Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,670Sensor size:full frameWeight:890 gBattery life (CIPA):900 shots

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

7.5

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.4

Technical score

10%

8.6

User score

â–²Better than 88% of cameras
7.4

Technical score

Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

8.6

Sensor & Image

25%

5.7

Photo Features

18%

8.2

Video & Audio

14%

5.9

Display & Design

8%

8.9

Battery & Power

7%

7.2

Connectivity & Storage

â–²Better than 88% of cameras
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

Based on 218 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 83% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Technical score
Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

8.6

Sensor & Image

25%

5.7

Photo Features

18%

8.2

Video & Audio

14%

5.9

Display & Design

8%

8.9

Battery & Power

7%

7.2

Connectivity & Storage

7.4
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

Based on 218 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.6
Popularity
Popularity
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV has a popularity score of 7.5, which is higher than 71.6% of cameras.
7.5
Value for money
Value for money
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.5

Overall score

40%

1.7

Price

5.7
Sensor size
full frame
Sensor size
full frame
This camera uses a sensor classified as full frame; it is larger than the sensor in 83.7% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 14% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
30.4 MP
Main camera megapixels
30.4 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 30.4 MP, which is higher than that of 91.6% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
5.36 µm
Main camera pixel size
5.36 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 5.36 µm, which are larger than those in 86.9% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.1% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 32000 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 32,000
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 32,000, which is higher than that of 88.2% of cameras and equal to that of 1.8% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Canon EF
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
61
N. of focus points
61
This camera has 61 focus points, more than the number offered by 71.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 0.8% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
3,840 px
Max video resolution
3,840 px
This camera supports 3,840 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 76% of cameras and equal to that of 19.2% of cameras.
Video bitrate
500 Mbps
Video bitrate
500 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 500 Mbps which is higher than that of 94% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
HDMI
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
This camera supports 4:2:2 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 77.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.1% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264, Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
dslr
Weight
890 g
Weight
890 g
This camera weighs 890 g which is heavier than 92.5% of cameras.
Width
150.7 mm
Width
150.7 mm
This camera has a width of 150.7 mm which is wider than 95.6% of cameras.
Height
116.4 mm
Height
116.4 mm
This camera has a height of 116.4 mm which is taller than 94.7% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Thickness
75.9 mm
Thickness
75.9 mm
This camera has a thickness of 75.9 mm which is thicker than 70.2% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
900 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
900 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 900 shots, which is longer than that of 94% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,865 mAh
Battery capacity
1,865 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,865 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 85.3% of cameras and equal to those in 0.8% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) which is newer than that of 54.2% of cameras and equal to that of 35.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 25,600 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    32,000 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (32000 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    32,000 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 470 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    500 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (500 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    500 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    30.4 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (30.4 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    30.4 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 2.02 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    5.36 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (5.4 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    5.36 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 570 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    900 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (900 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    900 shots vs 330 shots
  • Dual card slots
    Dual card slots
    yes
    This camera offers dual card slots, the average camera does not. 13.3% of cameras offer them.
    1x CF, 1x SD
  • Includes headphone output
    Headphone output
    yes
    This camera includes a headphone output, the average camera does not.
    3.5 mm headphone jack
  • 7.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
    the average camera
    Canon EOS 5D Mark IV has a higher user score than the average camera (8.58 vs 8.000).
    8.58 vs 8
  • 0.2 in larger screen diagonal
    Screen size
    3.2 in
    This camera has a larger screen than the average camera (3.2 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    3.2 in vs 3 in
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 10 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    10
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (10 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    10 vs 0
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentaprism optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 25,600 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    32,000 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (32000 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    32,000 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    30.4 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (30.4 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    30.4 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 2.02 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    5.36 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (5.4 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    5.36 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 2,152 points higher DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    2,995 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sports score than the average camera (2995 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    2,995 points vs 843 points
  • 77,100 ISO higher extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    102,400 ISO
    This camera has a higher expanded ISO than the average camera (102400 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    102,400 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    full frame
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (full frame vs APS-C).
    full frame vs APS-C
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    EOS Integrated Cleaning System.
  • 18 points higher DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    91 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (91 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    91 points vs 73 points
  • 1.8 points higher DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    24.8 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (24.8 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    24.8 points vs 23.0 points
  • 1.2 points higher DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    13.6 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (13.6 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    13.6 points vs 12.4 points
  • 3 newer
    Release date
    2016
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2016 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    September 2016
    2,016 vs 2,013
