Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G (12GB + 256GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£690RAM capacity:12 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:6.55 inchesMain camera megapixels:48 MP & 13 MP & 12 MP

Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G (12GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.1

Technical score

10%

8.5

User score

▼Worse than 64% of smartphones
6.5

Value for money

Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

6.9

Price

▼Worse than 95%
6.1

Technical score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

25%

5.9

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.8

Camera

15%

5.4

Display

15%

5.9

Battery

10%

5.0

Software

10%

7.4

Connectivity

4%

6.5

Audio

3%

6.7

Design

▼Worse than 69%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 79%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G (12GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

25%

5.9

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.8

Camera

15%

5.4

Display

15%

5.9

Battery

10%

5.0

Software

10%

7.4

Connectivity

4%

6.5

Audio

3%

6.7

Design

6.1
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G (12GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 7.3 points, which is higher than 67.8% of smartphones.
7.3
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

6.9

Price

6.5
Brand name
Oppo
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G processor which is faster than processors in 51.5% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.6% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
12 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 12 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 59% of smartphones and equal to that of 24.3% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.3% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.4 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.4 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 36.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 13.4% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 10
Android version
Android 10
This smartphone runs Android version Android 10 which is older than that found in 88.8% of smartphones and equal to that in 5.1% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
48 MP & 13 MP & 12 MP
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 48 MP & 13 MP & 12 MP which is lower than that of 76.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 which is wider than that of 83.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.1% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
30.7 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 30.7 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 63.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 6.3% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
1.6 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.55 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.55 inches which is smaller than the screens of 76.2% of smartphones and equal to those of 1.7% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2400 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2400 px which is higher than that of 36.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 20.4% of smartphones.
Pixel density
402 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 402 ppi which is higher than that of 61.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.3% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is lower than in 65.4% of smartphones and equal to that in 18.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,000 mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 90.2% of smartphones and equal to those in 2.6% of smartphones.
Charging speed
65 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 65 W which is faster than in 65.2% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 2.6% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
yes
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
159.6 mm
This smartphone has a height of 159.6 mm which is shorter than 82% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Width
72.5 mm
This smartphone has a width of 72.5 mm which is narrower than 91.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.6 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.6 mm which is thinner than 86% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.5% of smartphones.
Weight
172 g
This smartphone weighs 172 g which is lighter than 92.1% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.7% of smartphones.
Device volume
80,136 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 80,136 cm³ which is smaller than 93.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Show more

Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G (12GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • 97% faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (65 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    65 W vs 33 W
  • Has a multi-lens front camera
    This smartphone features a multi-lens front camera, the average smartphone does not. 18% of smartphones have multiple front lenses.
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.
    3.1 vs 2
  • 33.3% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (8 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    8 W vs 6 W
  • 5.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G
    the average smartphone
    Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G (12GB + 256GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.47 vs 8).
    8.47 vs 8
  • 33.8% more popular
    Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G (12GB + 256GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (7.28 vs 5.4).
    7.28 vs 5.44
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 33.3% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (8 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    8 W vs 6 W
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (1x2.4 GHz & 1x2.2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    1x2.4 GHz & 1x2.2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Has a multi-lens front camera
    This smartphone features a multi-lens front camera, the average smartphone does not. 18% of smartphones have multiple front lenses.
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.
    3.1 vs 2
  • Has a curved display
    This smartphone features a curved display, the average smartphone does not. 24.5% of smartphones have curved screens.
  • 1.8% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (402 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    402 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 100 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (1,100 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    1,100 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 97% faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (65 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    65 W vs 33 W
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 12.3% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (172 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    172 g vs 196.2 g
  • 3.5 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (72.5 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    72.5 mm vs 76 mm
  • 0.7 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.6 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.6 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 4 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (159.6 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    159.6 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 18.1% smaller volume
    This smartphone has a smaller device volume than the average smartphone (80,136 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97,800 cm³.
    80,136 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Lacks multithreading support
    This smartphone does not support multithreading, the average smartphone does. 80.5% of smartphones support multithreading.
  • 20% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • 21.1% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (750 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    750 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 25.6% lower PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in PCMark Work 3.0 than the average smartphone (8,023 vs 10,783). The average smartphone scores 10,783 in PCMark Work 3.0.
    8,023 vs 10,783
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • 12.7% worse value for money
    Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G (12GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.51 vs 7.3).
    6.51 vs 7.34
  • 2.65x more expensive
    Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G (12GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£690 vs £260).
    £690 vs £260
  • Lacks multithreading support
    This smartphone does not support multithreading, the average smartphone does. 80.5% of smartphones support multithreading.
  • 25.6% lower PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in PCMark Work 3.0 than the average smartphone (8,023 vs 10,783). The average smartphone scores 10,783 in PCMark Work 3.0.
    8,023 vs 10,783
  • 21.1% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (750 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    750 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 66.4% lower 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in the 3DMark Wild Life benchmark than the average smartphone (1,048 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115 in this benchmark.
    1,048 vs 3,115
  • 74.2% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (316 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    316 vs 1,226
  • 16.7% larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (7 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    7 nm vs 6 nm
  • 50% less L2 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L2 cache than the average smartphone (512 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average smartphone has an L2 cache of 1,024 KB.
    512 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 22.4% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 33.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (17 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    17 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 14.3% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 14 GB
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No location privacy controls
    This smartphone does not offer location privacy controls, the average smartphone does. 88% of smartphones include location privacy features.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 10 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 10 vs Android 14
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This smartphone lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average smartphone includes them. 87% of smartphones offer these toggles.
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No battery health monitoring
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • No dynamic theme support
    This smartphone does not support dynamic themes, the average smartphone does. 81.9% of smartphones support dynamic theming.
  • Lacks extra dim mode
    This smartphone does not have extra dim mode, the average smartphone does. 82.5% of smartphones offer extra dimming features.
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (48 MP & 13 MP & 12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    48 MP & 13 MP & 12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • No manual focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a manual focus mode, the average smartphone does. 91.2% of smartphones offer manual focus.
  • 4.1% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (30.7 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    30.7 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • No continuous autofocus in video
    This smartphone does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average smartphone does. 94.2% of smartphones have continuous AF.
  • No manual exposure control
    This smartphone does not offer manual exposure control, the average smartphone does. 94% of smartphones have manual exposure.
  • 10% lower DxOMark Mobile score
    This smartphone has a lower DxOMark Mobile score than the average smartphone (108 vs 120). The average smartphone scores 120.
    108 vs 120
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.1 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.1 vs 5.2
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 0.12 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.6 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.55 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 24.2% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (500 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    500 nits vs 660 nits
  • 25% lower touch sampling rate
    This smartphone has a lower touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (180 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average smartphone has a sampling rate of 240 Hz.
    180 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • 20% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 4 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2020 vs 2024). 4.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    July 2020
    2020 vs 2024

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Tech Spurt
≈ estimated
13/01/2021
Hands-on review · week of daily use and camera tests
Verdict
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G is not quite perfect, but it is a strong premium phone with a great camera and battery life.
9.0
ReviewsFire
≈ estimated
13/12/2020
Hands-on review · about a month of use
Verdict
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G is a strong mid-range phone with the features you need at a competitive price.
9.0
EMKWAN REVIEWS
≈ estimated
27/09/2020
Hands-on review · unboxing and extended daily use
Verdict
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G has a strong camera, especially in low light and video; battery falls short, but fast charging impresses.
8.0
Neowin
≈ estimated
01/11/2020
Unboxing · first look at design and software
Verdict
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G has an eye-catching green design and a smooth interface; the price seems reasonable.
7.0
Android Authority
≈ estimated
01/10/2020
First look · unboxing and first impressions
Verdict
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G has good looks and a good screen, but weak haptics and no wireless charging make it a hard sell.
8.0
#GNTECH
≈ estimated
19/09/2020
First look · unboxing and setup
Verdict
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G gets a quick first look, with the full review still to come.
Overview video
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

