OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£450RAM capacity:16 GBInternal storage:512 GBScreen size:13 inchesChipset:MediaTek Dimensity 9300

Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB)
8.8/10

Overall score

Score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components

90%

9.0

Technical score

10%

7.5

User score

★Better than 97% of tablets
8.6

Value for money

Value for money
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

Overall score

30%

8.1

Price

★Better than 97%
9.0

Technical score

Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

22%

9.6

Performance

20%

8.9

Display

16%

8.9

Camera

14%

9.7

Battery

12%

8.2

Connectivity

8%

9.1

Software & Features

5%

6.4

Design

3%

8.1

Audio & Multimedia

★Better than 99%
7.5

User score

User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

1.7

Number of reviews

â–¼Worse than 75%
  • vivo-pad-3-pro-16gb-512gb-wifi
vivo-pad-3-pro-16gb-512gb-wifi
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
16GB + 512GB
Other versions:
8GB + 128GB8GB + 256GB12GB + 256GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB)

Technical score
Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components:

22%

9.6

Performance

20%

8.9

Display

16%

8.9

Camera

14%

9.7

Battery

12%

8.2

Connectivity

8%

9.1

Software & Features

5%

6.4

Design

3%

8.1

Audio & Multimedia

9.0
User score
User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

1.7

Number of reviews

7.5
Popularity
Popularity
1.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Popularity:
Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) has a popularity of 1.7 points, which is higher than 63.5% of Tablets.
1.7
Value for money
Value for money
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components:

70%

8.8

Overall score

30%

8.1

Price

8.6
RAM capacity
16 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 16 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 96.2% of tablets and equal to that of 3.6% of tablets.
Process node
4 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 4 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 88.2% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.5% of tablets.
Internal storage
512 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 512 GB which is larger than the storage of 92.4% of tablets and equal to that of 5.3% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
2,223 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 2,223 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 89.2% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.2% of tablets.
Chipset
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
This tablet uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 86% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
3096×2064
This tablet has a screen resolution of 3096×2064 which is higher than that of 97.9% of tablets and equal to that of 0.5% of tablets.
Refresh rate
144 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 144 Hz which is higher than in 91.2% of tablets and equal to that in 7.5% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
286 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 286 ppi which is higher than that of 88.1% of tablets and equal to that of 0.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 13 MP which is higher than that of 74% of tablets and equal to that of 21.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than in 69.7% of tablets and equal to that in 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is wider than that of 30.2% of tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
11,500 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 11,500 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 96.7% of tablets and equal to those in 0.3% of tablets.
Charging speed
66 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 66 W which is faster than in 93.2% of tablets and equal to speeds in 2.4% of tablets.
Battery life
15 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 15 hours, which is longer than that of 85.6% of tablets and equal to that of 4.1% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
yes
This tablet supports NFC. 89.1% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
679 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 679 g which is heavier than 86.7% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
8
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 8 speakers, which is more than in 96.4% of tablets and equal to the number in 3.6% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 2.4x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Dimensity 9,300 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (3096×2064 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    3096×2064 vs 1920×1200
  • 8x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (512 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 64 GB
  • 12 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (16 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 4 GB
  • 5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (15 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    15 hours vs 10 hours
  • 62.5% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.25 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 74.8% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (11,500 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    11,500 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 21.3% better value for money
    Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (8.61 vs 7.1).
    8.61 vs 7.1
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Dimensity 9,300 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 8x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (512 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 64 GB
  • 12 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (16 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 4 GB
  • 62.5% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.25 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 3.99x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (7,547 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    7,547 points vs 1,891 points
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 3.05x higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (2,223 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    2,223 points vs 729 points
  • 5.15x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (76.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    76.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR5X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR5X vs LPDDR3
  • 6,667 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (8,533 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    8,533 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 71.4% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (4 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    4 nm vs 14 nm
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Immortalis-G720 MC12 vs Mali-G51
  • 2x faster GPU clock
    This tablet has a higher GPU frequency than the average tablet (1,300 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    1,300 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.7% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 8 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (12 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    12 vs 4
  • 2.4x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (3096×2064 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    3096×2064 vs 1920×1200
  • 499 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (900 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    900 nits vs 401 nits
  • 2.9 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (13 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    13 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    100% DCI-P3 coverage reported.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • 27.7% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (286 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    286 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 65 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (286 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    286 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This tablet supports HDR10, the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets are HDR10 compatible.
  • 2x higher touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a higher touch sampling rate than the average tablet (240 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    240 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This tablet allows manual shutter speed control, the average tablet does not. 21.9% of tablets offer manual shutter speed control.
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (15 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    15 hours vs 10 hours
  • 74.8% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (11,500 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    11,500 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 3.67x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (66 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    66 W vs 18 W
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This tablet supports reverse wireless charging, the average tablet does not. 4.2% of tablets offer reverse wireless charging.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This tablet supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Supports NFC
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • More Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports more Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.4 vs 5.0
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Includes fingerprint scanner
    This tablet offers a better fingerprint scanner setup than the average tablet (yes vs no). Fingerprint scanner quality still varies a lot between tablets.
    Side-mounted fingerprint scanner.
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Includes app tracking protection
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Allows app offloading
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 1.4 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.6 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    6.6 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 5 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2024 vs 2019).
    2024 vs 2019
  • 6 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (8 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    8 vs 2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Supports Bluetooth LE Audio
    This tablet supports Bluetooth LE Audio, the average tablet does not. 11.5% of tablets support Bluetooth LE Audio.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • 38.6% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (679 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    679 g vs 490 g
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • 89.6 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (289.6 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    289.6 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 73.1% more expensive
    Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£450 vs £260).
    £450 vs £260
  • 6.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi
    the average tablet
    Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.52 vs 8.000).
    7.52 vs 8
  • 23 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (198.3 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    198.3 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 73.1% more expensive
    Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£450 vs £260).
    £450 vs £260
  • 6.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi
    the average tablet
    Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.52 vs 8.000).
    7.52 vs 8
  • 2.79x less popular
    Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1.73 vs 4.8).
    1.73 vs 4.81
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • 38.6% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (679 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    679 g vs 490 g
  • 89.6 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (289.6 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    289.6 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 23 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (198.3 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    198.3 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB)

