Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Sony A900 DSLR Sony 28 75mm F2 8 SAM Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,310Sensor size:full frameWeight:895 gBattery life (CIPA):880 shots

Sony A900 DSLR Sony 28 75mm F2 8 SAM Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.1

Overall score

Score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.1

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 54% of cameras
5.1

Technical score

Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.4

Sensor & Image

25%

5.3

Photo Features

18%

2.3

Video & Audio

14%

4.9

Display & Design

8%

8.4

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

â–²Better than 53% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £1,310

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Sony A900 DSLR Sony 28 75mm F2 8 SAM

Technical score
Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.4

Sensor & Image

25%

5.3

Photo Features

18%

2.3

Video & Audio

14%

4.9

Display & Design

8%

8.4

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

5.1
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Sony A900 DSLR Sony 28 75mm F2 8 SAM has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.1

Overall score

40%

3.6

Price

4.6
Sensor size
full frame
Sensor size
full frame
This camera uses a sensor classified as full frame; it is larger than the sensor in 83.7% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 14% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
24.6 MP
Main camera megapixels
24.6 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 24.6 MP, which is higher than that of 88% of cameras and equal to that of 0.7% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
5.94 µm
Main camera pixel size
5.94 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 5.94 µm, which are larger than those in 89.3% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.8% of cameras.
Base ISO
200
Base ISO
200
This camera has a base ISO of 200 which is higher than that of 84.7% of cameras and equal to that of 13.9% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 3,200
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,200, which is lower than that of 62.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.7% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Sony A
Built-in focus motor
yes
Built-in focus motor
yes
This camera has a built-in focus motor. 10.9% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
N/A
Video bitrate
N/A
Video bit depth
N/A
Video chroma subsampling
N/A
Video codecs
N/A
Show more
Type
dslr
Weight
895 g
Weight
895 g
This camera weighs 895 g which is heavier than 92.7% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.4% of cameras.
Width
156.3 mm
Width
156.3 mm
This camera has a width of 156.3 mm which is wider than 97.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Height
117 mm
Height
117 mm
This camera has a height of 117 mm which is taller than 95.6% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Thickness
81.9 mm
Thickness
81.9 mm
This camera has a thickness of 81.9 mm which is thicker than 79.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
880 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
880 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 880 shots, which is longer than that of 93.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,650 mAh
Battery capacity
1,650 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,650 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 75.3% of cameras and equal to those in 2.2% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Sony A900 DSLR Sony 28 75mm F2 8 SAM vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 2.6 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    5.94 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (5.9 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    5.94 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 550 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    880 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (880 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    880 shots vs 330 shots
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    24.6 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (24.6 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    24.6 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Sensor-shift dust reduction.
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    full frame
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (full frame vs APS-C).
    full frame vs APS-C
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentaprism optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentaprism optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 2.6 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    5.94 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (5.9 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    5.94 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    24.6 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (24.6 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    24.6 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    full frame
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (full frame vs APS-C).
    full frame vs APS-C
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Sensor-shift dust reduction.
  • 588 points higher DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    1,431 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sports score than the average camera (1431 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    1,431 points vs 843 points
  • 0.7 points higher DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    23.7 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (23.7 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    23.7 points vs 23.0 points
  • 100 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    200
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (200 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    200 vs 100
  • 6 points higher DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    79 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (79 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    79 points vs 73 points
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Built-in AF motor
    Built-in focus motor
    yes
    This camera has a built-in focus motor, the average camera does not.
  • 550 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    880 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (880 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    880 shots vs 330 shots
  • 530 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,650 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1650 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,650 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • More versatile card slots
    Memory card slot types
    CF + Memory Stick Duo
    This camera uses more versatile card slots than the average camera (CF + Memory Stick Duo vs SD). The average camera supports SD memory card slot types.
    CF + Memory Stick Duo vs SD
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0 vs -4
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 500 g heavier
    Weight
    895 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (895 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    895 g vs 395 g
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 34% worse value for money
    Sony A900 DSLR Sony 28 75mm F2 8 SAM has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (4.63 vs 6.2).
    4.63 vs 6.2
  • 4.52x more expensive
    Sony A900 DSLR Sony 28 75mm F2 8 SAM is more expensive than the average camera (£1,310 vs £290).
    £1,310 vs £290
  • 93% less popular
    Sony A900 DSLR Sony 28 75mm F2 8 SAM is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 500 g heavier
    Weight
    895 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (895 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    895 g vs 395 g
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 43.1 mm taller body
    Height
    117 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (117 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    117 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 36.4 mm wider
    Width
    156.3 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (156.3 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    156.3 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 35.9 mm thicker
    Thickness
    81.9 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (81.9 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    81.9 mm vs 46 mm
  • 0.04 x less viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    0.74 x
    This camera has a lower viewfinder magnification than the average camera (0.7 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    0.74 x vs 0.78 x
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 18,900 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    6,400 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (6400 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    6,400 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 5 older
    Release date
    2008
    This camera is older than the average camera (2008 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    September 2008
    2,008 vs 2,013
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0 vs -4
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 0.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    5 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (5 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    5 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
22/10/2008
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
19/06/2009
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
10/11/2008
Summary of the review
L
luminous-landscape.com
13/01/2009
Summary of the review
P
photozone.de
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
C
cameracraft.online
15/04/2016
Summary of the review
A
abcdelafotografia.wordpress.com
18/07/2010
Summary of the review
E
edwardnoble.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
21/10/2008
Summary of the review
L
luminous-landscape.com
13/01/2009
Summary of the review
P
photozone.de
20/05/2011
Summary of the review
K
kenrockwell.com
20/02/2013
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
18/09/2008
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
25/11/2008
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
16/01/2009
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
21/11/2008
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.fr
23/01/2009
Summary of the review
L
lense.fr
31/10/2008
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
Date non spécifiée
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
16/01/2009
Summary of the review
A
alpha-numerique.fr
07/11/2010
Summary of the review
M
mpb.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Sony A900 DSLR Sony 28 75mm F2 8 SAM

