PICO 4 Ultra Review | 89 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price: ~£530
  • Weight: 580 g
  • Resolution: 2160x2160
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
  • Display type: LCD
  • Device type: standalone

PICO 4 Ultra review. Compare 89 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among VR headsets and if it is worth buying.

8.2

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the VR headset's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best VR headsets on the market.

Score components:

80.0%

8.0

Technical Score

20.0%

8.8

User score

Excellent
8.0

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the VR headset's technical performance, covering eight key areas: display quality, tracking, comfort, controllers, connectivity, audio, battery, and design.

When it matters: When you want to compare VR headsets based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

58.0%

7.3

Display & Optics

22.0%

9.1

Tracking & Sensors

10.0%

8.8

Controls & Audio

4.0%

9.1

Hardware

3.0%

9.0

Connectivity

3.0%

8.6

Design & Power

Excellent
8.8

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.

When it matters: When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.

Score components:

70.0%

9.2

User reviews

30.0%

7.8

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
4.6
(369)

(Reviews last updated: July 2026)

Excellent
  • 7.9
    Gaming

    Score components:

    40.0%

    5.5

    Refresh rate

    35.0%

    10

    Touch controllers

    25.0%

    8.9

    Resolution

  • 7.2
    Movies

    Score components:

    40.0%

    8.9

    Resolution

    35.0%

    5.2

    Display type

    25.0%

    7.1

    Visible FoV (horizontal)

  • pico-4-ultra
  • pico-4-ultra
  • pico-4-ultra
  • pico-4-ultra
  • pico-4-ultra
  • pico-4-ultra
  • pico-4-ultra
  • pico-4-ultra
pico-4-ultra
pico-4-ultra
pico-4-ultra
pico-4-ultra
pico-4-ultra
pico-4-ultra
pico-4-ultra
pico-4-ultra

Best prices in UK

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The Pico 4 Ultra is a high-performance standalone VR and mixed reality headset powered by the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 chipset and 12GB of LPDDR5 RAM. It features dual 2.56-inch LCD displays with a 2160 x 2160 per-eye resolution, a 90Hz refresh rate, and 105-degree field of view using pancake lenses. Key characteristics include dual 32MP color passthrough cameras for high-fidelity mixed reality, iToF depth sensing for environmental mapping, and Wi-Fi 7 support for low-latency streaming. Main pros are its balanced counterweighted design with the battery at the back, support for full-body motion trackers, and ringless controllers that improve handling. Major cons include a limited standalone app store compared to competitors, an uncomfortable face cushion for long sessions, and the lack of a 120Hz refresh rate mode found on some rival devices.

Technical Specifications of PICO 4 Ultra

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the VR headset's technical performance, covering eight key areas: display quality, tracking, comfort, controllers, connectivity, audio, battery, and design.

When it matters: When you want to compare VR headsets based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

58.0%

7.3

Display & Optics

22.0%

9.1

Tracking & Sensors

10.0%

8.8

Controls & Audio

4.0%

9.1

Hardware

3.0%

9.0

Connectivity

3.0%

8.6

Design & Power

8.0
PICO 4 Ultra has a technical score of 8.03 points, which is higher than 91.8% of VR headsets.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.

When it matters: When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.

Score components:

70.0%

9.2

User reviews

30.0%

7.8

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
4.6
(369)

(Reviews last updated: July 2026)

8.8
PICO 4 Ultra has a user score of 8.79 points, which is higher than 85.7% of VR headsets.
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters: When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
7.8
PICO 4 Ultra has a popularity of 7.8 points, which is higher than 63.3% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the VR headset's overall rating with its cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for a VR headset with a good balance between quality and price.

Score components:

60.0%

8.2

Overall score

40.0%

7.7

Price

8.0
PICO 4 Ultra has a quality-to-price ratio of 8 points, which is higher than 89.8% of products in this category.
Resolution
What it is: The total number of pixels displayed on the screen, expressed as width x height, determining sharpness.
When it matters: When you want crisp text and sharp details in photos and videos.

