Scored using VR headsets Methodology v1.0
VR headsets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo VR headsets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore VR headsets Methodology v1.0

HP Reverb G2 Review | 89 Data compared

Avg. price:~£530Weight:550 gResolution:2160x2160Refresh rate:90 HzDisplay type:LCDDevice type:PC VR

HP Reverb G2 Review: Compare 89 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the VR headsets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.6

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the VR headset's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best VR headsets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.5

Technical Score

20%

7.3

User score

▼Worse than 51% of vr-headsets
6.5

Technical Score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the VR headsets category across these key areas: Display & Optics, Tracking & Sensors, Connectivity, Controls & Audio, Hardware, Design & Power.
When it matters
When you want to compare VR headsets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

58%

6.4

Display & Optics

22%

6.1

Tracking & Sensors

10%

8.6

Controls & Audio

4%

4.0

Hardware

3%

6.9

Connectivity

3%

6.8

Design & Power

▲Better than 51% of vr-headsets
7.3

User score

User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

Based on 230 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 84% of vr-headsets
  • hp-reverb-g2
hp-reverb-g2

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of VR headset HP Reverb G2

Technical Score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the VR headsets category across these key areas: Display & Optics, Tracking & Sensors, Connectivity, Controls & Audio, Hardware, Design & Power.
When it matters
When you want to compare VR headsets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

58%

6.4

Display & Optics

22%

6.1

Tracking & Sensors

10%

8.6

Controls & Audio

4%

4.0

Hardware

3%

6.9

Connectivity

3%

6.8

Design & Power

6.5
User score
User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

Based on 230 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.3
Popularity
Popularity
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
HP Reverb G2 has a popularity score of 7 points, which is higher than 57.1% of VR headsets.
7.0
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the VR headset's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a VR headset with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.6

Overall score

40%

7.7

Price

7.0
Resolution
2160x2160
Resolution
2160x2160
This vr headset has a screen resolution of 2160x2160 which is higher than that of 76.9% of VR headsets and equal to that of 10.3% of VR headsets.
Screen size
2.89 inches
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Refresh rate
90 Hz
This vr headset supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is higher than in 18% of VR headsets and equal to that in 51.3% of VR headsets.
Visible FoV (horizontal)
98 °
Visible FoV (horizontal)
98 °
This vr headset offers a horizontal FoV of 98 ° which is narrower than that of 58.7% of VR headsets and equal to that of 2.2% of VR headsets.
Depends on facial interface version.
Visible FoV (vertical)
90 °
Visible FoV (vertical)
90 °
This vr headset offers a vertical FoV of 90 ° which is narrower than that of 80% of VR headsets and equal to that of 8.6% of VR headsets.
Depends on facial interface version.
Show more
Tracking type
inside-out
360° head tracking
yes
360° head tracking
yes
This vr headset supports full 360° head tracking. 2% of VR headsets support this tracking mode.
N. of tracking sensors
4
N. of cameras
4
N. of cameras
4
This vr headset has 4 cameras which is more than in 60.4% of VR headsets and equal to that in 12.5% of VR headsets.
Tracking frequency
?
Show more
Operating system
Windows
OpenXR support
yes
OpenXR support
yes
This vr headset supports OpenXR. 38.8% of VR headsets support this cross-platform VR standard.
Via Windows Mixed Reality runtime.
Wireless PC streaming
no
Wireless PC streaming
no
This vr headset does not support wireless PC streaming. 38.8% of VR headsets support cable-free PC VR streaming.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This vr headset does not have Wi-Fi. 38.8% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Show more
Touch controllers
yes
Touch controllers
yes
This vr headset includes touch controllers. 28.6% of VR headsets come with dedicated hand controllers.
Game controller included
yes
Game controller included
yes
This vr headset includes a game controller. 36.7% of VR headsets ship with controllers in the box.
Spatial audio
yes
Spatial audio
yes
This vr headset supports spatial audio. 10.6% of VR headsets support spatial audio.
Valve-designed off-ear speakers.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
This vr headset has 2 speakers which is more than in 39.1% of VR headsets and equal to that in 60.9% of VR headsets.
Off-ear speakers.
N. of microphones
2
N. of microphones
2
This vr headset includes 2 microphones, which is more than 46.7% of VR headsets and equal to 46.7% of VR headsets.
Show more
Device type
PC VR
Chipset
N/A
CPU clock speed
N/A
GPU model
N/A
RAM capacity
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Weight
550 g
Weight
550 g
This vr headset weighs 550 g which is lighter than 57.8% of VR headsets.
Headstrap type
balanced strap
Headstrap type
balanced strap
This vr headset uses a balanced strap headstrap, which is less comfortable than the design on 57.1%.
Semi-rigid side supports with soft top strap.
Body material
plastic
Show more

