OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Oppo Find X7 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£820RAM capacity:16 GBInternal storage:512 GBScreen size:6.82 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP

Oppo Find X7 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

8.6/10

Overall score

Score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

90%

8.7

Technical score

10%

7.5

User score

★Better than 96% of smartphones
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

Overall score

30%

6.2

Price

â–²Better than 83%
8.7

Technical score

Technical score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components

25%

9.3

Performance & Hardware

18%

8.8

Camera

15%

9.4

Display

15%

8.0

Battery

10%

8.1

Software

10%

7.9

Connectivity

4%

8.3

Audio

3%

7.4

Design

★Better than 97%
7.5

User score

User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

1.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 82%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £820
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Oppo Find X7 Ultra (16GB + 512GB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components:

25%

9.3

Performance & Hardware

18%

8.8

Camera

15%

9.4

Display

15%

8.0

Battery

10%

8.1

Software

10%

7.9

Connectivity

4%

8.3

Audio

3%

7.4

Design

8.7
User score
User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

1.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.5
Popularity
Popularity
1.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Popularity:
Oppo Find X7 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) has a popularity of 1.7 points, which is lower than 63.4% of smartphones.
1.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components:

70%

8.6

Overall score

30%

6.2

Price

7.9
Brand name
Oppo
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor which is faster than processors in 90.4% of smartphones and equal to processors in 2% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 16 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 83.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 12% of smartphones.
Internal storage
512 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 512 GB which is larger than the storage of 77.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 17.2% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
3.3 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 3.3 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 89.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 2% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 14
Android version
Android 14
This smartphone runs Android version Android 14 which is newer than that found in 49.5% of smartphones and equal to that in 21% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP which is higher than that of 74.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.0 & f/2.6 & f/4.3
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.0 & f/2.6 & f/4.3 which is wider than that of 72.8% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
128 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 128 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 99% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.9% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1.6 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1.6 µm which is larger than in 97% of smartphones and equal to the size in 1.2% of smartphones.
3.2 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.82 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.82 inches which is larger than the screens of 89.7% of smartphones and equal to those of 0.7% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1440x 3168 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1440x3168 px which is higher than that of 95.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.6% of smartphones.
Pixel density
510 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 510 ppi which is higher than that of 94% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 28.3% of smartphones and equal to those in 28.8% of smartphones.
Charging speed
100 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 100 W which is faster than in 90.1% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 4.2% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
26 min
Market range: <36 min – >120 min
This smartphone reaches a full wired charge in 26 min which is faster than 95.9% of smartphones and equal to the time of 0.6% of smartphones.
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
?
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
?
Show more
Height
164.3 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 164.3 mm which is taller than 61.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.1% of smartphones.
Width
76.2 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 76.2 mm which is wider than 56.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.1% of smartphones.
Thickness
9.5 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 9.5 mm which is thicker than 85.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 1% of smartphones.
Weight
221 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 221 g which is heavier than 82.5% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.3% of smartphones.
Device volume
112,176 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 112,176 cm³ which is larger than 83.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Show more

