OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Fe Plus WiFi (8GB + 128GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£400RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:12.4 inchesChipset:Exynos 1380

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Fe Plus WiFi (8GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Fe Plus WiFi (8GB + 128GB)
8.3/10

Overall score

Score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components

90%

8.2

Technical score

10%

9.1

User score

â–²Better than 87% of tablets
8.3

Value for money

Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Score components

70%

8.3

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

★Better than 91%
8.2

Technical score

Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 85% of models
Score components

22%

7.6

Performance

20%

7.3

Display

16%

8.6

Camera

14%

9.2

Battery

12%

8.7

Connectivity

8%

9.2

Software & Features

5%

8.2

Design

3%

6.2

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 85%
9.1

User score

User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

9.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 90%
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-s9-fe-plus-8gb-128gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-s9-fe-plus-8gb-128gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-s9-fe-plus-8gb-128gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-s9-fe-plus-8gb-128gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-s9-fe-plus-8gb-128gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-s9-fe-plus-8gb-128gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-s9-fe-plus-8gb-128gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-s9-fe-plus-8gb-128gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-s9-fe-plus-8gb-128gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-s9-fe-plus-8gb-128gb-wifi
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
8GB + 128GB12GB + 256GBCheck price
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Fe Plus WiFi (8GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 85% of models
Score components:

22%

7.6

Performance

20%

7.3

Display

16%

8.6

Camera

14%

9.2

Battery

12%

8.7

Connectivity

8%

9.2

Software & Features

5%

8.2

Design

3%

6.2

Audio & Multimedia

8.2
User score
User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

9.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.1
Popularity
Popularity
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Fe Plus WiFi (8GB + 128GB) has a user popularity of 9.1 points, which is lower than 87% of Tablets.
9.1
Value for money
Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Score components:

70%

8.3

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

8.3
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 72.3% of tablets and equal to that of 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
5 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 5 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 84.6% of tablets and equal to the node used in 3.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is larger than the storage of 56.7% of tablets and equal to that of 19.6% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,019 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 1,019 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 61.5% of tablets.
Chipset
Exynos 1380
This tablet uses the Exynos 1380 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 62.8% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2560×1600
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2560×1600 which is higher than that of 77.6% of tablets and equal to that of 10.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is higher than in 73.8% of tablets and equal to that in 6.5% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
243 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 243 ppi which is higher than that of 66.3% of tablets and equal to that of 0.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
12 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 12 MP which is higher than in 90% of tablets and equal to that in 6.2% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/1.9
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/1.9 which is wider than that of 82.2% of tablets and equal to that of 3.7% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
10,090 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 10,090 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 91% of tablets and equal to those in 1% of tablets.
Charging speed
45 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 45 W which is faster than in 83.8% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.7% of tablets.
Battery life
18 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 18 hours, which is longer than that of 93.4% of tablets and equal to that of 2% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
yes
This tablet supports 5G connectivity. 89% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
IP68
This tablet has an IP rating of IP68 which is higher than that of 94.8% of tablets and equal to that of 3.5% of tablets.
Weight
627 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 627 g which is heavier than 81.1% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
2.8 ms
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 2.8 ms, which is lower than that of 77% of tablets and equal to that of 11.5% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Fe Plus WiFi (8GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 8 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (18 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    18 hours vs 10 hours
  • 7 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (12 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    12 MP vs 5 MP
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 319 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (720 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    720 nits vs 401 nits
  • 53.3% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (10,090 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    10,090 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Exynos 1380 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Exynos 1,380 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 50% higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (90 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 2.5x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • 13.5% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Fe Plus WiFi
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Fe Plus WiFi (8GB + 128GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (9.08 vs 8.000).
    9.08 vs 8
  • 16.9% better value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Fe Plus WiFi (8GB + 128GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (8.3 vs 7.1).
    8.3 vs 7.1
  • 90.1% more popular
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Fe Plus WiFi (8GB + 128GB) is more popular than the average tablet (9.14 vs 4.8).
    9.14 vs 4.81
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Exynos 1380 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Exynos 1,380 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR5 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR5 vs LPDDR3
  • 64.3% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (5 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    5 nm vs 14 nm
  • 20% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 1,334 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (3,200 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    3,200 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.7% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 46.2% faster GPU clock
    This tablet has a higher GPU frequency than the average tablet (950 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    950 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Mali-G68 MP5 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-G68 MP5 vs Mali-G51
  • 71.8% higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 47.9% higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (2,796 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    2,796 points vs 1,891 points
  • 39.8% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,019 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    1,019 points vs 729 points
  • 319 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (720 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    720 nits vs 401 nits
  • 50% higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (90 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 2.3 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12.4 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12.4 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2560×1600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2560×1600 vs 1920×1200
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • 8.5% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (243 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    243 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 22 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (243 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    243 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 7 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (12 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    12 MP vs 5 MP
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This tablet allows manual shutter speed control, the average tablet does not. 21.9% of tablets offer manual shutter speed control.
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • 8 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (18 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    18 hours vs 10 hours
  • 53.3% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (10,090 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    10,090 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 2.5x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Supports 5G connectivity
    This tablet supports 5G connectivity, the average tablet does not. 11.1% of tablets are 5G compatible.
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Supports eSIM
    This tablet supports eSIM, the average tablet does not. 11.5% of tablets support eSIM.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This tablet supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.3 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • Includes fingerprint scanner
    This tablet offers a better fingerprint scanner setup than the average tablet (yes vs no). Fingerprint scanner quality still varies a lot between tablets.
    Side-mounted fingerprint scanner.
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Higher IP rating
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP68 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP68 vs not rated
  • Includes stylus
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 1.5 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.5 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    6.5 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 6.2 ms lower pen latency
    This tablet has lower pen latency than the average tablet (2.8 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    2.8 ms vs 9 ms
  • 4 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2023 vs 2019).
    October 2023
    2023 vs 2019
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 28% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (627 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    627 g vs 490 g
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (1000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 53.9% more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Fe Plus WiFi (8GB + 128GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£400 vs £260).
    £400 vs £260
  • 53.9% more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Fe Plus WiFi (8GB + 128GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£400 vs £260).
    £400 vs £260
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (1000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 28% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (627 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    627 g vs 490 g
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Android Digest
≈ estimated
31/01/2025
Long-term review · over a year of use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus WiFi is still a very good mid-range tablet, but it is only worth buying at a reduced price.
9.0
Android Digest
≈ estimated
06/04/2024
Long-term review · six months of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus WiFi still holds up after six months, especially on sale, thanks to its large screen and included S Pen.
8.0
RichMe
≈ estimated
10/01/2024
Hands-on review · gaming, notes and battery
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus WiFi is a great choice that reaches roughly 70 to 80 percent of the regular S9's performance.
9.0
My Next Tablet
≈ estimated
12/12/2023
Hands-on review · benchmarks, gaming and battery tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus WiFi is an excellent large mid-range tablet with a good overall package, though it is slower than flagships.
7.0
MobileTechReview
≈ estimated
06/12/2023
Hands-on review · display, speakers, battery and cameras
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus WiFi is good value and a solid tablet, but the older S8 Plus may be the better buy at the same price.
4.0
Flossy Carter
≈ estimated
18/11/2023
Hands-on review · lag tests, apps and price
Verdict
Pretty good for tablet tasks, but the processor and price are the main drawbacks.
7.0
SamMobile
≈ estimated
24/10/2023
Review · almost a month of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus WiFi is not Samsung's best, but it is a capable tablet for buyers who don't need flagship features.
9.0
Android Digest
≈ estimated
20/10/2023
Full review · comparison, battery and stylus use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus WiFi is recommended for people who want a large tablet with an S Pen without many compromises.
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcmag.com
27/10/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ Review
T
tomsguide.com
26/09/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus review - Tom's Guide
T
techradar.com
03/05/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus review: this anti-iPad Air is a sleeper hit
N
notebookcheck.net
22/11/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) in review - Waterproof XXL tablet with S Pen and a bright display
A
androidheadlines.com
28/02/2024
Summary of the review
Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ Review: Nothing about it feels mid-range
C
cnn.com
01/11/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus review | CNN Underscored
T
t3.com
05/05/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ review: premium looks, mid-range performance
U
uk.pcmag.com
27/10/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ - Review 2023 PCMag UK +1
A
avforums.com
02/07/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ Review AVForums
M
mashable.com
17/01/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ review: The tablet gives you more of everything Mashable +1
E
express.co.uk
16/11/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ review: Mega mid-range tablet
T
theinsidersnet.com
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ Review: A Versatile Powerhouse The InsidersAre you looking for specific performance benchmarks or battery life comparisons f...
C
computerbild.de
09/11/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ im Test: Wie gut ist günstig?
(Translated)Show original
C
connect.de
01/12/2023
Summary of the review
Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Plus): Samsungs Spar-Tablets im Test
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Test (beinhaltet Vergleichswerte zum S9 FE+)
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.com
25/11/2023
Summary of the review
Testfazit zum Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+: Das Samsung-Tablet fügt sich ins Galaxy-Universum
(Translated)Show original
N
nextpit.de
04/11/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ im Test: S-Klasse-Design trifft A-Klasse-Leistung
(Translated)Show original
H
heise.de
04/12/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ im Test | Heise online Bestenlisten
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
25/12/2023
Summary of the review
Test de la Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+: notre avis complet
(Translated)Show original
P
phonandroid.com
07/12/2023
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+: une tablette élégante et polyvalente, mais en manque de puissance
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Fe Plus WiFi (8GB + 128GB)

