OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

vivo X200S (16GB + 1TB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£620RAM capacity:16 GBInternal storage:1 TBScreen size:6.67 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP

vivo X200S (16GB + 1TB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

8.3/10

Overall score

Score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

90%

8.3

Technical score

10%

?

User score

★Better than 93% of smartphones
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components

70%

8.3

Overall score

30%

7.2

Price

â–²Better than 87%
8.3

Technical score

Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

25%

9.3

Performance & Hardware

18%

8.3

Camera

15%

8.8

Display

15%

7.7

Battery

10%

7.6

Software

10%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

7.6

Audio

3%

8.0

Design

★Better than 93%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £620
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone vivo X200S (16GB + 1TB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components:

25%

9.3

Performance & Hardware

18%

8.3

Camera

15%

8.8

Display

15%

7.7

Battery

10%

7.6

Software

10%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

7.6

Audio

3%

8.0

Design

8.3
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
vivo X200S (16GB + 1TB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 63.9% of smartphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components:

70%

8.3

Overall score

30%

7.2

Price

8.0
Brand name
vivo
Processor model
MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ processor which is faster than processors in 94.7% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.4% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 16 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 83.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 12% of smartphones.
Internal storage
1 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 1 TB which is larger than the storage of 94.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.6% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
3.73 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 3.73 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 94% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 15
Android version
Android 15
This smartphone runs Android version Android 15 which is newer than that found in 70.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 25.1% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP which is higher than that of 72.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.5% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.6 & f/2.0 & f/2.6
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.6 & f/2.0 & f/2.6 which is wider than that of 94.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
50 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 50 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 65.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 16.5% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1 µm which is larger than in 57.7% of smartphones and equal to the size in 20% of smartphones.
2 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.67 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches which is larger than the screens of 38.3% of smartphones and equal to those of 13.4% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1260x 2800 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1260x2800 px which is higher than that of 83.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.1% of smartphones.
Pixel density
460 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 460 ppi which is higher than that of 88.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.3% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
6,200 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 6,200 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 80.9% of smartphones and equal to those in 0.3% of smartphones.
Charging speed
90 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 90 W which is faster than in 86.6% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 3.5% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
160 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 160 mm which is shorter than 79.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.9% of smartphones.
Width
74.3 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 74.3 mm which is narrower than 79% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.4% of smartphones.
Thickness
8 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 8 mm which is thinner than 63.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 6.9% of smartphones.
Weight
203 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 203 g which is heavier than 62.8% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 1.2% of smartphones.
Device volume
94,720 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 94,720 cm³ which is smaller than 61.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.8% of smartphones.
Show more

