Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 128GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£270RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:10.4 inchesChipset:Exynos 9611

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications, 68 expert and video reviews and 2 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 128GB)
7.5/10

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

6.8

Technical score

30%

6.8

List score

25%

8.2

Reviews score

10%

10

Sentiment score

▲Better than 72% of tablets
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

▲Better than 80%
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

6.8

Performance

20%

5.8

Display

16%

7.1

Camera

14%

7.0

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

7.6

Software

5%

7.3

Design

3%

5.9

Audio

▲Better than 66%
8.2

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

7.8

Average grade

20%

9.5

Popularity

Grades by review (68)
34 reviews: 23 with a printed score, 11 estimated from the review. 34 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 74%
6.8

List score

List score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (2)
List score: in 2 of 144 lists (1%)
★Better than 93%

What reviewers say about the Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 128GB)

Based on 34 · 37

Reviewers praise the S Pen, battery, speakers and build, but complain about sluggish performance and limited unlock options, and split on the display.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 128GB)

Based on 200 owners sharing their experience in online comments

80%positive5%mixed15%negative

Owners value its affordable price, capable S Pen and study tools, while gaming limits and occasional pen or display issues frustrate some.

What owners dislike

  • Owners say the S Pen sometimes fails to respond, palm rejection is not always reliable, and the pen can react too sensitively when hovering.9
  • Owners report a TFT screen with washed-out colours, a brighter edge or bleeding at the bottom, and some ghosting after switching apps.8
  • Owners miss Procreate, which is not available on Android, and say Android apps offer less than the iPad's app library.7
  • Owners say the processor is weak for demanding games, and Fortnite runs poorly or not at all, while most other games run fine.5
  • When the S Pen tip wears out, owners cannot swap just the nib, so they must replace the whole pen or order spares from Samsung.4
  • Owners find handwriting-to-text clunky, since it uses a separate input box and often leaves no spaces between words.3
  • Some owners report the tablet failing soon after the one-year warranty ends, including a reboot loop after an update that a hard reset did not fix.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

6.8

Performance

20%

5.8

Display

16%

7.1

Camera

14%

7.0

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

7.6

Software

5%

7.3

Design

3%

5.9

Audio

6.8
Reviews score
8.2
List score
6.8
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

8.0
RAM capacity
4 GB
This tablet has 4 GB of RAM, which is more than 47.2% of tablets and equal to 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
10 nm
This tablet is built on a 10 nm process, which is smaller than 67.8% of tablets and equal to 1.4% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
This tablet has 128 GB of internal storage, which is more than 56.2% of tablets and equal to 20% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
357 points
This tablet scores 357 points in single-core tests, which is lower than 76.5% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Chipset
Exynos 9611
This tablet runs on Exynos 9611, which is more advanced than 79.2% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
2000×1200
This tablet has a 2000×1200 screen, which is sharper than 58.1% of tablets and equal to 8.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
224 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 224 ppi, which is higher than 50.1% of tablets and equal to 11.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass 3, which is more durable than 80.2% of tablets and the same as 11.2% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 36.4% of tablets and equal to 31.9% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 5 MP resolution, which is higher than 48.6% of tablets and equal to 19.7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/1.9
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/1.9, which is wider than 82.2% of tablets and equal to 3.7% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
7,040 mAh
This tablet has 7,040 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 57.6% of tablets and equal to 2% of tablets.
Charging speed
15 W
This tablet charges at 15 W, which is slower than 52.1% of tablets and equal to 6.3% of tablets.
Battery life
15 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 15 hours, which is longer than that of 85.6% of tablets and equal to that of 4.1% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 32.4% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
This tablet does not support direct OS updates. 79.8% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
467 g
This tablet weighs 467 g, which is lighter than 59.4% of tablets and equal to 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 26 ms, which is higher than that of 88.7% of tablets and equal to that of 3.4% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.7% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Exynos 9,611 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (15 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    15 hours vs 10 hours
  • 100 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (500 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    500 nits vs 400 nits
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1754:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,754:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Stylus included
    This tablet includes a stylus, while the average tablet does not. 17.2% of tablets offer this.
  • 17.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    7.8

