OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Umidigi Uwatch 2 review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£35Screen size:1.33 inchBattery life:10 daysDisplay type:IPS LCD

Umidigi Uwatch 2 Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 21 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Umidigi Uwatch 2
6.5/10

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components

35%

5.0

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.2

Reviews score

10%

5.0

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 66% of smartwatches
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 62%
5.0

Technical score

Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

24%

4.9

Health

21%

7.5

Fitness

16%

6.0

Battery

14%

3.7

Smart features

12%

2.5

Connectivity

9%

4.9

Display & Design

4%

1.0

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 85%
8.2

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models

80%

8.2

Average grade

20%

8.1

Popularity

Grades by review (21)
4 reviews + 17 videos, average 8.2/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 66%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • umidigi-uwatch-2
  • umidigi-uwatch-2
  • umidigi-uwatch-2
  • umidigi-uwatch-2
  • umidigi-uwatch-2
  • umidigi-uwatch-2
  • umidigi-uwatch-2
umidigi-uwatch-2
umidigi-uwatch-2
umidigi-uwatch-2
umidigi-uwatch-2
umidigi-uwatch-2
umidigi-uwatch-2
umidigi-uwatch-2
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Umidigi Uwatch 2

Based on 4 · 11

Reviewers praise the long battery life, nice straps and design, but GPS and language support disappoint, and the screen divides opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Umidigi Uwatch 2

Based on 85 owners sharing their experience in online comments

9%positive13%mixed78%negative

Owners appreciate the low price and attractive design, but watch failures, missing health features, and unreliable notifications dominate.

What owners dislike

  • Owners report the watch works for a short while, then stops powering on, shows only a blinking light, or won't charge after a few weeks.14
  • Owners say notifications from texts and apps stop arriving after a few hours, often after leaving Bluetooth range or after reconnecting the watch.12
  • Some buyers received units without blood pressure or blood oxygen features, which the official specs and the app do not show.10
  • Owners say the watch often disconnects from the phone app, and pairing with some Android and iPhone models is difficult.8
  • Owners report the battery draining quickly, sometimes dropping several percent with no use, or lasting under five hours after a couple of months.7
  • Several owners say the watch stopped charging after a few weeks or months, with the charging sensor blinking and no response.6
  • Owners say the screen switches off too quickly, so reading texts or info on the display is difficult.3
  • Owners say the watch counts steps when they are driving or doesn't count steps at all.3
  • Owners say sleep tracking is poor, with the watch stopping early or missing long sleep periods.3
  • Owners say calorie burn figures seem far too low on active days, and blood pressure readings sometimes look implausible.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Umidigi Uwatch 2

Technical score
Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components:

24%

4.9

Health

21%

7.5

Fitness

16%

6.0

Battery

14%

3.7

Smart features

12%

2.5

Connectivity

9%

4.9

Display & Design

4%

1.0

Hardware

5.0
Reviews score
8.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components:

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.6
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 71.3% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
10 days
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 10 days on a charge, which is longer than 59.2% of Smartwatches and the same as 6.6% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
180 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 180 mAh battery, which is smaller than 91.2% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.6% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 120 min, which is quicker than 13.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 44.6% of Smartwatches.
Normalized from hour-based sources to 2 minutes.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS, which is less advanced than the system in 54.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 42% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 69.3% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 59.8% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.33 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.33 inch screen, which is smaller than 63.1% of Smartwatches.
Some sources mention multiple/uncertain size variants.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartwatch uses IPS LCD, which is less advanced than the screen in 70.4% of Smartwatches and equal to 5.9% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
240x 240
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240 which is lower than that of 75.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 14.1% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
255 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 255 ppi, which is lower than 81.3% of Smartwatches and equal to 0.1% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
0.064 GHz
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 0.064 GHz which is slower than that in 93.4% of smartwatches and equal to that in 1.5% of smartwatches.
Processor model
Nordic nRF52832
This smartwatch uses the Nordic nRF52832 processor model.
RAM
?
Internal storage
0 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 0 GB of internal storage, which is less than 76.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 23.5% of Smartwatches.
No local user storage for apps/media
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Umidigi Uwatch 2 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 21.8% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
    Measurements are for wellness guidance, not medical diagnosis.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 3 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (10 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    10 days vs 7 days
  • 17.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 66% of models

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    8.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (21)
    4 reviews + 17 videos, average 8.2/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.2 vs 7.0
  • Perspiration monitoring
    This smartwatch tracks perspiration, the average smartwatch does not. 15.1% of smartwatches track perspiration.
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • 17.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 66% of models

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    8.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (21)
    4 reviews + 17 videos, average 8.2/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.2 vs 7.0
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 21.8% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
    Measurements are for wellness guidance, not medical diagnosis.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Perspiration monitoring
    This smartwatch tracks perspiration, the average smartwatch does not. 15.1% of smartwatches track perspiration.
  • 3 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (10 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    10 days vs 7 days
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No GPS support
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 59.7% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • 49 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • 33.3% lower sentiment score
    5.0 vs 7.5
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No smart scale support
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • 2 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2019 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    July 2019
    2019 vs 2021
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No gyroscope
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 71.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No auto-pause
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 62.6% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No route support
    This smartwatch does not support route support, the average smartwatch does. 54.4% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 83 fewer exercise types
    This smartwatch includes fewer exercise types than the average smartwatch (7 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    7 vs 90
  • No achievement tracking
    This smartwatch does not support achievements, the average smartwatch does. 87% of smartwatches support achievements.
  • No voice feedback
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 125 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery than the average smartwatch (180 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    180 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • No GPS support
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 59.7% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • 49 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No always-on display
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 70.3% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • More basic display
    This smartwatch uses a more basic screen than the average smartwatch (IPS LCD vs AMOLED).
    IPS LCD vs AMOLED
  • Weaker ingress protection
    This smartwatch has weaker ingress protection than the average smartwatch (IP67 vs IP68).
    Also reported with 5 ATM water-resistance rating.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • No ambient light sensor
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 15 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (60 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    60 g vs 45 g
  • Lower resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    240x240 vs 360x360
  • 71 ppi less sharp screen
    This smartwatch has a less sharp screen than the average smartwatch (255 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    255 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 0.07 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    Some sources mention multiple/uncertain size variants.
    1.33 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice assistant
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 69.2% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 60% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 68.1% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No passcode
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 70.4% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • Slower CPU speed
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 0.064 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    0.064 GHz vs 1 GHz

