OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£170RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.6 inchesChipset:MediaTek Helio G80

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 30 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)
7.2/10

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components

35%

6.7

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

7.8

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 61% of tablets
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

â–²Better than 80%
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Score components

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

5.3

Display

16%

7.7

Camera

14%

7.5

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

9.0

Software

5%

6.9

Design

3%

7.7

Audio

â–²Better than 63%
7.8

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models

80%

7.6

Average grade

20%

8.8

Popularity

Grades by review (30)
21 reviews: 13 with a printed score, 8 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 51%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • lenovo-tab-m10-plus-gen-3-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • lenovo-tab-m10-plus-gen-3-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • lenovo-tab-m10-plus-gen-3-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • lenovo-tab-m10-plus-gen-3-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • lenovo-tab-m10-plus-gen-3-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • lenovo-tab-m10-plus-gen-3-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • lenovo-tab-m10-plus-gen-3-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • lenovo-tab-m10-plus-gen-3-4gb-64gb-wifi
lenovo-tab-m10-plus-gen-3-4gb-64gb-wifi
lenovo-tab-m10-plus-gen-3-4gb-64gb-wifi
lenovo-tab-m10-plus-gen-3-4gb-64gb-wifi
lenovo-tab-m10-plus-gen-3-4gb-64gb-wifi
lenovo-tab-m10-plus-gen-3-4gb-64gb-wifi
lenovo-tab-m10-plus-gen-3-4gb-64gb-wifi
lenovo-tab-m10-plus-gen-3-4gb-64gb-wifi
lenovo-tab-m10-plus-gen-3-4gb-64gb-wifi
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 64GB4GB + 128GBCheck price
Other versions:
3GB + 32GB6GB + 128GB

What reviewers say about the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

Based on 21 · 9

Reviewers praise long battery life, solid build and good sound, but agree it feels slow, charges slowly and struggles with games.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Score components:

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

5.3

Display

16%

7.7

Camera

14%

7.5

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

9.0

Software

5%

6.9

Design

3%

7.7

Audio

6.7
Reviews score
7.8
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components:

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

8.0
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 4 GB of RAM, which is more than 47.2% of tablets and equal to 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
12 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 12 nm process, which is smaller than 53.2% of tablets and equal to 13.9% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 64 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 17% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
415 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scores 415 points in single-core tests, which is lower than 68.9% of tablets and equal to 0.2% of tablets.
Chipset
MediaTek Helio G80
This tablet runs on MediaTek Helio G80, which is less advanced than 55.1% of tablets and equal to 0.7% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
2000×1200
This tablet has a 2000×1200 screen, which is sharper than 58.1% of tablets and equal to 8.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
220 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 220 ppi, which is lower than 50.1% of tablets and equal to 1.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Tempered Glass, which is less durable than 78% of tablets and the same as 19.6% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 36.4% of tablets and equal to 31.9% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 69.6% of tablets and equal to 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2, which is wider than 30.1% of tablets and equal to 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
7,700 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 7,700 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 66.8% of tablets and equal to 2.8% of tablets.
Charging speed
20 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 20 W, which is faster than 60.4% of tablets and equal to 6.2% of tablets.
Battery life
14 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 14 hours, which is longer than that of 81.5% of tablets and equal to that of 3.5% of tablets.
web browsing
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 32.4% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet supports app tracking protection. 71.6% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
465 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 465 g, which is lighter than 59.7% of tablets and equal to 1.8% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
?
Pen latency
?
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.7% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.9% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 4 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (14 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    web browsing
    14 hours vs 10 hours
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51
  • 3 MP higher front resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution front camera than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (MediaTek Helio G80 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    MediaTek Helio G80 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Manual focus control
    This tablet supports manual focus, while the average tablet does not. 36.9% of tablets support manual focus.
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 11.4% higher review score
    Reviews score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (30)
    21 reviews: 13 with a printed score, 8 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    7.8 vs 7.0
  • 5.4% better value for money
    Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (7.96 vs 7.6).
    7.96 vs 7.55
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (MediaTek Helio G80 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    MediaTek Helio G80 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 14.3% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (12 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    12 nm vs 14 nm
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 0.5 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (10.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    10.6 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (2000×1200 vs 1920×1200).
    2,000×1,200 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 3 MP higher front resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution front camera than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Manual focus control
    This tablet supports manual focus, while the average tablet does not. 36.9% of tablets support manual focus.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports slow-motion video
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, while the average tablet does not. 37.3% of tablets support slow-motion recording.
  • 4 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (14 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    web browsing
    14 hours vs 10 hours
  • 16.7% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (7,700 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    7,700 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, while the average tablet does not. 35.1% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports app tracking protection
    This tablet supports app tracking protection, while the average tablet does not. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports app offloading
    This tablet supports app offloading, while the average tablet does not. 26.3% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports dynamic themes
    This tablet supports dynamic themes, while the average tablet does not. 29.5% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet supports extra dim mode, while the average tablet does not. 35.9% of tablets offer this.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 40.3% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.5% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 41.2 mm shorter
    This tablet is shorter than the average tablet (158.8 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    158.8 mm vs 200 mm
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Narrower color gamut
    This tablet supports a narrower color gamut than the average tablet (NTSC vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    72% NTSC coverage reported.
    NTSC vs sRGB
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • 29.3% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (1,336 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    1,336 points vs 1,891 points
  • 43.1% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (415 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    415 points vs 729 points
  • 75.9 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (251.2 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    251.2 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 1 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 29.3% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (1,336 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    1,336 points vs 1,891 points
  • 43.1% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (415 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    415 points vs 729 points
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Narrower color gamut
    This tablet supports a narrower color gamut than the average tablet (NTSC vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    72% NTSC coverage reported.
    NTSC vs sRGB
  • 1 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • 75.9 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (251.2 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    251.2 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
tomsguide.com
✓ explicit
28/03/2023
Lab test · Media tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus is a light, long-lasting tablet for video and e-books, but its slow performance rules out demanding games.
8.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
19/07/2023
Hands-on test · Family tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus is a good everyday family tablet for streaming and browsing, but it struggles with 3D games and comes with few accessories.
7.0
reviewed.com
≈ estimated
25/07/2023
Hands-on test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus suits tight budgets and handles email, movies and e-books, but lag and a dim screen hold it back.
7.0
xda-developers.com
✓ explicit
06/12/2023
Hands-on test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus looks and sounds good, with a clear IPS screen and long battery life, but its performance is choppy for its class.
8.0
androidheadlines.com
✓ explicit
14/02/2023
Hands-on test · Everyday tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus is a well-built, lightweight tablet for streaming and everyday tasks, but it is not for hardcore gaming.
8.5
androidpolice.com
✓ explicit
01/03/2023
Hands-on test · Media tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus is a well-built Android tablet with a sharp screen for movies, but its camera and slow charger are weak points.
8.0
laptopmedia.com
≈ estimated
15/05/2023
Hands-on review · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 is an affordable tablet with a taller screen and very long battery life, though its box charger is only 10W.
8.0
notebookcheck.com
≈ estimated
06/07/2022
Test verdict · Media-focused tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus is a media tablet with four speakers and long battery life, but it is not made for productive work and lacks keyboard cover support.
8.0
heise.de
✓ explicit
14/11/2023
Hands-on test · Streaming tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus is a good streaming tablet with a bright screen and four speakers, but its slow processor and missing Wi-Fi 6 hold it back.
7.4
giga.de
✓ explicit
17/04/2022
Everyday use test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus is a light tablet with a bright screen and long battery life, but sluggish performance makes it worth it only at a lower price.
8.0
laptopmedia.com
≈ estimated
15/05/2023
Hands-on review · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 is an affordable tablet with a taller screen and very long battery life, though its box charger is only 10W.
6.4
netzwelt.de
✓ explicit
06/08/2022
Hands-on test · Everyday tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus is a well-built, long-lasting tablet for everyday use and work, but it is weak at gaming and its updates may be limited.
8.2
notebookcheck.biz
✓ explicit
07/06/2022
Lab test · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus is a clean Android tablet for family streaming, with security updates promised until 2025, but its cameras are weak.
6.8
charlestech.fr
✓ explicit
12/09/2022
Hands-on test · Entry-level tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus is a well-built entry tablet with a bright screen, but daily lag and a high price for its features hold it back.
7.0
lemondenumerique.ouest-france.fr
≈ estimated
04/11/2022
Hands-on test · Video-focused tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus is a bright, long-lasting entry tablet for watching video, but slow to charge and limited by its 4GB of memory.
7.0
tomshw.it
✓ explicit
06/07/2022
Hands-on test · Family tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus is a dependable family tablet with a readable screen and long battery life, though it lacks vibration and a fingerprint sensor.
8.0
it.mashable.com
≈ estimated
24/06/2022
Hands-on test · Streaming tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus suits streaming on the go, with a bright 2K screen and long battery life, but it is not made for demanding multitasking.
7.8
smartworld.it
✓ explicit
06/09/2022
Hands-on review · Mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus is a sturdy tablet with a good screen and long battery life, best for one app at a time, but slow when switching apps.
9.0
androidworld.nl
≈ estimated
06/07/2022
Hands-on review · Entertainment tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus is a good-value entertainment tablet with four speakers and Netflix HD, but heavier tasks and graphics-heavy games run slowly.
8.0
techfi.nl
✓ explicit
23/07/2022
Hands-on review · Budget media tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 is a strong budget tablet for video with Netflix in HD, but it is slow with demanding apps and heavy games.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

  • Excellent value for money for a budget tablet
  • High-quality 2K (2000 x 1200) IPS display with sharp visuals and good colors
  • Exceptional battery life, often lasting over 14 hours on a single charge
  • Premium build quality with a sturdy, slim, and lightweight aluminum-alloy body
  • Quad-speaker array with Dolby Atmos provides loud and clear audio
  • Presence of a 3.5mm headphone jack and a microSD card slot
  • Front camera is well-positioned on the long edge for landscape video calls

What customers don't like about Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

  • Sluggish overall performance with noticeable lag and stuttering during multitasking
  • Very slow charging times using the included 10W power adapter
  • Struggles with high-end or graphically-demanding 3D games
  • Cameras perform poorly in low-light conditions, producing noisy images
  • Significant amount of pre-installed bloatware apps and games
  • Limited software support, typically receiving only one major Android OS update
  • Display brightness (approx. 400 nits) is insufficient for comfortable outdoor use in direct sunlight

Verdict

The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) is a budget-oriented 10.6-inch tablet featuring a sharp 2K (2000 x 1200) IPS LCD with 400 nits brightness and TÃœV Low Blue Light certification. It is powered by a MediaTek Helio G80 octa-core processor, paired with 4GB of LPDDR4x RAM and 64GB of expandable storage. Key highlights include its premium aluminum dual-tone chassis, a quad-speaker system with Dolby Atmos for immersive audio, and a large 7,700mAh battery that supports up to 14 hours of web browsing. However, it suffers from sluggish performance and UI lag during intensive multitasking or gaming, and the included 10W charger results in very slow charging times.

Compare Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found