Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (16GB + 128GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,190RAM capacity:16 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:6.9 inchesMain camera megapixels:108 MP & 48 MP & 12 MP & 0.3 MP

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (16GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

7.7/10

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.7

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▲Better than 78% of smartphones
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

4.2

Price

▼Worse than 93%
7.7

Technical score

Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

25%

7.2

Performance & Hardware

18%

8.8

Camera

15%

8.2

Display

15%

6.8

Battery

10%

8.0

Software

10%

8.1

Connectivity

4%

6.2

Audio

3%

7.0

Design

▲Better than 79%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (16GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

25%

7.2

Performance & Hardware

18%

8.8

Camera

15%

8.2

Display

15%

6.8

Battery

10%

8.0

Software

10%

8.1

Connectivity

4%

6.2

Audio

3%

7.0

Design

7.7
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (16GB + 128GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 63.9% of smartphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

4.2

Price

6.6
Brand name
Samsung
Processor model
Samsung Exynos 990
This smartphone uses the Samsung Exynos 990 processor which is faster than processors in 53.7% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.3% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 16 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 83.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 12% of smartphones.
Internal storage
128 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is smaller than the storage of 61.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 28.4% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.73 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.73 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 63.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 13
Android version
Android 13
This smartphone runs Android version Android 13 which is older than that found in 50.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 16.5% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
108 MP & 48 MP & 12 MP & 0.3 MP
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 108 MP & 48 MP & 12 MP & 0.3 MP which is higher than that of 96.4% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.0 & f/2.2 & f/3.5
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.0 & f/2.2 & f/3.5 which is wider than that of 72.8% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
69.1 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 69.1 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 88.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.9% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
2.4 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.9 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.9 inches which is larger than the screens of 93.8% of smartphones and equal to those of 2.6% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1440x 3200 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1440x3200 px which is higher than that of 96% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.1% of smartphones.
Pixel density
511 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 511 ppi which is higher than that of 94.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 28.3% of smartphones and equal to those in 28.8% of smartphones.
Charging speed
45 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 45 W which is faster than in 57.1% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 6.6% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
166.9 mm
This smartphone has a height of 166.9 mm which is taller than 78.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Width
76 mm
This smartphone has a width of 76 mm which is narrower than 47.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.2% of smartphones.
Thickness
8.8 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 8.8 mm which is thicker than 71.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.7% of smartphones.
Weight
222 g
This smartphone weighs 222 g which is heavier than 82.8% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.3% of smartphones.
Device volume
100,928 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 100,928 cm³ which is larger than 68.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.6% of smartphones.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (16GB + 128GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 5 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (5 x vs 0 x).
    5 x vs 0 x
  • 2.16x larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (69.1 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    69.1 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1440x3200 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1440x3200 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (108 MP & 48 MP & 12 MP & 0.3 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    108 MP & 48 MP & 12 MP & 0.3 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 29.4% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (511 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    511 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 50% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (9 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    9 W vs 6 W
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • 2 more memory channels
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x2.73 GHz & 4x2.5 GHz & 2x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x2.73 GHz & 4x2.5 GHz & 2x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 13.8% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.73 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 33.7% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (1,259 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    1,259 vs 942
  • 71.9% higher memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has higher memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (44 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s.
    44 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 14.3% higher maximum RAM
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    16 GB vs 14 GB
  • 16.4% faster memory speed
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (3,200 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2,750 MHz memory speed.
    3,200 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 6.8% higher PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 performance score than the average smartphone (11,519 vs 10,783). The average score is 10,783.
    11,519 vs 10,783
  • Includes cross-site tracking protection
    This smartphone supports cross-site tracking prevention, the average smartphone does not. 32.2% of smartphones include this feature.
  • Supports desktop mode
    This smartphone includes desktop mode, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones support desktop functionality.
  • 5 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (5 x vs 0 x).
    5 x vs 0 x
  • 2.16x larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (69.1 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    69.1 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (108 MP & 48 MP & 12 MP & 0.3 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    108 MP & 48 MP & 12 MP & 0.3 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Better main camera video
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 44.20x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    4320x24 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (40 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    40 MP vs 16 MP
  • Has a multi-lens front camera
    This smartphone features a multi-lens front camera, the average smartphone does not. 18% of smartphones have multiple front lenses.
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This smartphone allows manual shutter speed control, the average smartphone does not. 29.8% of smartphones include this.
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Has a pro camera setup
    This smartphone features a pro camera setup, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones include professional-grade camera hardware.
  • 5% higher DxOMark Mobile score
    This smartphone has a higher DxOMark Mobile score than the average smartphone (126 vs 120). The average smartphone scores 120.
    126 vs 120
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.2 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.
    3.2 vs 2
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Supports ANT+
    This smartphone supports ANT+ technology, the average smartphone does not. 6% of smartphones are ANT+ compatible.
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1440x3200 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1440x3200 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 29.4% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (511 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    511 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 0.23 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This smartphone has a higher contrast ratio than the average smartphone (2000000:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone contrast ratio is 1000000:1.
    AMOLED/OLED displays have an effectively infinite contrast ratio
    2,000,000:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • Has a curved display
    This smartphone features a curved display, the average smartphone does not. 24.5% of smartphones have curved screens.
  • 25.5% higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (828 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    828 nits vs 660 nits
  • Better display glass type
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass 6 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 6 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.6% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • 36.4% faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (45 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    45 W vs 33 W
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • Better IP rating
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • 50% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • 15.8% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (800 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    800 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Lower GSMArena battery endurance score
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena battery endurance score than the average smartphone (87 vs 99.5). The average smartphone scores 99.5.
    87 vs 99.5
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Samsung Exynos 990 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Samsung Exynos 990 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5 vs 5.2
  • 16.7% larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (7 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    7 nm vs 6 nm
  • 4.58x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (16GB + 128GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£1,190 vs £260).
    £1,190 vs £260
  • 10.4% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (16GB + 128GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.65 vs 7.3).
    6.65 vs 7.34
  • 5.44x less popular
    Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (16GB + 128GB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • 50% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • 15.8% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (800 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    800 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Samsung Exynos 990 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Samsung Exynos 990 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 16.7% larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (7 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    7 nm vs 6 nm
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 13 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 13 vs Android 14
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5 vs 5.2
  • Lower GSMArena battery endurance score
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena battery endurance score than the average smartphone (87 vs 99.5). The average smartphone scores 99.5.
    87 vs 99.5
  • 25% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    15 W vs 20 W
  • 10% slower reverse wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower reverse wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (4.5 W vs 5 W). The average smartphone speed is 5 W.
    4.5 W vs 5 W
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • 13.1% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (222 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    222 g vs 196.2 g
  • 4 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2020 vs 2024). 4.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    March 2020
    2020 vs 2024
  • 3.3 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (166.9 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    166.9 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 0.5 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (8.8 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    8.8 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    South Korea vs China

