OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£650RAM capacity:16 GBInternal storage:1 TBScreen size:6.78 inchesMain camera megapixels:200 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP

vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB)
8.7/10

Overall score

Score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components

90%

8.8

Technical score

10%

7.5

User score

★Better than 97% of smartphones
8.2

Value for money

Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

Overall score

30%

7.1

Price

★Better than 94%
8.8

Technical score

Technical score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 98% of models
Score components

25%

9.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

9.4

Camera

15%

9.4

Display

15%

8.6

Battery

10%

7.6

Software

10%

8.4

Connectivity

4%

7.3

Audio

3%

6.6

Design

★Better than 98%
7.5

User score

User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

1.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 82%
  • vivo-x200-pro
  • vivo-x200-pro
  • vivo-x200-pro
  • vivo-x200-pro
  • vivo-x200-pro
  • vivo-x200-pro
  • vivo-x200-pro
  • vivo-x200-pro
  • vivo-x200-pro
vivo-x200-pro
vivo-x200-pro
vivo-x200-pro
vivo-x200-pro
vivo-x200-pro
vivo-x200-pro
vivo-x200-pro
vivo-x200-pro
vivo-x200-pro
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 98% of models
Score components:

25%

9.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

9.4

Camera

15%

9.4

Display

15%

8.6

Battery

10%

7.6

Software

10%

8.4

Connectivity

4%

7.3

Audio

3%

6.6

Design

8.8
User score
User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

1.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.5
Popularity
Popularity
1.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 64% of models
Popularity:
vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB) has a popularity of 1.7 points, which is lower than 63.4% of smartphones.
1.7
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components:

70%

8.7

Overall score

30%

7.1

Price

8.2
Brand name
vivo
Processor model
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 processor which is faster than processors in 94.5% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.2% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 16 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 83.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 12% of smartphones.
Internal storage
1 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 1 TB which is larger than the storage of 94.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.6% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
3.63 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 3.63 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 93.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 15
Android version
Android 15
This smartphone runs Android version Android 15 which is newer than that found in 70.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 25.1% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
200 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 200 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP which is higher than that of 99.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.57 & f/2.0 & f/2.67
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.57 & f/2.0 & f/2.67 which is wider than that of 96.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
74.4 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 74.4 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 94.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.5% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1.22 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1.22 µm which is larger than in 88.8% of smartphones and equal to the size in 3% of smartphones.
2.44 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.78 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.78 inches which is larger than the screens of 73.5% of smartphones and equal to those of 9.5% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1260x 2800 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1260x2800 px which is higher than that of 83.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.1% of smartphones.
Pixel density
452 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 452 ppi which is higher than that of 83.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
6,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 6,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 73.2% of smartphones and equal to those in 6.9% of smartphones.
Charging speed
90 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 90 W which is faster than in 86.6% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 3.5% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
?
Show more
Height
162.4 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 162.4 mm which is shorter than 64.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.9% of smartphones.
Width
76 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 76 mm which is narrower than 47.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.2% of smartphones.
Thickness
8.2 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 8.2 mm which is thinner than 51.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 6.1% of smartphones.
Weight
228 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 228 g which is heavier than 85.1% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.5% of smartphones.
Device volume
98,496 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 98,496 cm³ which is larger than 56.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.3% of smartphones.
Show more

vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 3.7 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (3.7 x vs 0 x).
    3.7 x vs 0 x
  • 2.33x larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (74.4 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    74.4 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 4x more storage
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (1 TB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    1 TB vs 256 GB
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 5.97x higher 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life than the average smartphone (18,601 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115.
    18,601 vs 3,115
  • 50% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • 2.73x faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (90 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    90 W vs 33 W
  • 12% better value for money
    vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB) has better value for money than the average smartphone (8.21 vs 7.3).
    8.21 vs 7.34
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 4x more storage
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (1 TB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    1 TB vs 256 GB
  • 5.97x higher 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life than the average smartphone (18,601 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115.
    18,601 vs 3,115
  • 50% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • 51.3% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    3.63 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 3.02x higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (2,848 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    2,848 vs 942
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (1x3.63 GHz & 4x3.3 GHz & 3x2.4 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    1x3.63 GHz & 4x3.3 GHz & 3x2.4 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Better processor
    This smartphone features a better processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Dimensity 9,400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 48% higher PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 performance score than the average smartphone (15,956 vs 10,783). The average score is 10,783.
    15,956 vs 10,783
  • 6x more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (1,536 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    1,536 vs 256
  • 3.88x faster memory speed
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (10667 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2750 MHz memory speed.
    10,667 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 3.42x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (8,656 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in multi-core.
    8,656 vs 2,533
  • 3x more L3 cache
    This smartphone has more L3 cache than the average smartphone (12288 KB vs 4096 KB). The average L3 cache is 4096 KB.
    12,288 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 36.8% faster GPU clock
    This smartphone has a higher GPU frequency than the average smartphone (1300 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone GPU frequency is 950 MHz.
    1,300 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • 71.4% higher maximum RAM
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (24 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    24 GB vs 14 GB
  • 2 more memory channels
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • 4x more L1
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (128 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    128 KB vs 32 KB
  • Supports newer OpenCL version
    This smartphone supports a newer OpenCL version than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average version is 2.0.
    3.0 vs 2.0
  • 95.3% more L2 cache
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (2000 KB vs 1024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1024 KB.
    2,000 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the agentic AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Dimensity Agentic AI Engine (DAE
    agentic vs fundamental
  • Newer Android version
    This smartphone features a newer Android version than the average smartphone (Android 15 vs Android 14). The average version is Android 14.
    Android 15 vs Android 14
  • 3.7 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (3.7 x vs 0 x).
    3.7 x vs 0 x
  • 2.33x larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (74.4 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    74.4 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (200 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    200 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 0.42 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.2 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    2.44 binned
    1.22 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Better main camera video
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 44.20x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    4320x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.57 & f/2 & f/2.67 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.57 & f/2.0 & f/2.67 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Supports Dolby Vision video recording
    This smartphone supports Dolby Vision video recording, the average smartphone does not. 10.7% of smartphones support Dolby Vision.
  • Has a multi-lens front camera
    This smartphone features a multi-lens front camera, the average smartphone does not. 18% of smartphones have multiple front lenses.
  • Supports laser autofocus
    This smartphone features laser autofocus, the average smartphone does not. 21.4% of smartphones include laser AF.
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This smartphone allows manual shutter speed control, the average smartphone does not. 29.8% of smartphones include this.
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Has a pro camera setup
    This smartphone features a pro camera setup, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones include professional-grade camera hardware.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Has 3D facial recognition
    This smartphone features 3D facial recognition, the average smartphone does not. 4.3% of smartphones support 3D face unlock.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.2 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.0.
    3.2 vs 2.0
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.4 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.4 vs 5.2
  • Has an infrared sensor
    This smartphone includes an infrared sensor, the average smartphone does not. 33.3% of smartphones feature an IR blaster.
  • 3.82x higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (2521 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    2,521 nits vs 660 nits
  • 3,500 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (4500 nits vs 1000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    4,500 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This smartphone has a higher contrast ratio than the average smartphone (8000000:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone contrast ratio is 1000000:1.
    AMOLED/OLED displays have an effectively infinite contrast ratio
    8,000,000:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1260x2800 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1260x2800 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 14.4% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (452 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    452 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Supports Dolby Vision support
    This smartphone supports Dolby Vision, the average smartphone does not. 17.3% of smartphones are Dolby Vision compatible.
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    This smartphone supports HDR10+, the average smartphone does not. 22.2% of smartphones include HDR10+ support.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • 0.11 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.8 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.78 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Has a curved display
    This smartphone features a curved display, the average smartphone does not. 24.5% of smartphones have curved screens.
  • 25% higher touch sampling rate
    This smartphone has a higher touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (300 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average touch sampling rate is 240 Hz.
    300 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • 2.73x faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (90 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    90 W vs 33 W
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 20% larger battery capacity
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (6000 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5000 mAh.
    6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 50% faster wireless charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (30 W vs 20 W). The average speed is 20 W.
    30 W vs 20 W
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • Is designed for seniors
    This smartphone is designed specifically for seniors, the average smartphone is not. 17% of smartphones are senior-friendly.
  • Better IP rating
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • 1.2 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (162.4 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    162.4 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • 30% lower French repairability index
    This smartphone has a lower French repairability index than the average smartphone (5.6 vs 8). The average smartphone scores 8.
    5.6 vs 8
  • 16.2% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (228 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    228 g vs 196.2 g
  • 2.5x more expensive
    vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£650 vs £260).
    £650 vs £260
  • 6.3% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    vivo X200 Pro
    the average smartphone
    vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.52 vs 8.000).
    7.52 vs 8
  • 3.12x less popular
    vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1.74 vs 5.4).
    1.74 vs 5.44
  • 2.5x more expensive
    vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£650 vs £260).
    £650 vs £260
  • 6.3% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    vivo X200 Pro
    the average smartphone
    vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.52 vs 8.000).
    7.52 vs 8
  • 3.12x less popular
    vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1.74 vs 5.4).
    1.74 vs 5.44
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 30% lower French repairability index
    This smartphone has a lower French repairability index than the average smartphone (5.6 vs 8). The average smartphone scores 8.
    5.6 vs 8
  • 16.2% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (228 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    228 g vs 196.2 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
androidauthority.com
29/01/2025
Summary of the review
Android Authority: vivo x200 Pro review: Fantastic camera phone with one weird flaw
Y
yankodesign.com
02/11/2024
Summary of the review
Vivo X200 Pro Review: A Flagship Reaching Further in Mobile Photography
T
trustedreviews.com
13/12/2024
Summary of the review
Trusted Reviews: Vivo X200 Pro Review: The best camera phone yet?
G
gsmarena.com
08/01/2025
Summary of the review
vivo X200 Pro (Global) review
G
geardiary.com
27/01/2025
Summary of the review
Gear Diary: Vivo X200 Pro Review: Carl Zeiss and Vivo Pair Up to Make the Camera King
A
amateurphotographer.com
19/04/2025
Summary of the review
Amateur Photographer: Vivo X200 Pro Review: A superb all rounder with excellent camera
A
androidheadlines.com
16/01/2026
Summary of the review
Android Headlines: Vivo X200 Pro Review: Unleash Your Inner Photographer
P
petapixel.com
02/02/2025
Summary of the review
PetaPixel: Vivo X200 Pro Review: A Telephoto for the Ages
F
forbes.com
29/12/2024
Summary of the review
Forbes: Vivo X200 Pro Review: The Flagship Phone To Beat In 2025
P
phonearena.com
15/01/2025
Summary of the review
PhoneArena: Vivo X200 Pro review: best camera phone or just an ambitious flagship?
N
nerdsheaven.de
12/11/2025
Summary of the review
vivo X200 Pro - The Camera Beast! - NerdsHeaven
(Translated)Show original
A
alza.at
12/02/2025
Summary of the review
Vivo X200 Pro (REVIEW): Top-tier smartphone with a stunning display
(Translated)Show original
C
connect.de
28/04/2025
Summary of the review
Vivo X200 Pro Review: The best 200MP telephoto camera on the market
(Translated)Show original
B
beyondpixels.de
28/01/2025
Summary of the review
vivo X200 Pro Review: If You Love Cameras, You'll Love This Smartphone
(Translated)Show original
S
smartzone.de
27/11/2024
Summary of the review
Vivo X200 Pro Review - Is the best reserved only for China?
(Translated)Show original
C
chinamobilemag.de
29/11/2024
Summary of the review
Vivo X200 Pro Review - ChinaMobileMag
(Translated)Show original
Q
qualitaetstest.at
19/03/2025
Summary of the review
High-End Smartphone Individual Test: The Vivo X200 Pro
(Translated)Show original
F
futurezone.at
01/03/2025
Summary of the review
Vivo X200 Pro Review: Excellent camera, but is it good enough?
(Translated)Show original
H
heise.de
29/09/2025
Summary of the review
Vivo X200 Pro Review: The Insider Tip Among Flagship Smartphones
(Translated)Show original
T
tg24.sky.it
17/03/2025
Summary of the review
X200 Pro, testing vivo's new “cameraphone” - Sky TG24
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB)

