OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Philips 8000 Pet Series Cordless Vacuum Cleaner Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£310Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:80 minutesCapacity:0.6 LWeight:2.7 kg

Philips 8000 Pet Series Cordless Vacuum Cleaner Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

7.6

Overall score

Score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components

80%

7.6

Technical Score

20%

?

User score

▲Better than 80% of vacuum-cleaners
7.6

Technical Score

Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 81% of models
Score components

28%

6.5

Performance

22%

8.1

Battery

18%

8.0

Filtration

14%

8.2

Attachments

10%

7.5

Design

8%

8.5

Smart features

▲Better than 81% of vacuum-cleaners
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £310
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Philips 8000 Pet Series Cordless Vacuum Cleaner features a high-performance 25.2V Lithium-Ion battery, a 0.6-litre dust bucket capacity, and the advanced PowerCyclone 10 filtration technology paired with a PowerBlade digital motor producing an airflow up to 1100 L/min. Key advantages include a maximum runtime of 70 to 80 minutes in eco mode (28 minutes in turbo mode), a 360-degree suction nozzle with integrated LEDs to reveal hidden dust, and a specialized Mini Turbo Brush ideal for extracting embedded pet hair from furniture. However, notable drawbacks include a relatively high sound power level of 84 dB during operation and a lengthy charging time of 5 hours.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Philips 8000 Pet Series Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Technical Score
Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 81% of models
Score components:

28%

6.5

Performance

22%

8.1

Battery

18%

8.0

Filtration

14%

8.2

Attachments

10%

7.5

Design

8%

8.5

Smart features

7.6
Philips 8000 Pet Series Cordless Vacuum Cleaner has a technical score of 7.6 points, which is higher than 81% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Philips 8000 Pet Series Cordless Vacuum Cleaner has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
1.0
Philips 8000 Pet Series Cordless Vacuum Cleaner has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 72% of models
Score components:

60%

7.6

Overall score

40%

8.9

Price

8.0
Philips 8000 Pet Series Cordless Vacuum Cleaner has a value-for-money score of 8 points, which is higher than 72.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
?
Airflow
18 L/s
Airflow
18 L/s
▼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
This vacuum cleaner delivers 18 L/s airflow, which is lower than that of 85.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Motor type
brushless
Power consumption
120 W
Power consumption
120 W
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 120 W, which is lower than the power consumption of 93.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
yes
Cordless
yes
▲ Better than 51% of models
This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
80 minutes
Battery runtime
80 minutes
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
This vacuum cleaner offers a battery runtime of 80 minutes, which is longer than that of 91.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2% of vacuum cleaners.
Charging time
5 hours
Charging time
5 hours
▼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
This vacuum cleaner charges in 5 hours, which is slower than 73.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to 20.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery capacity
2,400 mAh
Battery capacity
2,400 mAh
▼ Worse than 53% of models
Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
This vacuum cleaner has a battery capacity of 2,400 mAh, which is smaller than that of 53.2% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery voltage
25.2 V
Battery voltage
25.2 V
▲ Better than 56% of models
Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
This vacuum cleaner uses a battery voltage of 25.2 V, which is higher than that of 56.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 23.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Filter class
epa 10
Filter class
epa 10
▲ Better than 62% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class epa 10, which is more advanced than the class used by 62.2% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 2.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.9%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.9%
▼ Worse than 68% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.9% minimum overall efficiency, which is lower than that of 68.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 10.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
▲ Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
0.6 L
Capacity
0.6 L
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 0.6 L, which is smaller than that of 71.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 6.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
▲ Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
classic
Roller type
none
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
yes
Mini motorized brush
yes
▲ Better than 73% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
yes
Suitable for pet owners
yes
▲ Better than 28% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
stick
Weight
2.7 kg
Weight
2.7 kg
▲ Better than 70% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 2.7 kg, which is lower than the weight of 70.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.4% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
yes
2-in-1 design
yes
▲ Better than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner offers a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
no
Adjustable tube height
no
▼ Worse than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
yes
Auto suction adjustment
yes
▲ Better than 80% of models
This vacuum cleaner supports automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
▼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
yes
LED display
yes
▲ Better than 74% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
yes
Nozzle light
yes
▲ Better than 57% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
yes
Mopping support
yes
★ Better than 96% of models
This vacuum cleaner supports mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Philips 8000 Pet Series Cordless Vacuum Cleaner vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • 30 minutes longer runtime
    Battery runtime
    80 minutes
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (80 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    80 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes mini motorized brush
    Mini motorized brush
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a mini motorized brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Automatic suction adjustment
    Auto suction adjustment
    yes
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    This vacuum cleaner supports automatic suction adjustment, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a removable battery, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 480 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    120 W
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (120 W vs 600 W).
    120 W vs 600 W
  • 16 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    28 minutes
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (28 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    28 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 480 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    120 W
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (120 W vs 600 W).
    120 W vs 600 W
  • 30 minutes longer runtime
    Battery runtime
    80 minutes
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (80 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    80 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a removable battery, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 16 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    28 minutes
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (28 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    28 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 3 V higher voltage
    Battery voltage
    25.2 V
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a higher battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (25.2 V vs 22.2 V).
    25.2 V vs 22.2 V
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    epa 10
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (epa 10 vs hepa).
    epa 10 vs hepa
  • Includes mini motorized brush
    Mini motorized brush
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a mini motorized brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes wall bracket
    Wall-mounted bracket
    yes
    ▲ Better than 64% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a wall-mounted bracket, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 25.4% lower weight
    Weight
    2.7 kg
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.7 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.7 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 45 mm shallower body
    Depth
    220 mm
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is less deep than the average vacuum cleaner (220 mm vs 265 mm).
    220 mm vs 265 mm
  • Automatic suction adjustment
    Auto suction adjustment
    yes
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    This vacuum cleaner supports automatic suction adjustment, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes LED display
    LED display
    yes
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes an LED display, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Supports mopping
    Mopping support
    yes
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    This vacuum cleaner supports mopping, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-84 dB
    ▼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-84 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-84 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    ▼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • 9.8 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    18 L/s
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (18 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    18 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • 0.4 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.6 L
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.6 L vs 1 L).
    0.6 L vs 1 L
  • 0.05 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.9 %
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99.9 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.9 % vs 99.95 %
  • 100 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,400 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2400 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,400 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • 2.07x more expensive
    Cordless
    £310
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is more expensive than the average vacuum cleaner (£310 vs £150).
    £310 vs £150
  • 70 mm taller body
    Height
    1,170 mm
    ▼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is taller than the average vacuum cleaner (1170 mm vs 1100 mm).
    1,170 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • 2.07x more expensive
    Cordless
    £310
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is more expensive than the average vacuum cleaner (£310 vs £150).
    £310 vs £150
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-84 dB
    ▼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-84 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-84 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 9.8 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    18 L/s
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (18 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    18 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    ▼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • 100 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,400 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2400 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,400 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • 0.4 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.6 L
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.6 L vs 1 L).
    0.6 L vs 1 L
  • 0.05 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.9 %
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99.9 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.9 % vs 99.95 %
  • 70 mm taller body
    Height
    1,170 mm
    ▼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is taller than the average vacuum cleaner (1170 mm vs 1100 mm).
    1,170 mm vs 1,100 mm

