OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Zeblaze Thor 5 Pro Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£150Screen size:1.60 inchBattery life:1.5 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Zeblaze Thor 5 Pro Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 5 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.7

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

70%

6.6

Technical score

30%

7.1

Review score ( 1 · 4)

Review score 30% · 7.1 · based on 1 written review + 4 videos
1 written review + 4 videos count as 2.8 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–²Better than 55% of smartwatches
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Score components

24%

4.8

Health

21%

7.8

Fitness

16%

5.1

Battery

14%

7.3

Smart features

12%

7.0

Connectivity

9%

8.0

Display & Design

4%

9.2

Hardware

â–²Better than 59% of smartwatches
7.1

Review score

Review score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Grades by review (5)
1 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 1
✓ explicit
1

20%

6.8

gbatemp.net

Video reviews 2

10%

9.0

Vimal Chintapatla

5%

7.0

Redskull

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 76% of smartwatches
  • No image
No image

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Zeblaze Thor 5 Pro

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Score components:

24%

4.8

Health

21%

7.8

Fitness

16%

5.1

Battery

14%

7.3

Smart features

12%

7.0

Connectivity

9%

8.0

Display & Design

4%

9.2

Hardware

6.6
Review score
Review score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Grades by review (5)
1 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 1
✓ explicit
1

20%

6.8

gbatemp.net

Video reviews 2

10%

9.0

Vimal Chintapatla

5%

7.0

Redskull

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.1
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Zeblaze Thor 5 Pro has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 70.7% of smartwatches.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components:

60%

6.7

Overall score

40%

9.7

Price

7.6
Brand name
Zeblaze
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
Gyroscope
no
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 70% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
1.5 days
Battery life
1.5 days
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 1.5 days which is shorter than that of 85.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.3% of smartwatches.
Converted from the reported 24-48 hour battery life.
Battery life in training mode
30 h
Battery life in training mode
30 h
â–² Better than 71% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 30 h in training mode which is longer than 71.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 5.6% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery power
673 mAh
Battery power
673 mAh
★ Better than 99% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 673 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 99.3% of smartwatches.
Charge time
180 min
Charge time
180 min
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 180 min which is slower than 96.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 2.1% of smartwatches.
Approximate value from reported charging range: 180 minutes.
Show more
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
â–² Better than 82% of models
This smartwatch includes a cellular module. 82.2% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
1
SIM cards
1
â–² Better than 2% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
eSIM
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.6 inch
Screen size
1.6 inch
â–² Better than 75% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.6 inch which is larger than the screens of 74.5% of smartwatches and equal to those of 1.7% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
320x 320
Resolution
320x 320
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 320x320 which is lower than that of 57% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.7% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
283 ppi
Pixel density
283 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 283 ppi which is lower than that of 65.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 4.7% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
4x 1.25 GHz
CPU speed
4x 1.25 GHz
★ Better than 90% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.25 GHz which is faster than that in 90% of smartwatches.
Derived from core-count and per-core clock notation
Processor model
?
RAM
3 GB
RAM
3 GB
★ Better than 100% of models
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 3 GB of RAM which is larger than the RAM in 99.5% of smartwatches.
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 32 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 84.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 13.4% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Zeblaze Thor 5 Pro vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • 373 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    673 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (673 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Converted from the reported 24-48 hour battery life.
    673 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 373 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    673 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (673 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Converted from the reported 24-48 hour battery life.
    673 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 10.75 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    30 h
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (30 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    30 h vs 19.25 h
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • Better case material
    Case material
    ceramic, fiber-reinforced polymer, polycarbonate
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This smartwatch uses ceramic, fiber-reinforced polymer, polycarbonate for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    ceramic, fiber-reinforced polymer, polycarbonate vs polycarbonate
  • 0.2 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.60 inch
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.6 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.60 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • Better band material
    Band material
    silicone, leather
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch uses silicone, leather for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, leather vs silicone
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • 2 GB more RAM
    RAM
    3 GB
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
    This smartwatch has more RAM than the average smartwatch (3 GB vs 1 GB). The average smartwatch includes 1 GB of RAM.
    3 GB vs 1 GB
  • 28 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers more internal storage than the average smartwatch (32 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    32 GB vs 4 GB
  • Built-in camera
    Camera megapixels
    yes MP
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports camera, the average smartwatch does not. 2% of smartwatches support camera.
    Front and side cameras.
  • Faster CPU speed
    CPU speed
    4 x 1.25 GHz
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.25 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    Derived from core-count and per-core clock notation
    4x1.25 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • No stress monitoring
    Stress monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 65.4% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No swim mode
    Swim sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 74.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • 5.5 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    1.5 days
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 1.5 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Converted from the reported 24-48 hour battery life.
    1.5 days vs 7 days
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch has a lower IP rating than the average smartwatch (IP67 vs IP68).
    IP67 vs IP68
  • 6.12x less popular
    Zeblaze Thor 5 Pro has a lower popularity than the average smartwatch (1 vs 6.1).
    1 vs 6.12
  • No stress monitoring
    Stress monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 65.4% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No inactivity alerts
    Inactivity alerts
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    This smartwatch does not support inactivity alerts, the average smartwatch does. 91.7% of smartwatches support inactivity alerts.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No swim mode
    Swim sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 74.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • 71 fewer exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    9
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (9 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    9 vs 80
  • 5.5 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    1.5 days
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 1.5 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Converted from the reported 24-48 hour battery life.
    1.5 days vs 7 days
  • 60 min longer charge time
    Charge time
    180 min
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges slower than the average smartwatch (180 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 180 minutes.
    180 min vs 120 min
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This smartwatch supports an older Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (4 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch has a lower IP rating than the average smartwatch (IP67 vs IP68).
    IP67 vs IP68
  • 5.2 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    16.80 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (16.8 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    16.80 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 20.7 g heavier weight
    Weight
    65.7 g
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (65.7 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    65.7 g vs 45.0 g
  • 9 mm taller watch height
    Height
    54.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (54 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    54.0 mm vs 45 mm
  • 8 mm wider watch width
    Width
    50.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (50 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    50.0 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 43 ppi lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    283 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a lower pixel density than the average smartwatch (283 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    283 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No widget support
    Widget support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartwatch does not support widgets, the average smartwatch does. 83.1% of smartwatches support widgets.
  • 2 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2019
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch is an older model than the average smartwatch (2019 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    November 2019
    2019 vs 2021

