Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 LTE (8GB + 256GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:12.3 inchesChipset:Intel Core i5-7300U

Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 LTE (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 LTE (8GB + 256GB)
7.2/10

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.0

Technical score

10%

8.4

User score

â–²Better than 71% of tablets
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

â–²Better than 80%
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

7.6

Performance

20%

6.6

Display

16%

7.4

Camera

14%

7.1

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

8.2

Software & Features

5%

5.4

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 70%
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

7.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 79%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 LTE (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

7.6

Performance

20%

6.6

Display

16%

7.4

Camera

14%

7.1

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

8.2

Software & Features

5%

5.4

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

7.0
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

7.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.4
Popularity
Popularity
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 LTE (8GB + 256GB) has a user popularity of 7.6 points, which is lower than 74.3% of Tablets.
7.6
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

7.9
RAM capacity
8 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 72.3% of tablets and equal to that of 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 45% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 76.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15.7% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,201 points
This tablet scored 1,201 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 68.1% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.3% of tablets.
Chipset
Intel Core i5-7300U
This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-7300U chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 75% of tablets and equal to those in 0.7% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2736×1824
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2736×1824 which is higher than that of 88.7% of tablets and equal to that of 0.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
267 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 267 ppi which is higher than that of 77.5% of tablets and equal to that of 1.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 4
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass 4 display glass which is stronger than that on 91.4% of tablets and equal to that on 2.4% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is wider than that of 30.2% of tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
5,940 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 5,940 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 58.2% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Charging speed
44 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 44 W which is faster than in 82.6% of tablets and equal to speeds in 1.2% of tablets.
Battery life
12.5 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 12.5 hours, which is longer than that of 75.4% of tablets and equal to that of 0.5% of tablets.
local video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
?
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
812 g
This tablet weighs 812 g which is heavier than 95.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
Number of microphones
2
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 LTE (8GB + 256GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses NVMe storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    NVMe vs eMMC
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-7300U chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i5-7300U vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 75% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2736×1824 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2736×1824 vs 1920×1200
  • 2.2 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12.3 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12.3 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 2.44x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (44 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    44 W vs 18 W
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4.7% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 LTE
    the average tablet
    Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 LTE (8GB + 256GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (8.37 vs 8.000).
    8.37 vs 8
  • 11.1% better value for money
    Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 LTE (8GB + 256GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (7.89 vs 7.1).
    7.89 vs 7.1
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses NVMe storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    NVMe vs eMMC
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-7300U chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i5-7300U vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 75% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 44 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (48 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    48 vs 4
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 64.7% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,201 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    1,201 points vs 729 points
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2736×1824 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2736×1824 vs 1920×1200
  • 2.2 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12.3 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12.3 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 21,000 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (21,000 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    21,000 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • 19.2% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (267 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    267 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • More durable display glass
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 4 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 4 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 27 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (427 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    427 nits vs 400 nits
  • 72 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (473 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    473 nits vs 401 nits
  • 46 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (267 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    267 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1300:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,300:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • 2.44x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (44 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    44 W vs 18 W
  • 2.5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    local video playback
    12.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Supports eSIM
    This tablet supports eSIM, the average tablet does not. 11.5% of tablets support eSIM.
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • 65.7% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (812 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    812 g vs 490 g
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 53.8% slower GPU clock
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (300 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    300 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • 9.7% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (5,940 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    5,940 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
    via Mini DisplayPort adapter
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4.1 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.1 vs 5.0
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • 65.7% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (812 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    812 g vs 490 g
  • 116.7 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (292 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    292 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 3 points lower iFixit repairability score
    This tablet has a lower repairability score than the average tablet (1 points vs 4 points). The average tablet repairability score is 4 points.
    1 points vs 4 points
  • 0.5 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.5 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    8.5 mm vs 8.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcmag.com
06/03/2018
Summary of the review
windowscentral.com
12/08/2020
Daily use review · LTE 2-in-1
Verdict
The Surface Pro LTE is a fast, quiet hybrid with excellent built-in mobile data, but its late arrival and last-generation processor hold it back.
irishlegal.com
07/08/2018
Hands-on review · Business hybrid
Verdict
The Surface Pro LTE is a slim hybrid that can replace both a laptop and an iPad, though its steep price suits business buyers best.
itpro.com
20/07/2022
Updated review · Windows 2-in-1
Verdict
The Surface Pro (2017) is a fast, slim 2-in-1 with a sharp screen, long battery life and one of the best keyboards, though it lacks USB-C.
theverge.com
06/03/2018
Hands-on test · Mobile Windows laptop
Verdict
The Surface Pro LTE is a capable 2-in-1 that gets online anywhere without Wi-Fi or a phone hotspot, but its processor is outdated.
cnet.com
05/03/2018
Hands-on test · LTE 2-in-1
Verdict
The Surface Pro LTE adds always-on mobile internet to a familiar, fanless 2-in-1, but it is pricey next to tethering from a phone.
C
chip.de
03/07/2017
Summary of the review
pcwelt.de
01/08/2017
Lab test · Kaby Lake tablet
Verdict
The Surface Pro (2017) is a sturdy, fast Windows tablet with a good battery, but the Core i7 model pays off mainly for photo and video editing.
chip.de
07/07/2017
Lab test · Powerful Windows tablet
Verdict
The Surface Pro (2017) is a powerful, long-lasting Windows tablet with a solid build, but its single USB port is a real limit.
C
computerbild.de
21/06/2021
Summary of the review
X
xatakawindows.com
01/11/2017
Summary of the review
P
profesionalreview.com
28/12/2017
Summary of the review
xataka.com
03/07/2017
Hands-on test · Windows convertible
Verdict
The Surface Pro (2017) is a silent, fast Windows 2-in-1 with handy face login, but it lacks USB-C and its charger does not fit older Surface Pro models.
heraldo.es
15/07/2017
Hands-on test · Windows 2-in-1
Verdict
The Surface Pro (2017) is probably the best 2-in-1 around, a fast, reliable machine for office work and drawing, though it wobbles on your lap.
R
revistabyte.es
03/01/2018
Summary of the review
dday.it
02/08/2017
Hands-on test · Performance tablet
Verdict
The Surface Pro (2017) is a very fast tablet with a bright, well-calibrated display, but its battery falls well short of Microsoft's claim.
smartworld.it
23/06/2017
Hands-on review · Windows tablet
Verdict
The Surface Pro (2017) is probably the best Windows tablet on sale, with strong performance and display, but it costs more than rivals and has few ports.
T
techpost.it
04/12/2017
Summary of the review
T
tvtech.it
10/07/2017
Summary of the review
fwd.nl
25/10/2017
Hands-on review · Windows 2-in-1
Verdict
The Surface Pro (2017) is a well-built, fast Windows 2-in-1 that lasts a full office workday, but it usually misses Microsoft's 13-hour battery claim.

