OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Fossil Gen 6 44mm review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£260Screen size:1.28 inchBattery life:1 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Fossil Gen 6 44mm Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 19 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Fossil Gen 6 44mm
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

35%

6.5

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

6.5

Reviews score

10%

6.1

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 59% of smartwatches
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 69%
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components

24%

5.6

Health

21%

8.9

Fitness

16%

3.5

Battery

14%

6.9

Smart features

12%

7.4

Connectivity

9%

6.7

Display & Design

4%

6.4

Hardware

â–²Better than 53%
6.5

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models

6.5

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.6

Average grade

20%

8.0

Popularity

Grades by review (19)
11 reviews + 8 videos, average 7.5/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 63%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • fossil-gen-6-44-mm
  • fossil-gen-6-44-mm
  • fossil-gen-6-44-mm
  • fossil-gen-6-44-mm
  • fossil-gen-6-44-mm
  • fossil-gen-6-44-mm
  • fossil-gen-6-44-mm
fossil-gen-6-44-mm
fossil-gen-6-44-mm
fossil-gen-6-44-mm
fossil-gen-6-44-mm
fossil-gen-6-44-mm
fossil-gen-6-44-mm
fossil-gen-6-44-mm
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Fossil Gen 6 44mm

Based on 10 · 8

Reviewers love the design and smooth performance, but battery life splits opinion and fitness tracking falls short.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Fossil Gen 6 44mm

Based on 44 owners sharing their experience in online comments

14%positive6%mixed80%negative

Attractive styling is the clearest bright spot, while poor battery life and recurring software and connection failures frustrate owners.

What owners dislike

  • Battery drains fast: owners report needing daily charging, some getting under a day, and one said the battery drops while on the charger; disabling Wi-Fi helped one owner.14
  • Phone notifications such as WhatsApp, messages and emails often stop arriving, and a reset only fixes it for a short time before the problem returns.5
  • Setup is hard: Wear OS and the Fossil app conflict, and the watch may not pair with the Wear OS app, forcing a Fossil app setup and QR code.5
  • Calls and text replies stop working after setup or an update, and one owner could not reply to SMS messages.5
  • Google Assistant stops working: 'OK Google' does not trigger, replies are text-only, and it reports it cannot connect to the phone.4
  • The watch often disconnects from the phone and sometimes loses notifications, and a reset helps only temporarily.4
  • The large black bezels make the display look small and take up screen space.3
  • Charging is unreliable: the watch often fails to charge unless it sits exactly on the charger, overheats, or does not charge with USB cables.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Fossil Gen 6 44mm

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components:

24%

5.6

Health

21%

8.9

Fitness

16%

3.5

Battery

14%

6.9

Smart features

12%

7.4

Connectivity

9%

6.7

Display & Design

4%

6.4

Hardware

6.5
Reviews score
6.5
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

7.5
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports HRV tracking. 54.9% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
1 day
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 1 day on a charge, which is shorter than 88.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 8.1% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
10 h
Market range: <6 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 10 h on a charge, which is shorter than 69% of Smartwatches and the same as 4% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
5 h
Market range: <6 h – >46 h
This smartwatch lasts 5 h with GPS on, which is shorter than 92.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.4% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
300 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 300 mAh battery, which is smaller than 51.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 6.3% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
This smartwatch runs Wear OS, which is more advanced than the system in 80.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 15.8% of Smartwatches.
OS detail: Wear OS (3).
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.6% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
?
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.28 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.28 inch screen, which is smaller than 78% of Smartwatches and the same as 4.9% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
416x 416
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 416x416 which is higher than that of 70.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.5% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
460 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 460 ppi, which is higher than 80.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 4.8% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
600 nits
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch has a screen brightness of 600 nits, which is lower than 52.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 13.1% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
4x 1.7 GHz
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.7 GHz which is faster than that in 89.6% of smartwatches and equal to that in 8.5% of smartwatches.
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 4100
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 4100 processor model.
RAM
1 GB
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM, which is more than 34.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 41.8% of Smartwatches.
Internal storage
8 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 8 GB of internal storage, which is more than 65.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 11.3% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Fossil Gen 6 44mm vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (3).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.6% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
    Compatible through third-party apps/workarounds.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass vs mineral glass
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44.1% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
    Compatible through third-party apps/workarounds.
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.6% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass vs mineral glass
  • 134 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (460 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    460 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Better band material
    This smartwatch uses silicone, leather, stainless steel for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, leather, stainless steel vs silicone
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • Higher resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 416x416, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    416x416 vs 360x360
  • 0.7 mm slimmer
    This smartwatch is slimmer than the average smartwatch (11 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    11 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (3).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • More advanced processor model
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 4100 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    Snapdragon Wear 4,100 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • Faster CPU speed
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.7 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    4x1.7 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • 2x more internal storage
    This smartwatch has more internal storage than the average smartwatch (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No multi-sport mode
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 71.7% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • 16 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (5 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    5 h vs 21 h
  • 6 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (1 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 75 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (120 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    120.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 10 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (10 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    10 h vs 20 h
  • 18.7% lower sentiment score
    6.1 vs 7.5
  • 7.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models