Importance: HIGH

2160x2160
PICO 4 Ultra has a screen resolution of 2160x2160 which is higher than that of 76.9% of VR headsets and equal to that of 10.3% of VR headsets.
Screen size
What it is: The physical diagonal measurement of the display area, usually expressed in inches.
When it matters: When you want a larger image area that can feel more immersive in games, movies, and VR apps.

Importance: LOW

2.56 inches
Refresh rate
What it is: The number of times per second the display updates the image, measured in Hertz (Hz); higher rates offer smoother motion.
When it matters: When you want scrolling to feel fluid and games to look smoother.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >100 Hz

90 Hz
PICO 4 Ultra supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is higher than in 20.5% of VR headsets and equal to that in 51.3% of VR headsets.
Visible FoV (horizontal)
What it is: Measures the visible horizontal field of view of the image, expressed in degrees.
When it matters: When you want a wider left-to-right view for racing, shooters, and room-scale immersion.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >105 °

105 °
PICO 4 Ultra offers a horizontal FoV of 105 ° which is wider than that of 63.9% of VR headsets and equal to that of 2.8% of VR headsets.
Visible FoV (vertical)
What it is: Measures the visible vertical field of view of the image, expressed in degrees.
When it matters: When a taller visible image helps scenes feel less cropped above and below your view.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >97 °

104 °
PICO 4 Ultra offers a vertical FoV of 104 ° which is wider than that of 80% of VR headsets and equal to that of 2.9% of VR headsets.
Show more
Tracking type
What it is: Specifies the tracking method used for positional detection, such as inside-out or outside-in.
When it matters: When you want to know whether tracking depends on onboard cameras or external hardware.

Importance: LOW

inside-out
360° head tracking
What it is: Shows whether the headset can track head movement across a full 360-degree space.
When it matters: When you turn around often in room-scale games and do not want tracking blind spots.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
PICO 4 Ultra supports full 360° head tracking. 2% of VR headsets support this tracking mode.
N. of tracking sensors
What it is: Counts the integrated sensors used for positional or motion tracking.
When it matters: When you compare how much built-in hardware the headset uses for motion tracking.

Importance: LOW

4
N. of cameras
What it is: Counts the built-in cameras used for tracking, passthrough, or environmental sensing.
When it matters: When passthrough quality, room mapping, and inside-out tracking matter to your setup.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >4

6
PICO 4 Ultra has 6 cameras which is more than in 83.3% of VR headsets and equal to that in 10.4% of VR headsets.
Tracking frequency
What it is: Indicates how often the tracking system updates position data, measured in hertz.
When it matters: When you want fast motion tracking to stay stable during quick head or hand movement.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >700 Hz

?
Show more
Operating system
What it is: The primary system software that manages the headset's hardware, apps, and core functions.
When it matters: When you have a preference for the user interface and app ecosystem.

Importance: LOW

Android
OpenXR support
What it is: Indicates whether the headset supports the OpenXR standard for compatible VR software.
When it matters: When you want broader compatibility with VR apps across different software platforms.

Importance: LOW

yes
PICO 4 Ultra supports OpenXR. 35.6% of VR headsets support this cross-platform VR standard.
Wireless PC streaming
What it is: Shows whether the headset can receive PC VR content over a wireless connection.
When it matters: When you want PC VR without a cable running from the headset to your computer.

Importance: LOW

yes
PICO 4 Ultra supports wireless PC streaming. 63.3% of VR headsets support cable-free PC VR streaming.
Wi-Fi connectivity
What it is: The ability of the headset to connect to a wireless network.
When it matters: When you want wireless downloads, streaming, updates, or online features without relying on a cable.

Importance: LOW

yes
PICO 4 Ultra has Wi-Fi. 63.3% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
Wi-Fi version
What it is: Version of Wi-Fi standard supported.
When it matters: When compatibility with your router and wireless setup affects download speeds, streaming quality, or latency.

Importance: LOW

Wi-Fi 7
PICO 4 Ultra supports Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 7, which is more advanced than 98% of VR headsets and equal to 2% of VR headsets.
Show more
Touch controllers
What it is: Shows whether dedicated motion controllers are included for hand-based input in VR.
When it matters: When your favorite games rely on precise hand input rather than hand tracking alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
PICO 4 Ultra includes touch controllers. 28.6% of VR headsets come with dedicated hand controllers.
Game controller included
What it is: Indicates whether game controllers are included in the standard package.
When it matters: When you want a complete VR package and do not want to buy controllers separately.