HP Reverb G2 vs the average VR headset

246810TotalDisplay & OpticsTracking & SensorsConnectivityControls & AudioHardwareDesign & Power
  • 50 nits higher peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    150 nits
    This vr headset has a higher peak brightness than the average VR headset (150 nits vs 100 nits). The average VR headset has a peak brightness of 100 nits.
    150 nits vs 100 nits
  • Higher screen resolution
    Resolution
    2160x2160
    This vr headset has a higher screen resolution than the average VR headset (2160x2160 vs 1830x1464). The average VR headset has a screen resolution of 1830x1464.
    2160x2160 vs 1830x1464
  • Supports voice commands
    Voice commands
    yes
    This vr headset supports voice commands, the average VR headset does not. 43.8% of VR headsets include voice command functionality.
    Via Windows Mixed Reality/Cortana.
  • Includes compass
    Compass
    yes
    This vr headset features a compass, the average VR headset does not. 32.7% of VR headsets include a compass sensor.
  • Supports SteamVR
    SteamVR support
    yes
    This vr headset supports SteamVR, the average VR headset does not. 50% of VR headsets support this PC VR ecosystem.
  • 2 more cameras
    N. of cameras
    4
    This vr headset has more cameras than the average VR headset (4 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.
    4 vs 2
  • 106 mm narrower
    Width
    84 mm
    This vr headset is narrower than the average VR headset (84 mm vs 190 mm). The average VR headset has a width of 190 mm.
    84 mm vs 190 mm
  • 37.15 mm lower height
    Height
    75 mm
    This vr headset is shorter than the average VR headset (75 mm vs 112.15 mm). The average VR headset has a height of 112.15 mm.
    Without headstrap.
    75 mm vs 112.15 mm
  • 50 nits higher peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    150 nits
    This vr headset has a higher peak brightness than the average VR headset (150 nits vs 100 nits). The average VR headset has a peak brightness of 100 nits.
    150 nits vs 100 nits
  • Higher screen resolution
    Resolution
    2160x2160
    This vr headset has a higher screen resolution than the average VR headset (2160x2160 vs 1830x1464). The average VR headset has a screen resolution of 1830x1464.
    2160x2160 vs 1830x1464
  • Includes compass
    Compass
    yes
    This vr headset features a compass, the average VR headset does not. 32.7% of VR headsets include a compass sensor.
  • 2 more cameras
    N. of cameras
    4
    This vr headset has more cameras than the average VR headset (4 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports SteamVR
    SteamVR support
    yes
    This vr headset supports SteamVR, the average VR headset does not. 50% of VR headsets support this PC VR ecosystem.
  • Supports voice commands
    Voice commands
    yes
    This vr headset supports voice commands, the average VR headset does not. 43.8% of VR headsets include voice command functionality.
    Via Windows Mixed Reality/Cortana.
  • 3 h longer controller battery life
    Controller battery life
    15 h
    This vr headset has a higher controller battery life than the average VR headset (15 h vs 12 h). The average controller battery lasts 12 h.
    With recommended 1.5V batteries.
    15 h vs 12 h
  • 106 mm narrower
    Width
    84 mm
    This vr headset is narrower than the average VR headset (84 mm vs 190 mm). The average VR headset has a width of 190 mm.
    84 mm vs 190 mm
  • 37.15 mm lower height
    Height
    75 mm
    This vr headset is shorter than the average VR headset (75 mm vs 112.15 mm). The average VR headset has a height of 112.15 mm.
    Without headstrap.
    75 mm vs 112.15 mm
  • 5 °C higher maximum operating temperature
    Max operating temperature
    40 °C
    This vr headset has a higher maximum operating temperature than the average VR headset (40 °C vs 35 °C). The average VR headset reaches a maximum operating temperature of 35 °C.
    40 °C vs 35 °C
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    LCD
    This vr headset uses LCD for display type, while the average VR headset uses Micro-OLED.
    Full RGB stripe LCD.
    LCD vs Micro-OLED
  • 5.5 ° narrower vertical FoV
    Visible FoV (vertical)
    90 °
