Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Oppo A54 5G (4GB + 64GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:6.51 inchesMain camera megapixels:13 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP

Oppo A54 5G (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.4/10

Overall score

Score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.0

Technical score

10%

8.8

User score

â–¼Worse than 96% of smartphones
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.4

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

â–¼Worse than 91%
5.0

Technical score

Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

25%

3.9

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.4

Camera

15%

4.2

Display

15%

5.3

Battery

10%

6.9

Software

10%

5.8

Connectivity

4%

4.4

Audio

3%

6.4

Design

â–¼Worse than 98%
8.8

User score

User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 88%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Oppo A54 5G (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

25%

3.9

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.4

Camera

15%

4.2

Display

15%

5.3

Battery

10%

6.9

Software

10%

5.8

Connectivity

4%

4.4

Audio

3%

6.4

Design

5.0
User score
User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.8
Popularity
Popularity
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Oppo A54 5G (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 8.6 points, which is higher than 82.2% of smartphones.
8.6
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.4

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

6.7
Brand name
Oppo
Processor model
MediaTek Helio P35
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Helio P35 processor model which is slower than processors in 96.4% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.4% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
4 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 14% of smartphones.
Internal storage
64 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is smaller than the storage of 89.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 7.9% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.3 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 63.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.4% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 10
Android version
Android 10
This smartphone runs Android version Android 10 which is older than that found in 88.8% of smartphones and equal to that in 5.1% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 13 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP which is lower than that of 88.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4 which is narrower than that of 95.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
16.3 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 16.3 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 93.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.8% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1.12 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1.12 µm which is larger than in 78.2% of smartphones and equal to the size in 5.6% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.51 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.51 inches which is smaller than the screens of 79.9% of smartphones and equal to those of 0.1% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
720x 1600 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 720x1600 px which is lower than that of 87.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.7% of smartphones.
Pixel density
270 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 270 ppi which is lower than that of 79% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.3% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is lower than in 84.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 15.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 28.3% of smartphones and equal to those in 28.8% of smartphones.
Charging speed
18 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 18 W which is slower than in 76% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 11.7% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
146 min
This smartphone reaches a full wired charge in 146 min which is slower than 94.3% of smartphones and equal to the time of 0.2% of smartphones.
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
1
This smartphone has 1 microphones, which is fewer than in 89.6% of smartphones and equal to the number in 10.4% of smartphones.
FM radio
yes
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
163.6 mm
This smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm which is shorter than 48.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.3% of smartphones.
Width
75.7 mm
This smartphone has a width of 75.7 mm which is narrower than 56% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.5% of smartphones.
Thickness
8.4 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 8.4 mm which is thicker than 55.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.6% of smartphones.
Weight
192 g
This smartphone weighs 192 g which is lighter than 58.8% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 3.2% of smartphones.
Device volume
97,800 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 97,800 cm³ which is smaller than 46.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 5% of smartphones.
Show more