gsmarena.com
23/11/2020
Full review · Camera and display
Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G is a capable phone with a 90 Hz screen and a 2x telephoto lens, but it lacks a microSD slot and a headphone jack.
techradar.com
04/11/2020
Hands-on review · Mid-range phone
Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G is a stylish mid-range phone with some of the fastest charging in its class, but its price is hard to justify against cheaper rivals.
techstomper.com
16/12/2020
Hands-on review · Mid-range phone
Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G is a stylish all-rounder with a bright 90Hz screen and 65W charging, but its battery trails rival phones.
itpro.com
26/02/2021
Hands-on review · Stylish mid-ranger
Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G is a striking phone with a bright display and great night photos, but its price sits above similar rivals with few extra features.
techadvisor.com
14/12/2020
Full review · Stylish mid-ranger
Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G is a slim, attractive phone with standout video and fast charging, but ColorOS and no water resistance may deter some.
pocket-lint.com
08/03/2021
Expert review · Mid-range 5G phone
Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G is a slim, sleek phone with a strong three-camera setup and very fast charging, though it's pricey for a mid-range phone and games look rougher.
digitalcameraworld.com
13/10/2020
Hands-on review · Camera and screen
Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G is a thin phone with an excellent screen and fast charging, but weak gaming power makes it best for casual users.
stuff.tv
23/10/2020
Full review · Design-led midranger
Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G is a slim, good-looking phone with strong cameras and very fast charging, but its midrange chip suits casual gamers rather than hardcore ones.
trustedreviews.com
26/10/2020
Hands-on review · Upper mid-range phone
Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G is a near-flagship performer with very fast charging and a strong main camera, but rivals like the OnePlus 8T offer more for your money.
phonandroid.com
1er octobre 2020
Hands-on test · Design and screen
Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G is almost identical to the Find X2 Neo, with a bright 90Hz screen and responsive software, but it costs more than the Reno3 Pro.
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
08/12/2020
Summary of the review
clubic.com
24/12/2020
Hands-on test · All-round use
Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G is a solid, light all-rounder with long battery life and good photos, though weak audio and the price hold it back.
T
techpulse.be
20/10/2020
Summary of the review
gadgetgear.nl
23/10/2020
Hands-on review · Night photography
Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G is a mid-range phone that feels fast and takes excellent night photos, but Android 10 and a slightly high price hold it back.
digitailing.nl
05/11/2020
Hands-on review · Night photos
Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G is light, fast-charging and strong in night photos, and it competes with high-end phones.
global.techradar.com
10/11/2020
Full review · Mid-range premium
Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G has a premium look and 65W charging that is hard to beat, but its price is too high for a mid-range phone.
itdaily.be
03/11/2020
Full review · Camera and software
Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G has premium hardware, with fast charging and great cameras, but software glitches and a forced HeyTap account spoil the experience.
C
consumentenbond.nl
19/10/2020
Summary of the review
P
portablegear.nl
21/10/2020
Summary of the review
nl.letsgodigital.org
04/11/2020
Full review · Design and camera
Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G is a stylish, fast-charging phone with a versatile camera and 5x zoom, but it lacks wireless charging and water resistance.

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G (12GB + 256GB)

  • Extremely fast 65W SuperVOOC charging (full charge in ~36 minutes).
  • Slim, lightweight, and premium-feeling design/build quality.
  • Spectacular 90Hz AMOLED display with great brightness and clarity.
  • Good overall camera performance, especially in night mode and for video stabilization.
  • Snappy everyday performance for general use and multitasking (Snapdragon 765G with 12GB RAM).
  • 5G connectivity support.
  • Generous onboard storage (256GB option).
  • Face recognition feature is very fast and works well.

What customers don't like about Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G (12GB + 256GB)

  • High price point for a mid-range chipset (Snapdragon 765G), especially compared to competitors at the time of launch.
  • No official IP rating for water or dust resistance.
  • No microSD card slot for expandable storage.
  • No 3.5mm headphone jack.
  • Audio quality from the single (or stereo, depending on the version) speakers is considered average, lacking bass and clarity at high volumes.
  • Camera autofocus can be inconsistent, and images may be noisy in low light without using night mode.
  • Some users report the phone can get warm or overheat, and battery life can be average for power users.

Verdict

The Oppo Reno 4 Pro 5G with 12GB RAM and 256GB storage is a stylish, lightweight upper mid-range smartphone known for its 90Hz curved AMOLED display and incredibly fast 65W SuperVOOC 2.0 charging. Powered by the capable, though not flagship-level, Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G processor, the phone delivers smooth everyday performance for multitasking and general use. Its versatile triple camera system (48MP main, 13MP telephoto, 12MP ultrawide) excels in daytime photos and video stabilization, especially in low light with the dedicated Night Mode. The main cons are its premium price point compared to some competitors with beefier processors, the absence of a 3.5mm headphone jack and microSD card slot, and a battery life that might not cover a full two days of heavy use despite the rapid charging.

Compare Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G (12GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G (12GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found