OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Skagen Falster 3 review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£260Screen size:1.30 inchBattery life:1 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Skagen Falster 3 Review: Compare 127 technical specifications, 38 expert and video reviews and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Skagen Falster 3
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

35%

6.4

Technical score

30%

6.4

List score

25%

8.1

Reviews score

10%

6.4

Sentiment score

▼Worse than 58% of smartwatches
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

▼Worse than 69%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models
Score components

24%

4.0

Health

21%

8.6

Fitness

16%

4.9

Battery

14%

7.8

Smart features

12%

7.4

Connectivity

9%

6.7

Display & Design

4%

6.4

Hardware

▲Better than 51%
8.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 59% of models

80%

7.9

Average grade

20%

8.7

Popularity

Grades by review (38)
18 reviews + 20 videos, average 7.9/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 59%
6.4

List score

List score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 119 lists (1%)
▲Better than 76%
  • skagen-falster-3
  • skagen-falster-3
  • skagen-falster-3
  • skagen-falster-3
  • skagen-falster-3
  • skagen-falster-3
  • skagen-falster-3
  • skagen-falster-3
  • skagen-falster-3
skagen-falster-3
skagen-falster-3
skagen-falster-3
skagen-falster-3
skagen-falster-3
skagen-falster-3
skagen-falster-3
skagen-falster-3
skagen-falster-3
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Skagen Falster 3

Based on 11 · 12

Reviewers praise the stylish build and clear calls, but the software feels clunky and the strap divides opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Skagen Falster 3

Based on 37 owners sharing their experience in online comments

32%positive19%mixed49%negative

Owners love its stylish design, but short battery life and frustrating software are the biggest drawbacks.

What owners dislike

  • Many owners report battery lasting only a few hours to one day, draining fast with always-on display or workouts, and some want multi-day life.18
  • Owners describe Wear OS as laggy and slow to respond to simple commands, with the watch feeling sluggish at times.6
  • Owners say the watch often disconnects from their phone, especially iPhones or Huawei, and notifications sometimes stop arriving entirely.5
  • Owners report the strap clicks when put on, and the brackets arrived bent outward, with a cut-out post design they find poorly made.3
  • Owners say Google sign-in fails on some phones, Google Assistant won't work, contacts don't sync, and Google Maps shows a can't-navigate error.3
  • Owners report buggy software, including sound that works only after restarts, clicky tones without audio, and general frustration with Wear OS.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Skagen Falster 3

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models
Score components:

24%

4.0

Health

21%

8.6

Fitness

16%

4.9

Battery

14%

7.8

Smart features

12%

7.4

Connectivity

9%

6.7

Display & Design

4%

6.4

Hardware

6.4
Reviews score
8.1
List score
6.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

7.5
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 69.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
1 day
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 1 day on a charge, which is shorter than 88.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 8.1% of Smartwatches.
Up to 2 days in power saving.
Battery life in training mode
3 h
Market range: <6 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 3 h on a charge, which is shorter than 97.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.3% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery power
310 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 310 mAh battery, which is larger than 51% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.2% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
63 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 63 min, which is quicker than 83.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.2% of Smartwatches.
Normalized from hour-based sources to 63 minutes.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
This smartwatch runs Wear OS, which is more advanced than the system in 80.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 15.8% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
Screen size
1.3 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.3 inch screen, which is smaller than 67.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 10.8% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
416x 416
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 416x416 which is higher than that of 70.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.5% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
453 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 453 ppi, which is higher than 75.6% of Smartwatches and equal to 2.3% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
500 nits
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch has a screen brightness of 500 nits, which is lower than 73.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 13.6% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 3100
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 3100 processor model.
RAM
1 GB
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM, which is more than 34.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 41.8% of Smartwatches.
Internal storage
8 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 8 GB of internal storage, which is more than 65.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 11.3% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Skagen Falster 3 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 57 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (63 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    Normalized from hour-based sources to 63 minutes.
    63 min vs 120 min
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 44.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 15.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 59% of models

    80%

    7.9

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (38)
    18 reviews + 20 videos, average 7.9/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.0
  • 15.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 59% of models

