Scored using VR headsets Methodology v1.0
VR headsets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo VR headsets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore VR headsets Methodology v1.0

PICO 4 Review | 89 Data compared

Avg. price:~£380Weight:586 gResolution:2160x2160Refresh rate:90 HzDisplay type:LCDDevice type:standalone

PICO 4 Review: Compare 89 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the VR headsets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.8

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the VR headset's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best VR headsets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.5

Technical Score

20%

8.9

User score

▲Better than 86% of vr-headsets
7.5

Technical Score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the VR headsets category across these key areas: Display & Optics, Tracking & Sensors, Connectivity, Controls & Audio, Hardware, Design & Power.
When it matters
When you want to compare VR headsets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

58%

7.0

Display & Optics

22%

8.5

Tracking & Sensors

10%

8.7

Controls & Audio

4%

6.6

Hardware

3%

8.6

Connectivity

3%

7.8

Design & Power

▲Better than 80% of vr-headsets
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

9.7

Number of reviews

Based on 2,438 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 92% of vr-headsets
  • pico-4
  • pico-4
  • pico-4
  • pico-4
  • pico-4
  • pico-4
  • pico-4
pico-4
pico-4
pico-4
pico-4
pico-4
pico-4
pico-4

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of VR headset PICO 4

Technical Score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the VR headsets category across these key areas: Display & Optics, Tracking & Sensors, Connectivity, Controls & Audio, Hardware, Design & Power.
When it matters
When you want to compare VR headsets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

58%

7.0

Display & Optics

22%

8.5

Tracking & Sensors

10%

8.7

Controls & Audio

4%

6.6

Hardware

3%

8.6

Connectivity

3%

7.8

Design & Power

7.5
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

9.7

Number of reviews

Based on 2,438 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.9
Popularity
Popularity
9.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
PICO 4 has a popularity score of 9.7 points, which is higher than 87.8% of VR headsets.
9.7
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the VR headset's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a VR headset with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.8

Overall score

40%

8.5

Price

8.0
Resolution
2160x2160
Resolution
2160x2160
This vr headset has a screen resolution of 2160x2160 which is higher than that of 76.9% of VR headsets and equal to that of 10.3% of VR headsets.
Screen size
2.56 inches
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Refresh rate
90 Hz
This vr headset supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is higher than in 18% of VR headsets and equal to that in 51.3% of VR headsets.
Visible FoV (horizontal)
105 °
Visible FoV (horizontal)
105 °
This vr headset offers a horizontal FoV of 105 ° which is wider than that of 63% of VR headsets and equal to that of 2.2% of VR headsets.
Visible FoV (vertical)
102 °
Visible FoV (vertical)
102 °
This vr headset offers a vertical FoV of 102 ° which is wider than that of 74.3% of VR headsets and equal to that of 2.9% of VR headsets.
Show more
Tracking type
inside-out
360° head tracking
yes
360° head tracking
yes
This vr headset supports full 360° head tracking. 2% of VR headsets support this tracking mode.
N. of tracking sensors
4
N. of cameras
5
N. of cameras
5
This vr headset has 5 cameras which is more than in 75% of VR headsets and equal to that in 6.3% of VR headsets.
Tracking frequency
?
Show more
Operating system
Android
OpenXR support
yes
OpenXR support
yes
This vr headset supports OpenXR. 38.8% of VR headsets support this cross-platform VR standard.
Standalone native; PCVR via SteamVR or VDXR.
Wireless PC streaming
yes
Wireless PC streaming
yes
This vr headset supports wireless PC streaming. 63.3% of VR headsets support cable-free PC VR streaming.
Via PICO Connect.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This vr headset has Wi-Fi. 63.3% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
Wi-Fi 6.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 6
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 6
This vr headset supports Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 6, which is more advanced than 77.6% of VR headsets and equal to 4.1% of VR headsets.
Show more
Touch controllers
yes
Touch controllers
yes
This vr headset includes touch controllers. 28.6% of VR headsets come with dedicated hand controllers.
Game controller included
yes
Game controller included
yes
This vr headset includes a game controller. 36.7% of VR headsets ship with controllers in the box.
Spatial audio
yes
Spatial audio
yes
This vr headset supports spatial audio. 10.6% of VR headsets support spatial audio.
3D spatial effects / positioning.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
This vr headset has 2 speakers which is more than in 39.1% of VR headsets and equal to that in 60.9% of VR headsets.
Integrated stereo speakers.
N. of microphones
2
N. of microphones
2
This vr headset includes 2 microphones, which is more than 46.7% of VR headsets and equal to 46.7% of VR headsets.
Show more
Device type
standalone
Chipset
Snapdragon XR2
Chipset
Snapdragon XR2
This vr headset uses the Snapdragon XR2 processor which is faster than processors in 38.9% of VR headsets and equal to processors in 27.8% of VR headsets.
CPU clock speed
2.84 GHz
CPU clock speed
2.84 GHz
This vr headset has a CPU clock speed of 2.84 GHz which is higher than that of 38.9% of VR headsets and equal to that of 33.3% of VR headsets.
Peak performance-core clock.
GPU model
Adreno 650
GPU model
Adreno 650
This vr headset uses the Adreno 650 GPU model, which is more advanced than that used in 38.9%.
RAM capacity
8 GB
RAM capacity
8 GB
This vr headset has 8 GB of RAM, which is more than 44.4% of VR headsets and equal to 22.2% of VR headsets.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,300 mAh
Battery capacity
5,300 mAh
This vr headset has a battery capacity of 5,300 mAh which is higher than that of 70.6% of VR headsets.
Charging time
2 h
Charging time
2 h
This vr headset recharges in 2 h, which is faster than 40% of VR headsets and equal to 40% of VR headsets.
Fast charging can be quicker; included-charger reports are longer.
Weight
586 g
Weight
586 g
This vr headset weighs 586 g which is heavier than 51.1% of VR headsets.
Headstrap type
rigid halo
Headstrap type
rigid halo
This vr headset uses a rigid halo headstrap, which is more comfortable than the design on 44.9%.
Body material
plastic
Show more