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Fabinho Tech
≈ estimated
08/02/2020
Unboxing and full review · screen, connectivity and battery
Verdict
Umidigi Uwatch 2 is good value for a budget smartwatch, worth buying despite washed-out colours and poor sunlight visibility.
8.0
lawmanfj
≈ estimated
02/02/2020
Long-term test · a few months of daily use
Verdict
Umidigi Uwatch 2 is a simple fitness tracker and a good budget pick, with limited phone features.
9.0
Greg Toope
≈ estimated
25/10/2019
Hands-on review · heart rate, oxygen and app tests
Verdict
Umidigi Uwatch 2 is one of the best watches tried at this price, though a brighter screen would help.
9.0
Snipeoff
≈ estimated
07/10/2019
Long-term test · one week of daily use after unboxing
Verdict
Umidigi Uwatch 2 is a good watch for the price, with no real complaints after a week of use.
8.0
GSMDome
≈ estimated
28/08/2019
Hands-on review · fitness tracking and blood pressure tests
Verdict
Umidigi Uwatch 2 is an elegant, cheap fitness watch with accurate pulse tracking, but its blood pressure readings remain uncertain.
7.0
PokeTech
✓ explicit
08/08/2019
Hands-on review · about a week of use
Verdict
Umidigi Uwatch 2 is a cheap watch that looks and feels premium, recommended despite its short screen timeout and weak vibration.
7.0
T-tech vids
≈ estimated
07/08/2019
Long-term test · five days of daily use
Verdict
Umidigi Uwatch 2 is recommended mainly for heart rate tracking, though limited features and its square design are drawbacks.
7.0
Richard Moore
≈ estimated
06/08/2019
Hands-on review · heart rate, blood pressure and watch faces
Verdict
Umidigi Uwatch 2 is fine for the price, but its square screen, slow face changes and messaging limits hold it back.
9.0
TUXX REVIEWS
≈ estimated
11/10/2019
Unboxing · first impressions and feature tour
Verdict
Umidigi Uwatch 2 is an affordable smartwatch with many features and a comfortable fit, recommended for budget buyers.
Overview video
Overview video
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
smartwatchspecifications.com
≈ estimated
27/01/2020
Review · Everyday smartwatch
Verdict
The UMIDIGI Uwatch 2 suits buyers who want a good-looking basic fitness watch with a smooth screen, but it has no GPS for mapping outdoor routes.
7.0
framboise314.fr
≈ estimated
19/12/2019
Hands-on test · Sport tracking
Verdict
The UMIDIGI Uwatch 2 is a square-screen fitness watch that lasts about a week and suits basic step and heart-rate tracking, but not swimming.
8.0
ugeek.fr
≈ estimated
06/08/2019
Hands-on test · Simple smartwatch
Verdict
The UMIDIGI Uwatch 2 is a solidly built, simple smartwatch for notifications and sport tracking, but its screen needs maximum brightness in sunshine.
7.0
angolodiwindows.com
≈ estimated
01/11/2019
Long-term test · Fitness watch
Verdict
The UMIDIGI Uwatch 2 lasts about a week with monitoring on and gives a detailed sleep report, but step counts run high.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Umidigi Uwatch 2

  • Excellent value for money and affordable price point
  • High-quality build with a premium-looking aluminum or zinc alloy case
  • Strong battery life, often lasting 7 to 10 days on a single charge
  • Quick charging capabilities, taking as little as 20-30 minutes for a full charge
  • Stylish, lightweight design that is comfortable for daily wear
  • IP67 or 5ATM water resistance suitable for swimming and water activities
  • Large selection of customizable watch faces available via the companion app

What customers don't like about Umidigi Uwatch 2

  • Low screen brightness makes it very difficult to read in direct sunlight
  • Inconsistent accuracy for heart rate, sleep tracking, and blood pressure readings
  • Square display positioned inside a circular watch face can look 'cheap' or odd
  • Limited smart features, such as the inability to respond to notifications
  • Poor text formatting on screen where words or characters are often cut off
  • Companion app (Da Fit) lacks detailed data breakdown and third-party syncing
  • Installation of new watch faces can be slow, sometimes taking over a minute

Verdict

The Umidigi Uwatch 2 is a budget-friendly smartwatch featuring a 1.33-inch square IPS LCD color touchscreen housed within a 44mm circular full-metal unibody made of aluminum alloy. Protected by 2.5D curved tempered glass, it includes an IP67 waterproof rating, a 180mAh battery providing 7–10 days of active use, and a Nordic nRF52832 chipset for power efficiency. Key pros include its premium metallic build, comprehensive health tracking for heart rate, sleep, and blood pressure, and a dual-strap inclusion (metal and silicone) for versatile styling. However, notable cons include a square display that does not fill the circular face, limited screen brightness in direct sunlight, and inconsistent accuracy for blood pressure and sleep data.

Compare Umidigi Uwatch 2 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Umidigi Uwatch 2 and other Smartwatches

No results found