Oppo A54 5G (4GB + 64GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 0.32 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.1 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.12 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Includes cross-site tracking protection
    This smartphone supports cross-site tracking prevention, the average smartphone does not. 32.2% of smartphones include this feature.
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • 50% more L3 cache
    This smartphone has more L3 cache than the average smartphone (6,144 KB vs 4,096 KB). The average L3 cache is 4,096 KB.
    6,144 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 9.7% higher user score
    User score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Oppo A54 5G
    the average smartphone
    Oppo A54 5G (4GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.78 vs 8).
    8.78 vs 8
  • 2x cheaper
    Oppo A54 5G (4GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£130 vs £260).
    £130 vs £260
  • 57.5% more popular
    Oppo A54 5G (4GB + 64GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (8.57 vs 5.4).
    8.57 vs 5.44
  • 50% more L3 cache
    This smartphone has more L3 cache than the average smartphone (6,144 KB vs 4,096 KB). The average L3 cache is 4,096 KB.
    6,144 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (4x2.3 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    4x2.3 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Includes cross-site tracking protection
    This smartphone supports cross-site tracking prevention, the average smartphone does not. 32.2% of smartphones include this feature.
  • 0.32 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.1 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.12 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 49.1% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (16.3 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    16.3 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 2x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • 9.2% worse value for money
    Oppo A54 5G (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.72 vs 7.3).
    6.72 vs 7.34
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • 55.7% lower PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in PCMark Work 3.0 than the average smartphone (4,780 vs 10,783). The average smartphone scores 10,783 in PCMark Work 3.0.
    4,780 vs 10,783
  • 2x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • 31.6% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (650 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    650 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 57.1% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (6 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 14 GB
  • 41.8% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1,600 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 16.7% higher TDP (less efficient)
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (5 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    5 W vs 6 W
  • 76.7% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (286 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    286 vs 1,226
  • 87.5% fewer shader units
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (32 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    32 vs 256
  • 39.9% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (1,522 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    1,522 vs 2,533
  • 41.8% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (14.9 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    14.9 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • Supports older OpenCL version
    This smartphone supports a lower OpenCL version than the average smartphone (1.2 vs 2). The average smartphone supports OpenCL version 2.
    1.2 vs 2
  • 2.3% less L2 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L2 cache than the average smartphone (1,000 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average smartphone has an L2 cache of 1,024 KB.
    1,000 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 4.2% lower CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 10 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 10 vs Android 14
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No battery health monitoring
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • No voice command support
    This smartphone does not support voice commands, the average smartphone does. 98.9% of smartphones include voice command support.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • 49.1% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (16.3 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    16.3 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (13 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    13 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • No burst mode
    This smartphone does not have a burst mode, the average smartphone does. 98.1% of smartphones support burst shooting.
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • No NFC
    This smartphone does not support NFC, the average smartphone does. 83.1% of smartphones feature NFC.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5 vs 5.2
  • No gyroscope
    This smartphone does not have a gyroscope, the average smartphone does. 84.4% of smartphones feature a gyroscope.
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Lower screen resolution
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (720x1600 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    720x1600 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 31.6% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (270 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    270 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 0.16 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.5 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.51 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 27.3% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (480 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    480 nits vs 660 nits
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This smartphone has a lower contrast ratio than the average smartphone (1500:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone has a contrast ratio of 1000000:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • 84 min slower full wired charge time
    This smartphone has a slower full wired charge time than the average smartphone (146 min vs 62 min). The average smartphone takes 62 min to charge.
    146 min vs 62 min
  • 45.5% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (18 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    18 W vs 33 W
  • No reverse wired charging
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 60.8% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • 1 fewer microphone/s
    This smartphone has fewer microphones than the average smartphone (1 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 3 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2021 vs 2024). 3.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    March 2021
    2021 vs 2024

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

6.0
Haydenssphotography
≈ estimated
01/02/2023
Hands-on photo test · countryside shots and camera modes
Verdict
Oppo A54 5G takes decent photos in good light, but zoom and macro results are weak.
7.0
Tech Spurt
≈ estimated
24/05/2021
First look · unboxing, performance and camera tests
Verdict
Oppo A54 5G is a budget option that works well if you don't need extra memory, though charging is slow.
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

techradar.com
25/06/2021
Hands-on test · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The Oppo A54 5G won't wow you, but it's a cheap way into 5G with a smooth 90Hz screen and a decent main camera.
techadvisor.com
23/08/2021
Long-term test · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The Oppo A54 5G is easy to recommend if you're set on 5G on a budget, with a long-lasting battery and sharp screen, though 10W charging is slow.
trustedreviews.com
18/06/2021
Lab test · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The Oppo A54 5G is a cheap way to get 5G with long battery life, but weak low-light photos, 4GB RAM and slow charging hold it back.
digitalcameraworld.com
04/06/2021
Hands-on test · Budget camera phone
Verdict
The Oppo A54 5G is a strong budget camera phone, with an ultra-wide lens and many shooting modes, but 64GB storage fills fast.
root-nation.com
08/06/2021
Full review · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The Oppo A54 5G has a good screen and camera and a useful case, but sluggish performance makes it hard to recommend unless you need 5G.
radiotimes.com
28/05/2021
Hands-on review · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The Oppo A54 5G is a basic 5G phone with long battery life and a sharp screen, but slow charging and weak gaming hold it back.
N
nextpit.com
28/07/2021
Summary of the review
eftm.com
02/06/2021
Hands-on review · Phone comparison
Verdict
The Oppo A54 5G is good-looking and well priced for 5G, with a smooth 90Hz screen and decent photos, though the A74 is better with its extra memory.
moviesgamesandtech.com
21/02/2022
Quick review · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The Oppo A54 5G is a lightweight, comfortable 5G phone with great battery life and a sharp screen, though its 4GB RAM is the weak point.
pickr.com.au
11/05/2021
Real-world test · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The Oppo A54 5G is Australia's cheapest 5G phone, with a good battery and screen, but its 4GB RAM causes slowdowns between apps.
reviews.org
22/06/2021
Review · Budget 5G comparison
Verdict
The Oppo A54 5G offers great battery life and a crisp screen for little money, though sluggish moments and 10W charging let it down.
futurefive.co.nz
31/05/2021
Hands-on test · Side-by-side comparison
Verdict
The OPPO A54 5G is a budget-friendly pick with a 90 Hz screen and large battery, but its LCD trails the A94 on color and blacks.
lesnumeriques.com
19/06/2021
Lab test · Mid-range phone
Verdict
The OPPO A54 5G is a long-lasting, well-calibrated mid-range phone, but it charges slowly and its photos are uneven.
frandroid.com
06/09/2021
Full review · Everyday use
Verdict
The OPPO A54 5G suits everyday users who want a pleasant LCD screen and easy customization, but its fingerprint-prone plastic back and single speaker are weak spots.
clubic.com
03/09/2021
Full review · Design and performance
Verdict
The OPPO A54 5G has a long-lasting battery and attractive back, but slow charging and stuttering Fortnite gameplay hold it back.
presse-citron.net
21/07/2021
Full review · Screen and night photos
Verdict
The OPPO A54 5G is a balanced mid-range phone with an accurate LCD and long battery life, but slow charging and a fingerprint-prone back are drawbacks.
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
30/06/2021
Summary of the review
fr.root-nation.com
08/06/2021
Full review · Design and screen
Verdict
The OPPO A54 5G is a compact, well-finished 6.5-inch phone that is comfortable to hold, but its glossy back and poor readability in sunlight are drawbacks.
charlestech.fr
19/06/2024
Full review · Design and value
Verdict
The OPPO A54 5G is an excellent-value entry-level 5G phone with long battery life and a solid finish, held back by a thick chin and a bulky front camera.
A
androidplanet.nl
29/04/2021
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Oppo A54 5G (4GB + 64GB)

