OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Noise Colorfit Pro 4 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Screen size:1.72 inchBattery life:7 daysDisplay type:TFT LCD

Noise Colorfit Pro 4 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 7 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components

70%

6.1

Technical score

30%

7.4

Review score ( 5 · 2)

Review score 30% · 7.4 · based on 7 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
â–¼Worse than 53% of smartwatches
6.1

Technical score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components

24%

6.0

Health

21%

8.2

Fitness

16%

6.1

Battery

14%

4.7

Smart features

12%

4.3

Connectivity

9%

6.2

Display & Design

4%

6.9

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 52% of smartwatches
7.4

Review score

Review score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Grades by review (7)
5 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
2

16.7%

7.0

smartgearhq.com

16.7%

6.6

firstpost.com

≈ estimated
3

16.7%

9.0

thehindu.com

16.7%

7.0

fonearena.com

16.7%

6.0

newsbytesapp.com

Video reviews 2

8.3%

9.0

Gadget Gig

8.3%

8.0

Custom Tech Reviews

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 67% of smartwatches
  • noise-colorfit-pro-4
  • noise-colorfit-pro-4
  • noise-colorfit-pro-4
  • noise-colorfit-pro-4
  • noise-colorfit-pro-4
  • noise-colorfit-pro-4
  • noise-colorfit-pro-4
  • noise-colorfit-pro-4
  • noise-colorfit-pro-4
  • noise-colorfit-pro-4
noise-colorfit-pro-4
noise-colorfit-pro-4
noise-colorfit-pro-4
noise-colorfit-pro-4
noise-colorfit-pro-4
noise-colorfit-pro-4
noise-colorfit-pro-4
noise-colorfit-pro-4
noise-colorfit-pro-4
noise-colorfit-pro-4

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Noise Colorfit Pro 4

Technical score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components:

24%

6.0

Health

21%

8.2

Fitness

16%

6.1

Battery

14%

4.7

Smart features

12%

4.3

Connectivity

9%

6.2

Display & Design

4%

6.9

Hardware

6.1
Review score
Review score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Grades by review (7)
5 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
2

16.7%

7.0

smartgearhq.com

16.7%

6.6

firstpost.com

≈ estimated
3

16.7%

9.0

thehindu.com

16.7%

7.0

fonearena.com

16.7%

6.0

newsbytesapp.com

Video reviews 2

8.3%

9.0

Gadget Gig

8.3%

8.0

Custom Tech Reviews

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.4
Popularity
Popularity
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 88% of models
Popularity:
Noise Colorfit Pro 4 has a popularity of 9.4 points, which is higher than 88.5% of smartwatches.
9.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components:

60%

6.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.6
Brand name
Noise
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
?
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
Gyroscope
no
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 70% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
?
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 7 days which is longer than that of 38.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 17.1% of smartwatches.
7 (drops to 1 with bluetooth calling.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery power
250 mAh
Battery power
250 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 250 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 70.6% of smartwatches and equal to those in 1.5% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.72 inch
Screen size
1.72 inch
â–² Better than 83% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.72 inch which is larger than the screens of 82.7% of smartwatches.
Some sources mention multiple/uncertain size variants.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
This smartwatch uses a TFT LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 74.1% of smartwatches and the same as that of 15.9% of smartwatches.
Resolution
356x 400
Resolution
356x 400
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 356x400 which is higher than that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
311 ppi
Pixel density
311 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 311 ppi which is lower than that of 59.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
500 nits
Display brightness
500 nits
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 500 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 70% of smartwatches and equal to that of 15.6% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0 GB
Internal storage
0 GB
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 73.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.4% of smartwatches.
No local user storage for apps/media
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Noise Colorfit Pro 4 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 20.9 g lighter weight
    Weight
    24.1 g
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (24.1 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight includes strap/bracelet.
    24.1 g vs 45.0 g
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.3
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.3 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • 0.32 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.72 inch
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.7 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    Some sources mention multiple/uncertain size variants.
    1.72 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • Better case material
    Case material
    stainless steel, titanium, polycarbonate
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel, titanium, polycarbonate for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel, titanium, polycarbonate vs polycarbonate
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 3.71x cheaper
    Noise Colorfit Pro 4 is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£35 vs £130).
    £35 vs £130
  • 53.9% more popular
    Noise Colorfit Pro 4 has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (9.42 vs 6.1).
    9.42 vs 6.12
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 20 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    100
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (100 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    100 vs 80
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.3
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.3 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • 20.9 g lighter weight
    Weight
    24.1 g
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (24.1 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight includes strap/bracelet.
    24.1 g vs 45.0 g
  • 0.32 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.72 inch
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.7 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    Some sources mention multiple/uncertain size variants.
    1.72 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • Better case material
    Case material
    stainless steel, titanium, polycarbonate
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel, titanium, polycarbonate for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel, titanium, polycarbonate vs polycarbonate
  • 10 °C higher max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    55.0 °C
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a higher maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (55 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    55.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No swim mode
    Swim sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 74.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No swim mode
    Swim sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 74.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 50 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    250 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (250 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    7 (drops to 1 with bluetooth calling.
    250 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 100 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    500 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (500 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    500 nits vs 600 nits
  • Less practical form
    Form
    rectangular
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No widget support
    Widget support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartwatch does not support widgets, the average smartwatch does. 83.1% of smartwatches support widgets.
  • 4 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    No local user storage for apps/media
    0 GB vs 4 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Custom Tech Reviews
≈ estimated
15/07/2022
Long-term review · about two weeks of heavy use
Verdict
Noise Colorfit Pro 4 is a good budget calling smartwatch, though call quality drops in noisy places.
9.0
Gadget Gig
≈ estimated
03/07/2022
Unboxing and review · features, app and calling tests
Verdict
Noise Colorfit Pro 4 is highly recommended for budget buyers who want good Bluetooth calling, build and design.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 5 · 2

Reviewers praise the bright display and light, comfortable fit, but are split on call quality and doubt the stress monitoring.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
thehindu.com
≈ estimated
09/07/2022
Hands-on review · Budget smartwatch
Verdict
The Noise ColorFit Pro 4 is a light, comfortable calling watch with a bright screen and about a week of battery, suited to outdoor use.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Noise Colorfit Pro 4

  • High-resolution 1.72-inch display with a smooth 60Hz refresh rate
  • Functional digital crown that simplifies menu navigation
  • Reliable Bluetooth calling functionality with decent speaker and mic quality
  • Lightweight and comfortable design suitable for all-day wear
  • Competitive pricing, making it a strong budget-friendly option
  • IP68 dust and water resistance rating

What we don't like about Noise Colorfit Pro 4

  • Inconsistent fitness tracking accuracy, particularly for steps and heart rate during movement
  • Frequent Bluetooth disconnection and pairing issues reported by users
  • Lack of an Always-On Display (AOD) mode
  • Slow data synchronisation with the companion mobile app
  • Mixed battery performance that can drop significantly under heavy use
  • Occasional software lag even when the device is new

Verdict

The Noise Colorfit Pro 4 is an affordable smartwatch featuring a 1.72-inch TFT LCD display with a 356x400 pixel resolution, 500 nits of brightness, and a smooth 60Hz refresh rate. It is built with a lightweight polycarbonate frame, weighing 24.1g, and includes a fully functional rotating digital crown for interface navigation. Key characteristics include Bluetooth 5.3 for calling via a built-in mic and speaker, IP68 water resistance, and a 300mAh battery providing up to 7 days of life. Its main pros are the vibrant, high-refresh-rate screen, reliable Bluetooth calling, and comprehensive health suite (heart rate, SpO2, and sleep tracking). However, notable cons include the lack of an Always-on Display mode, inconsistent fitness tracking accuracy when in motion, and reports of occasional software lag and connectivity drops.

Compare Noise Colorfit Pro 4 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Noise Colorfit Pro 4 and other Smartwatches

No results found