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 38 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    61
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (61 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    61 vs 23
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • Has anti-flicker mode
    Anti-flicker mode
    yes
    This camera includes an anti-flicker mode, the average camera does not. 20% of cameras include it.
    100/120Hz support
  • 50,000 more shutter cycles
    Shutter durability rating
    150,000
    This camera has a higher shutter durability than the average camera (150,000 vs 100,000). The average camera is rated for 100,000 shutter cycles.
    150,000 vs 100,000
  • 1.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    7 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (7 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    7 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 470 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    500 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (500 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    500 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • Includes headphone output
    Headphone output
    yes
    This camera includes a headphone output, the average camera does not.
    3.5 mm headphone jack
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • Higher video resolution
    Max video resolution
    3,840 px
    This camera records higher-resolution video than the average camera (3840 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    3840 px vs 1920 px
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 120 fps high-speed video.
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • Phase-detect AF in video
    Phase-detection autofocus (video)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus in video, the average camera does not.
  • Clean HDMI output
    Clean HDMI output
    yes
    This camera offers clean HDMI output, the average camera does not.
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    EOS Webcam Utility.
  • Supports log profiles
    Log profile support
    yes
    This camera supports log profiles, the average camera does not.
    Canon Log via paid upgrade.
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
    Interval timer + time-lapse movie
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
    true 24.00p + 23.98p
  • 570 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    900 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (900 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    900 shots vs 330 shots
  • 745 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,865 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1865 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,865 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Dual card slots
    Dual card slots
    yes
    This camera offers dual card slots, the average camera does not. 13.3% of cameras offer them.
    1x CF, 1x SD
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Has GPS
    GPS
    yes
    This camera supports GPS, the average camera does not. 9.8% of cameras support GPS.
    built-in GPS
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 1
    This camera supports a newer USB version than the average camera (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average camera uses USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • More versatile card slots
    Memory card slot types
    CF + SD
    This camera uses more versatile card slots than the average camera (CF + SD vs SD). The average camera supports SD memory card slot types.
    CF + SD vs SD
  • Has NFC
    NFC
    yes
    This camera supports NFC, the average camera does not. 15% of cameras support NFC.
  • 495 g heavier
    Weight
    890 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (890 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    890 g vs 395 g
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 42.5 mm taller body
    Height
    116.4 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (116.4 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    116.4 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 30.8 mm wider
    Width
    150.7 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (150.7 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    150.7 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -3
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-3 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -4 EV in Live View.
    -3 vs -4
  • 5.76x more expensive
    Canon EOS 5D Mark IV is more expensive than the average camera (£1,670 vs £290).
    £1,670 vs £290
  • 0.07 x less viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    0.71 x
    This camera has a lower viewfinder magnification than the average camera (0.7 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    0.71 x vs 0.78 x
  • 5.76x more expensive
    Canon EOS 5D Mark IV is more expensive than the average camera (£1,670 vs £290).
    £1,670 vs £290
  • 8% worse value for money
    Canon EOS 5D Mark IV has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.74 vs 6.2).
    5.74 vs 6.2
  • 495 g heavier
    Weight
    890 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (890 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    890 g vs 395 g
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 42.5 mm taller body
    Height
    116.4 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (116.4 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    116.4 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 30.8 mm wider
    Width
    150.7 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (150.7 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    150.7 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 0.07 x less viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    0.71 x
    This camera has a lower viewfinder magnification than the average camera (0.7 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    0.71 x vs 0.78 x
  • 29.9 mm thicker
    Thickness
    75.9 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (75.9 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    75.9 mm vs 46 mm
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -3
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-3 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -4 EV in Live View.
    -3 vs -4
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
14/09/2016
Summary of the review
D
digitalcameraworld.com
08/07/2022
Summary of the review
S
space.com
19/10/2021
Summary of the review
P
photoreview.com.au
30/08/2016
Summary of the review
S
shanelongphotography.com
04/05/2020
Summary of the review
A
all-things-photography.com
14/12/2016
Summary of the review
T
the-digital-picture.com
06/10/2016
Summary of the review
D
dustinabbott.net
14/11/2016
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
06/10/2016
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
07/10/2016
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
07/11/2016
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
19/04/2018
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
19/09/2016
Summary of the review
F
fotomagazin.de
10/01/2017
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
18/10/2016
Summary of the review
F
fotowissen.eu
03/04/2026
Summary of the review
R
rosegoldandmarble.de
06/01/2018
Summary of the review
E
erkunde-die-welt.de
17/01/2019
Summary of the review
C
calumet.de
No Date
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
29/09/2016
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
A
apprendre-la-photo.fr
17/03/2024
Summary of the review
L
luzphotos.com
30/09/2016
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.fr
14/09/2016
Summary of the review
P
phototrend.fr
21/12/2018
Summary of the review
X
xatakafoto.com
04/10/2016
Summary of the review
K
kamandula.es
19/07/2018
Summary of the review
B
blankpaper.es
08/10/2020
Summary of the review
P
photo-review.com
19/05/2017
Summary of the review
C
canonistas.com
20/01/2017
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
20/09/2017
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
07 Marzo 2021 (aggiornato)
Summary of the review
F
fotocamerapro.it
11/11/2018
Summary of the review
R
reflex-mania.com
07/03/2021
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
20/09/2017
Summary of the review
O
osservatoriodigitale.it
25/08/2016
Summary of the review
N
natuurportret.nl
05/09/2016
Summary of the review
F
fotosloep.nl
12/07/2025
Summary of the review
J
johanvanderwielen.nl
11/10/2016
Summary of the review
N
nandoonline.com
25/08/2016
Summary of the review
E
eoszine.nl
21/09/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 218 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