  • Exceptional battery life, often lasting multiple days with light use or up to 18-20 hours of video playback.
  • Premium aluminum build quality with a rare IP68 water and dust resistance rating.
  • Included S Pen provides a responsive, natural writing and drawing experience without an extra cost.
  • Large, bright 12.4-inch display with a smooth 90Hz refresh rate suitable for media consumption.
  • Powerful multitasking software, including Samsung DeX for a desktop-like experience.
  • Good sound quality from AKG-tuned dual speakers with Dolby Atmos support.

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Fe Plus WiFi (8GB + 128GB)

  • Mid-range Exynos 1380 processor can struggle with demanding 3D games or intensive video editing.
  • Uses a TFT LCD panel instead of an AMOLED display, resulting in less vibrant colors and shallower blacks.
  • The 12.4-inch size and large battery contribute to a noticeable 'heft' and weight compared to smaller tablets.
  • USB-C 2.0 port limits data transfer speeds and lacks support for external monitor output via cable.
  • Fingerprint sensor integrated into the power button can be finicky or less convenient than under-display versions.
  • No 3.5mm headphone jack, requiring a USB-C dongle or Bluetooth for wired audio.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ WiFi is a premium-built mid-range tablet featuring a large 12.4-inch WQXGA (2560 x 1600) LCD display with an adaptive 90Hz refresh rate. It is powered by the Exynos 1380 octa-core processor paired with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage, which is expandable up to 1TB via microSD. Key characteristics include a robust IP68 water and dust resistance rating, a massive 10,090mAh battery with 45W fast charging support, and a versatile camera system consisting of dual 8MP rear lenses and a 12MP ultrawide front-facing camera. Its main advantages are the included low-latency S Pen, exceptional battery life reaching up to 20 hours of video playback, and a sleek, durable aluminum design. However, notable drawbacks include the lack of an OLED panel, mid-tier performance that can struggle with intensive gaming or high-end video editing, and the absence of external display support via its USB-C 2.0 port.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Fe Plus WiFi (8GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Fe Plus WiFi (8GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found