Scored using VR headsets Methodology v3.0
VR headsets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum VR headsets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore VR headsets Methodology v3.0

DPVR E3S review: 90 specs compared

Avg. price:~£310Weight:394 gResolution:1832x1920Refresh rate:72 HzDisplay type:LCDDevice type:PC VR

DPVR E3S Review: Compare 90 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the VR headsets category and whether it is worth buying.

DPVR E3S
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

5.9

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.2, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

▼Worse than 55% of VR headsets
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the VR headset's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a VR headset with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

8.9

Price

▲Better than 55%
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

58%

6.6

Display

22%

4.3

Tracking

10%

5.6

Controls & Audio

4%

4.0

Hardware

3%

6.3

Connectivity

3%

8.1

Design & Power

▼Worse than 65%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.2.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • dpvr-e3s
  • dpvr-e3s
  • dpvr-e3s
  • dpvr-e3s
  • dpvr-e3s
  • dpvr-e3s
  • dpvr-e3s
  • dpvr-e3s
  • dpvr-e3s
dpvr-e3s
dpvr-e3s
dpvr-e3s
dpvr-e3s
dpvr-e3s
dpvr-e3s
dpvr-e3s
dpvr-e3s
dpvr-e3s
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

VR headsets model ranking

Ranked #30 of 63 models in VR headsets (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of VR headset DPVR E3S

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

58%

6.6

Display

22%

4.3

Tracking

10%

5.6

Controls & Audio

4%

4.0

Hardware

3%

6.3

Connectivity

3%

8.1

Design & Power

5.9
Reviews score
7.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the VR headset's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a VR headset with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

8.9

Price

7.4
Resolution
1832x1920
This VR headset has a screen resolution of 1832x1920 which is higher than that of 56.5% of VR headsets and equal to that of 8.7% of VR headsets.
Screen size
5.46 inches
Refresh rate
72 Hz
This VR headset supports a refresh rate of 72 Hz which is lower than in 91.1% of VR headsets and equal to that in 6.7% of VR headsets.
Visible FoV (horizontal)
110 °
This VR headset offers a horizontal FoV of 110 ° which is wider than that of 62.1% of VR headsets and equal to that of 22.4% of VR headsets.
Visible FoV (vertical)
?
Show more
Tracking type
?
360° head tracking
yes
This VR headset supports full 360° head tracking. 1.6% of VR headsets support this tracking mode.
N. of tracking sensors
?
N. of cameras
0
This VR headset has 0 cameras which is fewer than in 55.6% of VR headsets and equal to that in 44.4% of VR headsets.
Tracking frequency
?
Show more
Operating system
?
OpenXR support
yes
This VR headset supports OpenXR. 43.8% of VR headsets support this cross-platform VR standard.
Wireless PC streaming
no
This VR headset does not support wireless PC streaming. 31.3% of VR headsets support cable-free PC VR streaming.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This VR headset does not have Wi-Fi. 31.3% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Show more
Touch controllers
no
This VR headset does not include touch controllers. 71.4% of VR headsets come with dedicated hand controllers.
Game controller included
no
This VR headset does not include a game controller. 60.3% of VR headsets ship with controllers in the box.
Spatial audio
yes
This VR headset supports spatial audio. 16.7% of VR headsets support spatial audio.
N. of speakers
0
This VR headset has 0 speakers which is fewer than in 58.3% of VR headsets and equal to that in 41.7% of VR headsets.
N. of microphones
?
Show more
Device type
PC VR
Chipset
N/A
CPU clock speed
N/A
GPU model
N/A
RAM capacity
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery life
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Weight
394 g
This VR headset weighs 394 g which is lighter than 74.1% of VR headsets.
Headstrap type
?
Show more