  • High-resolution 30.4MP full-frame sensor providing excellent image detail
  • Fast and reliable Dual Pixel CMOS AF for smooth Live View and video focusing
  • Robust, weather-sealed build quality suitable for professional workhorse use
  • Exceptional high ISO performance with much-improved dynamic range over predecessors
  • Responsive 3.2-inch touchscreen for easy navigation and tap-to-focus
  • Built-in Wi-Fi, NFC, and GPS for easy file transfer and location tagging

What we don't like about Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

  • Severe 1.7x crop factor when recording in 4K video
  • Large and inefficient 4K file sizes due to the Motion JPEG codec
  • Fixed LCD screen that does not tilt or articulate
  • Bulky and heavy compared to modern mirrorless alternatives
  • No in-body image stabilization (IBIS)
  • HDMI output is limited to 1080p for external recording

Verdict

The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV is a professional-grade full-frame DSLR featuring a 30.4MP CMOS sensor paired with a DIGIC 6+ processor, a 61-point High-Density Reticular AF II system, and a 150,000-pixel RGB+IR metering sensor. Key characteristics include native ISO sensitivity up to 32,000 (expandable to 102,400), 7 fps continuous shooting, and DCI 4K video recording at up to 30p. Main pros include its exceptional Dual Pixel CMOS AF for smooth live-view and video tracking, a responsive 3.2-inch touchscreen interface, robust weather-sealed build quality, and built-in Wi-Fi, NFC, and GPS. However, notable cons include a significant 1.64x crop factor when recording 4K video, the use of the storage-intensive Motion JPEG codec for 4K files, and a lack of built-in Log picture profiles or 4K HDMI output.

Compare Canon EOS 5D Mark IV with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon EOS 5D Mark IV and other products in the Cameras category

No results found