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

5.0
Simple Alpaca
≈ estimated
26/01/2025
Retrospective review · software support and performance check
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is still capable, but with no more updates and better phones available, it is hard to recommend today.
6.0
ATR
≈ estimated
24/01/2021
One-year review · pros, cons and value
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has strong performance and display, but its launch price made it hard to recommend against rivals.
8.0
Vernon Lee Warren
≈ estimated
03/01/2021
Long-term review · six months of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a great device overall, though the cheaper S20 models suit most people better.
9.0
ATM Tech
≈ estimated
25/11/2020
Long-term review · months of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has flaws and is expensive, but it has aged well and is a great buy if you can find a bargain.
8.0
Marc Yeo Tech Review
≈ estimated
24/10/2020
Long-term test · 7 months of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G remains likeable despite its shortcomings, mainly Exynos performance and overheating in games.
9.5
Simple Alpaca
≈ estimated
03/10/2020
Long-term review · 6 months of use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is still an extremely good phone six months on, with its top-heavy build as the main drawback.
9.0
Two Tech Dudes
≈ estimated
28/08/2020
Long-term test · six months of use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G held up well after six months and is recommended, especially for its camera and display.
9.5
TechEdit
≈ estimated
13/08/2020
Rooftop review · six months of use and photo comparisons
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is strongly recommended, with the Exynos version a bit weaker in battery life and performance.
6.0
TechieTechTech
≈ estimated
14/07/2020
Long-term review · 4 months of use and camera tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a strong camera and display, but its 8K mode is overhyped and the high price is hard to justify.
7.0
Kevin The Tech Ninja
≈ estimated
25/06/2020
Long-term review · 4 months of use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has strong performance and display, but camera focus, a weak 100x zoom and its size hold it back.
7.0
Jonathan Casey
≈ estimated
13/06/2020
Long-term test · 3 months of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is feature-rich and hard to put down, but autofocus and camera glitches still need fixing.
8.0
Real World Review
≈ estimated
07/06/2020
Hands-on review · camera tests and value verdict
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is mainly recommended at a reasonable or financed price, since the phone is strong but very expensive.
More graded video reviews (21)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

