 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 76.8 mm which is wider than 68.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.8% of smartphones.
Thickness
8.7 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 8.7 mm which is thicker than 69.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.7% of smartphones.
Weight
229 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 229 g which is heavier than 85.6% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.6% of smartphones.
Device volume
99,104 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 99,104 cm³ which is larger than 58.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 2% of smartphones.
Show more

vivo X200 Ultra (16GB + 1TB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 3.7 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (3.7 x vs 0 x).
    3.7 x vs 0 x
  • 2.33x larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (74.4 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    74.4 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 4x more storage
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (1 TB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    1 TB vs 256 GB
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 80% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (4.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    4.32 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 50% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1440x3168 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1440x3168 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 8.2% better value for money
    vivo X200 Ultra (16GB + 1TB) has better value for money than the average smartphone (7.94 vs 7.3).
    7.94 vs 7.34
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 4x more storage
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (1 TB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    1 TB vs 256 GB
  • 80% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (4.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    4.32 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 50% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x4.32 GHz & 6x3.53 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x4.32 GHz & 6x3.53 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Better processor
    This smartphone features a better processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 11.77x more L2 cache
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (12,048 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1,024 KB.
    12,048 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 3.32x higher memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has higher memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (85.1 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s.
    85.1 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 5.56x higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone performs better in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (6,816 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    6,816 vs 1,226
  • 6x more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (1,536 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    1,536 vs 256
  • 3.69x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (9,353 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in multi-core.
    9,353 vs 2,533
  • 6x more L1
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (192 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    192 KB vs 32 KB
  • 92.7% faster memory speed
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (5,300 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2,750 MHz memory speed.
    5,300 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • Supports ECC memory
    This smartphone supports ECC memory, the average smartphone does not. 2.4% of smartphones support ECC.
  • 71.4% higher maximum RAM
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (24 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    24 GB vs 14 GB
  • 15.8% faster GPU clock
    This smartphone has a higher GPU frequency than the average smartphone (1,100 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone GPU frequency is 950 MHz.
    1,100 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 2x more L3 cache
    This smartphone has more L3 cache than the average smartphone (8,192 KB vs 4,096 KB). The average L3 cache is 4,096 KB.
    8,192 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • Supports newer OpenCL version
    This smartphone supports a newer OpenCL version than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average version is 2.
    3 vs 2
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Circle to Search, AI Note Assist, AI Transcript Assist, Live Call Translation, AI Photo Enhance, AI Erase, Origin Island
    productivity vs fundamental
  • Newer Android version
    This smartphone features a newer Android version than the average smartphone (Android 15 vs Android 14). The average version is Android 14.
    Android 15 vs Android 14
  • 3.7 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (3.7 x vs 0 x).
    3.7 x vs 0 x
  • 2.33x larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (74.4 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    74.4 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (200 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    200 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 0.42 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.2 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    2.44 binned
    1.22 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Better main camera video
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 44.20x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    4320x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 2 more flash LEDs
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (3 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    3 vs 1
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (50 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    50 MP vs 16 MP
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Supports Dolby Vision video recording
    This smartphone supports Dolby Vision video recording, the average smartphone does not. 10.7% of smartphones support Dolby Vision.
  • Has a multi-lens front camera
    This smartphone features a multi-lens front camera, the average smartphone does not. 18% of smartphones have multiple front lenses.
  • Supports laser autofocus
    This smartphone features laser autofocus, the average smartphone does not. 21.4% of smartphones include laser AF.
  • Supports 360° panorama
    This smartphone can capture 360° panoramas, the average smartphone cannot. 25.2% of smartphones support 360° panoramas.
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This smartphone allows manual shutter speed control, the average smartphone does not. 29.8% of smartphones include this.
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.7 & f/2 & f/2.3 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.7 & f/2.0 & f/2.3 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Has a pro camera setup
    This smartphone features a pro camera setup, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones include professional-grade camera hardware.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.2 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.
    3.2 vs 2
  • Supports satellite SOS
    This smartphone supports satellite SOS functionality, the average smartphone does not. 8.1% of smartphones offer satellite emergency services.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.4 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.4 vs 5.2
  • Has an infrared sensor
    This smartphone includes an infrared sensor, the average smartphone does not. 33.3% of smartphones feature an IR blaster.
  • 1 more external displays supported
    This smartphone supports more external displays than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone supports 1 external displays.
    2 vs 1
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1440x3168 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1440x3168 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 3,500 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (4,500 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    4,500 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 29.1% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (510 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    510 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 0.15 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.8 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.82 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This smartphone has a higher contrast ratio than the average smartphone (8000000:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone contrast ratio is 1000000:1.
    AMOLED/OLED displays have an effectively infinite contrast ratio
    8,000,000:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • 922.5 nits higher GSMArena max display brightness
    This smartphone has a higher GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (1,816 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average max brightness is 893.5 nits.
    1,816 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • Supports Dolby Vision support
    This smartphone supports Dolby Vision, the average smartphone does not. 17.3% of smartphones are Dolby Vision compatible.
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    This smartphone supports HDR10+, the average smartphone does not. 22.2% of smartphones include HDR10+ support.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Has a curved display
    This smartphone features a curved display, the average smartphone does not. 24.5% of smartphones have curved screens.
  • 25% higher touch sampling rate
    This smartphone has a higher touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (300 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average touch sampling rate is 240 Hz.
    300 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • 2.73x faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (90 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    90 W vs 33 W
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 20% larger battery capacity
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5,000 mAh.
    6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.6% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • 2x faster wireless charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (40 W vs 20 W). The average speed is 20 W.
    40 W vs 20 W
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This smartphone supports aptX Adaptive, the average smartphone does not. 34.5% of smartphones include aptX Adaptive support.
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • Better IP rating
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68/IP69K vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68/IP69K vs IP67
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 1 year/s newer release date
    This smartphone has a newer release date than the average smartphone (2025 vs 2024). 1.00% of smartphones are released annually.
    April 2025
    2025 vs 2024
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 16.7% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (229 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    229 g vs 196.2 g
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.5 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.5 vs f/2.2
  • 3.62x more expensive
    vivo X200 Ultra (16GB + 1TB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£940 vs £260).
    £940 vs £260
  • 5.44x less popular
    vivo X200 Ultra (16GB + 1TB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • 0.8 mm wider
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (76.8 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    76.8 mm vs 76 mm
  • 0.4 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (8.7 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    8.7 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 3.62x more expensive
    vivo X200 Ultra (16GB + 1TB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£940 vs £260).
    £940 vs £260
  • 5.44x less popular
    vivo X200 Ultra (16GB + 1TB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.5 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.5 vs f/2.2
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 16.7% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (229 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    229 g vs 196.2 g
  • 0.4 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (8.7 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    8.7 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 0.8 mm wider
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (76.8 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    76.8 mm vs 76 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Steven Divish
≈ estimated
06/06/2025
Hands-on review · camera, zoom, portrait and video tests
Verdict
vivo X200 Ultra needs software work, but it may be a top-three camera phone of the year.
Not graded
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