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Vimal Chintapatla
≈ estimated
29/02/2020
Hands-on review · unboxing, cameras, battery and games
Verdict
Zeblaze Thor 5 Pro is one of the best all-round Android smartwatches, with only minor issues like buttons and display shape.
8.5
Chigz Tech Reviews
✓ explicit
06/01/2020
Hands-on review · screen, calls, camera and speed tests
Verdict
Zeblaze Thor 5 Pro is a decent all-round big-screen Android smartwatch, held back by missing Bluetooth calls and a slow screen-on.
7.0
Redskull
≈ estimated
05/11/2019
First look · unboxing and hands-on checks
Verdict
Zeblaze Thor 5 Pro has a solid feature list, but the lack of multi-touch and slow screen wake make for a cautious first impression.
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded yet
Shop video
Overview video

What reviewers agree on

Based on 1 · 4

Reviewers praise its smooth performance and solid build, with hardly any complaints raised.
Praised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.8
gbatemp.net
✓ explicit
14/12/2019
Hardware review · Full Android watch
Verdict
The Zeblaze Thor 5 Pro is a full-Android watch suited to notifications, news and 4G calls, but its weak battery holds it back.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Zeblaze Thor 5 Pro

  • Standalone 4G LTE functionality with nano SIM support for calls and data
  • Large, crisp 1.6-inch LTPS display with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Fluid performance for multitasking and gaming with 3GB RAM and quad-core CPU
  • Dual 5MP cameras for video calling and decent daylight photography
  • Access to the full Google Play Store for downloading standard Android apps
  • Premium build quality featuring a ceramic bezel and metal case

What we don't like about Zeblaze Thor 5 Pro

  • Poor battery life, with some users reporting as little as 6 hours of use or needing twice-daily charging
  • Lack of app optimisation for the round screen, sometimes requiring a 'squared off' mode that reduces size
  • Absence of an IP water resistance rating, making it vulnerable to moisture
  • Awkward side-facing camera angle for photography and video
  • Bulky design that may not be aesthetically pleasing on thinner wrists
  • Finicky setup and occasional pairing issues with the companion app

Verdict

The Zeblaze Thor 5 Pro is a 4G LTE-capable smartwatch phone featuring a 1.6-inch LTPS crystal display with 320x320 resolution and a premium ceramic bezel. It is powered by a MediaTek MT6739 quad-core processor with 3GB of RAM and 32GB of internal storage, running on Android 7.1.1 with full Google Play Store support. Main characteristics include dual 5MP cameras for video calls and photos, built-in GPS/GLONASS, and face unlock security. Its primary pros are its high memory capacity, standalone cellular connectivity, and the inclusion of high-quality hybrid leather straps. However, notable cons include poor battery life from the 800mAh cell (often requiring daily charging under heavy use), a lack of official IP-rated waterproofing, and some unoptimized apps for the round screen.

Compare Zeblaze Thor 5 Pro with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Zeblaze Thor 5 Pro and other Smartwatches

No results found