OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Boat Lunar Call Pro review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£35Screen size:1.39 inchBattery life:10 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Boat Lunar Call Pro Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 5 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Boat Lunar Call Pro
6.5/10

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

35%

6.2

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

6.2

Reviews score

10%

5.6

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 67% of smartwatches
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 62%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components

24%

6.3

Health

21%

8.2

Fitness

16%

5.8

Battery

14%

5.8

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

6.9

Display & Design

4%

7.8

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 52%
6.2

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models

6.2

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

8.0

Average grade

20%

6.6

Popularity

Grades by review (5)
5 videos, average 8.0/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 67%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • boat-lunar-call-pro
  • boat-lunar-call-pro
  • boat-lunar-call-pro
  • boat-lunar-call-pro
  • boat-lunar-call-pro
  • boat-lunar-call-pro
  • boat-lunar-call-pro
boat-lunar-call-pro
boat-lunar-call-pro
boat-lunar-call-pro
boat-lunar-call-pro
boat-lunar-call-pro
boat-lunar-call-pro
boat-lunar-call-pro
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Boat Lunar Call Pro

Based on 0 · 4

Reviewers agree the build quality is solid and well made, with no complaints raised about how it holds up.
Praised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Boat Lunar Call Pro

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components:

24%

6.3

Health

21%

8.2

Fitness

16%

5.8

Battery

14%

5.8

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

6.9

Display & Design

4%

7.8

Hardware

6.2
Reviews score
6.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components:

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.6
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports HRV tracking. 54.9% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
10 days
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 10 days on a charge, which is longer than 59.2% of Smartwatches and the same as 6.6% of Smartwatches.
10 (or 15 days with power saving.
Battery life in training mode
6 h
Market range: <6 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 6 h on a charge, which is shorter than 84.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 5.6% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
260 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 260 mAh battery, which is smaller than 68% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.6% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
30 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 30 min, which is quicker than 98.9% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.6% of Smartwatches.
Show more
Operating system
Proprietary OS
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS, which is less advanced than the system in 54.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 42% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 59.8% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
Screen size
1.39 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.39 inch screen, which is smaller than 51.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 9% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
454x 454
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454 which is higher than that of 76.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 7% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
462 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 462 ppi, which is higher than 91.7% of Smartwatches and equal to 4.6% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
600 nits
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch has a screen brightness of 600 nits, which is lower than 52.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 13.1% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
Apollo3.5 Blue Plus
This smartwatch uses the Apollo3.5 Blue Plus processor model.
RAM
?
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Boat Lunar Call Pro vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 90 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (30 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    30 min vs 120 min
  • Fall detection
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 23% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 610 more exercise types
    This smartwatch includes more exercise types than the average smartwatch (700 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    Reported as at least 700 exercise modes.
    700 vs 90
  • 136 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (462 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    462 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 3 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (10 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    10 (or 15 days with power saving.
    10 days vs 7 days
  • 10.7 mm slimmer
    This smartwatch is slimmer than the average smartwatch (1 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    1 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 41.9% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • Water intake tracking
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44.1% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 2 years newer
    This smartwatch was released more recently than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    March 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • 610 more exercise types
    This smartwatch includes more exercise types than the average smartwatch (700 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    Reported as at least 700 exercise modes.
    700 vs 90
  • 90 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (30 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    30 min vs 120 min
  • 3 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (10 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    10 (or 15 days with power saving.
    10 days vs 7 days
  • 136 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (462 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    462 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 10.7 mm slimmer
    This smartwatch is slimmer than the average smartwatch (1 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    1 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • Higher resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    454x454 vs 360x360
  • 38.5 mm narrower case
    This smartwatch has a narrower case than the average smartwatch (4 mm vs 42.5 mm). The average smartwatch measures 42.5 mm across.
    4 mm vs 42.5 mm
  • 19 mm shorter case
    This smartwatch has a shorter case than the average smartwatch (26 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch is 45 mm tall.
    26 mm vs 45 mm
  • Fall detection
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 23% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • No GPS support
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 59.7% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No elevation tracking
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • 48.5 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No auto-pause
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 62.6% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • 14 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (6 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    6 h vs 20 h
  • 11.4% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models