Oppo Find X7 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 6 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (6 x vs 0 x).
    6 x vs 0 x
  • 4x larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (128 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    128 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 3.03x faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (100 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    100 W vs 33 W
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 5.4x higher 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life than the average smartphone (16,831 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115.
    16,831 vs 3,115
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1440x3168 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1440x3168 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 2.08x lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (12.5 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    12.5 W vs 6 W
  • 7.1% better value for money
    Oppo Find X7 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) has better value for money than the average smartphone (7.85 vs 7.3).
    7.85 vs 7.34
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 5.4x higher 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life than the average smartphone (16,831 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115.
    16,831 vs 3,115
  • 2.08x lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (12.5 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    12.5 W vs 6 W
  • 2x more storage
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (512 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 256 GB
  • 37.5% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 2.35x higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (2,213 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    2,213 vs 942
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (3x3.15 GHz & 2x2.96 GHz & 2x2.26 GHz & 1x3.3 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    3x3.15 GHz & 2x2.96 GHz & 2x2.26 GHz & 1x3.3 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 6x more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (1,536 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    1,536 vs 256
  • 4.4x higher 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited than the average smartphone (16,831 vs 3,825). The average smartphone scores 3,825.
    16,831 vs 3,825
  • Better processor
    This smartphone features a better processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 2.99x higher memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has higher memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (76.6 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s.
    76.6 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 33% higher PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 performance score than the average smartphone (14,344 vs 10,783). The average score is 10,783.
    14,344 vs 10,783
  • 33.3% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (4 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    4 nm vs 6 nm
  • 2.9x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (7,352 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in multi-core.
    7,352 vs 2,533
  • 3x more L3 cache
    This smartphone has more L3 cache than the average smartphone (12,288 KB vs 4,096 KB). The average L3 cache is 4,096 KB.
    12,288 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • 74.5% faster memory speed
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (4,800 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2,750 MHz memory speed.
    4,800 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 71.4% higher maximum RAM
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (24 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    24 GB vs 14 GB
  • Supports newer OpenGL version
    This smartphone supports a newer OpenGL version than the average smartphone (3.3 vs 3.2). The average version is 3.2.
    3.3 vs 3.2
  • 26.2% more transistors
    This smartphone has more transistors than the average smartphone (13,000 million vs 10,300 million). The average smartphone includes 10,300 million transistors.
    13,000 million vs 10,300 million
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    AI Eraser, AI Smart Summary, AI Ultra-Clear Image, Breeno AI Assistant with AndesGPT
    productivity vs fundamental
  • Includes cross-site tracking protection
    This smartphone supports cross-site tracking prevention, the average smartphone does not. 32.2% of smartphones include this feature.
  • 6 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (6 x vs 0 x).
    6 x vs 0 x
  • 4x larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (128 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    128 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 0.8 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.6 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    3.2 binned
    1.6 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • 30.8% higher DxOMark Mobile score
    This smartphone has a higher DxOMark Mobile score than the average smartphone (157 vs 120). The average smartphone scores 120.
    157 vs 120
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Supports Dolby Vision video recording
    This smartphone supports Dolby Vision video recording, the average smartphone does not. 10.7% of smartphones support Dolby Vision.
  • Has a multi-lens front camera
    This smartphone features a multi-lens front camera, the average smartphone does not. 18% of smartphones have multiple front lenses.
  • Supports laser autofocus
    This smartphone features laser autofocus, the average smartphone does not. 21.4% of smartphones include laser AF.
  • 46.9% higher DxOMark Selfie score
    This smartphone has a higher DxOMark Selfie score than the average smartphone (144 vs 98). The average smartphone scores 98 for selfies.
    144 vs 98
  • Better main camera video
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 22.60x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    2160x60 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This smartphone allows manual shutter speed control, the average smartphone does not. 29.8% of smartphones include this.
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Has a pro camera setup
    This smartphone features a pro camera setup, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones include professional-grade camera hardware.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.2 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.
    3.2 vs 2
  • Supports satellite SOS
    This smartphone supports satellite SOS functionality, the average smartphone does not. 8.1% of smartphones offer satellite emergency services.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.4 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.4 vs 5.2
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1440x3168 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1440x3168 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 3,500 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (4,500 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    4,500 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 2.42x higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (1,600 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    1,600 nits vs 660 nits
  • 29.1% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (510 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    510 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 0.15 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.8 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.82 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Supports Dolby Vision support
    This smartphone supports Dolby Vision, the average smartphone does not. 17.3% of smartphones are Dolby Vision compatible.
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    This smartphone supports HDR10+, the average smartphone does not. 22.2% of smartphones include HDR10+ support.
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This smartphone has a higher contrast ratio than the average smartphone (5000000:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone contrast ratio is 1000000:1.
    AMOLED/OLED displays have an effectively infinite contrast ratio
    5,000,000:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Better display glass type
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Has a curved display
    This smartphone features a curved display, the average smartphone does not. 24.5% of smartphones have curved screens.
  • 271.5 nits higher GSMArena max display brightness
    This smartphone has a higher GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (1,165 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average max brightness is 893.5 nits.