    6.5

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (19)
    11 reviews + 8 videos, average 7.5/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.5 vs 7.0
  • 2.36x more expensive
    Fossil Gen 6 44mm is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£260 vs £110).
    £260 vs £110
  • 4.1% worse value for money
    Fossil Gen 6 44mm has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.46 vs 7.8).
    7.46 vs 7.76
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No multi-sport mode
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 71.7% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • 16 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (5 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    5 h vs 21 h
  • 6 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (1 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • 10 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (10 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    10 h vs 20 h
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 75 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (120 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    120.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 20 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (30 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    30 m vs 50 m
  • 0.12 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.28 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • 150 nits dimmer screen
    This smartwatch has a dimmer screen than the average smartwatch (600 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    600 nits vs 750 nits

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
M20UBR
≈ estimated
11/10/2022
First impressions · unboxing and build check
Verdict
Fossil Gen 6 44mm has solid build quality and a handy scroll wheel; features are still to be tested.
Hands-on video, no verdict

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
28/10/2021
Hands-on review · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 is a fast, good-looking Wear OS watch that works with iOS and Android, but its battery lasts about a day.
7.4
techgearlab.com
✓ explicit
24/01/2023
Lab test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 is worth it only if you mainly want its look, as battery life and health tracking fall short.
8.0
yours.co.uk
≈ estimated
07/01/2022
Daily use test · Stylish smartwatch
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 is a stylish standalone smartwatch that suits everyday wear, but its battery and buttons get in the way of serious workouts.
7.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
04/11/2021
Lab test · Battery and fitness
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 only makes sense for Fossil fans, as the Galaxy Watch 4 is the better pick until Wear OS 3 arrives.
8.0
chip.de
≈ estimated
17/12/2021
Hands-on test · Design and charging
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 is best for a premium steel look and very quick charging, but its low-resolution display looks blurry.
8.0
smartzone.de
≈ estimated
05/12/2021
Hands-on test · Fitness and battery
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 runs smoothly on a newer chip, but its battery needs charging most days and heart rate readings can swing.
6.2
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
26/01/2023
Hands-on test · Fitness apps
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 brings Wear OS 3 and useful Google apps, but its basic fitness app and short battery keep it behind rivals.
8.0
global.techradar.com
✓ explicit
09/11/2021
Full review · Design and battery
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 is a responsive, stylish watch with a limited battery, and Wear OS 3 is still months away.
8.0
frandroid.com
✓ explicit
05/11/2021
Hands-on test · Design and apps
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 is a classy, responsive watch with Google Assistant and Google Pay, but Wear OS 3 is still months away.
8.0
techprincess.it
≈ estimated
18/10/2021
Field test · Design and fitness
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 is a stylish, responsive watch with a bright screen, but the battery runs short and Wear OS 3 is still to come.
7.0
bright.nl
≈ estimated
03/11/2021
Hands-on test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 suits buyers who want a classic-looking watch with extra features, but athletes should look elsewhere.
tweakers.net
28/11/2021
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Fossil Gen 6 44mm

  • Stylish and attractive traditional watch design
  • Extremely fast charging (reaches 80% in about 30 minutes)
  • Bright and crisp 1.28-inch AMOLED display
  • Snappy performance powered by the Snapdragon Wear 4100+ chipset
  • Includes physical shortcut buttons and a rotating crown for navigation
  • Comprehensive health sensors including SpO2 and heart rate monitoring
  • Built-in speaker and microphone for taking phone calls

What customers don't like about Fossil Gen 6 44mm

  • Poor battery life, typically requiring daily charging
  • Frequent Bluetooth disconnection and pairing issues
  • Health and fitness tracking can be inaccurate or less detailed than competitors
  • Large physical buttons can be accidentally pressed during workouts
  • Vague or missing instructions for initial setup and advanced features
  • Some users report durability concerns with the charging contacts and screen
  • The 44mm case size can feel bulky on smaller wrists

Verdict

The Fossil Gen 6 44mm is a versatile Wear OS smartwatch powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100+ chipset with 1GB of RAM and 8GB of storage. It features a 1.28-inch AMOLED touchscreen (416 x 416 resolution) housed in a durable stainless steel case with a 3 ATM water resistance rating. Key characteristics include built-in GPS, NFC for contactless payments, a speaker and microphone for phone calls, and comprehensive health sensors for heart rate, SpO2 (blood oxygen), and sleep tracking. Main pros are its exceptionally fast charging (reaching 80% in roughly 30 minutes), a vibrant always-on display, and smooth performance across a wide range of apps. However, common cons include a relatively short battery life that typically requires daily charging, occasional Bluetooth connectivity issues, and a bulky physical profile that some users find less ideal for intense workouts.

Compare Fossil Gen 6 44mm with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fossil Gen 6 44mm and other Smartwatches

No results found