Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Olympus E 30 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£140Sensor size:four thirdsWeight:740 gBattery life (CIPA):750 shots

Olympus E 30 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.9

Overall score

Score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.6

Technical score

10%

7.8

User score

â–¼Worse than 59% of cameras
4.6

Technical score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.9

Sensor & Image

25%

5.4

Photo Features

18%

2.3

Video & Audio

14%

5.0

Display & Design

8%

8.1

Battery & Power

7%

2.0

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 65% of cameras
7.8

User score

User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

5.4

Number of reviews

Based on 43 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 84% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Olympus E 30

Technical score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.9

Sensor & Image

25%

5.4

Photo Features

18%

2.3

Video & Audio

14%

5.0

Display & Design

8%

8.1

Battery & Power

7%

2.0

Connectivity & Storage

4.6
User score
User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

5.4

Number of reviews

Based on 43 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.8
Popularity
Popularity
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Olympus E 30 has a popularity score of 5.4, which is higher than 59.6% of cameras.
5.4
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.9

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

6.4
Sensor size
four thirds
Sensor size
four thirds
This camera uses a sensor classified as four thirds; it is larger than the sensor in 49% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 8.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
12.3 MP
Main camera megapixels
12.3 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 12.3 MP, which is lower than that of 83.9% of cameras and equal to that of 1.7% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.27 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.27 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.27 µm, which are larger than those in 69.3% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.2% of cameras.
Base ISO
200
Base ISO
200
This camera has a base ISO of 200 which is higher than that of 84.7% of cameras and equal to that of 13.9% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 3,200
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,200, which is lower than that of 62.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.7% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Four Thirds
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
11
N. of focus points
11
This camera has 11 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 60.4% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 6.5% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
N/A
Video bitrate
N/A
Video bit depth
N/A
Video chroma subsampling
N/A
Video codecs
N/A
Show more
Type
dslr
Weight
740 g
Weight
740 g
This camera weighs 740 g which is heavier than 86.3% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.4% of cameras.
Width
142 mm
Width
142 mm
This camera has a width of 142 mm which is wider than 89.5% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Height
108 mm
Height
108 mm
This camera has a height of 108 mm which is taller than 91.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Thickness
75 mm
Thickness
75 mm
This camera has a thickness of 75 mm which is thicker than 69.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
750 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
750 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 750 shots, which is longer than that of 91.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,500 mAh
Battery capacity
1,500 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,500 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 72.2% of cameras and equal to those in 1.2% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Olympus E 30 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    Up to 5 stops.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 420 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    750 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (750 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    750 shots vs 330 shots
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • 1,770 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1,800 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (1800 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1,800 s vs 30 s
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentaprism optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 0.93 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.27 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.27 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentaprism optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 0.24 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    1.02 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (1 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    1.02 x vs 0.78 x
  • 1 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    1
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (1 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • 0.93 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.27 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.27 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 100 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    200
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (200 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    200 vs 100
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    Up to 5 stops.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 1,770 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1,800 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (1800 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1,800 s vs 30 s
  • 1 stops more CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    5 stops
    This camera offers more CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (5 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    5 stops vs 4 stops
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • 50,000 more shutter cycles
    Shutter durability rating
    150,000
    This camera has a higher shutter durability than the average camera (150,000 vs 100,000). The average camera is rated for 100,000 shutter cycles.
    unofficial estimate
    150,000 vs 100,000
  • 420 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    750 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (750 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    750 shots vs 330 shots
  • 380 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,500 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1500 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,500 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • More versatile card slots
    Memory card slot types
    CF + xD-Picture Card
    This camera uses more versatile card slots than the average camera (CF + xD-Picture Card vs SD). The average camera supports SD memory card slot types.
    CF + xD-Picture Card vs SD
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.3 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.3 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.3 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 345 g heavier
    Weight
    740 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (740 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    740 g vs 395 g
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • 2.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Olympus E 30
    the average camera
    Olympus E 30 has a lower user score than the average camera (7.79 vs 8.000).
    7.79 vs 8
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • 345 g heavier
    Weight
    740 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (740 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    740 g vs 395 g
  • 2 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    98 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (98 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    98 % vs 100 %
  • 34.1 mm taller body
    Height
    108 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (108 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    108 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 22.1 mm wider
    Width
    142 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (142 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    142 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 29 mm thicker
    Thickness
    75 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (75 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    75 mm vs 46 mm
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.3 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.3 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.3 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • 2 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    10.4 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (10.4 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    10.4 points vs 12.4 points
  • 18 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    55 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (55 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    55 points vs 73 points
  • 1.7 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    21.3 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (21.3 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    21.3 points vs 23.0 points
  • 313 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    530 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (530 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    530 points vs 843 points
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 4 older
    Release date
    2009
    This camera is older than the average camera (2009 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    January 2009
    2,009 vs 2,013
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -2
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-2 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -2 vs -4
  • 12 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    11
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (11 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    11 vs 23
  • 0.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    5 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (5 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    5 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
24/03/2009
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
12/03/2009
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
12/03/2009
Summary of the review
D
dpinterface.com
23/12/2009
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
06/10/2010
Summary of the review
B
biofos.com
07/12/2008
Summary of the review
M
mikeeckman.com
13/12/2009
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
05/11/2008
Summary of the review
P
photocrati.com
29/04/2009
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
10/03/2009
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
22/01/2009
Summary of the review
D
d-pixx.de
20/01/2009
Summary of the review
C
channelpartner.de
17/02/2009
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
18/06/2009
Summary of the review
M
macwelt.de
26/06/2009
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
28/01/2009
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
17/02/2009
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
17/02/2009
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
24/03/2009
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
24/03/2009
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 43 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Olympus E 30

  • Fully articulated 2.7-inch LCD monitor for flexible shooting angles
  • Highly responsive and fast autofocus system (especially with SWD lenses)
  • Excellent ergonomics with a solid, well-balanced body and comfortable grip
  • In-body image stabilization that works with all compatible lenses
  • Creative 'Art Filters' that provide professional-looking effects in-camera
  • Fast 5 fps continuous burst shooting speed
  • Comprehensive feature set including a built-in digital level and AF fine-tuning

What we don't like about Olympus E 30

  • Higher noise levels at high ISO settings compared to same-class competitors
  • Limited highlight headroom in RAW files, making it hard to recover blown highlights
  • Lacks video recording capabilities, which was common in newer rivals at the time
  • Smaller optical viewfinder than professional models like the Olympus E-3
  • Long, unstructured menu system that can be difficult to navigate
  • Contrast-detect autofocus in Live View is relatively slow
  • Auto white balance can be unreliable under artificial lighting
  • No dedicated AF assist lamp (requires raising the flash)

Verdict

The Olympus E-30 is a 12.3-megapixel Four Thirds DSLR featuring the TruePic III+ image processor and in-body sensor-shift image stabilization. It offers a 2.7-inch articulating LCD screen, 5 fps continuous shooting, and an 11-point cross-type autofocus system. Drawbacks include noticeable noise at higher ISO settings and the absence of video recording capability.

Compare Olympus E 30 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Olympus E 30 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found