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 LTE (8GB + 256GB)

  • Seamless LTE Advanced connectivity that works reliably on the go
  • High-quality 12.3-inch PixelSense display with sharp resolution and vibrant colors
  • Versatile 2-in-1 design with an improved, flexible kickstand that reaches 'Studio Mode'
  • Silent, fanless operation on Core i5 models
  • Premium build quality with a lightweight and portable form factor
  • Excellent stylus response and pressure sensitivity with the Surface Pen

What customers don't like about Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 LTE (8GB + 256GB)

  • High overall price as the Type Cover and Surface Pen are sold separately
  • Lacks modern ports like USB-C or Thunderbolt, relying on USB-A and Mini DisplayPort
  • Battery life can be mediocre, often falling well short of advertised figures during real-world use
  • Limited to a Core i5 processor for the LTE variant; no i7 or 16GB RAM options available for this model
  • Ergonomics are poor for use on a lap compared to a traditional laptop
  • Windows OS can be buggy or unintuitive in tablet/touch mode

Verdict

The Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 LTE (5th Gen) is a premium 2-in-1 tablet featuring a 12.3-inch PixelSense touchscreen with 2736 x 1824 resolution, an Intel Core i5-7300U processor, 8GB of RAM, and a 256GB SSD. Notable for its versatility, it includes integrated 4G LTE Advanced connectivity, a silent fanless cooling design, and a multi-position kickstand supporting 'Studio Mode'. Main pros include its vibrant high-resolution display, lightweight 812g build, and improved battery life of up to 12.5 hours on LTE. However, common cons include the lack of USB-C or Thunderbolt 3 ports, and the fact that essential accessories like the Type Cover and Surface Pen are sold separately.

Compare Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 LTE (8GB + 256GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 LTE (8GB + 256GB) and other tablets

No results found