Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon EOS 60D Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£160Sensor size:APS-CWeight:755 gBattery life (CIPA):1100 shots

Canon EOS 60D Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.3

Overall score

Score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.3

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–²Better than 57% of cameras
5.3

Technical score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

5.6

Sensor & Image

25%

4.9

Photo Features

18%

4.6

Video & Audio

14%

6.0

Display & Design

8%

8.8

Battery & Power

7%

2.7

Connectivity & Storage

â–²Better than 60% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon EOS 60D

Technical score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

5.6

Sensor & Image

25%

4.9

Photo Features

18%

4.6

Video & Audio

14%

6.0

Display & Design

8%

8.8

Battery & Power

7%

2.7

Connectivity & Storage

5.3
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon EOS 60D has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.3

Overall score

40%

9.7

Price

6.6
Sensor size
APS-C
Sensor size
APS-C
This camera uses a sensor classified as APS-C; it is larger than the sensor in 57.4% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 25.7% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
18 MP
Main camera megapixels
18 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 18 MP, which is higher than that of 55.7% of cameras and equal to that of 1.8% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.31 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.31 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.31 µm, which are larger than those in 72.3% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.1% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Canon EF/EF-S
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
46 Mbps
Video bitrate
46 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 46 Mbps which is higher than that of 66.3% of cameras and equal to that of 1.1% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
dslr
Weight
755 g
Weight
755 g
This camera weighs 755 g which is heavier than 87.2% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.2% of cameras.
Width
144.5 mm
Width
144.5 mm
This camera has a width of 144.5 mm which is wider than 91.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Height
105.8 mm
Height
105.8 mm
This camera has a height of 105.8 mm which is taller than 90.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Thickness
78.6 mm
Thickness
78.6 mm
This camera has a thickness of 78.6 mm which is thicker than 76% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
1,100 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
1,100 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 1,100 shots, which is longer than that of 97% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,800 mAh
Battery capacity
1,800 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,800 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 78.6% of cameras and equal to those in 3.3% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon EOS 60D vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 770 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    1,100 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (1100 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    1,100 shots vs 330 shots
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Self-cleaning sensor unit.
  • 680 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,800 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1800 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,800 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    EOS Webcam Utility.
  • 0.97 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.31 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.31 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentaprism optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 0.17 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    0.95 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (1 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    0.95 x vs 0.78 x
  • 3 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    3
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (3 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    3 vs 0
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Self-cleaning sensor unit.
  • 0.97 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.31 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.31 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    18 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (18 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    18 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    EOS Webcam Utility.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 16 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    46 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (46 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    46 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 770 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    1,100 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (1100 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    1,100 shots vs 330 shots
  • 680 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,800 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1800 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,800 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0.5
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0.5 vs -4
  • 360 g heavier
    Weight
    755 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (755 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    755 g vs 395 g
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    single-shot AF only; button-press refocus only
  • 4 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    96 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (96 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    96 % vs 100 %
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 0.9 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    11.5 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (11.5 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    11.5 points vs 12.4 points
  • 93% less popular
    Canon EOS 60D is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 360 g heavier
    Weight
    755 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (755 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    755 g vs 395 g
  • 4 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    96 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (96 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    96 % vs 100 %
  • 31.9 mm taller body
    Height
    105.8 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (105.8 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    105.8 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 24.6 mm wider
    Width
    144.5 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (144.5 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    144.5 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 32.6 mm thicker
    Thickness
    78.6 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (78.6 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    78.6 mm vs 46 mm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 0.9 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    11.5 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (11.5 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    11.5 points vs 12.4 points
  • 0.8 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    22.2 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (22.2 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    22.2 points vs 23.0 points
  • 3 older
    Release date
    2010
    This camera is older than the average camera (2010 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    August 2010
    2,010 vs 2,013
  • 7 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    66 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (66 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    66 points vs 73 points
  • 12,500 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    12,800 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (12800 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    12,800 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0.5
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0.5 vs -4
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    single-shot AF only; button-press refocus only
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
10/11/2010
Summary of the review
I
imaging-resource.com
10/08/2010
Summary of the review
T
the-digital-picture.com
08/11/2010
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
13/01/2011
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
14/10/2010
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
17/09/2011
Summary of the review
R
reviewed.com
14/10/2010
Summary of the review
I
imaging-resource.com
10/08/2010
Summary of the review
R
rolandlim.wordpress.com
17/11/2010
Summary of the review
P
popphoto.com
13/01/2011
Summary of the review
P
photographybay.com
02/05/2011
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
23/10/2010
Summary of the review
N
nicolesy.com
23/09/2010
Summary of the review
I
impulsegamer.com
20/10/2010
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
01/03/2011
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
10/08/2011
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
23/12/2010
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
03/11/2010
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
01/11/2010
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
02/02/2014
Summary of the review
S
slashcam.de
06/12/2010
Summary of the review
C
computerwoche.de
19/10/2011
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
19/04/2011
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
15/11/2010
Summary of the review
C
cnetfrance.fr
04/02/2011
Summary of the review
L
lmscope.com
N/A
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
10/11/2010
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.fr
N/A
Summary of the review
R
radojuva.com
08 Noviembre 2011
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
07/02/2011
Summary of the review
S
saggiamente.com
11/02/2011
Summary of the review
D
dday.it
08/09/2010
Summary of the review
F
fotocamerapro.it
18/04/2014
Summary of the review
P
photofacts.nl
19/10/2010
Summary of the review
E
eoszine.nl
najaar 2010
Summary of the review
E
eoszine.nl
22/02/2012
Summary of the review
F
fotografie.nl
16/12/2010
Summary of the review
E
eoszine.nl
16/03/2011
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
17/09/2011
Summary of the review
D
digifotopro.nl
29/10/2011
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Canon EOS 60D

  • High image quality with an 18-megapixel sensor and great color rendition
  • Articulated swivel LCD screen, highly useful for video and creative angles
  • Excellent battery life, enduring long shooting sessions
  • Good ergonomics with a comfortable, deep hand grip
  • Robust video capabilities with manual controls and an external mic socket
  • Strong performance in low-light conditions with manageable noise at high ISO

What we don't like about Canon EOS 60D

  • Plastic (polycarbonate) body feels less professional than the magnesium alloy of predecessors
  • Lack of a dedicated AF joystick, which was replaced by a more finicky multi-control dial
  • Slow autofocus during Live View and video recording
  • Removal of high-end features found on the 50D, such as AF micro-adjustment
  • Outdated by modern standards, lacking 4K video and built-in Wi-Fi
  • Limited continuous shooting speed compared to more advanced models like the 7D

Verdict

The Canon EOS 60D is a mid-range DSLR featuring an 18-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor and the DIGIC 4 image processor, notable for introducing the first 3.0-inch 1,040k-dot Vari-angle Clear View LCD in the EOS line. It offers a 9-point all cross-type AF system, an ISO range of 100-6400 (expandable to 12,800), and 5.3 fps continuous shooting alongside 1080p Full HD video recording with manual exposure control. While praised for its ergonomic grip, top-plate LCD, and excellent battery life, it lacks a dedicated PC sync port, features only a single SD card slot, and lacks the weather-sealed magnesium alloy durability found in its predecessor.

Compare Canon EOS 60D with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon EOS 60D and other products in the Cameras category

No results found