Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Olympus E 5 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,500Sensor size:four thirdsWeight:892 gBattery life (CIPA):870 shots

Olympus E 5 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.7

Overall score

Score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.5

Technical score

10%

7.8

User score

▲Better than 66% of cameras
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.8

Sensor & Image

25%

6.3

Photo Features

18%

4.1

Video & Audio

14%

6.4

Display & Design

8%

8.4

Battery & Power

7%

4.2

Connectivity & Storage

▲Better than 64% of cameras
7.8

User score

User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

6.4

Number of reviews

Based on 104 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 83% of cameras
  • olympus-e-5
  • olympus-e-5
  • olympus-e-5
  • olympus-e-5
  • olympus-e-5
  • olympus-e-5
  • olympus-e-5
  • olympus-e-5
  • olympus-e-5
  • olympus-e-5
  • olympus-e-5
  • olympus-e-5
  • olympus-e-5
  • olympus-e-5
olympus-e-5
olympus-e-5
olympus-e-5
olympus-e-5
olympus-e-5
olympus-e-5
olympus-e-5
olympus-e-5
olympus-e-5
olympus-e-5
olympus-e-5
olympus-e-5
olympus-e-5
olympus-e-5

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Olympus E 5

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.8

Sensor & Image

25%

6.3

Photo Features

18%

4.1

Video & Audio

14%

6.4

Display & Design

8%

8.4

Battery & Power

7%

4.2

Connectivity & Storage

5.5
User score
User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

6.4

Number of reviews

Based on 104 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.8
Popularity
Popularity
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Olympus E 5 has a popularity score of 6.4, which is higher than 65% of cameras.
6.4
Value for money
Value for money
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.7

