OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Motorola Razr 50 (8GB + 256GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£410RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:6.9 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 13 MP

Motorola Razr 50 (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Motorola Razr 50 (8GB + 256GB)
7.5/10

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 75% of models
Score components

90%

7.5

Technical score

10%

7.9

User score

â–²Better than 75% of smartphones
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

â–²Better than 78%
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 75% of models
Score components

25%

7.1

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.3

Camera

15%

9.0

Display

15%

6.5

Battery

10%

8.3

Software

10%

7.5

Connectivity

4%

6.1

Audio

3%

7.5

Design

â–²Better than 75%
7.9

User score

User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

7.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 72%
  • motorola-razr-50
  • motorola-razr-50
  • motorola-razr-50
  • motorola-razr-50
  • motorola-razr-50
  • motorola-razr-50
  • motorola-razr-50
motorola-razr-50
motorola-razr-50
motorola-razr-50
motorola-razr-50
motorola-razr-50
motorola-razr-50
motorola-razr-50
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
8GB + 256GB
Other versions:
12GB + 512GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Motorola Razr 50 (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 75% of models
Score components:

25%

7.1

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.3

Camera

15%

9.0

Display

15%

6.5

Battery

10%

8.3

Software

10%

7.5

Connectivity

4%

6.1

Audio

3%

7.5

Design

7.5
User score
User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

7.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.9
Popularity
Popularity
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 67% of models
Popularity:
Motorola Razr 50 (8GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 7.2 points, which is higher than 66.9% of smartphones.
7.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components:

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

7.8
Brand name
Motorola
Processor model
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X processor which is faster than processors in 59.9% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.2% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 28.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 30.4% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.3% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.5 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.5 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 50.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 14
Android version
Android 14
This smartphone runs Android version Android 14 which is newer than that found in 49.5% of smartphones and equal to that in 21% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 13 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 13 MP which is higher than that of 59.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.9% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
?
Main camera sensor area
32 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 32 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 42.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.2% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
1.6 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.9 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.9 inches which is larger than the screens of 93.8% of smartphones and equal to those of 2.6% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2640 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2640 px which is higher than that of 71.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.8% of smartphones.
Pixel density
413 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 413 ppi which is higher than that of 70.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.7% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,200 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,200 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 88.3% of smartphones and equal to those in 0.9% of smartphones.
Charging speed
30 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 30 W which is slower than in 61.1% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 4.7% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
85 min
Market range: <36 min – >120 min
This smartphone reaches a full wired charge in 85 min which is slower than 72% of smartphones and equal to the time of 0.4% of smartphones.
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
171.3 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 171.3 mm which is taller than 89.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Width
74 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 74 mm which is narrower than 82.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.5% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.3 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.3 mm which is thinner than 94.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.2% of smartphones.
Weight
188.4 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 188.4 g which is lighter than 70.3% of smartphones.
Device volume
88,578 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 88,578 cm³ which is smaller than 70.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Show more

Motorola Razr 50 (8GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the agentic AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Moto AI beta suite
    agentic vs fundamental
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • 2.27x higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (1500 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    1,500 nits vs 660 nits
  • 2,000 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (3000 nits vs 1000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    3,000 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 0.23 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 33.3% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (4 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    4 nm vs 6 nm
  • 6% better value for money
    Motorola Razr 50 (8GB + 256GB) has better value for money than the average smartphone (7.78 vs 7.3).
    7.78 vs 7.34
  • 31.8% more popular
    Motorola Razr 50 (8GB + 256GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (7.17 vs 5.4).
    7.17 vs 5.44
  • 33.3% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (4 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    4 nm vs 6 nm
  • 2.33x faster memory speed
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (6400 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2750 MHz memory speed.
    6,400 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (4x2.5 GHz & 4x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    4x2.5 GHz & 4x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 4.2% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 10.6% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (1,042 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    1,042 vs 942
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the agentic AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Moto AI beta suite
    agentic vs fundamental
  • Includes cross-site tracking protection
    This smartphone supports cross-site tracking prevention, the average smartphone does not. 32.2% of smartphones include this feature.
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.2 & f/1.7 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.2 & f/1.7 vs f/2.2
  • Has a multi-lens front camera
    This smartphone features a multi-lens front camera, the average smartphone does not. 18% of smartphones have multiple front lenses.
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (50 MP & 13 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    50 MP & 13 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.4 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.4 vs 5.2
  • 1 more external displays supported
    This smartphone supports more external displays than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone supports 1 external displays.
    2 vs 1
  • 2.27x higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (1500 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    1,500 nits vs 660 nits
  • 2,000 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (3000 nits vs 1000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    3,000 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 0.23 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Supports Dolby Vision support
    This smartphone supports Dolby Vision, the average smartphone does not. 17.3% of smartphones are Dolby Vision compatible.
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This smartphone has a higher contrast ratio than the average smartphone (5000000:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone contrast ratio is 1000000:1.
    AMOLED/OLED displays have an effectively infinite contrast ratio
    5,000,000:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2640 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2640 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 395.5 nits higher GSMArena max display brightness
    This smartphone has a higher GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (1289 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average max brightness is 893.5 nits.
    1,289 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • Has a secondary display
    This smartphone features a secondary display, the average smartphone does not. 6.7% of smartphones include a secondary screen.
  • 4.6% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (413 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    413 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 25% higher touch sampling rate
    This smartphone has a higher touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (300 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average touch sampling rate is 240 Hz.
    300 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 1 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.3 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.3 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • Is designed for seniors
    This smartphone is designed specifically for seniors, the average smartphone is not. 17% of smartphones are senior-friendly.
  • 2 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (74 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    74 mm vs 76 mm
  • Is foldable
    This smartphone is foldable, the average smartphone is not. 3.9% of smartphones are foldable devices.
  • 4% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (188.4 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    188.4 g vs 196.2 g
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • 16% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4200 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 39.8% fewer transistors
    This smartphone contains fewer transistors than the average smartphone (6200 million vs 10300 million). The average smartphone has 10300 million transistors.
    6,200 million vs 10,300 million
  • 23 min slower full wired charge time
    This smartphone has a slower full wired charge time than the average smartphone (85 min vs 62 min). The average smartphone takes 62 min to charge.
    85 min vs 62 min
  • 7.7 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (171.3 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    171.3 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 25% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    15 W vs 20 W
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Dimensity 7300X vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Dimensity 7300X vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 57.7% more expensive
    Motorola Razr 50 (8GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£410 vs £260).
    £410 vs £260
  • 0.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Motorola Razr 50
    the average smartphone
    Motorola Razr 50 (8GB + 256GB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.94 vs 8.000).
    7.94 vs 8
  • 39.8% fewer transistors
    This smartphone contains fewer transistors than the average smartphone (6200 million vs 10300 million). The average smartphone has 10300 million transistors.
    6,200 million vs 10,300 million
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Dimensity 7300X vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Dimensity 7300X vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 42.9% lower 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in 3DMark Steel Nomad than the average smartphone (347 vs 608). The average smartphone scores 608.
    347 vs 608
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 16% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4200 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 23 min slower full wired charge time
    This smartphone has a slower full wired charge time than the average smartphone (85 min vs 62 min). The average smartphone takes 62 min to charge.
    85 min vs 62 min
  • 25% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    15 W vs 20 W
  • 9.1% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (30 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    30 W vs 33 W
  • 7.7 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (171.3 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    171.3 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    United States vs China