    This vr headset has a lower vertical visible FoV than the average VR headset (90 ° vs 95.5 °). The average VR headset offers a vertical visible FoV of 95.5 °.
    Depends on facial interface version.
    90 ° vs 95.5 °
  • 20% heavier controllers
    Controller weight
    186 g
    This vr headset is heavier than the average VR headset (186 g vs 155 g). The average controller weighs 155 g.
    167 g without battery.
    186 g vs 155 g
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    3.5 mm audio jack
    no
    This vr headset does not include a 3.5 mm audio jack, the average VR headset does. 60% of VR headsets include wired audio output.
  • Not compatible with Android
    Android compatibility
    no
    This vr headset is not compatible with Android, the average VR headset is. 51% of VR headsets support Android pairing or companion apps.
  • 2 ° narrower horizontal FoV
    Visible FoV (horizontal)
    98 °
    This vr headset has a lower horizontal visible FoV than the average VR headset (98 ° vs 100 °). The average VR headset offers a horizontal visible FoV of 100 °.
    Depends on facial interface version.
    98 ° vs 100 °
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    10 °C
    This vr headset has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average VR headset (10 °C vs 0 °C). The average VR headset reaches a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    10 °C vs 0 °C
  • Inferior headstrap type
    Headstrap type
    balanced strap
    This vr headset uses a balanced strap headstrap, while the average VR headset uses rigid halo.
    Semi-rigid side supports with soft top strap.
    balanced strap vs rigid halo
  • 9.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    HP Reverb G2
    the average VR headset
    HP Reverb G2 has a lower user score than the average VR headset (7.30 vs 8.000).
    7.3 vs 8
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    LCD
    This vr headset uses LCD for display type, while the average VR headset uses Micro-OLED.
    Full RGB stripe LCD.
    LCD vs Micro-OLED
  • 5.5 ° narrower vertical FoV
    Visible FoV (vertical)
    90 °
    This vr headset has a lower vertical visible FoV than the average VR headset (90 ° vs 95.5 °). The average VR headset offers a vertical visible FoV of 95.5 °.
    Depends on facial interface version.
    90 ° vs 95.5 °
  • 2 ° narrower horizontal FoV
    Visible FoV (horizontal)
    98 °
    This vr headset has a lower horizontal visible FoV than the average VR headset (98 ° vs 100 °). The average VR headset offers a horizontal visible FoV of 100 °.
    Depends on facial interface version.
    98 ° vs 100 °
  • Narrower IPD adjustment range
    IPD adjustment range
    60–68 mm
    This vr headset has a lower IPD adjustment range than the average VR headset (60–68 mm vs 60–70 mm). The average VR headset supports an IPD adjustment range of 60–70 mm.
    60–68 mm vs 60–70 mm
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    3.5 mm audio jack
    no
    This vr headset does not include a 3.5 mm audio jack, the average VR headset does. 60% of VR headsets include wired audio output.
  • Not compatible with Android
    Android compatibility
    no
    This vr headset is not compatible with Android, the average VR headset is. 51% of VR headsets support Android pairing or companion apps.
  • Old Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    This vr headset supports an older Bluetooth version than the average VR headset (5 vs 5.2). The average VR headset uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    For motion controllers.
    5.0 vs 5.2
  • 20% heavier controllers
    Controller weight
    186 g
    This vr headset is heavier than the average VR headset (186 g vs 155 g). The average controller weighs 155 g.
    167 g without battery.
    186 g vs 155 g
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    10 °C
    This vr headset has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average VR headset (10 °C vs 0 °C). The average VR headset reaches a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    10 °C vs 0 °C
  • Inferior headstrap type
    Headstrap type
    balanced strap
    This vr headset uses a balanced strap headstrap, while the average VR headset uses rigid halo.
    Semi-rigid side supports with soft top strap.
    balanced strap vs rigid halo