    1,165 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • 3.03x faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (100 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    100 W vs 33 W
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.6% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • 36 min faster GSMArena full wired charge time
    This smartphone has a faster GSMArena full wired charge time than the average smartphone (26 min vs 62 min). The average charge time is 62 min.
    26 min vs 62 min
  • 2.5x faster wireless charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (50 W vs 20 W). The average speed is 20 W.
    50 W vs 20 W
  • 2x faster reverse wireless charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster reverse wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (10 W vs 5 W). The average speed is 5 W.
    10 W vs 5 W
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This smartphone supports aptX Adaptive, the average smartphone does not. 34.5% of smartphones include aptX Adaptive support.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • Is designed for seniors
    This smartphone is designed specifically for seniors, the average smartphone is not. 17% of smartphones are senior-friendly.
  • Better IP rating
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • No reverse wired charging
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 60.8% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • 20.1% lower PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark than the average smartphone (628 min vs 786 min). The average smartphone scores 786 min.
    628 min vs 786 min
  • 12.6% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (221 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    221 g vs 196.2 g
  • 3.15x more expensive
    Oppo Find X7 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£820 vs £260).
    £820 vs £260
  • 5.3% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (900 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    900 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 1.2 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (9.5 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    9.5 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 3.15x more expensive
    Oppo Find X7 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£820 vs £260).
    £820 vs £260
  • 6.3% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Oppo Find X7 Ultra
    the average smartphone
    Oppo Find X7 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.52 vs 8).
    7.52 vs 8
  • 3.12x less popular
    Oppo Find X7 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1.74 vs 5.4).
    1.74 vs 5.44
  • 5.3% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (900 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    900 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • No reverse wired charging
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 60.8% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • 20.1% lower PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark than the average smartphone (628 min vs 786 min). The average smartphone scores 786 min.
    628 min vs 786 min
  • 12.6% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (221 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    221 g vs 196.2 g
  • 1.2 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (9.5 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    9.5 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 0.7 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (164.3 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    164.3 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 14.7% larger volume
    This smartphone has a larger volume than the average smartphone (112,176 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97,800 cm³.
    112,176 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Golf Sky
≈ estimated
15/01/2026
Hands-on review · weeks of daily use, camera focus
Verdict
Oppo Find X7 Ultra is excellent for camera and performance enthusiasts, but not the best pick for US buyers who need carrier support.
9.0
OPTechWithAskar
≈ estimated
28/11/2024
Overview · zoom test and feature walkthrough
Verdict
Oppo Find X7 Ultra is a top flagship contender with strong zoom photos, fast charging and a packed feature set.
9.0
YugaTech
≈ estimated
01/07/2024
Hands-on review · design, performance, battery and camera tests
Verdict
Oppo Find X7 Ultra is a solid flagship with standout photography and performance, though it will not be officially sold locally.
6.0
TheUnlockr
≈ estimated
27/03/2024
Real-world day test · café, food and software use
Verdict
Oppo Find X7 Ultra has an enjoyable camera, but software issues in the China-only version would be fixed by a global release.
9.0
Subhamclick
≈ estimated
15/09/2024
Hands-on camera test · mountain trip, zoom and video
Verdict
Oppo Find X7 Ultra's camera exceeded all expectations, with sharp zoom shots and stable handheld video.
9.5
Barry Johnson
≈ estimated
05/08/2024
Hands-on review · concert video and camera tests
Verdict
Oppo Find X7 Ultra is the favorite slab phone so far, with great video footage, though low-light noise trails Vivo.
9.0
ben's gadget reviews
≈ estimated
08/01/2024
Camera test · early first look vs rival phones
Verdict
Oppo Find X7 Ultra has a very good camera system and excellent hardware, though this is only an early look.
Brand video
Overview video
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
phonearena.com
17/10/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X7 Ultra review: two zoom scopes on a real S24 Ultra killer
wired.com
20/02/2024
Camera review · China import
Verdict
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra is a camera-first phone with excellent photos, but it's China-only and its Chinese software makes importing a hassle for most.
androidauthority.com
04/02/2024
Full review · Imported camera phone
Verdict
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra has one of the most consistent camera setups, but ColorOS quirks, performance dips and no warranty make it hard to recommend outside China.
stuff.tv
19/01/2024
Review · Camera-first import
Verdict
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra takes some of the best phone photos, but its China-only sales and region-specific software make it hard to get and use.
androidcentral.com
22/04/2024
Long-term review · Import flagship
Verdict
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra looks striking and takes excellent portraits, but its Chinese software and China-only sales make it a tough buy.
techadvisor.com
23/02/2024
Full review · Camera-led flagship
Verdict
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra has excellent cameras and very fast charging, but untranslated software and no official launch outside China make it a hassle.
geardiary.com
10/02/2024
Hands-on review · Photo-focused flagship
Verdict
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra is a strong choice for photographers who want RAW control, but Chinese-market software and a bulky camera bump are trade-offs.
thehindu.com
03/05/2024
Review · Capable flagship
Verdict
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra is a capable flagship with strong telephoto zoom, but it needs Google Play installed yourself and runs at lower performance in regular mode.
T
techradar.com
03/06/2024
Summary of the review
I made Real Madrid disappear... using Oppo’s AI Eraser (Field Test)
S
smartzone.de
27/02/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Review - THE new Android King?
(Translated)Show original
connect.de
04/04/2024
Lab test · Camera comparison
Verdict
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra has a strong 2.8x telephoto and good night shots, but its 6x zoom is dim at night and it lacks some European network bands.
allround-pc.com
20/02/2024
Short test · Camera-focused
Verdict
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra is a camera-first flagship that suits enthusiasts, but its import-only sale and limited language options hold it back.
C
chinahandys.net
27/02/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Review: A Camera Monster You Can Hardly Get
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
24/06/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X7 Ultra: best price, specs and news on Frandroid
(Translated)Show original
xataka.com.mx
30/05/2024
Field test · Amazon trip
Verdict
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra has an excellent main camera and two sharp periscope zoom lenses, but its ultrawide lens is clearly weaker.
W
wired.it
13/03/2024
Summary of the review
The two best camera phones aren't available in Italy
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Oppo Find X7 Ultra (16GB + 512GB)