    Average grade

    20%

    9.5

    Popularity

    Grades by review (68)
    34 reviews: 23 with a printed score, 11 estimated from the review. 34 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.2 vs 7.0
  • 33.3% higher sentiment score
    10.0 vs 7.5
  • 5.5% better value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 128GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (7.97 vs 7.6).
    7.97 vs 7.55
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Exynos 9,611 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 61.5% faster GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU faster than the average tablet (1,050 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    1,050 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 2x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Mali-G72 MP3 vs Mali-G51).
    Mali-G72 MP3 vs Mali-G51
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.6% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 28.6% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (10 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    10 nm vs 14 nm
  • 100 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (500 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    500 nits vs 400 nits
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1754:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,754:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 81,970 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (81,970 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    81,970 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • Supports HDR10+
    This tablet supports HDR10+, while the average tablet does not. 8% of tablets support HDR10+.
  • 0.3 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (10.4 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    10.4 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • More durable glass
    This tablet has more durable glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (2000×1200 vs 1920×1200).
    2,000×1,200 vs 1,920×1,200
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • 5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (15 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    15 hours vs 10 hours
  • 6.7% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (7,040 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    7,040 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet has a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.3 vs 5).
    5.3 vs 5
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports app offloading
    This tablet supports app offloading, while the average tablet does not. 26.3% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet supports extra dim mode, while the average tablet does not. 35.9% of tablets offer this.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 40.3% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Stylus included
    This tablet includes a stylus, while the average tablet does not. 17.2% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.5% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 1 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (7 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    7 mm vs 8 mm
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 13.9% lower list score
    List score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (2)
    List score: in 2 of 144 lists (1%)
    6.8 vs 7.9
  • 17 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (26 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    26 ms vs 9 ms
  • 51% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (357 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    357 points vs 729 points
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • 16.7% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (15 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    15 W vs 18 W
  • 13.9% lower list score
    List score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (2)
    List score: in 2 of 144 lists (1%)
    6.8 vs 7.9
  • 51% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (357 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    357 points vs 729 points
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • 16.7% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (15 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    15 W vs 18 W
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 17 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (26 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    26 ms vs 9 ms
  • 44.5 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (244.5 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    244.5 mm vs 200 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
19/04/2022
Hands-on review · Budget iPad rival
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab S6 Lite is a sturdy, S Pen-equipped iPad alternative for movies, but sluggish touch response and weak gaming limit it.
5.0
kilmermedia.net
≈ estimated
21/11/2024
Personal review · Android first impressions
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite offers a stylus, microSD slot and direct USB transfer for the price, but its fiddly Android layout frustrates a longtime Apple user.
8.0
cnet.com
✓ explicit
30/06/2020
Hands-on review · Midrange Android tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite is a capable midrange tablet for drawing, notes and streaming, but it may not replace a laptop.
10
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
28/11/2023
Full review · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite is a solid Android rival to the iPad, with long battery life and a bundled S Pen, though a slow chip holds it back.
8.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
22/07/2020
Hands-on review · Mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite is a good everyday tablet for students and casual users, but it skips DeX and has a weaker screen than the Tab S5e.
8.0
laptopmag.com
✓ explicit
22/10/2020
Hands-on test · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite is a long-lasting, bright Android tablet with an included S Pen, but sluggish performance and apps not built for tablets hold it back.
8.0
engadget.com
≈ estimated
29/05/2020
Hands-on review · Everyday Android tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite is a simple, slim Android tablet that suits note-taking and streaming, though it's hard to read in sunlight and palm rejection needs work.
6.0
wired.com
✓ explicit
07/07/2020
Hands-on review · Android iPad alternative
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite is a light, long-lasting Android tablet for mixing work and play, but stutters and weak face unlock keep it behind the iPad.
6.0
androidcentral.com
✓ explicit
29/05/2020
Hands-on review · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite has a well-built design, an included S Pen and good sound, but sluggish performance means the base iPad is the better buy.
7.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
14/07/2020
Hands-on review · Stylus Android tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite is a good S Pen tablet for drawing and reading, but weak gaming and the lack of a keyboard attachment hold it back.
7.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
14/07/2020
Lab test · Budget stylus tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab S6 Lite suits note-taking and sketching with its S Pen, but its weak processor and lack of DeX make it poor for games and desktop-style work.
8.3
notebookcheck.net
✓ explicit
16/06/2020
Lab test · Benchmark results
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite is a cheaper take on the S6 with chip-average speeds, but trails most tablets in multi-core and graphics tests.
8.0
gsmarena.com
≈ estimated
29/06/2020
Hands-on test · iPad comparison
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite offers a stylus, 64GB storage and day-long battery, but stutters and a dull screen hold it back.
7.0
frandroid.com
✓ explicit
24/10/2020
Full review · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite feels premium and includes a headphone jack and S Pen, but its LCD screen trades away AMOLED's deep blacks.
6.7
presse-citron.net
✓ explicit
11/09/2020
Full review · Midrange Samsung tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite lasts days on one charge and includes a useful S Pen, but its modest processor and LCD screen show its midrange limits.
7.0
journaldugeek.com
✓ explicit
02/07/2020
Full review · Midrange Android tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite is a good everyday tablet for video and light work, but its modest chip and 4GB RAM struggle with multitasking and heavy games.
9.0
lapresse.ca
✓ explicit
17/05/2020
Hands-on review · Everyday Android tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite is a bright, versatile tablet for video and calls, good value for most Android users, though slower than pricier models.
7.8
lecafedugeek.fr
✓ explicit
24/09/2020
Full review · Media tablet with S Pen
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab S6 Lite is well suited to video and casual games, with a comfortable S Pen, but its slow 10W charger and modest chip limit it.
8.0
global.techradar.com
✓ explicit
25/05/2020
Hands-on review · Budget iPad rival
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite is a good entertainment tablet with a bright screen and included S Pen, but it lags for games and video editing.
8.0
sotactile.fr
≈ estimated
03/06/2021
Full review · Everyday stylus tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab S6 Lite is well built and streams video in 1080p, but it has no fingerprint sensor and is not made for demanding games.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 128GB)