Importance: LOW

yes
PICO 4 Ultra includes a game controller. 36.7% of VR headsets ship with controllers in the box.
Spatial audio
What it is: Supports immersive spatial audio playback.
When it matters: When movies, games, and VR experiences feel better with more immersive positional sound.

Importance: LOW

yes
PICO 4 Ultra supports spatial audio. 10.6% of VR headsets support spatial audio.
N. of speakers
What it is: Counts the built-in speakers used for audio playback.
When it matters: When you plan to use the headset without separate headphones or external speakers.

Importance: LOW

2
PICO 4 Ultra has 2 speakers which is more than in 39.1% of VR headsets and equal to that in 60.9% of VR headsets.
N. of microphones
What it is: The number of microphones built into the headset or its integrated hardware.
When it matters: When voice chat, voice commands, or in-headset recording quality matter to your setup.

Importance: LOW

4
PICO 4 Ultra includes 4 microphones, which is more than 97.7% of VR headsets.
Show more
Device type
What it is: Describes the overall headset class, such as standalone, PC VR, or mixed reality.
When it matters: When you choose between a standalone headset, a PC VR model, or mixed-reality use.

Importance: LOW

standalone
Chipset
What it is: The central System-on-Chip (SoC) that houses the CPU, GPU, modem, and other core processing components.
When it matters: When you want to know which processor powers the headset’s performance and supported features.

Importance: LOW

Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2
PICO 4 Ultra uses the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 processor which is faster than processors in 77.8% of VR headsets and equal to processors in 11.1% of VR headsets.
CPU clock speed
What it is: Indicates the base operating frequency of the main processor, measured in gigahertz.
When it matters: When you compare standalone headset speed for games, menus, and mixed-reality apps.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >3 GHz

3.19 GHz
PICO 4 Ultra has a CPU clock speed of 3.19 GHz which is higher than that of 77.8% of VR headsets and equal to that of 11.1% of VR headsets.
GPU model
What it is: The official model name of the graphics processor used in the VR headset.
When it matters: When you compare graphics hardware for gaming, video editing, or benchmarks.

Importance: LOW

Adreno 740
PICO 4 Ultra uses the Adreno 740 GPU model, which is more advanced than that used in 77.8%.
RAM capacity
What it is: States the installed RAM capacity used for system operation and multitasking.
When it matters: When you want smoother multitasking and better headroom for demanding VR apps.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >8 GB

12 GB
PICO 4 Ultra has 12 GB of RAM, which is more than 72.2% of VR headsets and equal to 16.7% of VR headsets.
Show more
Battery capacity
What it is: The amount of electric charge the battery can store, usually measured in mAh.
When it matters: When you want longer untethered play time without recharging the headset too often.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >4900 mAh

5,700 mAh
PICO 4 Ultra has a battery capacity of 5700 mAh mAh which is higher than that of 82.4% of VR headsets.
Charging time
What it is: Time required for a full charge.
When it matters: When charging speed, charging method, or battery upkeep convenience matters to your routine.

Importance: LOW

Good value: <2.5 hours

?
Weight
What it is: The total weight of the headset, affecting how heavy it feels during use.
When it matters: When you want a headset that feels lighter and more comfortable during longer VR sessions.

Importance: LOW

Good value: <500 g

580 g
PICO 4 Ultra weighs 580 g which is lighter than 51.1% of VR headsets.
Headstrap type
What it is: Identifies the design of the headstrap used to secure the headset on the user's head.
When it matters: When comfort, balance, and pressure distribution matter during long VR sessions.

Importance: LOW

rigid halo
PICO 4 Ultra uses a rigid halo headstrap, which is more comfortable than the design on 44.9%.
Body material
What it is: The main material used for the headset body or housing.
When it matters: When you care about how sturdy, premium, or lightweight the headset feels over time.

Importance: LOW

plastic
Show more

PICO 4 Ultra vs the average VR headset

  • Higher screen resolution
    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher screen resolution than the average VR headset (2160x2160 vs 1440x1600). The average VR headset has a screen resolution of 1440x1600.
    What it is: The total number of pixels displayed on the screen, expressed as width x height, determining sharpness.
    When it matters: When you want crisp text and sharp details in photos and videos.