PICO 4 vs the average VR headset

246810TotalDisplay & OpticsTracking & SensorsConnectivityControls & AudioHardwareDesign & Power
  • 95% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    1,200 ppi
    This vr headset has a higher pixel density than the average VR headset (1200 ppi vs 615.5 ppi). The average VR headset has a pixel density of 615.5 ppi.
    1,200 ppi vs 615.5 ppi
  • Better lens type
    Lens type
    pancake
    This vr headset uses pancake lenses, while the average VR headset uses fresnel lenses.
    pancake vs fresnel
  • See-through mode
    See-through mode
    yes
    This vr headset supports see-through mode, the average VR headset does not. 44% of VR headsets offer passthrough viewing.
    Color passthrough.
  • Supports hand tracking
    Hand tracking
    yes
    This vr headset supports hand tracking, the average VR headset does not. 24% of VR headsets support hand tracking.
    Controller-free hand tracking.
  • Supports color passthrough
    Color passthrough
    yes
    This vr headset supports color passthrough, the average VR headset does not.
    Monoscopic color passthrough.
  • Higher screen resolution
    Resolution
    2160x2160
    This vr headset has a higher screen resolution than the average VR headset (2160x2160 vs 1830x1464). The average VR headset has a screen resolution of 1830x1464.
    2160x2160 vs 1830x1464
  • 6.5 ° wider vertical FoV
    Visible FoV (vertical)
    102 °
    This vr headset has a higher vertical visible FoV than the average VR headset (102 ° vs 95.5 °). The average VR headset offers a vertical visible FoV of 95.5 °.
    102 ° vs 95.5 °
  • 68 h longer controller battery life
    Controller battery life
    80 h
    This vr headset has a higher controller battery life than the average VR headset (80 h vs 12 h). The average controller battery lasts 12 h.
    80 h vs 12 h
  • 95% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    1,200 ppi
    This vr headset has a higher pixel density than the average VR headset (1200 ppi vs 615.5 ppi). The average VR headset has a pixel density of 615.5 ppi.
    1,200 ppi vs 615.5 ppi
  • Better lens type
    Lens type
    pancake
    This vr headset uses pancake lenses, while the average VR headset uses fresnel lenses.
    pancake vs fresnel
  • Higher screen resolution
    Resolution
    2160x2160
    This vr headset has a higher screen resolution than the average VR headset (2160x2160 vs 1830x1464). The average VR headset has a screen resolution of 1830x1464.
    2160x2160 vs 1830x1464
  • 6.5 ° wider vertical FoV
    Visible FoV (vertical)
    102 °
    This vr headset has a higher vertical visible FoV than the average VR headset (102 ° vs 95.5 °). The average VR headset offers a vertical visible FoV of 95.5 °.
    102 ° vs 95.5 °
  • 5 ° wider horizontal FoV
    Visible FoV (horizontal)
    105 °
    This vr headset has a higher horizontal visible FoV than the average VR headset (105 ° vs 100 °). The average VR headset offers a horizontal visible FoV of 100 °.
    105 ° vs 100 °
  • See-through mode
    See-through mode
    yes
    This vr headset supports see-through mode, the average VR headset does not. 44% of VR headsets offer passthrough viewing.
    Color passthrough.
  • Supports hand tracking
    Hand tracking
    yes
    This vr headset supports hand tracking, the average VR headset does not. 24% of VR headsets support hand tracking.
    Controller-free hand tracking.
  • Supports color passthrough
    Color passthrough
    yes
    This vr headset supports color passthrough, the average VR headset does not.
    Monoscopic color passthrough.
  • Supports body tracking
    Body tracking
    yes
    This vr headset supports body tracking, the average VR headset does not.
    Via PICO Motion Trackers.
  • 3 more cameras
    N. of cameras
    5
    This vr headset has more cameras than the average VR headset (5 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.
    5 vs 2
  • Wireless PC VR streaming
    Wireless PC streaming
    yes
    This vr headset supports wireless PC streaming, the average VR headset does not.
    Via PICO Connect.
  • Supports SteamVR
    SteamVR support
    yes
    This vr headset supports SteamVR, the average VR headset does not. 50% of VR headsets support this PC VR ecosystem.
  • Has Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This vr headset has Wi-Fi, the average VR headset does not. 38% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
    Wi-Fi 6.
  • Compatible with iOS
    iOS compatibility
    yes
    This vr headset is compatible with iOS, the average VR headset is not. 34.7% of VR headsets support iPhone or iPad integration.
    PICO app support on iOS.
  • 68 h longer controller battery life
    Controller battery life
    80 h
    This vr headset has a higher controller battery life than the average VR headset (80 h vs 12 h). The average controller battery lasts 12 h.
    80 h vs 12 h
  • 4 newer release date
    Release date
    2022
    This vr headset is newer than the average VR headset (2022 vs 2018). The average VR headset was released in 2018.
    October 2022
    2022 vs 2018
  • Battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    This vr headset has a battery level indicator, the average VR headset does not. 46% of VR headsets include a battery level indicator.