vivo X200S (16GB + 1TB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 3 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (3 x vs 0 x).
    3 x vs 0 x
  • 4x more storage
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (1 TB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    1 TB vs 256 GB
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 24% larger battery capacity
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (6,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5,000 mAh.
    6,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 4,000 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (5,000 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    5,000 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 50% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • 2.73x faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (90 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    90 W vs 33 W
  • 9.3% better value for money
    vivo X200S (16GB + 1TB) has better value for money than the average smartphone (8.02 vs 7.3).
    8.02 vs 7.34
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 4x more storage
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (1 TB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    1 TB vs 256 GB
  • 50% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • 55.4% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (3.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    3.73 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 3.13x higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (2,949 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    2,949 vs 942
  • Better processor
    This smartphone features a better processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (1x3.73 GHz & 4x3.3 GHz & 3x2.4 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    1x3.73 GHz & 4x3.3 GHz & 3x2.4 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 3.33x higher memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has higher memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (85.3 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s.
    85.3 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 6x more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (1,536 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    1,536 vs 256
  • 3.88x faster memory speed
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (10,667 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2,750 MHz memory speed.
    10,667 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 3.65x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (9,258 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in multi-core.
    9,258 vs 2,533
  • 2.98x higher PassMark single-core benchmark
    This smartphone has a better PassMark single-core score than the average smartphone (2,949 vs 988). The average single-core score is 988.
    2,949 vs 988
  • 36.8% faster GPU clock
    This smartphone has a higher GPU frequency than the average smartphone (1,300 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone GPU frequency is 950 MHz.
    1,300 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 2.93x more L3 cache
    This smartphone has more L3 cache than the average smartphone (12,000 KB vs 4,096 KB). The average L3 cache is 4,096 KB.
    12,000 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • 71.4% higher maximum RAM
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (24 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    24 GB vs 14 GB
  • 2x more L2 cache
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1,024 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 4x more L1
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (128 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    128 KB vs 32 KB
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the agentic AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Blue Heart Little V, Atomic Island, AI Transcript Assist, AI Erase, Live Call Translation, AI Search
    agentic vs fundamental
  • Newer Android version
    This smartphone features a newer Android version than the average smartphone (Android 15 vs Android 14). The average version is Android 14.
    Android 15 vs Android 14
  • 3 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (3 x vs 0 x).
    3 x vs 0 x
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 56.3% larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (50 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    50 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.6 & f/2 & f/2.6 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.6 & f/2.0 & f/2.6 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Has a multi-lens front camera
    This smartphone features a multi-lens front camera, the average smartphone does not. 18% of smartphones have multiple front lenses.
  • Supports laser autofocus
    This smartphone features laser autofocus, the average smartphone does not. 21.4% of smartphones include laser AF.
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 0.2 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    2 binned
    1 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.4 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.4 vs 5.2
  • Has an infrared sensor
    This smartphone includes an infrared sensor, the average smartphone does not. 33.3% of smartphones feature an IR blaster.
  • 4,000 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (5,000 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    5,000 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 2.73x higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (1,800 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    1,800 nits vs 660 nits
  • 16.5% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (460 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    460 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1260x2800 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1260x2800 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • 25% higher touch sampling rate
    This smartphone has a higher touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (300 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average touch sampling rate is 240 Hz.
    300 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • 24% larger battery capacity
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (6,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5,000 mAh.
    6,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 2.73x faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (90 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    90 W vs 33 W
  • 2x faster wireless charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (40 W vs 20 W). The average speed is 20 W.
    40 W vs 20 W
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • Is designed for seniors
    This smartphone is designed specifically for seniors, the average smartphone is not. 17% of smartphones are senior-friendly.
  • 1.7 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (74.3 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    74.3 mm vs 76 mm
  • 3.6 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (160 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    160 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 1 year/s newer release date
    This smartphone has a newer release date than the average smartphone (2025 vs 2024). 1.00% of smartphones are released annually.
    November 2025
    2025 vs 2024
  • Better IP rating
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • 0.3 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (8 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    8 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • 5.44x less popular
    vivo X200S (16GB + 1TB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • 2.38x more expensive
    vivo X200S (16GB + 1TB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£620 vs £260).
    £620 vs £260
  • 3.5% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (203 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    203 g vs 196.2 g
  • 5.44x less popular
    vivo X200S (16GB + 1TB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • 2.38x more expensive
    vivo X200S (16GB + 1TB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£620 vs £260).
    £620 vs £260
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 3.5% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (203 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    203 g vs 196.2 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.5
Pro Tech City
≈ estimated
07/04/2025
Unboxing and review · gaming test and heat test
Verdict
vivo X200s is an all-round flagship with strong performance, a great screen and a long-lasting battery.
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

F
frandroid.com
22/04/2025
Summary of the review
Hands-on with the Vivo X200 Ultra (and X200s): Copying this iPhone 16 feature was a mistake
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What customers like about vivo X200S (16GB + 1TB)

  • Exceptional battery life (6200mAh) that can last over a day or two with moderate use and fast 90W wired charging support.
  • Flagship-tier performance delivered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ processor with smooth performance and low throttling.
  • High-quality main and telephoto cameras (ZEISS Optics, 50MP sensors) that produce sharp, color-accurate photos and superior zoom capabilities.
  • Stunning design, premium build, and slim profile that feels good to handle.
  • Vibrant and crisp 6.67-inch 120Hz AMOLED display with excellent brightness and color calibration.
  • Effective cooling system and innovative gaming optimizations.
  • Smooth and responsive user experience with the Funtouch OS (or Origin OS in Chinese versions).
  • Robust durability with IP68/IP69 water and dust resistance ratings.

What customers don't like about vivo X200S (16GB + 1TB)

  • Front/selfie camera performance is considered average, lacking autofocus and generally performing like a mid-range sensor.
  • Speaker quality is decent for videos but lacks bass and depth compared to other flagship phones, sounding a bit 'barky' at high volumes.
  • Funtouch OS can sometimes aggressively kill background apps, which can interrupt downloads or background playback.
  • The software/OS sometimes lacks the polish or customization options found in competitors like Samsung's One UI.
  • The curved display design is a subjective point of contention for some users who prefer flat screens.
  • Lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack and some users experience issues with 5G data bandwidth throttling with certain carriers.

Verdict

The Vivo X200s (16GB+1TB model) is a "flagship light" smartphone powered by the high-performance 3nm MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ processor and featuring an expansive 6.67-inch, 1.5K flat AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a stunning 5000 nits peak brightness. A major pro is its exceptional all-day (or two-day) endurance from a massive 6,200mAh battery, supported by both 90W wired and 40W wireless charging, all within a slim 7.99mm metal frame with IP68/IP69 water and dust resistance. It boasts a versatile 50MP Zeiss-tuned triple-camera system (main, ultrawide, and 3x periscope telephoto) which performs well, though a potential con is that the selfie camera lacks autofocus and its low-light performance is considered slightly behind dedicated imaging flagships.

Compare vivo X200S (16GB + 1TB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of vivo X200S (16GB + 1TB) and other smartphones

No results found