  • Phenomenally capable and versatile camera system in most conditions, including excellent low-light performance and great portrait shots.
  • Stunning, bright (4500 nits peak), and high-resolution AMOLED display with smooth 120Hz refresh rate.
  • Flagship-grade performance powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor, handling gaming and multitasking with ease.
  • Premium, unique design with a comfortable vegan leather finish and solid build quality, including IP68 water and dust resistance.
  • Extremely fast 100W wired charging (charger included in the box) and 50W wireless charging support.
  • Smooth and responsive ColorOS 14 (once set up for Western users), with useful features like an alert slider and robust privacy options (VIP mode).
  • Good quality stereo speakers with clear vocals and a hint of bass.

What customers don't like about Oppo Find X7 Ultra (16GB + 512GB)

  • Only available in China, meaning users outside of China must import the device and deal with region-specific software frustrations.
  • Software includes pre-installed Chinese bloatware and some untranslated menus/features, making initial setup a hassle for non-Chinese users.
  • Google services must be sideloaded (though generally work fine once installed), and some Google features like Android Auto or certain AI services do not work.
  • Battery life is generally considered sufficient for a full day but is not the best compared to other top-tier flagships.
  • Video recording has some limitations (e.g., no 8K recording, limited cinematic mode options), and some specific photo modes like macro photography or RAW are noted as having issues by some users.
  • The large camera module can make the phone top-heavy and awkward to hold in some positions.

Verdict

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) is a top-tier flagship smartphone, distinguished primarily by its exceptional Hasselblad quad-camera system with four 50MP sensors, including dual periscope telephoto lenses, a 1-inch main sensor, and 4K 60fps video recording on all lenses. It boasts a powerful Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor, 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM, and 512GB of UFS 4.0 storage, delivering smooth performance for gaming and multitasking. Key pros include a stunning 6.82-inch QHD+ LTPO AMOLED display with a 4500 nits peak brightness, a large 5000mAh battery with rapid 100W wired and 50W wireless charging, a premium IP68-rated vegan leather and glass build, and an added hardware alert slider for a VIP privacy mode. The main con is its extremely limited availability, as it is a China-exclusive device, meaning international users face significant software hurdles like a lack of official Google services out of the box and potential network compatibility issues, making it difficult to recommend for global audiences.

Compare Oppo Find X7 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oppo Find X7 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) and other smartphones

No results found