OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£230RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.4 inchesChipset:Exynos 9611

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.0

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components

90%

6.8

Technical score

10%

9.2

User score

â–²Better than 68% of tablets
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 65% of models
Score components

22%

6.5

Performance

20%

5.8

Display

16%

7.2

Camera

14%

7.0

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

7.9

Software & Features

5%

7.3

Design

3%

5.9

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 65% of tablets
9.2

User score

User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

9.3

Number of reviews

Based on 3,040 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 93% of tablets
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-s6-lite-lte-4gb-64gb
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-s6-lite-lte-4gb-64gb
samsung-galaxy-tab-s6-lite-lte-4gb-64gb
samsung-galaxy-tab-s6-lite-lte-4gb-64gb

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 64GB4GB + 128GBCheck price
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 65% of models
Score components:

22%

6.5

Performance

20%

5.8

Display

16%

7.2

Camera

14%

7.0

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

7.9

Software & Features

5%

7.3

Design

3%

5.9

Audio & Multimedia

6.8
User score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

9.3

Number of reviews

Based on 3,040 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.2
Popularity
Popularity
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 64GB) has a user popularity of 9.3 points, which is lower than 87.4% of Tablets.
9.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components:

60%

7.0

Overall score

40%

9.3

Price

7.7
RAM capacity
4 GB
RAM capacity
4 GB
â–² Better than 48% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
10 nm
Process node
10 nm
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 10 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 68% of tablets and equal to the node used in 1.4% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
357 points
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
357 points
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 357 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 76.5% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.1% of tablets.
Chipset
Exynos 9611
Chipset
Exynos 9611
â–² Better than 79% of models
This tablet uses the Exynos 9611 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 79.2% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2000×1200
Screen resolution
2000×1200
â–² Better than 58% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2000×1200 which is higher than that of 58.2% of tablets and equal to that of 8.2% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
224 ppi
Pixel density
224 ppi
â–² Better than 50% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 224 ppi which is higher than that of 50% of tablets and equal to that of 11.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
â–² Better than 80% of models
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass which is stronger than that on 80.1% of tablets and equal to that on 11.2% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
â–² Better than 37% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
â–² Better than 49% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/1.9
Main camera aperture
f/1.9
â–² Better than 82% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/1.9 which is wider than that of 82.2% of tablets and equal to that of 3.7% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
7,040 mAh
Battery capacity
7,040 mAh
â–² Better than 58% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 7,040 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 57.9% of tablets and equal to those in 2% of tablets.
Charging speed
15 W
Charging speed
15 W
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 15 W which is slower than in 52.2% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.3% of tablets.
Battery life
15 hours
Battery life
15 hours
â–² Better than 86% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 15 hours, which is longer than that of 85.6% of tablets and equal to that of 4.1% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 50% of models
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
Update support duration
medium
â–² Better than 47% of models
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
467 g
Weight
467 g
â–² Better than 59% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 467 g which is lighter than 59.3% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
26 ms
Pen latency
26 ms
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 26 ms, which is higher than that of 88.6% of tablets and equal to that of 3.4% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
Dolby Atmos support
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Exynos 9611
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This tablet uses the Exynos 9611 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Exynos 9,611 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 5 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    15 hours
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (15 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    15 hours vs 10 hours
  • 100 nits higher typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    500 nits
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (500 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    500 nits vs 400 nits
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1754:1
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1754:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,754:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Supports PDAF
    Phase-detection autofocus
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.9
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • Wider front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 15% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (9.20 vs 8.000).
    9.2 vs 8
  • 93.3% more popular
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 64GB) is more popular than the average tablet (9.29 vs 4.8).
    9.29 vs 4.81
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Exynos 9611
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This tablet uses the Exynos 9611 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Exynos 9,611 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR4X
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 15% higher CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2.3 GHz
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-G72 MP3
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-G72 MP3 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-G72 MP3 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Includes neural engine
    Neural engine support
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.7% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 28.6% smaller process node
    Process node
    10 nm
    â–² Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (10 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    10 nm vs 14 nm
  • 100 nits higher typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    500 nits
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (500 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    500 nits vs 400 nits
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1754:1
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1754:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,754:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 81,970 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    PWM dimming frequency
    81,970 Hz
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <0 Hz – >2.9k Hz
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (81970 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    81,970 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    HDR10+ support
    yes
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This tablet supports HDR10+, the average tablet does not. 8% of tablets include HDR10+ support.
  • More durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 0.3 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    10.4 inches
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (10.4 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    10.4 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    2000×1200
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2000×1200 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2000×1200 vs 1920×1200
  • Supports PDAF
    Phase-detection autofocus
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.9
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • Wider front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • 5 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    15 hours
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (15 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    15 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 7% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    7,040 mAh
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (7040 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    7,040 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.3
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.3 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • Supports live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Allows app offloading
    App offloading
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    Extra dim mode
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    Clipboard warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
    paste warning
  • Includes stylus
    Stylus included
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Suitable for drawing
    Suitable for drawing
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    Stylus tilt support
    yes
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 1 mm thinner
    Thickness
    7 mm
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (7 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    7 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    Dolby Atmos support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 17 ms higher pen latency
    Pen latency
    26 ms
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (26 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    26 ms vs 9 ms
  • 51% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    357 points
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (357 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    357 points vs 729 points
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 16.7% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    15 W
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (15 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    15 W vs 18 W
  • 51% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    357 points
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (357 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    357 points vs 729 points
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • 16.7% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    15 W
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (15 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    15 W vs 18 W
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • 17 ms higher pen latency
    Pen latency
    26 ms
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (26 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    26 ms vs 9 ms
  • 44.5 mm taller
    Width
    244.5 mm
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (244.5 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    244.5 mm vs 200.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cnet.com
30/06/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite review: A better Android tablet Would you like a comparison of the LTE performance versus the Wi-Fi only models across thes...
K
kilmermedia.net
21/11/2024
Summary of the review
Tech Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Tablet
T
techradar.com
19/04/2022
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite review - TechRadar
A
androidpolice.com
23/12/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite review: Basic but adequate
A
androidauthority.com
19/06/2025
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) review: Should you buy it?
A
androidpolice.com
03/07/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2022): The iPad alternative Are you looking for reviews of a specific year's release (2020, 2022, or 2024), or would you l...
W
wired.com
07/07/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Review: A Fine Android Tablet
E
engadget.com
29/05/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite review: Just a really good basic Android tablet
L
laptopmag.com
22/10/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite review - Laptop Mag
T
techadvisor.com
22/07/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite review - Tech Advisor
E
expertreviews.co.uk
28/11/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite review: Lite yet mighty
N
notebookcheck.net
17/05/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Review - An affordable tablet with an S Pen and wrinkles
L
lowyat.net
15/05/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Review: A Decent Bang-For-Buck Tablet With An S-Pen
U
uk.pcmag.com
14/07/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite - Review 2020
A
androidcentral.com
29/05/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite review: You should just buy an iPad
C
computerbild.de
13/07/2023
Summary of the review
Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2022 im Test: Samsungs Bestseller für 300 Euro
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
16/05/2024
Summary of the review
Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) im Test: Samsungs neuer Bestseller?
(Translated)Show original
T
test.de
10/12/2025
Summary of the review
Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (2024, SM-P625)
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.com
18/06/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 - Notebookcheck Möchtest du einen direkten Vergleich zwischen der ursprünglichen Version von 2020 und der neuen 2024 E...
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
27/10/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite P615 Test - CHIP
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
22/11/2021
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite im Test - COMPUTER BILD
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.com
12/05/2024
Summary of the review
Testfazit zum Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 - Günstiger Tablet-Einstieg mit Samsung S Pen
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.biz
15/05/2024
Summary of the review
Test de la Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024: tablette abordable avec stylet S Pen
(Translated)Show original
J
journaldugeek.com
02/07/2020
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite, une bonne tablette aux quelques compromis
(Translated)Show original
P
presse-citron.net
11/09/2020
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite: une tablette un peu trop allégée?
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
24/10/2020
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite: notre avis complet
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
22/05/2020
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite: l'alternative à stylet de la Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e
(Translated)Show original
L
lapresse.ca
17/05/2020
Summary of the review
Testé: Galaxy Tab S6 Lite, du bonbon, cette tablette | La Presse Les Numériques
(Translated)Show original
C
cnetfrance.fr
09/06/2020
Summary of the review
Test de la Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite : un stylet en plus, le reste...
(Translated)Show original
E
elespanol.com
29/05/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite: análisis y experiencia de uso
(Translated)Show original
G
gadgerss.com
06/09/2020
Summary of the review
Review de la Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Reseña en español)
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.org
20/06/2020
Summary of the review
Review de la Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite - Notebookcheck.org
(Translated)Show original
F
fortuna.perfil.com
07/09/2020
Summary of the review
Galaxy Tab S6 Lite: los pros y contras de esta tablet | Fortuna
(Translated)Show original
A
andreagaleazzi.com
22/05/2020
Summary of the review
Recensione GALAXY TAB S6 Lite di SAMSUNG – Andrea Galeazzi
(Translated)Show original
T
techprincess.it
02/06/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite recensione: può sostituire un PC?
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
03/05/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite - Reviews - Tweakers Wil je dat ik voor een van deze versies (2020, 2022 of 2024) de belangrijkste testresultaten op een ri...
(Translated)Show original
T
technologyinsider.nl
16/06/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) Review. Superlange accuduur én handige S Pen
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
20/06/2020
Summary of the review
Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
02/05/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite: dit zijn de plus- en minpunten
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 3,040 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
Based on 24 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 64GB)