    80%

    7.9

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (38)
    18 reviews + 20 videos, average 7.9/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.0
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 57 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (63 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    Normalized from hour-based sources to 63 minutes.
    63 min vs 120 min
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Better band material
    This smartwatch uses silicone, leather, stainless steel for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, leather, stainless steel vs silicone
  • 127 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (453 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    453 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • 2 mm slimmer strap
    This smartwatch has a slimmer strap than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch has a 22 mm strap.
    20 mm vs 22 mm
  • Higher resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 416x416, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    416x416 vs 360x360
  • 0.7 mm slimmer
    This smartwatch is slimmer than the average smartwatch (11 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    11 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 44.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • More advanced processor model
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 3100 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    Snapdragon Wear 3,100 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • 2x more internal storage
    This smartwatch has more internal storage than the average smartwatch (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • 19.0% lower list score
    List score
    6.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 119 lists (1%)
    6.4 vs 7.9
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 17 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (3 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    3 h vs 20 h
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • 48.5 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 19.0% lower list score
    List score
    6.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 119 lists (1%)
    6.4 vs 7.9
  • 2.36x more expensive
    Skagen Falster 3 is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£260 vs £110).
    £260 vs £110
  • 14.7% lower sentiment score
    6.4 vs 7.5
  • 3.5% worse value for money
    Skagen Falster 3 has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.5 vs 7.8).
    7.5 vs 7.76
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No smart scale support
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No inactivity alerts
    This smartwatch does not support inactivity alerts, the average smartwatch does. 92.6% of smartwatches support inactivity alerts.
  • 1 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2020 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    January 2020
    2020 vs 2021
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • 17 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (3 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    3 h vs 20 h
  • 6 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (1 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    Up to 2 days in power saving.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • Less current Bluetooth version
    This smartwatch uses a less current Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (4.2 vs 5).
    4.2 vs 5
  • 48.5 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 250 nits dimmer screen
    This smartwatch has a dimmer screen than the average smartwatch (500 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    500 nits vs 750 nits
  • 0.1 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

5.0
MrMobile [Michael Fisher]
≈ estimated
22/04/2020
Long-term test · two months of daily use
Verdict
Skagen Falster 3 is only worth buying if you love its design; other watches are easier to recommend.
7.0
Mac's Tech Toy Box
≈ estimated
12/03/2020
Hands-on review · daily use, GPS and software testing
Verdict
Skagen Falster 3 has strong hardware and build, but battery life and Wear OS glitches hold it back for everyday users.
4.0
Naulton
≈ estimated
10/03/2020
Hands-on review · two weeks of daily use
Verdict
Skagen Falster 3 is a beautiful watch, but Wear OS lags and misses basics, so it is not recommended right now.
9.0
1asian1phone
≈ estimated
18/02/2020
Owner review · daily use and battery settings
Verdict
Skagen Falster 3 has minimalist looks, smooth performance and about 30 hours of battery in saver mode, which suits all-day notifications.
8.0
Joshua Vergara
≈ estimated
18/02/2020
Long-term test · travel battery and daily use
Verdict
Skagen Falster 3 is an elegant Wear OS watch, but its battery life of a day and a half limits travel use.
9.0
Mike O'Brien
≈ estimated
15/02/2020
Long-term review · one month of daily use
Verdict
Skagen Falster 3 is a recommended Wear OS watch, though a few daily-use quirks stand out.
8.0
TheUnlockr
≈ estimated
31/01/2020
Real-world test · full day of battery and workout tracking
Verdict
Skagen Falster 3 is recommended for Wear OS fans since its extra battery modes help, though it still feels average.
8.0
Innovate Life
≈ estimated
09/01/2021
Short experience video · comparison with previous watch
Verdict
Skagen Falster 3 is pretty good overall, with faster notifications and a speaker that works for phone calls.
8.0
Nerdbench
≈ estimated
23/03/2020
Hands-on review · weeks of use, calls and battery
Verdict
Skagen Falster 3 is a very attractive, fully featured watch whose only real drawback is battery life.
7.0
Neowin
≈ estimated
26/01/2020
First look · unboxing, setup and first impressions
Verdict
Skagen Falster 3 has clunky Wear OS, but it is the best of a bad lot and good value for iPhone users.
9.0
Android Central
≈ estimated
07/01/2020
Hands-on first look · CES 2020 impressions
Verdict
Skagen Falster 3 is among the best Wear OS hardware yet, with a comfortable strap and faster performance.
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
9to5google.com
≈ estimated
16/02/2020
Review · Minimalist Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Skagen Falster 3 is a handsome Wear OS watch for casual outfits, with a bigger 42mm case and apps that can be slow.
10
androidheadlines.com
✓ explicit
03/06/2020
Performance test · Stylish watch
Verdict
The Skagen Falster 3 is a smooth, good-looking Wear OS watch with an excellent screen and all-day battery, though small glitches and a flimsy charger remain.
8.0
androidpolice.com
✓ explicit
10/05/2020
Long-term review · Minimalist watch
Verdict
The Skagen Falster 3 is a sleek Wear OS watch that lasts all day, best for minimalist fans who don't need detailed health tracking.
8.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
10/03/2020
Hands-on review · Fitness and payments
Verdict
The Skagen Falster 3 is a fashionable, minimalist watch with GPS, NFC and offline music, but Google Fit is basic and battery lasts barely a day.
8.0
stuff.tv
✓ explicit
11/03/2020
One-week test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Skagen Falster 3 is a classic-looking Wear OS watch that lasts around two days, but its software feels fiddly.
7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
07/07/2020
Hands-on test · Fashion smartwatch
Verdict
The Skagen Falster 3 looks distinctive with a bright screen, but it's heavy and suits people who don't need many smart features.
8.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
11/03/2020
Hands-on review · Design and battery
Verdict
The Skagen Falster 3 is the best-looking Wear OS watch so far, but its mesh strap is fiddly to resize and its watch faces are dull.
9.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
16/03/2020
Few-week test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Skagen Falster 3 is a great-looking Wear OS watch with smoother performance, but it lasts about a day and its heart rate and fitness tracking aren't reliable.
8.0
androidauthority.com
≈ estimated
07/12/2021
Seven-day test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Skagen Falster 3 may be one of the best Wear OS watches, lasting all day with solid performance, though Wear OS is changing slowly.
8.0
droid-life.com
≈ estimated
03/02/2020
Hands-on review · Design and charging
Verdict
The Skagen Falster 3 is a Wear OS watch whose design is its main draw, with quick charging and about a day of battery, though it sometimes stutters.
8.0
heise.de
✓ explicit
14/02/2020
Test report · Fashion smartwatch
Verdict
The Skagen Falster 3 suits buyers who want a classic watch look with smart features, but the strap looks cheap and battery life depends on turning features off.
8.0
stadt-bremerhaven.de
≈ estimated
22/03/2020
Daily-use test · Classic-style smartwatch
Verdict
The Skagen Falster 3 is a classic-looking Wear OS watch that feels light and can last two workdays, best for buyers who want style over sports tracking.
6.0
allround-pc.com
✓ explicit
01/09/2020
Hands-on test · Elegant smartwatch
Verdict
The Skagen Falster 3 is an elegant watch with a sharp screen and speaker, but its battery often empties by evening and the software stutters.
9.0
miescapedigital.com
≈ estimated
24/09/2020
One-week test · Stainless steel watch
Verdict
The Skagen Falster 3 looks classic and lasts around two days, but Wear OS makes it harder to use.
7.0
androidworld.nl
≈ estimated
06/05/2020
Hands-on test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Skagen Falster 3 is a light, minimal watch that lasts 20 to 22 hours on custom settings, though Wear OS still glitches now and then.
7.0
androidworld.be
≈ estimated
06/05/2020
Hands-on test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Skagen Falster 3 is a light, minimal watch that lasts 20 to 22 hours on custom settings, though Wear OS still glitches now and then.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Skagen Falster 3