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

R
roadtovr.com
18/11/2020
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
18/11/2020
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
21/12/2020
Summary of the review
E
engadget.com
04/01/2021
Summary of the review
P
provideocoalition.com
02/02/2021
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
23/06/2021
Summary of the review
G
gamingnexus.com
29/12/2021
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
04/04/2022
Summary of the review
S
space.com
25/05/2022
Summary of the review
T
techgearlab.com
16/10/2023
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
18/03/2021
Summary of the review
W
windowscentral.com
18/11/2021
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
10/02/2022
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
04/04/2022
Summary of the review
U
uploadvr.com
16/11/2020
Summary of the review
I
ilikekillnerds.com
20/01/2021
Summary of the review
M
mixed.de
24/12/2020
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
30/03/2022
Summary of the review
V
voodoode-vr.com
17/11/2025
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
13/01/2021
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
13/09/2021
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
17/02/2021
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
17/02/2021
Summary of the review
C
clubic.com
07/04/2021
Summary of the review
3
3dvf.com
30/12/2020
Summary of the review
D
djustou.wordpress.com
12/02/2023
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
17/02/2021
Summary of the review
V
vrx.vr-expert.com
16/07/2020
Summary of the review
R
realovirtual.com
09/12/2020
Summary of the review
N
noticias3d.com
20/03/2023
Summary of the review
N
noticias3d.com
20/03/2023
Summary of the review
H
hobbyconsolas.com
06/08/2022
Summary of the review
V
vr-italia.org
03/01/2021
Summary of the review
D
dday.it
19/01/2021
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
28/05/2021
Summary of the review
B
backtovr.it
02/04/2021
Summary of the review
V
vr-italia.org
22/12/2020
Summary of the review
V
vr-italia.org
08/06/2022
Summary of the review
M
multiplayer.it
23/04/2026
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
12/01/2021
Summary of the review
B
bright.nl
19/01/2021
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
23/12/2020
Summary of the review
N
nwtv.nl
28/04/2021
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 230 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about HP Reverb G2

  • Exceptional visual clarity with 2160 x 2160 resolution per eye, nearly eliminating the screen door effect
  • High-quality integrated off-ear speakers developed in collaboration with Valve
  • Lightweight and ergonomic design often cited as one of the most comfortable VR headsets
  • Sharp text legibility making it suitable for productivity and flight simulators
  • Physical IPD (interpupillary distance) adjustment slider for better visual alignment
  • No external base stations required due to inside-out tracking

What we don't like about HP Reverb G2

  • Tracking volume is limited, with occasional 'dead zones' when hands are at the sides or above the head
  • Controllers feel bulky/plasticky and lack capacitive finger tracking found on competitors
  • Small visual 'sweet spot' results in blurriness toward the edges of the lenses
  • High PC hardware requirements to run the display at its native resolution
  • Windows Mixed Reality (WMR) software platform is considered less user-friendly and is being discontinued
  • Controller batteries (1.5V) drain quickly and standard 1.2V rechargeables may cause tracking issues

Verdict

The HP Reverb G2 is a high-resolution, PC-powered VR headset featuring dual 2.89-inch LCD panels that deliver a industry-leading 2160 x 2160 pixels per eye (4320 x 2160 combined) at a 90Hz refresh rate. Developed in collaboration with Valve and Microsoft, it utilizes Valve-designed Fresnel lenses for a 114-degree diagonal field of view and high-fidelity, off-ear spatial audio speakers identical to the Valve Index. Its main characteristics include an inside-out tracking system with four cameras, a lightweight 1.2 lb build, and a physical IPD slider adjustable from 60mm to 68mm. Key pros include exceptional visual clarity with minimal screen door effect, best-in-class integrated audio, and superior comfort for long sessions. However, its main cons include a relatively small lens 'sweet spot,' less reliable controller tracking compared to lighthouse-based systems, and its dependence on the Windows Mixed Reality platform, which is slated for discontinuation.

Compare HP Reverb G2 with other products in the VR headsets category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of HP Reverb G2 and other products in the VR headsets category

No results found