  • Included S Pen stylus that is highly accurate and doesn't require charging
  • Strong value for money, especially for students and light productivity tasks
  • Excellent dual AKG-tuned stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support
  • Solid battery life that can last through a full school or work day
  • Premium build quality with a slim, lightweight aluminum chassis
  • Useful software features like Samsung DeX for desktop-style productivity
  • Presence of a 3.5mm headphone jack and MicroSD card expansion slot

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 128GB)

  • Noticeable lag and slow performance when multitasking or switching apps
  • Limited 4GB of RAM can cause the tablet to struggle with heavy web browsing or many background apps
  • Slow charging speeds (15W maximum) taking several hours to fully replenish the battery
  • TFT LCD display lacks the vibrant colors and deep blacks of OLED screens
  • Basic camera quality that is often grainy and poor in low-light conditions
  • No built-in fingerprint sensor, relying on less secure face unlock or PINs
  • Light bleed issues reported along the screen edges on some units

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 128GB) is a portable 10.4-inch tablet featuring a 2000 x 1200 TFT LCD display and a sleek, 7mm-thin metal unibody. It is equipped with an octa-core processor, 4GB of RAM, and 128GB of internal storage that is expandable via microSD up to 1TB, alongside 4G LTE connectivity for on-the-go internet access. Key advantages include the bundled battery-free S Pen for precise note-taking, a long-lasting 7,040mAh battery supporting up to 13 hours of video playback, and dual AKG-tuned speakers with Dolby Atmos. However, notable drawbacks include the lack of a vibrant AMOLED panel, relatively slow 15W charging, and performance limitations that can lead to occasional lag during heavy multitasking or demanding gaming.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found