androidcentral.com
03/06/2025
Full review · Camera flagship
Verdict
The vivo X200 Ultra takes some of the best phone photos available, but its bulk, heat and China-only sales hold it back.
G
gsmarena.com
02/02/2026
Summary of the review
vivo X200 Ultra review: Software, performance
techradar.com
02/02/2026
Hands-on test · Camera kit
Verdict
The vivo X200 Ultra is a camera-first phone whose 35mm main lens and Photography Kit suit serious shooters, though Google apps need setup.
dxomark.com
06/08/2025
Lab test · Camera performance
Verdict
The vivo X200 Ultra excels at texture, portrait bokeh and telephoto shots, though its autofocus can struggle at night.
gizchina.com
15/05/2025
Hands-on review · Camera flagship
Verdict
The vivo X200 Ultra has a long-lasting battery and strong cameras, but its China-market software and cluttered preinstalled apps are frustrating.
G
gizmochina.com
07/08/2025
Summary of the review
Vivo X200 Ultra Scores High on DXOMARK's Camera Test
chinamobilemag.de
09/09/2025
Lab test · Heat and speed
Verdict
The vivo X200 Ultra matches the X200 Pro in everyday speed, but it runs warmer and slows down more under sustained load.
smartzone.de
15/06/2025
Hands-on test · Camera review
Verdict
The vivo X200 Ultra is a top camera phone, with a 35mm main lens and 3.7x telephoto that shoot excellent photos day and night.
A
alza.at
25/04/2025
Summary of the review
Vivo X200 Ultra (PREVIEW): A Camera Phone Like Never Before
(Translated)Show original
frandroid.com
22/04/2025
Hands-on test · Camera button
Verdict
The vivo X200 Ultra is a camera-first phone, but its copied camera button gets pressed by accident too often.
tuttoandroid.net
12/08/2025
Hands-on test · Camera-focused
Verdict
The vivo X200 Ultra is built for photos and video, with a 35mm main lens and 4K 120fps, though it lacks eSIM.
tomshw.it
11/10/2025
Hands-on test · Camera and display
Verdict
The vivo X200 Ultra is a camera-first flagship with a smooth, cool-running chip, a bright display and long battery life, but it sells only in China.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about vivo X200 Ultra (16GB + 1TB)