    Importance: HIGH

    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher screen resolution than the average VR headset (2160x2160 vs 1440x1600). The average VR headset has a screen resolution of 1440x1600.2160x2160 vs 1440x1600
  • 94.8% higher pixel density
    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher pixel density than the average VR headset (1200 ppi vs 616 ppi). The average VR headset has a pixel density of 616 ppi.
    What it is: The concentration of pixels on the display, measured in pixels per inch (PPI), affecting image clarity.
    When it matters: When you want the image to look perfectly smooth with no visible pixels.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >850 ppi

    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher pixel density than the average VR headset (1200 ppi vs 616 ppi). The average VR headset has a pixel density of 616 ppi.1200 ppi vs 616 ppi
  • Better lens type
    PICO 4 Ultra uses pancake lenses, while the average VR headset uses fresnel lenses.
    What it is: Identifies the optical lens design used by the headset, such as Fresnel or pancake.
    When it matters: When you compare edge clarity, glare behavior, and headset thickness across optical designs.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    PICO 4 Ultra uses pancake lenses, while the average VR headset uses fresnel lenses.pancake vs fresnel
  • See-through mode
    PICO 4 Ultra supports see-through mode, the average VR headset does not. 44.9% of VR headsets offer passthrough viewing.
    What it is: Shows whether the headset can display the outside world through passthrough cameras.
    When it matters: When you switch often between VR and seeing your room, keyboard, or nearby people.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    PICO 4 Ultra supports see-through mode, the average VR headset does not. 44.9% of VR headsets offer passthrough viewing.
  • 8.5 ° wider vertical FoV
    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher vertical visible FoV than the average VR headset (104 ° vs 95.5 °). The average VR headset offers a vertical visible FoV of 95.5 °.
    What it is: Measures the visible vertical field of view of the image, expressed in degrees.
    When it matters: When a taller visible image helps scenes feel less cropped above and below your view.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >97 °

    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher vertical visible FoV than the average VR headset (104 ° vs 95.5 °). The average VR headset offers a vertical visible FoV of 95.5 °.104 ° vs 95.5 °
  • Supports hand tracking
    PICO 4 Ultra supports hand tracking, the average VR headset does not. 24% of VR headsets support hand tracking.
    What it is: Shows whether the headset can track the user's hands without relying on controllers.
    When it matters: When you want controller-free interaction for menus, MR apps, or casual media use.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    PICO 4 Ultra supports hand tracking, the average VR headset does not. 24% of VR headsets support hand tracking.
  • Supports color passthrough
    PICO 4 Ultra supports color passthrough, the average VR headset does not.
    What it is: Indicates whether the passthrough view can display the surroundings in color rather than monochrome.
    When it matters: When mixed-reality apps feel more useful with a natural full-color view of the room.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    PICO 4 Ultra supports color passthrough, the average VR headset does not.
  • 4 more cameras
    PICO 4 Ultra has more cameras than the average VR headset (6 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.
    What it is: Counts the built-in cameras used for tracking, passthrough, or environmental sensing.
    When it matters: When passthrough quality, room mapping, and inside-out tracking matter to your setup.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: >4