  • Extraordinary 24.6MP resolution provides excellent detail even by modern standards
  • Built-in SteadyShot INSIDE provides image stabilization for any attached lens
  • Huge, bright 100% coverage pentaprism optical viewfinder
  • Rugged magnesium alloy body with a 'tank-like' build quality
  • Intuitive physical controls with many dedicated buttons and dials for professional use
  • Lens features a constant f/2.8 aperture for good low-light performance and shallow depth-of-field
  • Smooth Autofocus Motor (SAM) in the lens provides relatively quiet and responsive focusing

What we don't like about Sony A900 DSLR Sony 28 75mm F2 8 SAM

  • No Live View or movie recording capabilities
  • Poor high ISO performance with significant noise and 'mushy' details starting at ISO 1600
  • Loud and clunky mirror/shutter sound
  • Proprietary hot shoe design requires an adapter for standard accessories
  • Lens build includes more plastic components compared to high-end Zeiss alternatives
  • Rotating focus ring on the lens does not support full-time manual override and can be vulnerable during AF
  • Lens exhibits some 'onion-ring' bokeh and corner smearing at wide apertures

Verdict

The Sony A900 is a high-end, full-frame DSLR featuring a 24.6-megapixel Exmor CMOS sensor, dual BIONZ image processors, and the world's first sensor-shift image stabilization system (SteadyShot INSIDE) in a full-frame camera. Paired with the versatile Sony 28-75mm f/2.8 SAM lens—which features a bright, constant f/2.8 aperture, 7-blade circular aperture, and a built-in Smooth Autofocus Motor—this combination offers fantastic resolution, low-distortion, a magnificent 100% coverage optical viewfinder, and 5 frames per second continuous shooting. However, key disadvantages include relatively high chroma noise at sensitivities above ISO 400, lack of Live View or movie recording capabilities, the absence of weather sealing on the lens, and soft corner sharpness at maximum aperture.

Compare Sony A900 DSLR Sony 28 75mm F2 8 SAM with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sony A900 DSLR Sony 28 75mm F2 8 SAM and other products in the Cameras category

No results found