  • Elegant minimalist Danish design with high-quality stainless steel construction
  • Snappy and responsive performance due to 1GB of RAM and Snapdragon Wear 3100
  • Bright and clear circular OLED display that is easy to read
  • Includes a built-in speaker and microphone for phone calls and Google Assistant
  • Features a rotatable crown and customisable physical pushers for easy navigation
  • Quick charging capability allows for rapid battery top-ups
  • Excellent selection of stylish, branded Skagen watch faces

What customers don't like about Skagen Falster 3

  • Underwhelming battery life that typically requires daily charging
  • Fragile charging rings on the back have been known to peel off over time
  • Wear OS software can occasionally experience bugs or slow app loading
  • Lacks a dedicated offline music platform following the phase-out of Google Play Music
  • Vibration motor can feel weak compared to competitors
  • GPS and fitness tracking can significantly drain the battery during workouts

Verdict

The Skagen Falster 3 is a refined Wear OS smartwatch featuring a 42mm stainless steel case, a 1.3-inch AMOLED display (328 ppi), and the Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 3100 chipset. It significantly improves performance over its predecessor with 1GB of RAM and 8GB of internal storage, while maintaining a minimalist Danish design with a functional rotating crown and two customizable buttons. Key strengths include its elegant aesthetic, a built-in speaker and microphone for Bluetooth calls, 3 ATM water resistance, and rapid charging that reaches 80% in approximately 50 minutes. However, it is primarily hindered by mediocre battery life that typically necessitates daily charging, occasional software stutters common to Wear OS, and a higher price point compared to technically similar competitors.

Compare Skagen Falster 3 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Skagen Falster 3 and other Smartwatches

No results found