    PICO 4 Ultra has more cameras than the average VR headset (6 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.6 vs 2
  • Higher screen resolution
    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher screen resolution than the average VR headset (2160x2160 vs 1440x1600). The average VR headset has a screen resolution of 1440x1600.
  • 94.8% higher pixel density
    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher pixel density than the average VR headset (1200 ppi vs 616 ppi). The average VR headset has a pixel density of 616 ppi.
  • Better lens type
    PICO 4 Ultra uses pancake lenses, while the average VR headset uses fresnel lenses.
  • 8.5 ° wider vertical FoV
    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher vertical visible FoV than the average VR headset (104 ° vs 95.5 °). The average VR headset offers a vertical visible FoV of 95.5 °.
  • Wider IPD adjustment range
    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher IPD adjustment range than the average VR headset (58–72 mm vs 60–70 mm). The average VR headset supports an IPD adjustment range of 60–70 mm.
  • 5 ° wider horizontal FoV
    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher horizontal visible FoV than the average VR headset (105 ° vs 100 °). The average VR headset offers a horizontal visible FoV of 100 °.
  • See-through mode
    PICO 4 Ultra supports see-through mode, the average VR headset does not. 44.9% of VR headsets offer passthrough viewing.
  • Supports color passthrough
    PICO 4 Ultra supports color passthrough, the average VR headset does not.
  • Supports hand tracking
    PICO 4 Ultra supports hand tracking, the average VR headset does not. 24% of VR headsets support hand tracking.
  • 4 more cameras
    PICO 4 Ultra has more cameras than the average VR headset (6 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.
  • Depth sensor included
    PICO 4 Ultra has a depth sensor, the average VR headset does not. 10% of VR headsets include dedicated depth-sensing hardware.
  • Supports body tracking
    PICO 4 Ultra supports body tracking, the average VR headset does not.
  • Wireless PC VR streaming
    PICO 4 Ultra supports wireless PC streaming, the average VR headset does not.
  • Supports SteamVR
    PICO 4 Ultra supports SteamVR, the average VR headset does not. 50% of VR headsets support this PC VR ecosystem.
  • Has Wi-Fi
    PICO 4 Ultra has Wi-Fi, the average VR headset does not. 38% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
  • Newer USB version
    PICO 4 Ultra supports a newer USB version than the average VR headset (USB 3.2 Gen 2 vs USB 3.2 Gen 1). The average VR headset uses USB version USB 3.2 Gen 1.
  • Compatible with Android
    PICO 4 Ultra is compatible with Android, the average VR headset is not. 50% of VR headsets support Android pairing or companion apps.
  • Compatible with iOS
    PICO 4 Ultra is compatible with iOS, the average VR headset is not. 34.7% of VR headsets support iPhone or iPad integration.
  • 68 h longer controller battery life
    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher controller battery life than the average VR headset (80 h vs 12 h). The average controller battery lasts 12 h.
  • More microphones
    PICO 4 Ultra includes more microphones than the average VR headset (4 vs 2). The average VR headset includes 2 microphones.
  • 2x more storage
    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher internal storage than the average VR headset (256 GB vs 128 GB). The average VR headset offers 128 GB of internal storage.
  • 4 GB more RAM
    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher RAM capacity than the average VR headset (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average VR headset has a RAM capacity of 8 GB.
  • 3 nm smaller process node
    PICO 4 Ultra has a lower process node than the average VR headset (4 nm vs 7 nm). The average VR headset uses a process node of 7 nm.
  • 0.35 GHz higher CPU clock speed
    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher CPU clock speed than the average VR headset (3.2 GHz vs 2.84 GHz). The average VR headset has a CPU clock speed of 2.84 GHz.
  • 287.5 higher single-core score
    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher Geekbench 5 single-core score than the average VR headset (1110 vs 822.5). The average VR headset has a Geekbench 5 single-core score of 822.5.
  • 6 newer release date
    PICO 4 Ultra is newer than the average VR headset (2024 vs 2018). The average VR headset was released in 2018.
  • 37% larger battery capacity
    PICO 4 Ultra has a higher battery capacity than the average VR headset (5700 mAh vs 4162 mAh). The average VR headset has a battery capacity of 4162 mAh.
  • 43 mm thinner
    PICO 4 Ultra is thinner than the average VR headset (62 mm vs 105 mm). The average VR headset has a thickness of 105 mm.
  • Battery level indicator
    PICO 4 Ultra has a battery level indicator, the average VR headset does not. 46% of VR headsets include a battery level indicator.
  • 24.5 mm lower height
    PICO 4 Ultra is shorter than the average VR headset (84 mm vs 108.5 mm). The average VR headset has a height of 108.5 mm.
  • 25 mm narrower
    PICO 4 Ultra is narrower than the average VR headset (165 mm vs 190 mm). The average VR headset has a width of 190 mm.
  • Basic display type
    PICO 4 Ultra uses LCD for display type, while the average VR headset uses Micro-OLED.
  • 1.8 mm smaller lens diameter
    PICO 4 Ultra has a lower lens diameter than the average VR headset (48.2 mm vs 50 mm). The average VR headset has a lens diameter of 50 mm.
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    PICO 4 Ultra does not include a 3.5 mm audio jack, the average VR headset does. 61.2% of VR headsets include wired audio output.
  • Basic display type
    PICO 4 Ultra uses LCD for display type, while the average VR headset uses Micro-OLED.
    What it is: The type of display panel used in the headset, such as LCD, OLED, or micro-OLED.
    When it matters: When you compare panel technologies that affect contrast, brightness, motion clarity, and black levels.