  • 27.3% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    5,300 mAh
    This vr headset has a higher battery capacity than the average VR headset (5300 mAh vs 4162 mAh). The average VR headset has a battery capacity of 4162 mAh.
    5,300 mAh vs 4,162 mAh
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    LCD
    This vr headset uses LCD for display type, while the average VR headset uses Micro-OLED.
    Fast-switch LCD.
    LCD vs Micro-OLED
  • 1.8 mm smaller lens diameter
    Lens diameter
    48.2 mm
    This vr headset has a lower lens diameter than the average VR headset (48.2 mm vs 50 mm). The average VR headset has a lens diameter of 50 mm.
    48.2 mm vs 50 mm
  • 40 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    60 nits
    This vr headset has a lower peak brightness than the average VR headset (60 nits vs 100 nits). The average VR headset has a peak brightness of 100 nits.
    Measured per eye at standard setting.
    60 nits vs 100 nits
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    3.5 mm audio jack
    no
    This vr headset does not include a 3.5 mm audio jack, the average VR headset does. 60% of VR headsets include wired audio output.
  • 19.4% heavier controllers
    Controller weight
    185 g
    This vr headset is heavier than the average VR headset (185 g vs 155 g). The average controller weighs 155 g.
    140 g without battery.
    185 g vs 155 g
  • 5.9% slower GPU clock
    GPU clock speed
    587 MHz
    This vr headset has a lower GPU clock speed than the average VR headset (587 MHz vs 624 MHz). The average VR headset has a GPU clock speed of 624 MHz.
    587 MHz vs 624 MHz
  • 5 mm wider
    Width
    195 mm
    This vr headset is wider than the average VR headset (195 mm vs 190 mm). The average VR headset has a width of 190 mm.
    195 mm vs 190 mm
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    LCD
    This vr headset uses LCD for display type, while the average VR headset uses Micro-OLED.
    Fast-switch LCD.
    LCD vs Micro-OLED
  • 1.8 mm smaller lens diameter
    Lens diameter
    48.2 mm
    This vr headset has a lower lens diameter than the average VR headset (48.2 mm vs 50 mm). The average VR headset has a lens diameter of 50 mm.
    48.2 mm vs 50 mm
  • 40 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    60 nits
    This vr headset has a lower peak brightness than the average VR headset (60 nits vs 100 nits). The average VR headset has a peak brightness of 100 nits.
    Measured per eye at standard setting.
    60 nits vs 100 nits
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    3.5 mm audio jack
    no
    This vr headset does not include a 3.5 mm audio jack, the average VR headset does. 60% of VR headsets include wired audio output.
  • 19.4% heavier controllers
    Controller weight
    185 g
    This vr headset is heavier than the average VR headset (185 g vs 155 g). The average controller weighs 155 g.
    140 g without battery.
    185 g vs 155 g
  • 5.9% slower GPU clock
    GPU clock speed
    587 MHz
    This vr headset has a lower GPU clock speed than the average VR headset (587 MHz vs 624 MHz). The average VR headset has a GPU clock speed of 624 MHz.
    587 MHz vs 624 MHz
  • 5 mm wider
    Width
    195 mm
    This vr headset is wider than the average VR headset (195 mm vs 190 mm). The average VR headset has a width of 190 mm.
    195 mm vs 190 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techradar.com
16/11/2022
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
18/10/2022
Summary of the review
N
nookgaming.com
07/07/2023
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
08/12/2022
Summary of the review
S
stuff.tv
18/10/2022
Summary of the review
M
moviesgamesandtech.com
16/11/2022
Summary of the review
M
mrtv.co
18/10/2022
Summary of the review
P
phonearena.com
22/04/2024
Summary of the review
M
medium.com
24/09/2025
Summary of the review
G
gamestar.de
03/02/2023
Summary of the review
M
mixed.de
23/10/2022
Summary of the review
T
techrush.de
22/12/2022
Summary of the review
G
game2gether.de
15/03/2024
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
25/11/2022
Summary of the review
G
galaxus.de
13/03/2023
Summary of the review
G
galaxus.at
13/03/2023
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
06/02/2023
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
08/03/2023
Summary of the review
G
galaxus.fr
13/03/2023
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
10/01/2023
Summary of the review
D
digitec.ch
13/03/2023
Summary of the review
V
vrx.vr-expert.com
23/09/2022
Summary of the review
G
gamergen.com
20/10/2022
Summary of the review
H
hobbyconsolas.com
22/10/2022
Summary of the review
A
as.com
31/10/2022
Summary of the review
E
es.gizmodo.com
14/12/2022
Summary of the review
V
vandal.elespanol.com
26/10/2022
Summary of the review
H
htnoticias.com
16/12/2022
Summary of the review
W
wired.it
11/12/2022
Summary of the review
M
multiplayer.it
23/11/2023
Summary of the review
T
techprincess.it
13/03/2023
Summary of the review
V
vr-italia.org
12/10/2022
Summary of the review
T
tg24.sky.it
15/12/2022
Summary of the review
T
tech.everyeye.it
06/04/2023
Summary of the review
B
backtovr.it
11/01/2023
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 2,438 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about PICO 4

