OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

TCL NXTPAPER 11 4G (6GB + 128GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£170RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:10.95 inchesChipset:Mediatek MT8183 Helio P60T

TCL NXTPAPER 11 4G (6GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications, 15 expert and video reviews and 3 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.3/10

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 62% of models
Score components

35%

6.7

Technical score

30%

8.1

List score

25%

6.7

Reviews score

10%

8.3

Sentiment score

▲Better than 62% of tablets
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

▲Better than 80%
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 62% of models
Score components

22%

5.7

Performance

20%

6.3

Display

16%

7.7

Camera

14%

5.7

Battery

12%

7.3

Connectivity

8%

8.9

Software

5%

6.9

Design

3%

6.9

Audio

▲Better than 62%
6.7

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 60% of models

6.7

Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.3

Average grade

20%

8.1

Popularity

Grades by review (15)
9 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 60%
8.1

List score

List score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (3)
List score: in 3 of 139 lists (2%)
★Better than 95%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £170
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the TCL NXTPAPER 11 4G (6GB + 128GB)

Based on 9 · 6

Reviewers like the long battery life, solid design and comfortable matte screen, but agree performance is noticeably sluggish.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the TCL NXTPAPER 11 4G (6GB + 128GB)

Based on 42 owners sharing their experience in online comments

60%positive9%mixed31%negative

Owners love the comfortable matte screen for reading, though sluggish performance and slow charging are recurring frustrations.

What owners dislike

  • Slow performance and limited processing power7
  • Owners say the panel resolution is lower than LTPS or AMOLED rivals, and display settings are limited: tiny icons, few themes, no font changes.4
  • In some countries the pen is not included and the official TCL stylus is hard to find, so owners use third-party styluses.4
  • After a few weeks, owners say eyes still tire because the screen emits blue light, unlike a true e-ink ebook.3
  • Charging is slow with the bundled charger and no fast-charging support. Owners say a 30W charger charges it much quicker.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet TCL NXTPAPER 11 4G (6GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 62% of models
Score components:

22%

5.7

Performance

20%

6.3

Display

16%

7.7

Camera

14%

5.7

Battery

12%

7.3

Connectivity

8%

8.9

Software

5%

6.9

Design

3%

6.9

Audio

6.7
Reviews score
6.7
List score
8.1
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components:

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

8.0
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 4 GB of RAM, which is more than 47.2% of tablets and equal to 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
12 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 12 nm process, which is smaller than 53.2% of tablets and equal to 13.9% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 128 GB of internal storage, which is more than 56.2% of tablets and equal to 20% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
317 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scores 317 points in single-core tests, which is lower than 84.1% of tablets and equal to 0.4% of tablets.
Chipset
Mediatek MT8183 Helio P60T
This tablet runs on Mediatek MT8183 Helio P60T, which is less advanced than 56.9% of tablets and equal to 0.4% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
2000×1200
This tablet has a 2000×1200 screen, which is sharper than 58.1% of tablets and equal to 8.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
213 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 213 ppi, which is lower than 56.1% of tablets and equal to 1.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 36.4% of tablets and equal to 31.9% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 69.6% of tablets and equal to 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0, which is wider than 57.4% of tablets and equal to 24.7% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
8,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 8,000 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 70.2% of tablets and equal to 4% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 18 W, which is faster than 48% of tablets and equal to 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
8.5 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8.5 hours, which is shorter than that of 70% of tablets and equal to that of 1.2% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 32.4% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet supports app tracking protection. 71.6% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
462 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 462 g, which is lighter than 61.6% of tablets and equal to 0.5% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 2, which is more than 55.1% of tablets and equal to 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.9% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

TCL NXTPAPER 11 4G (6GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 100 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (500 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    500 nits vs 400 nits
  • 3 MP higher front resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution front camera than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.6% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Mediatek MT8183 Helio P60T vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Mediatek MT8183 Helio P60T vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • 5.8% better value for money
    TCL NXTPAPER 11 4G (6GB + 128GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (7.99 vs 7.6).
    7.99 vs 7.55
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Mediatek MT8183 Helio P60T vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Mediatek MT8183 Helio P60T vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 4 years newer
    This tablet was released more recently than the average tablet (2023 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    May 2023
    2023 vs 2019
  • 23.1% faster GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU faster than the average tablet (800 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    800 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 14.3% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (12 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 100 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (500 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    500 nits vs 400 nits
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.6% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • 99 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (500 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    500 nits vs 401 nits
  • 0.85 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (11 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    10.95 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (2000×1200 vs 1920×1200).
    2,000×1,200 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 2x faster touch response
    This tablet samples touch faster than the average tablet (240 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    240 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 3 MP higher front resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution front camera than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • 21.2% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (8,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    8,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This tablet supports reverse wireless charging, while the average tablet does not. 4.1% of tablets support reverse wireless charging.
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, while the average tablet does not. 35.1% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports app tracking protection
    This tablet supports app tracking protection, while the average tablet does not. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports dynamic themes
    This tablet supports dynamic themes, while the average tablet does not. 29.5% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet supports extra dim mode, while the average tablet does not. 35.9% of tablets offer this.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 40.3% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 1.1 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    6.9 mm vs 8 mm
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.3% of tablets support LDAC.
  • 1.5 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    8.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • 56.5% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (317 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    317 points vs 729 points
  • No headphone jack
    This tablet does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack, while the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets offer this.
  • 35.3% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (1,224 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    1,224 points vs 1,891 points
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (PowerVR GE8320 vs Mali-G51).
    PowerVR GE8320 vs Mali-G51
  • 59 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (259 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    259 mm vs 200 mm
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 4.3% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models

