Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon EOS 600D Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£620Sensor size:APS-CWeight:570 gBattery life (CIPA):440 shots

Canon EOS 600D Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.0

Overall score

Score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.8

Technical score

10%

7.1

User score

â–¼Worse than 57% of cameras
4.8

Technical score

Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

5.6

Sensor & Image

25%

3.7

Photo Features

18%

4.3

Video & Audio

14%

6.0

Display & Design

8%

6.1

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 59% of cameras
7.1

User score

User score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

5.7

Number of reviews

Based on 32 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 93% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon EOS 600D

Technical score
Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

5.6

Sensor & Image

25%

3.7

Photo Features

18%

4.3

Video & Audio

14%

6.0

Display & Design

8%

6.1

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

4.8
User score
User score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

5.7

Number of reviews

Based on 32 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.1
Popularity
Popularity
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon EOS 600D has a popularity score of 5.7, which is higher than 61.4% of cameras.
5.7
Value for money
Value for money
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.0

Overall score

40%

7.2

Price

5.7
Sensor size
APS-C
Sensor size
APS-C
This camera uses a sensor classified as APS-C; it is larger than the sensor in 57.4% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 25.7% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
18 MP
Main camera megapixels
18 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 18 MP, which is higher than that of 55.7% of cameras and equal to that of 1.8% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.31 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.31 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.31 µm, which are larger than those in 72.3% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.1% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Canon EF/EF-S
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
44 Mbps
Video bitrate
44 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 44 Mbps which is higher than that of 65.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.8% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
dslr
Weight
570 g
Weight
570 g
This camera weighs 570 g which is heavier than 71.3% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
133.1 mm
Width
133.1 mm
This camera has a width of 133.1 mm which is wider than 78.6% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Height
99.5 mm
Height
99.5 mm
This camera has a height of 99.5 mm which is taller than 82.6% of cameras.
Thickness
79.7 mm
Thickness
79.7 mm
This camera has a thickness of 79.7 mm which is thicker than 76.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
440 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
440 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 440 shots, which is longer than that of 73.9% of cameras and equal to that of 2.1% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,120 mAh
Battery capacity
1,120 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,120 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 48.9% of cameras and equal to those in 1.1% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon EOS 600D vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Self-cleaning sensor unit.
  • 0.97 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.31 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.31 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentamirror optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 110 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    440 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (440 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    440 shots vs 330 shots
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentamirror optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 0.07 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    0.85 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (0.9 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    0.85 x vs 0.78 x
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Self-cleaning sensor unit.
  • 0.97 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.31 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.31 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    18 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (18 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    18 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 14 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    44 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (44 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    44 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 110 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    440 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (440 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    440 shots vs 330 shots
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -0.5
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-0.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -0.5 vs -4
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 5 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    95 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (95 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    95 % vs 100 %
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    manual-trigger AF only
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 2 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.7 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.7 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3.7 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 175 g heavier
    Weight
    570 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (570 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    570 g vs 395 g
  • 11.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon EOS 600D
    the average camera
    Canon EOS 600D has a lower user score than the average camera (7.15 vs 8.000).
    7.15 vs 8
  • 9.1% worse value for money
    Canon EOS 600D has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.68 vs 6.2).
    5.68 vs 6.2
  • 2.14x more expensive
    Canon EOS 600D is more expensive than the average camera (£620 vs £290).
    £620 vs £290
  • 5 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    95 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (95 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    95 % vs 100 %
  • 175 g heavier
    Weight
    570 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (570 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    570 g vs 395 g
  • 25.6 mm taller body
    Height
    99.5 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (99.5 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    99.5 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 33.7 mm thicker
    Thickness
    79.7 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (79.7 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    79.7 mm vs 46 mm
  • 13.2 mm wider
    Width
    133.1 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (133.1 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    133.1 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 8 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    65 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (65 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    65 points vs 73 points
  • 0.9 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    11.5 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (11.5 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    11.5 points vs 12.4 points
  • 0.9 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    22.1 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (22.1 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    22.1 points vs 23.0 points
  • 2 older
    Release date
    2011
    This camera is older than the average camera (2011 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    March 2011
    2,011 vs 2,013
  • 12,500 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    12,800 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (12800 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    12,800 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 50 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    793 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (793 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    793 points vs 843 points
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -0.5
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-0.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -0.5 vs -4
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 2 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.7 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.7 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3.7 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    manual-trigger AF only
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
31/03/2011
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
14/04/2011
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.com
17/03/2011
Summary of the review
E
eoshd.com
12/04/2011
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
31/03/2011
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
02/04/2011
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
04/04/2011
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
26/05/2012
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
06/07/2012
Summary of the review
P
photoreview.com.au
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
22/03/2011
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
16/03/2011
Summary of the review
P
photographybay.com
09/06/2011
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
11/03/2011
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
01/04/2011
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
13/05/2011
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
01/04/2011
Summary of the review
Z
zielfoto.com
20/10/2023
Summary of the review
A
avguide.ch
11/05/2011
Summary of the review
S
speicherkarten.guru
10/06/2017
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
11/03/2011
Summary of the review
F
focus.de
03/08/2012
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
19/10/2011
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
24/05/2011
Summary of the review
S
studio-plus.fr
01/06/2011
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
01/04/2011
Summary of the review
A
aventurereflex.wordpress.com
24/05/2013
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
29/03/2011
Summary of the review
R
radojuva.com
01/12/2012
Summary of the review
R
radojuva.com
08/12/2012
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
13/05/2011
Summary of the review
S
saggiamente.com
16/09/2011
Summary of the review
F
fotocamerapro.it
08/03/2014
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
13/05/2011
Summary of the review
F
fotografiastore.it
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
29/05/2011
Summary of the review
E
eoszine.nl
01/03/2011
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
06/07/2012
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
19/04/2011
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 32 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon EOS 600D

  • Excellent overall image and color quality from the 18MP sensor
  • Articulated vari-angle 3-inch LCD screen is highly versatile for video and odd angles
  • Intuitive menu system and user-friendly controls, making it great for beginners
  • Includes an external microphone jack and manual audio controls for video recording
  • Built-in wireless flash transmitter to control off-camera Speedlite units
  • Lightweight and portable camera body with comfortable rubberised grips
  • Fast and reliable autofocus when shooting traditionally through the optical viewfinder

What we don't like about Canon EOS 600D

  • Painfully slow and frustrating autofocus performance when using Live View or video mode
  • Outdated technology lacks modern features like 4K video resolution and modern continuous tracking
  • Automatic white balance often produces overly orange or warm skin tones under artificial indoor lighting
  • Poor internal microphone quality that frequently picks up lens focusing noise
  • Prone to short battery life and occasional overheating shutdowns during prolonged video recording sessions
  • The 9-point autofocus system struggles to accurately track fast-moving subjects or perform in low-light environments
  • The LCD screen becomes highly reflective and difficult to read when used in bright, direct sunlight

Verdict

The Canon EOS 600D is an entry-level DSLR featuring an 18-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor and the DIGIC 4 image processor, capable of capturing high-resolution stills and Full HD 1080p video at up to 30fps. Key characteristics include a 3.0-inch vari-angle 1,040k-dot LCD screen for creative framing, a 9-point AF system, and an ISO range of 100–6400 (expandable to 12,800). Its main pros are the highly flexible articulating display, built-in wireless flash control, and a helpful on-screen Feature Guide for beginners. However, it suffers from slow contrast-detection autofocus in Live View and video modes, lacks a dedicated movie recording button, and does not feature a touchscreen or built-in Wi-Fi.

Compare Canon EOS 600D with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon EOS 600D and other products in the Cameras category

No results found