    Importance: HIGH

    PICO 4 Ultra uses LCD for display type, while the average VR headset uses Micro-OLED.LCD vs Micro-OLED
  • 1.8 mm smaller lens diameter
    PICO 4 Ultra has a lower lens diameter than the average VR headset (48.2 mm vs 50 mm). The average VR headset has a lens diameter of 50 mm.
    What it is: States the diameter of the optical lenses, usually measured in millimeters.
    When it matters: When lens size affects the optical design and how the headset feels close to your face.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: >44 mm

    PICO 4 Ultra has a lower lens diameter than the average VR headset (48.2 mm vs 50 mm). The average VR headset has a lens diameter of 50 mm.48.2 mm vs 50 mm
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    PICO 4 Ultra does not include a 3.5 mm audio jack, the average VR headset does. 61.2% of VR headsets include wired audio output.
    What it is: Indicates whether a 3.5 mm analog audio jack is available for wired headphones or headsets.
    When it matters: When you want to plug in wired headphones without using adapters or USB audio.

    Importance: LOW

    PICO 4 Ultra does not include a 3.5 mm audio jack, the average VR headset does. 61.2% of VR headsets include wired audio output.

Graphic comparison of PICO 4 Ultra and

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom

(Reviews last updated: July 2026)

What customers like about PICO 4 Ultra?

  • Superior comfort and weight distribution due to a rear-mounted battery design
  • Smooth performance and high-quality graphics powered by the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 chipset and 12GB of RAM
  • Impressive 32MP mixed reality passthrough with significantly reduced warping and distortion compared to previous models
  • Excellent PCVR streaming capabilities with ultra-low latency and Wi-Fi 7 support
  • Ergonomic, ringless controllers that are lightweight and offer improved haptic feedback
  • Innovative native support for first-party motion trackers for full-body tracking right out of the box
  • High-resolution 4K+ display providing great clarity and vivid colors

What customers dislike about PICO 4 Ultra?

  • Standalone game library is still limited compared to the Meta Quest ecosystem
  • Pancake lenses, while good, lack the edge-to-edge clarity found in the Meta Quest 3
  • Noticeable lens glare and internal reflections in high-contrast scenes
  • Limited global availability, making it difficult to purchase in regions like the US without importing
  • Productivity features like multi-window support and screen legibility for text are currently underwhelming
  • Missing minor accessories in the box, such as a nose pad for light leakage prevention, compared to the original Pico 4
  • Lower display refresh rate (90Hz) compared to some competitors offering 120Hz

Expert reviews

G
galaxus.at
20/09/2024
Summary of the review
G
gamesradar.com
28/10/2025
Summary of the review
H
helloexpress.net
08/11/2024
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
03/09/2024
Summary of the review
U
uploadvr.com
04/09/2024
Summary of the review
S
stuff.tv
12/10/2024
Summary of the review
N
nasilemaktech.com
07/10/2024
Summary of the review
M
mixed.de
07/09/2024
Summary of the review
G
gamestar.de
30/09/2024
Summary of the review
S
stadt-bremerhaven.de
19/01/2025
Summary of the review
D
de.ign.com
12/09/2024
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
06/09/2024
Summary of the review
G
gameswelt.de
09/09/2024
Summary of the review
N
nat-games.de
23/11/2024
Summary of the review
N
nerdsheaven.de
17/11/2025
Summary of the review
D
digitec.ch
20/09/2024
Summary of the review
G
game7days.de
22/11/2024
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.biz
23/09/2024
Summary of the review
G
galaxus.it
20/09/2024
Summary of the review

Video reviews

Compare PICO 4 Ultra with

VS
VS

Compare