    6.7

    Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.3

    Average grade

    20%

    8.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (15)
    9 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.7 vs 7.0
  • 4.3% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models

    6.7

    Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.3

    Average grade

    20%

    8.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (15)
    9 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.7 vs 7.0
  • 56.5% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (317 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    317 points vs 729 points
  • 35.3% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (1,224 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    1,224 points vs 1,891 points
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (PowerVR GE8320 vs Mali-G51).
    PowerVR GE8320 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 3.6% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (213 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    213 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (1000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 1.5 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    8.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • 59 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (259 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    259 mm vs 200 mm
  • No headphone jack
    This tablet does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack, while the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets offer this.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Shannon Morse
≈ estimated
19/02/2024
Hands-on review · unlock, battery, charging and camera tests
Verdict
TCL NXTPAPER 11 4G is a solid budget deal for readers and manga fans, though it is a basic Android tablet.
8.0
FishBee Productions
≈ estimated
13/11/2023
Hands-on review · battery, performance, speakers and camera
Verdict
TCL NXTPAPER 11 4G is good for some buyers wanting an e-reader tablet with extras, though performance and speakers are modest.
8.0
GregglesTV
≈ estimated
Hands-on review · gaming, video and multitasking tests
Verdict
TCL NXTPAPER 11 4G has a premium-feeling build and great value for media, but performance lags and gaming struggles.
7.0
Android Authority
≈ estimated
26/02/2023
First look · hands-on impressions and key features
Verdict
TCL NXTPAPER 11 4G is a decent budget tablet with a matte display, though its speakers and an older processor hold it back.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
08/03/2024
Benchmark test · Budget reading tablet
Verdict
The TCL NXTPAPER 11 is a comfortable reader with long battery life, but its sluggish processor and slow Wi-Fi make everyday use underwhelming.
6.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
07/08/2023
Review · Pen-friendly reading tablet
Verdict
The TCL NXTPAPER 11 is a niche winner for reading and handwriting, but it's only average as an everyday tablet.
6.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
16/08/2023
Review · Comics and e-reading
Verdict
The TCL NXTPAPER 11 is a strong e-reader for comics and full-colour books, but sluggish performance makes it hard to recommend for video.
6.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
30/08/2023
Hands-on review · Matte paper-like screen
Verdict
The TCL NXTPAPER 11 suits e-books and documents in good light, but slow performance and a cluttered interface hold it back.
6.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
16/10/2023
Hands-on test · Comic reading
Verdict
The TCL NXTPAPER 11 suits comic reading and handwritten notes with a long battery, but inaccurate colours and dim peak brightness hold it back.
6.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
08/03/2024
Lab test · Matte reading tablet
Verdict
The TCL NXTPAPER 11 has a glare-cutting matte screen and long battery, but slow performance, weak Wi-Fi and poor cameras make the Amazon Fire Max 11 the better buy.
7.8
gbatemp.net
✓ explicit
13/06/2023
Hands-on review · Productivity tablet
Verdict
The TCL NXTPAPER 11 is a budget-friendly productivity tablet with a sturdy build and anti-glare screen, though gaming is limited and the e-reader mode is missing.
7.0
journaldugeek.com
✓ explicit
02/11/2023
Hands-on test · Comic reading
Verdict
The TCL NXTPAPER 11 is an Android tablet with a matte screen that suits comics and reading in bright rooms, though its speakers and gaming are weak.
8.0
today.it
≈ estimated
22/11/2023
Review · Matte reading display
Verdict
The TCL NXTPAPER 11 is a good reading tablet with natural colours, but its older processor slows heavy apps and games.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about TCL NXTPAPER 11 4G (6GB + 128GB)

  • Unique matte 'Nxtpaper' display effectively reduces glare and eye strain
  • Paper-like screen texture provides a natural feel for writing and drawing
  • Excellent battery life (8000mAh) lasting through long reading or streaming sessions
  • Affordable price point compared to high-end tablets or color e-ink devices
  • Quad-speaker system delivers surprisingly loud and clear audio
  • Premium-feeling aluminum build quality despite the budget category
  • Multiple specialized reading modes (Grayscale/Ink, Color Paper) for comfort

What customers don't like about TCL NXTPAPER 11 4G (6GB + 128GB)

  • Sluggish performance with frequent stutters when multitasking or gaming
  • Matte coating can slightly mute colors and reduce sharpness in videos
  • Extremely slow charging speeds (taking up to 4 hours for a full charge)
  • Lack of biometric security (no fingerprint sensor; face unlock is unreliable)
  • Poor camera quality, particularly the front-facing selfie camera for video calls
  • Outdated Wi-Fi 5 and Bluetooth 5.0 connectivity standards
  • Limited official accessory availability (cases and stylus nibs are hard to find)

Verdict

The TCL NXTPAPER 11 4G is a specialized 11-inch tablet featuring a 2K (2000 x 1200) matte display with NXTPAPER 2.0 technology designed to reduce glare and blue light for an eye-friendly, paper-like reading experience. It is powered by a MediaTek Helio P60T octa-core processor paired with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage, expandable via microSD up to 1TB. Key advantages include its lightweight premium aluminum design, a high-capacity 8000mAh battery with reverse charging support, and a quad-speaker system that delivers loud, clear audio. However, the tablet is noted for its sluggish performance during multitasking and heavy gaming, slow 18W charging speeds, and a matte screen coating that can slightly mute color vibrancy and sharpness when watching high-definition videos.

Compare TCL NXTPAPER 11 4G (6GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of TCL NXTPAPER 11 4G (6GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found