  • Excellent weight distribution due to the rear-mounted battery
  • High visual clarity and large 'sweet spot' from pancake lenses
  • Lightweight and compact design compared to competitors
  • Competitive pricing for the hardware specifications
  • Clear, full-color passthrough for checking surroundings
  • Great performance for wireless PC VR streaming (especially with Virtual Desktop)

What we don't like about PICO 4

  • Smaller standalone game library compared to the Meta Quest store
  • Standard face cushion can feel stiff or uncomfortable for some users
  • Battery life is relatively short, typically lasting 2–3 hours
  • Noticeable light leakage around the nose for some facial shapes
  • Built-in speakers lack bass and overall audio depth
  • No native DisplayPort for uncompressed wired PC VR

Verdict

The Pico 4 is a standalone VR headset powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 chipset with 8GB of RAM and dual LCD screens providing a 4K+ resolution of 2160 x 2160 pixels per eye. It features compact pancake lenses that enable a thin, lightweight front profile, while its 5300mAh battery is positioned at the rear of the strap for a balanced, ergonomic fit during extended use. Key characteristics include a 105-degree field of view, a 90Hz refresh rate, 6DoF inside-out tracking with five cameras, and full-color passthrough for mixed reality awareness. Main pros include exceptional weight distribution, sharp visual clarity with motorized IPD adjustment (62-72mm), and a competitive price point compared to rivals. However, notable cons include a relatively limited native app library, the absence of a 3.5mm headphone jack, and some reports of light leakage through the standard facial interface.

Compare PICO 4 with other products in the VR headsets category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of PICO 4 and other products in the VR headsets category

No results found