pcmag.com
25/02/2020
Lab tests · 5G and battery
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is an early 5G phone, but it is too expensive and heavy, and its 100x zoom is mostly hype.
wired.com
26/02/2020
Hands-on review · Camera and screen
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra takes some of the best phone photos yet, but its 100x zoom is mostly hype and its battery is only just good enough.
mashable.com
28/02/2020
Hands-on review · Photos and zoom
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra zooms well to 30x with punchy colors, but its 100x zoom is unusable and the cheaper S20 suits most buyers.
cnbc.com
02/03/2020
Hands-on review · 5G and screen
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra has a great 120Hz screen and strong cameras, but it is for people who want everything; most are better off with the S20+.
time.com
04/03/2020
Hands-on test · Camera review
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra has a strong display and 5G, but slow autofocus and inconsistent photos don't justify its high price.
cnet.com
06/03/2020
Real-world test · Battery and design
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra has excellent cameras and all-day battery at 60Hz, but its bulk, weight and fast drain at 120Hz hold it back.
hothardware.com
13/03/2020
Full review · Display and cameras
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a top flagship with an excellent display and 5G support, but its big body and missing headphone jack are drawbacks.
hardwarecanucks.com
15/05/2020
Long-term review · Design and battery
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra has an excellent screen and a battery that improved with updates, but its dated design and huge body are its weak points.
techradar.com
02/02/2021
Full review · Display and zoom
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a huge, pricey phone with a smooth 120Hz screen and long-range zoom, though its cameras are inconsistent.
androidcentral.com
01/06/2021
Long-term review · Design and value
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra has an excellent display and the S20 line's best cameras, but its size, weight and price suit enthusiasts only.
digitaltrends.com
24/01/2022
Five-month review · Camera and battery
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra has a great screen, long battery life and strong 5G, but its zoom and low-light photos lag behind rivals.
androidauthority.com
26/04/2022
Long-term review · Price and value
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra packs a huge feature list into one phone, but at full price it is hard to justify, so buy it only on sale.
T
tomsguide.com
12/10/2022
Summary of the review
S
sammobile.com
30/03/2020
Summary of the review
T
thehindu.com
15/06/2020
Summary of the review
gsmarena.com
17/01/2026
Full review · Camera hardware
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra has one of the most ambitious camera setups yet, with a 108MP main sensor and periscope zoom, but its ultra-wide lens lacks autofocus.
dxomark.com
20/10/2020
Lab camera test · Photo quality
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is strong for portraits and wide shots, with good detail, but oversharpening and slow focus in dim light hold it back.
digitalcameraworld.com
02/03/2020
Full review · Camera and video
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a very versatile camera phone with strong portraits and video, but its battery life and 120Hz mode disappoint.
zdnet.com
05/12/2020
Hands-on review · Software and 5G
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra leads on paper with future-proof 5G and a large 120Hz screen, but it is huge and costly.
frandroid.com
29/06/2021
Full review · Performance and battery
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a very powerful phone with an excellent screen, but its battery is only decent despite 5,000mAh.

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (16GB + 128GB)

  • Big, bright, and beautiful 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 120Hz display, praised for its clarity, vividness, and smoothness when scrolling or gaming (though the 120Hz is limited to Full HD+ resolution).
  • Excellent camera quality overall, with praise for the main 108MP sensor's detail and the versatility of the periscope telephoto lens, especially for shots up to 30x zoom.
  • Long battery life (5,000mAh) that generally lasts all day, and for many users, even into a second day, though this is significantly impacted by running the screen at 120Hz or using 5G.
  • Very fast performance thanks to the Snapdragon 865 (or Exynos 990 in some regions) processor and high RAM (12GB/16GB), allowing for smooth multitasking and gaming with no lag.
  • Extremely fast wired charging (with a 25W charger included, 45W supported) and support for wireless and reverse wireless charging.
  • Premium, solid build quality and design, although it is a large and heavy phone.
  • Loud and clear stereo speakers and good call quality.
  • Expandable storage up to 1TB via microSD card slot.
  • IP68 dust and water resistance rating.

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (16GB + 128GB)

  • Very high initial price tag, considered expensive and poor value for money compared to competitors or other S20 models at the time of release.
  • Large, heavy, and unwieldy design that can be difficult to use with one hand and makes the phone prone to dropping; the significant camera bump also causes the phone to wobble on flat surfaces.
  • The highly marketed 100x Space Zoom feature is generally considered a gimmick, producing grainy, low-quality photos that require a tripod for any usability.
  • Camera experienced autofocus issues, especially at launch, and generally inconsistent performance, with some users feeling photos were not significantly better than cheaper alternatives like the Google Pixel or older iPhones.
  • Battery life drains quickly when using the 120Hz display refresh rate setting.
  • Cannot use the 120Hz refresh rate at the full Quad HD+ display resolution simultaneously.
  • Lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack, a common complaint among users.
  • Fingerprint sensor performance is inconsistent and slow compared to physical sensors or the competition at the time.
  • Slow software updates compared to other brands.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (16GB RAM + 128GB storage) is a powerful, high-end 5G smartphone that boasts a stunning 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X 120Hz display, a massive 5,000mAh battery, and a versatile quad-camera system with a 108MP main sensor and 10x hybrid optic zoom. Key pros include its incredibly smooth scrolling and gaming experience, excellent performance from the Snapdragon 865 (or Exynos 990 in some regions) processor, expandable storage via microSD card slot, and very fast charging capabilities. However, the phone's major cons are its significant physical bulk and weight, a very high launch price, camera autofocus inconsistencies (especially at launch), and the fact that the 120Hz refresh rate cannot be used simultaneously with the full Quad HD+ resolution.

Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (16GB + 128GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (16GB + 128GB) and other smartphones

No results found