  • Exceptional performance driven by the Dimensity 9300 flagship processor, achieving over 2 million AnTuTu benchmark points
  • Immersive 13-inch 3.1K display with a smooth 144Hz refresh rate, highly praised for gaming and media consumption
  • Outstanding battery life from the 11,500mAh capacity, reported to last up to 15 hours in some use cases
  • High-quality 8-speaker matrix system providing an excellent audio-visual experience
  • Premium build quality that rivals high-end tablets like the iPad Pro and Samsung Galaxy S series
  • Efficient heat management even when running demanding games at maximum settings
  • Useful ecosystem features like the Vivo Office Suite, which supports remote control of Mac devices

What customers don't like about Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB)

  • Mediocre camera performance (13MP rear/8MP front), which is considered underwhelming for a 'Pro' designated tablet
  • Productivity limitations due to a lack of support for PC-level office software like WPS Office
  • Physical size and weight of the 13-inch screen can make it tiring to hold for long periods
  • Software limitations typical of the Chinese version, requiring manual APK installation for Google Play Store services
  • Higher price point compared to competitors like Xiaomi, moving it into premium tablet territory
  • Potential for thermal throttling where performance is slightly more conservative compared to flagship smartphones with larger cooling systems

Verdict

The Vivo Pad 3 Pro (16GB + 512GB) is a high-performance WiFi tablet featuring a massive 13-inch 3.1K IPS LCD display with a 144Hz refresh rate, 900 nits peak brightness, and HDR10 support. It is powered by the flagship MediaTek Dimensity 9300 chipset and includes a substantial 11,500mAh battery with 66W fast charging. Key advantages include its exceptional build quality, professional-grade 8-speaker matrix for immersive audio, and robust multitasking capabilities facilitated by 16GB of RAM and UFS 4.0 storage. However, notable drawbacks include the lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack, no microSD card slot for expandable storage, and the absence of a fingerprint sensor for biometric security.

Compare Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Vivo Pad 3 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) and other tablets

No results found