Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,360Sensor size:full frameWeight:1530 gBattery life (CIPA):1210 shots

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

7.0

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.0

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▲Better than 86% of cameras
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

8.0

Sensor & Image

25%

5.9

Photo Features

18%

7.9

Video & Audio

14%

5.9

Display & Design

8%

8.9

Battery & Power

7%

4.9

Connectivity & Storage

▲Better than 87% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon EOS 1D X Mark II

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

8.0

Sensor & Image

25%

5.9

Photo Features

18%

7.9

Video & Audio

14%

5.9

Display & Design

8%

8.9

Battery & Power

7%

4.9

Connectivity & Storage

7.0
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon EOS 1D X Mark II has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.0

Overall score

40%

3.3

Price

5.9
Sensor size
full frame
Sensor size
full frame
This camera uses a sensor classified as full frame; it is larger than the sensor in 83.7% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 14% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
20.2 MP
Main camera megapixels
20.2 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 20.2 MP, which is higher than that of 66.2% of cameras and equal to that of 1.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
6.58 µm
Main camera pixel size
6.58 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 6.58 µm, which are larger than those in 97% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.1% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 51200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 51,200
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 51,200, which is higher than that of 92% of cameras and equal to that of 4.3% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Canon EF
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
61
N. of focus points
61
This camera has 61 focus points, more than the number offered by 71.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 0.8% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
3,840 px
Max video resolution
3,840 px
This camera supports 3,840 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 76% of cameras and equal to that of 19.2% of cameras.
Video bitrate
800 Mbps
Video bitrate
800 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 800 Mbps which is higher than that of 97.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
HDMI
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
This camera supports 4:2:2 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 77.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.1% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264, Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
dslr
Weight
1,530 g
Weight
1,530 g
This camera weighs 1,530 g which is heavier than 99.3% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.2% of cameras.
Width
158 mm
Width
158 mm
This camera has a width of 158 mm which is wider than 97.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Height
167.6 mm
Height
167.6 mm
This camera has a height of 167.6 mm which is taller than 99.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Thickness
82.6 mm
Thickness
82.6 mm
This camera has a thickness of 82.6 mm which is thicker than 81.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
1,210 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
1,210 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 1,210 shots, which is longer than that of 98.1% of cameras.
Battery capacity
2,700 mAh
Battery capacity
2,700 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 2,700 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 97.9% of cameras and equal to those in 0.2% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 44,800 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    51,200 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (51200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    51,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 770 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    800 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (800 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    800 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 3.24 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    6.58 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (6.6 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    6.58 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 8.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    14 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (14 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    14 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 880 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    1,210 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (1210 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    1,210 shots vs 330 shots
  • 384,300 ISO higher extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    409,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher expanded ISO than the average camera (409600 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    409,600 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • Dual card slots
    Dual card slots
    yes
    This camera offers dual card slots, the average camera does not. 13.3% of cameras offer them.
    1x CFast 2, 1x CF
  • 0.2 in larger screen diagonal
    Screen size
    3.2 in
    This camera has a larger screen than the average camera (3.2 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    3.2 in vs 3 in
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 10 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    10
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (10 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    10 vs 0
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentaprism optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 44,800 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    51,200 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (51200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    51,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 3.24 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    6.58 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (6.6 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    6.58 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 384,300 ISO higher extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    409,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher expanded ISO than the average camera (409600 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    409,600 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 2,364 points higher DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    3,207 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sports score than the average camera (3207 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    3,207 points vs 843 points
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    full frame
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (full frame vs APS-C).
    full frame vs APS-C
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Self-cleaning sensor unit.
  • 15 points higher DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    88 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (88 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    88 points vs 73 points
  • 1.1 points higher DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    13.5 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (13.5 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    13.5 points vs 12.4 points
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    20.2 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (20.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    20.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 1.1 points higher DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    24.1 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (24.1 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    24.1 points vs 23.0 points
  • 3 newer
    Release date
    2016
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2016 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    April 2016
    2,016 vs 2,013
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 8.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    14 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (14 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    14 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 38 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    61
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (61 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    61 vs 23
  • 300,000 more shutter cycles
    Shutter durability rating
    400,000
    This camera has a higher shutter durability than the average camera (400,000 vs 100,000). The average camera is rated for 100,000 shutter cycles.
    400,000 vs 100,000
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
    Touch AF works in live view / video use.
  • Has anti-flicker mode
    Anti-flicker mode
    yes
    This camera includes an anti-flicker mode, the average camera does not. 20% of cameras include it.
  • 770 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    800 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (800 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    800 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • Includes headphone output
    Headphone output
    yes
    This camera includes a headphone output, the average camera does not.
    3.5 mm headphone jack.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • Higher video resolution
    Max video resolution
    3,840 px
    This camera records higher-resolution video than the average camera (3840 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    3840 px vs 1920 px
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 120 fps high-speed video.
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • Phase-detect AF in video
    Phase-detection autofocus (video)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus in video, the average camera does not.
  • Clean HDMI output
    Clean HDMI output
    yes
    This camera offers clean HDMI output, the average camera does not.
    1080p max over HDMI.
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    EOS Webcam Utility.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 880 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    1,210 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (1210 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    1,210 shots vs 330 shots
  • 1,580 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,700 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (2700 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    2,700 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Dual card slots
    Dual card slots
    yes
    This camera offers dual card slots, the average camera does not. 13.3% of cameras offer them.
    1x CFast 2, 1x CF
  • Has GPS
    GPS
    yes
    This camera supports GPS, the average camera does not. 9.8% of cameras support GPS.
    built-in GPS
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 1
    This camera supports a newer USB version than the average camera (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average camera uses USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • More versatile card slots
    Memory card slot types
    CFast 2.0
    This camera uses more versatile card slots than the average camera (CFast 2 vs SD). The average camera supports SD memory card slot types.
    CFast 2.0 vs SD
  • 1,135 g heavier
    Weight
    1,530 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (1530 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    1,530 g vs 395 g
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 93.7 mm taller body
    Height
    167.6 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (167.6 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    167.6 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 38.1 mm wider
    Width
    158 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (158 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    158 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -3
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-3 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -3 vs -4
  • 4.69x more expensive
    Canon EOS 1D X Mark II is more expensive than the average camera (£1,360 vs £290).
    £1,360 vs £290
  • 93% less popular
    Canon EOS 1D X Mark II is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 5% worse value for money
    Canon EOS 1D X Mark II has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.91 vs 6.2).
    5.91 vs 6.2
  • 1,135 g heavier
    Weight
    1,530 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (1530 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    1,530 g vs 395 g
  • 93.7 mm taller body
    Height
    167.6 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (167.6 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    167.6 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 38.1 mm wider
    Width
    158 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (158 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    158 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 36.6 mm thicker
    Thickness
    82.6 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (82.6 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    82.6 mm vs 46 mm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -3
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-3 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -3 vs -4
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
27/07/2016
Summary of the review
I
imaging-resource.com
01/02/2016
Summary of the review
T
the-digital-picture.com
19/05/2016
Summary of the review
S
shutterbug.com
16/08/2016
Summary of the review
E
eoshd.com
16/11/2016
Summary of the review
V
videomaker.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
21/04/2016
Summary of the review
L
laszlopusztai.net
30/05/2016
Summary of the review
H
helenbartlett.co.uk
29/04/2016
Summary of the review
K
kenrockwell.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
M
michaeldanielho.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
19/07/2016
Summary of the review
P
photoreview.com.au
31/10/2016
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
13/06/2016
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
08/08/2016
Summary of the review
I
imaging-resource.com
22/06/2016
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
10/05/2016
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
10/05/2016
Summary of the review
S
slashcam.de
08/07/2016
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
01/07/2016
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
09/05/2016
Summary of the review
S
slashcam.de
03/05/2016
Summary of the review
D
digitalphoto.de
17/06/2016
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
23/05/2016
Summary of the review
P
photoetmac.com
02/03/2016
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
27/05/2016
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
Non daté
Summary of the review
A
apprendre-la-photo.fr
01/02/2020
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.fr
01/02/2016
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
24/05/2016
Summary of the review
X
xatakafoto.com
20/04/2016
Summary of the review
F
fotografonocturno.com
15/09/2016
Summary of the review
P
photo-review.com
12/09/2016
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
14/11/2016
Summary of the review
F
fotocamerapro.it
19/10/2016
Summary of the review
T
tuttodigitale.it
01/06/2016
Summary of the review
F
fotografiastore.it
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
J
jumper.it
24/04/2026
Summary of the review
E
eoszine.nl
29/06/2016
Summary of the review
N
natuurfotografie.nl
21/12/2016
Summary of the review
V
vivacamera.nl
28/01/2017
Summary of the review
P
photofacts.nl
05/02/2016
Summary of the review
S
shoot.be
02/02/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Canon EOS 1D X Mark II