    6.2

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.0

    Average grade

    20%

    6.6

    Popularity

    Grades by review (5)
    5 videos, average 8.0/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.2 vs 7.0
  • 25.3% lower sentiment score
    5.6 vs 7.5
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No smart scale support
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No elevation tracking
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No auto-pause
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 62.6% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • 14 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (6 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    6 h vs 20 h
  • 45 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery than the average smartwatch (260 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    260 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • No GPS support
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 59.7% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • 48.5 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 150 nits dimmer screen
    This smartwatch has a dimmer screen than the average smartwatch (600 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    600 nits vs 750 nits
  • 5 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (50 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    50 g vs 45 g
  • 0.01 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.4 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.39 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No passcode
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 70.4% of smartwatches include passcode protection.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
BV ke Review
≈ estimated
03/05/2023
Hands-on test · heart rate, SpO2 and step tracking
Verdict
Boat Lunar Call Pro gives reliable heart rate and SpO2 readings for casual tracking, but step counting is less accurate.
8.0
TECHINN TECH
≈ estimated
11/04/2023
Long-term test · 7 days of daily use
Verdict
Boat Lunar Call Pro is recommended overall, but its call delays and weather disconnects need a software fix.
9.0
ANUPAM Dev official
≈ estimated
31/03/2023
Unboxing and review · sensor and call tests
Verdict
Boat Lunar Call Pro offers good value for money, though features such as a calculator and games are missing.
9.0
IE Tech
≈ estimated
28/03/2023
Unboxing and full review · design, features, app, calling
Verdict
Boat Lunar Call Pro offers good value for its price, worth buying if you like the design and features.
7.0
Early Mystery Unboxing
≈ estimated
30/04/2023
Unboxing · first impressions
Verdict
Boat Lunar Call Pro impresses on build quality, though connection drops and the price feels a little high.
Overview video
Overview video

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Boat Lunar Call Pro

  • Vibrant 1.39-inch AMOLED display with high brightness (up to 600 nits) suitable for outdoor use
  • Premium design and build quality including a sleek metallic finish
  • Excellent battery life, lasting several days to a week depending on features like AOD and BT calling
  • Smooth and intuitive touch interface with a responsive UI
  • Good value for money as a feature-rich budget smartwatch
  • Effective Bluetooth calling with clear sound quality and ENx technology

What customers don't like about Boat Lunar Call Pro

  • Inconsistent accuracy in fitness tracking, specifically with the step counter which may record hand movements
  • Connectivity issues reported, with some users experiencing frequent Bluetooth disconnections
  • Limited contact syncing (some users report only 10 contacts sync instead of the advertised 20)
  • Heavier feel that may be uncomfortable for regular use or for those with smaller wrists
  • Occasional software or hardware defects, such as the side button or display failing after short-term use
  • Slow 'Raise to Wake' gesture response for some users

Verdict

The boAt Lunar Call Pro is a feature-rich smartwatch headlined by a 1.39-inch AMOLED display with a 454x454 resolution and 600 nits of brightness. It is powered by the Apollo 3.5 Blue Plus processor, which offers twice the speed of its predecessors, and includes an ambient light sensor for automatic brightness adjustment. Key characteristics include an IP68 water resistance rating, 700+ active fitness modes, and specialized 'SensAi' cricket analytics. Its primary pros are its vibrant always-on display, seamless Bluetooth calling with a built-in HD mic/speaker, and a long-lasting 260mAh battery that provides up to 15 days of life with ASAP fast charging. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS and occasional user-reported issues with step counting accuracy and Bluetooth connectivity stability.

Compare Boat Lunar Call Pro with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Boat Lunar Call Pro and other Smartwatches

No results found