DPVR E3S vs the average VR headset

246810TotalDisplayTrackingConnectivityControls & AudioHardwareDesign & Power
  • 9 ° wider horizontal FoV
    This VR headset has a higher horizontal visible FoV than the average VR headset (110 ° vs 101 °). The average VR headset offers a horizontal visible FoV of 101 °.
    110 ° vs 101 °
  • 29.6% lighter
    This VR headset is lighter than the average VR headset (394 g vs 560 g). The average VR headset weighs 560 g.
    394 g vs 560 g
  • 35 °C higher maximum operating temperature
    This VR headset has a higher maximum operating temperature than the average VR headset (70 °C vs 35 °C). The average VR headset reaches a maximum operating temperature of 35 °C.
    70 °C vs 35 °C
  • 9 ° wider horizontal FoV
    This VR headset has a higher horizontal visible FoV than the average VR headset (110 ° vs 101 °). The average VR headset offers a horizontal visible FoV of 101 °.
    110 ° vs 101 °
  • 29.6% lighter
    This VR headset is lighter than the average VR headset (394 g vs 560 g). The average VR headset weighs 560 g.
    394 g vs 560 g
  • 35 °C higher maximum operating temperature
    This VR headset has a higher maximum operating temperature than the average VR headset (70 °C vs 35 °C). The average VR headset reaches a maximum operating temperature of 35 °C.
    70 °C vs 35 °C
  • 20% lower refresh rate
    This VR headset has a lower refresh rate than the average VR headset (72 Hz vs 90 Hz). The average VR headset has a refresh rate of 90 Hz.
    72 Hz vs 90 Hz
  • No touch controllers
    This VR headset does not include touch controllers, the average VR headset does. 70.2% of VR headsets come with dedicated hand controllers.
  • No haptic feedback
    This VR headset does not support haptic feedback, the average VR headset does. 55.4% of VR headsets offer haptics in the headset or controllers.
  • 2 fewer cameras
    This VR headset has fewer cameras than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.
    0 vs 2
  • 2 fewer speakers
    This VR headset has fewer speakers than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 speakers.
    0 vs 2
  • Lower screen resolution
    This VR headset has a lower screen resolution than the average VR headset (1832x1920 vs 2000x2040). The average VR headset has a screen resolution of 2000x2040.
    1832x1920 vs 2000x2040
  • No game controller included
    This VR headset does not include a game controller, the average VR headset does. 59.4% of VR headsets ship with controllers in the box.
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    This VR headset does not include a 3.5 mm audio jack, the average VR headset does. 54.7% of VR headsets include wired audio output.
  • 20% lower refresh rate
    This VR headset has a lower refresh rate than the average VR headset (72 Hz vs 90 Hz). The average VR headset has a refresh rate of 90 Hz.
    72 Hz vs 90 Hz
  • Lower screen resolution
    This VR headset has a lower screen resolution than the average VR headset (1832x1920 vs 2000x2040). The average VR headset has a screen resolution of 2000x2040.
    1832x1920 vs 2000x2040
  • 2 fewer cameras
    This VR headset has fewer cameras than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.
    0 vs 2
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    This VR headset does not include a 3.5 mm audio jack, the average VR headset does. 54.7% of VR headsets include wired audio output.
  • Not compatible with Android
    This VR headset is not compatible with Android, the average VR headset is. 54% of VR headsets support Android pairing or companion apps.
  • Older USB version
    This VR headset supports an older USB version than the average VR headset (USB 2 vs USB 3.2 Gen 1). The average VR headset uses USB version USB 3.2 Gen 1.
    USB 2.0 vs USB 3.2 Gen 1
  • No touch controllers
    This VR headset does not include touch controllers, the average VR headset does. 70.2% of VR headsets come with dedicated hand controllers.
  • No haptic feedback
    This VR headset does not support haptic feedback, the average VR headset does. 55.4% of VR headsets offer haptics in the headset or controllers.
  • 2 fewer speakers
    This VR headset has fewer speakers than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 speakers.
    0 vs 2
  • No game controller included
    This VR headset does not include a game controller, the average VR headset does. 59.4% of VR headsets ship with controllers in the box.
  • 20 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    This VR headset has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average VR headset (-20 °C vs 0 °C). The average VR headset reaches a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -20 °C vs 0 °C

Third-party reviews

What customers like about DPVR E3S

  • A 110° field of view gives a wide view of the scene.
  • At 394 g it is light on the head.
  • It works from -20 °C to 70 °C, so cold and hot rooms are no problem.
  • Eye spacing adjusts to fit different faces.
  • OpenXR support lets it work with standard VR software.
  • USB-C connects it to the computer.

What customers don't like about DPVR E3S

  • The 72 Hz refresh rate can look less smooth in fast scenes.
  • There is no Wi-Fi, so a cable always runs to the computer.
  • There are no hand tracking or touch controllers, so your hands stay out of the game.
  • No game controller is included.
  • There are no speakers or 3.5 mm audio jack, so you need your own headphones.

Verdict

A 110° field of view is the main draw of the DPVR E3S, a wired headset with an LCD panel. At 394 g it sits lightly on the head, and soft foam keeps it comfortable through long sessions. The eye spacing can be adjusted to line up the picture for each face. It works from -20 °C to 70 °C, so a cold garage or a hot workshop is no problem. The trade-off is the 72 Hz refresh rate, which can look less smooth in fast scenes. It also has no wireless link and no hand or touch controllers, so it is harder to use as a game box. It suits a business that runs simulators, training sessions or a shared display, where a fixed setup with a cable is normal.

Compare DPVR E3S with other products in the VR headsets category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of DPVR E3S and other products in the VR headsets category

No results found