  • Exceptional build quality with a robust, 'tank-like' design
  • Blazing fast burst shooting speeds up to 14 fps (16 fps in Live View)
  • Highly reliable Dual Pixel CMOS autofocus, even in low-light conditions
  • Professional-grade 4K video recording at 60 fps
  • Excellent high-ISO performance and dynamic range
  • Long-lasting battery life capable of over 3,000 shots

What we don't like about Canon EOS 1D X Mark II

  • Large and heavy physical footprint, making it bulky for travel
  • High initial retail price targeted primarily at professionals
  • Lacks built-in Wi-Fi and official Log profiles out-of-the-box
  • HDMI output is limited to 1080p, even when shooting 4K internally
  • No focus peaking available for manual focusing
  • 4K video recording features a 1.3x crop factor

Verdict

The Canon EOS 1D X Mark II is a professional-grade flagship DSLR built around a 20.2-megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor and dual DIGIC 6+ image processors, capable of rapid-fire bursts up to 14 fps with full AF/AE tracking or 16 fps in live view. It features an advanced 61-point High-Density Reticular AF II system with 41 cross-type points and is the first full-frame EOS to include Dual Pixel CMOS AF for smooth, fast focus during its DCI 4K video recording at up to 60p and Full HD at 120p. Main pros include its exceptional build quality, virtually unlimited RAW buffer when using a CFast 2.0 card, and class-leading low-light performance with an expanded ISO up to 409,600. However, notable cons include its significant weight (approx. 1530g), the expensive requirement for CFast 2.0 cards to unlock top performance, and limited touchscreen functionality restricted mainly to focus point selection.

Compare Canon EOS 1D X Mark II with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon EOS 1D X Mark II and other products in the Cameras category

No results found