Overall score

40%

2.6

Price

4.8
Sensor size
four thirds
Sensor size
four thirds
This camera uses a sensor classified as four thirds; it is larger than the sensor in 49% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 8.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
12.3 MP
Main camera megapixels
12.3 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 12.3 MP, which is lower than that of 83.9% of cameras and equal to that of 1.7% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.29 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.29 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.29 µm, which are larger than those in 69.7% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.2% of cameras.
Base ISO
200
Base ISO
200
This camera has a base ISO of 200 which is higher than that of 84.7% of cameras and equal to that of 13.9% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Four Thirds
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
11
N. of focus points
11
This camera has 11 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 60.4% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 6.5% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1,280 px
Max video resolution
1,280 px
This camera supports 1,280 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 71.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.5% of cameras.
Video bitrate
38 Mbps
Video bitrate
38 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 38 Mbps which is higher than that of 60.3% of cameras and equal to that of 2.9% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
This camera supports 4:2:2 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 77.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.1% of cameras.
Video codecs
Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
dslr
Weight
892 g
Weight
892 g
This camera weighs 892 g which is heavier than 92.6% of cameras.
Width
142.5 mm
Width
142.5 mm
This camera has a width of 142.5 mm which is wider than 89.8% of cameras.
Height
116.5 mm
Height
116.5 mm
This camera has a height of 116.5 mm which is taller than 95.2% of cameras.
Thickness
75 mm
Thickness
75 mm
This camera has a thickness of 75 mm which is thicker than 69.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
870 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
870 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 870 shots, which is longer than that of 93.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,620 mAh
Battery capacity
1,620 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,620 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 75.2% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Olympus E 5 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Dual card slots
    Dual card slots
    yes
    This camera offers dual card slots, the average camera does not. 13.3% of cameras offer them.
    1x CF, 1x SD
  • 540 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    870 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (870 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    870 shots vs 330 shots
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    3.5 mm mic input
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentaprism optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 0.37 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    1.15 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (1.2 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    1.15 x vs 0.78 x
  • 3 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    3
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (3 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    3 vs 0
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • 0.95 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.29 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.29 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 100 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    200
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (200 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    200 vs 100
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 1,770 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1,800 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (1800 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1,800 s vs 30 s
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • 50,000 more shutter cycles
    Shutter durability rating
    150,000
    This camera has a higher shutter durability than the average camera (150,000 vs 100,000). The average camera is rated for 100,000 shutter cycles.
    150,000 vs 100,000
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    3.5 mm mic input
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • 540 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    870 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (870 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    870 shots vs 330 shots
  • 500 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,620 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1620 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,620 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Dual card slots
    Dual card slots
    yes
    This camera offers dual card slots, the average camera does not. 13.3% of cameras offer them.
    1x CF, 1x SD
  • More versatile card slots
    Memory card slot types
    CF + SD
    This camera uses more versatile card slots than the average camera (CF + SD vs SD). The average camera supports SD memory card slot types.
    CF + SD vs SD
  • 497 g heavier
    Weight
    892 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (892 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    892 g vs 395 g
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.3 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.3 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.3 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no native continuous video AF
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • 29.2% worse value for money
    Olympus E 5 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (4.8 vs 6.2).
    4.8 vs 6.2
  • 5.17x more expensive
    Olympus E 5 is more expensive than the average camera (£1,500 vs £290).
    £1,500 vs £290
  • 2.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Olympus E 5
    the average camera
    Olympus E 5 has a lower user score than the average camera (7.80 vs 8.000).
    7.8 vs 8
  • 497 g heavier
    Weight
    892 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (892 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    892 g vs 395 g
  • 42.6 mm taller body
    Height
    116.5 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (116.5 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    116.5 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 22.6 mm wider
    Width
    142.5 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (142.5 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    142.5 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 29 mm thicker
    Thickness
    75 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (75 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    75 mm vs 46 mm
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.3 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.3 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.3 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • 19 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    54 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (54 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    54 points vs 73 points
  • 1.9 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    10.5 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (10.5 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    10.5 points vs 12.4 points
  • 1.4 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    21.6 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (21.6 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    21.6 points vs 23.0 points
  • 18,900 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    6,400 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (6400 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    6,400 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 324 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    519 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (519 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    519 points vs 843 points
  • 3 older
    Release date
    2010
    This camera is older than the average camera (2010 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    September 2010
    2,010 vs 2,013
  • 12 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    11
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (11 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    11 vs 23
  • 0.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    5 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (5 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    5 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no native continuous video AF
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 23 min shorter recording time
    Max video recording time
    7 min
    This camera records continuously for less time than the average camera (7 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    7 min vs 30 min
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
04/02/2011
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
22/11/2010
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
22/12/2010
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
23/02/2011
Summary of the review
B
biofos.com
15/04/2011
Summary of the review
S
stevehuffphoto.com
01/10/2012
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
23/02/2011
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
24/11/2010
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
03/01/2011
Summary of the review
N
netzwelt.de
24/11/2010
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
17/11/2010
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
11/11/2010
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
16/01/2011
Summary of the review
C
connect-living.de
15/02/2012
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
14/04/2011
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
03/02/2011
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
03/02/2011
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
16/12/2010
Summary of the review
D
digitalefotografievakantie.nl
12/01/2011
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 104 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Olympus E 5

  • Tank-like, fully weather-sealed magnesium alloy construction
  • Excellent image sharpness and color quality with TruePic V+ engine
  • Bright optical viewfinder with 100% field of view
  • Highly effective in-body image stabilization
  • High-resolution 3-inch articulating dual-axis swivel LCD
  • Speedy autofocus and dual card slots (CF and SDXC)
  • Extensive creative Art Filters including 'Dramatic Tone'

What we don't like about Olympus E 5

  • Large and heavy body compared to modern mirrorless alternatives
  • Limited video capabilities (max 720p; no Full HD)
  • High ISO performance and dynamic range lag behind APS-C competitors
  • Slow autofocus during Live View mode
  • Relatively low burst rate of 5 frames per second
  • Outdated AVI Motion JPEG video format
  • High initial launch price compared to similar spec DSLRs

Verdict

The Olympus E-5 is a professional-grade flagship DSLR featuring a 12.3-megapixel High Speed Live MOS sensor and a TruePic V+ image processing engine capable of 720p HD video recording. Known for its 'tank-like' durability, it boasts a magnesium alloy body with extensive weather-sealing against dust and splashes, alongside a 3-inch dual-axis articulated 920,000-dot LCD and a large optical viewfinder with 100% coverage. Main pros include its exceptional build quality, built-in sensor-shift image stabilisation offering up to 5 stops of compensation, and high levels of customisation with 10 creative Art Filters. However, it suffers from uncompetitive high ISO performance above 1600 compared to its peers, a relatively slow 5 fps maximum continuous shooting rate, and sluggish contrast-detection autofocus when using Live View or video modes.

Compare Olympus E 5 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Olympus E 5 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found