  • Affordable price for a 5G phone.
  • Stellar, long-lasting 5000mAh battery life (often two days of use).
  • Good quality 90Hz Full HD+ display, which is sharp and smooth.
  • Decent main 48MP camera performance in good lighting conditions, producing vibrant and sharp photos.
  • Premium design and build quality for a budget/mid-range phone, including a side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
  • Includes a 3.5mm headphone jack and expandable storage via a dedicated microSD card slot.
  • Generally smooth day-to-day performance for basic tasks and app launching, without major lag.
  • Easy to use and a streamlined user interface (ColorOS 11 based on Android 11) with minimal bloatware.
  • Features NFC for wireless payments and dual SIM support.

What customers don't like about Oppo A54 5G (4GB + 64GB)

  • Performance can be sluggish and occasionally lags, especially with heavy multitasking or high-end gaming, due to the Snapdragon 480 5G chipset and 4GB RAM.
  • Slow 10W charging speed; a full charge can take over two hours, which is slow compared to competitors.
  • Only 64GB of internal storage in the base model (some of which is used by the system), which is small and can fill up quickly (apps cannot be offloaded to a microSD card).
  • Weak secondary cameras (ultra-wide and macro lenses), and poor night mode performance for all cameras.
  • Display is an LCD panel and is sometimes considered too dark compared to AMOLED rivals, especially in direct sunlight.
  • Lacks an IP certification for water and dust resistance, and generally has no official protection against moisture.
  • Only has a single, below-average mono speaker.
  • Video recording is limited to 1080p resolution; there is no 4K recording option.
  • Some users reported the side-mounted fingerprint reader as unreliable and often requiring multiple attempts.

Verdict

The Oppo A54 (4GB + 64GB) is a budget-friendly 4G smartphone featuring a large 6.51-inch HD+ (1600 x 720 pixels) LCD display and a substantial 5,000 mAh battery with 18W fast charging support. It is powered by an octa-core MediaTek Helio P35 processor and runs on Android 10 with ColorOS 7.2. The phone includes a versatile rear triple-camera setup (13MP main, 2MP macro, 2MP depth) and a 16MP front selfie camera. Key pros include its excellent battery life (lasting over a day with heavy use), a dedicated microSD card slot for expandable storage up to 256GB, IPX4 splash water resistance, and a convenient side-mounted fingerprint sensor. Cons are notable, including a lower-resolution HD+ display with only a 60Hz refresh rate, a processor that can show performance lags with heavy multitasking or intensive gaming, a mono speaker, and a main camera system that can produce low-quality images in dim lighting conditions.

Compare Oppo A54 5G (4GB + 64GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oppo A54 5G (4GB + 64GB) and other smartphones

No results found