  • The rear camera system is widely regarded as one of the best available on a smartphone, particularly the 200MP telephoto and portrait capabilities.
  • It has a class-leading 6,000 mAh battery that provides exceptional, long-lasting life, often lasting two days with moderate use.
  • The device delivers excellent, smooth, and lag-free flagship performance, powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 processor.
  • The display is a bright, vivid 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate and high peak brightness, praised for color accuracy and reduced eye strain (PWM dimming).
  • Build quality and design are consistently described as premium, solid, and luxurious, with a good in-hand feel (despite its size).
  • It features fast 90W wired and 30W wireless charging capabilities.
  • The software (Funtouch OS 15) is considered an improvement over previous versions, with a clean interface, useful AI features, and smooth operation.
  • The phone offers a wide array of connectivity options, including Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, and an IR blaster.
  • It is IP68 and IP69 rated for dust and water resistance.

What we don't like about vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB)

  • The selfie (front) camera quality is generally considered average or disappointing for a flagship phone, often producing soft details, especially in low light.
  • The main and ultrawide cameras, while good, are not as impressive as the telephoto lens, sometimes producing softer details and inconsistent color in certain lighting conditions.
  • The phone comes with some pre-installed bloatware and occasional annoying notifications from Vivo apps, though most can be disabled.
  • Major Android OS updates are not guaranteed for as long a period as competitors like Samsung or Google, which is a significant consideration for some users.
  • The circular camera module is massive and prominent, which some users find off-putting or causes the phone to tilt on a flat surface.
  • The speaker quality is considered good but lacks bass and sounds tinnier compared to major flagships from Apple or Samsung.
  • The phone can get warm or experience thermal throttling during heavy gaming or extensive camera use.
  • The curved display design, while aesthetically pleasing to some, can make it difficult to use tempered glass screen protectors (requiring hydrogel protectors instead).

Verdict

The vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB) is a flagship powerhouse driven by the 3nm MediaTek Dimensity 9400 chipset and a massive 1TB UFS 4.0 storage capacity. Its standout feature is the ZEISS-co-engineered imaging system, headlined by a 200MP APO telephoto periscope lens and a 50MP LYT-818 main sensor, capable of 4K 120fps video and 100x digital zoom. The device features a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a staggering 4500 nits peak brightness. Main pros include its industry-leading camera performance, a high-capacity 6,000mAh silicon-carbon battery with 90W wired and 30W wireless charging, and a robust IP68/IP69 durability rating. On the downside, the phone is relatively heavy at 228g, lacks a microSD slot for further expansion, and its ultra-fast charging speeds are only achievable with proprietary vivo hardware.

Compare vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of vivo X200 Pro (16GB + 1TB) and other smartphones

No results found