Graphic comparison of Philips 8000 Pet Series Cordless Vacuum Cleaner and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Philips 8000 Pet Series Cordless Vacuum Cleaner?

  • Excellent suction power across both hard floors and carpets
  • Bright integrated LED headlights effectively reveal hidden pet hair and fine dust
  • Impressive battery life, especially the long-lasting Turbo mode performance
  • Highly versatile with useful accessories, including a specialized mini turbo brush for pet hair
  • Convenient 2-in-1 design that easily converts into a portable handheld unit
  • Clear digital smart display that tracks real-time battery usage and filter maintenance status

What customers dislike about Philips 8000 Pet Series Cordless Vacuum Cleaner?

  • Noticeably heavy and can cause hand fatigue during extended cleaning sessions
  • High premium price point compared to other cordless models on the market
  • The bulkier top-mounted dust bin design makes it difficult to navigate under very low furniture
  • Long hair and pet fur can wrap tightly around the brush roller pins and become difficult to clear
  • The main floorhead occasionally judders or resists smooth movement when pulled backward
  • Water tank and dust bin require frequent emptying and refilling during deep cleans

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

N
nerdsheaven.de
14/11/2025
Summary of the review
Philips Cordless Vacuum Cleaner 8000 Aqua - NerdsHeaven
(Translated)Show original
E
etm-testmagazin.de
24/11/2023
Summary of the review
ETM TEST MAGAZINE
(Translated)Show original
H
homeandsmart.de
05/07/2024
Summary of the review
Philips 8000 Series Aqua Plus Review: Modern and Powerful
(Translated)Show original
A
altroconsumo.it
11/10/2026
Summary of the review
PHILIPS XC8055/01 8000 Series Aqua Plus Cordless Vacuum Cleaner
(Translated)Show original
A
altroconsumo.it
11/10/2026
Summary of the review
PHILIPS XC8057/01 8000 Series Aqua Plus Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner
(Translated)Show original
I
id.nl
15/07/2024
Summary of the review
Philips Aqua Plus 8000 Review – A Dyson on a budget
(Translated)Show original
R
review.nl
19/11/2023
Summary of the review
Philips 8000 Series Aqua Plus Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner XC8057/01 Review
(Translated)Show original
I
id.nl
15/04/2024
Summary of the review
Consumers test Philips 8000 Series cordless stick vacuum Aqua Plus (XC8055/01): Versatile and effective
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
19/08/2024
Summary of the review
Philips 8000 Series Aqua Plus XC8055/01 - Consumentenbond Review
(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Philips 8000 Pet Series Cordless Vacuum Cleaner with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)