  • Included S Pen stylus that is highly accurate and doesn't require charging
  • Strong value for money, especially for students and light productivity tasks
  • Excellent dual AKG-tuned stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support
  • Solid battery life that can last through a full school or work day
  • Premium build quality with a slim, lightweight aluminum chassis
  • Useful software features like Samsung DeX for desktop-style productivity
  • Presence of a 3.5mm headphone jack and MicroSD card expansion slot

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 64GB)

  • Noticeable lag and slow performance when multitasking or switching apps
  • Limited 4GB of RAM can cause the tablet to struggle with heavy web browsing or many background apps
  • Slow charging speeds (15W maximum) taking several hours to fully replenish the battery
  • TFT LCD display lacks the vibrant colors and deep blacks of OLED screens
  • Basic camera quality that is often grainy and poor in low-light conditions
  • No built-in fingerprint sensor, relying on less secure face unlock or PINs
  • Light bleed issues reported along the screen edges on some units

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 64GB) is a versatile mid-range tablet featuring a 10.4-inch TFT LCD display with a 2000 x 1200 resolution, housed in a slim 7mm metal body weighing 467g. Key characteristics include an octa-core processor (Exynos 1280 in the 2024 edition), a 7,040mAh battery with 15W charging, 8MP rear and 5MP front cameras, and dual AKG-tuned speakers with Dolby Atmos. Its primary pros are the included S Pen for precise note-taking and drawing, reliable 4G LTE connectivity for mobile productivity, and a dedicated microSD slot supporting up to 1TB of expanded storage. However, notable cons include the lack of a fingerprint sensor, relatively slow 15W wired charging speeds, and a display that lacks the high refresh rates and vibrant color depth of premium AMOLED panels.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found