  • Exceptional camera system, with the 200MP telephoto and high-quality ultra-wide lenses often described as the best available on a smartphone.
  • Outstanding photo quality in most conditions, including daylight, low light, and portraits, with excellent detail, natural colors (in Zeiss mode), and effective stabilization.
  • Very smooth and fast performance thanks to the flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite processor.
  • Excellent battery life, with many users getting a full day to a day and a half of heavy use, and support for 90W wired and 40W wireless fast charging.
  • Premium and solid build quality with an elegant design and an IP68/IP69 ingress protection rating.
  • High-quality, bright 2K AMOLED display with good color calibration and eye protection features.
  • Fast and reliable ultrasonic in-display fingerprint sensor and face unlock.
  • Useful dedicated two-stage camera control button for a more tactile shooting experience.
  • Feature-packed OriginOS software (for its intended market), offering many customization options and smooth animations.
  • Good quality haptics and decent stereo speakers.

What customers don't like about vivo X200 Ultra (16GB + 1TB)

  • The phone is only available as a Chinese version, meaning a lack of global ROM, which results in significant software issues for users outside of China (e.g., problems with Google apps, delayed notifications, untranslated menus, unusable AI features).
  • Extremely large and bulky camera bump makes the phone top-heavy and potentially awkward to handle.
  • Video recording quality is considered average and not competitive with top rivals like the iPhone or Samsung, with issues such as inaccurate colors, unnatural skin tones, and motion blur in low light.
  • Speakers, while decent, are widely reported as lacking bass and sound thin compared to other flagships.
  • Inconsistent camera performance in challenging light conditions (e.g., indoor HDR, harsh backlighting), sometimes requiring manual mode adjustments for optimal results.
  • Poor battery life and overheating issues reported by some users, especially on older software versions or when used heavily as a main phone with many background apps.
  • Lack of eSIM support is a major drawback for some international users.
  • In-box accessories like the PGYTECH case can have poor build quality.
  • File transfer speeds can be slow, and the proprietary PC software is entirely in Chinese.

Verdict

The vivo X200 Ultra (16GB + 1TB) is a flagship powerhouse featuring the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and a 6.82-inch LTPO AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 4,500 nits. Its defining characteristic is the professional-grade Zeiss-tuned camera system, headlined by a massive 200MP periscope telephoto lens with 3.7x optical zoom and a 50MP gimbal-stabilized main sensor. Key pros include exceptional long-range photography performance, a high-capacity 6,000mAh battery with 90W wired and 40W wireless charging, and premium IP69 water and dust resistance. However, notable cons include its significant weight (229g) and a large, protruding camera bump that may cause the device to wobble on flat surfaces, along with the lack of a global software ROM in some regions.

Compare vivo X200 Ultra (16GB + 1TB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of vivo X200 Ultra (16GB + 1TB) and other smartphones

No results found