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pickr.com.au
12/11/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 review (XT-2453-1)
E
expertreviews.co.uk
22/08/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 review: Better, but still not there yet
T
trustedreviews.com
09/08/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Review
G
gsmarena.com
09/08/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50/razr (2024) review
R
root-nation.com
07/08/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 review: IPX8 and a large external display
E
eftm.com
03/12/2024
Summary of the review
Review: Motorola razr 50 — the affordable flip phone with full external display functionality
T
thehindu.com
19/09/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Review: A phone that makes a statement
E
eftm.com.en2fr.search.translate.goog
03/12/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Review: The Affordable Flip Phone with Full External Screen Functionality
(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
01/04/2025
Summary of the review
MOTOROLA razr 50 Lab Test: A foldable that's out of shape
(Translated)Show original
F
fr.root-nation.com
07/08/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Review: IPX8 and a Large Cover Screen
(Translated)Show original
J
journaldugeek.com
15/10/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Review: Everything a flagship has... except the price?
(Translated)Show original
T
tomsguide.fr
12/08/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Review: The market's most affordable foldable smartphone hits the mark
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
29/07/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Review: Is a €900 Foldable Smartphone Actually Worth It?
(Translated)Show original
E
es.wired.com
15/05/2025
Summary of the review
We tested the Motorola Razr Ultra and the Razr 2025 (Razr 50), and they are still the best
(Translated)Show original
E
es.root-nation.com
07/08/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Review: IPX8 and a Large External Display
(Translated)Show original
T
techpulse.be
10/09/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 review: a budget phone in a premium shell
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
04/02/2026
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 - Spritz Orange - Test, Reviews & Prices
(Translated)Show original
T
technologyinsider.nl
19/07/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Review: Versatile flip phone at a more attractive price
(Translated)Show original
I
itdaily.be
16/08/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 review: it's not the Samsung (and you can feel it)
(Translated)Show original
A
androidplanet.nl
30/07/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 review: folding at a great price
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Motorola Razr 50 (8GB + 256GB)

  • Large, high-quality 3.6-inch external display that supports most apps without opening the phone
  • Excellent battery life for a foldable, often lasting a full day of moderate use
  • Attractive and premium design featuring a vegan leather finish for better grip
  • Vibrant 6.9-inch internal OLED display with a nearly invisible crease
  • Stronger IPX8 water resistance rating compared to previous models
  • Solid value for money, positioned as a high-quality entry point into the foldable market

What we don't like about Motorola Razr 50 (8GB + 256GB)

  • Underwhelming chipset performance (Dimensity 7300X) compared to flagship competitors
  • Camera quality is average, with notable lag and poor performance in low light
  • Slow and inconsistent software update support from Motorola
  • Lack of a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom
  • Durability concerns regarding long-term screen longevity and visible wear at the fold
  • No charger included in the box for many regions

Verdict

The Motorola Razr 50 (8GB + 256GB) is a stylish, mid-range flip phone running Android 14, primarily built around a power-efficient MediaTek Dimensity 7300X processor. Its main draw is the functional 3.6-inch external pOLED display, which supports a 90Hz refresh rate and can run nearly any app, complemented by a large 6.9-inch 120Hz foldable LTPO internal display. Pros include excellent battery life for a flip phone (4,200mAh capacity), a durable IPX8 water-resistant design, and a clean user interface. Cons involve an average camera performance that can be slow to capture photos, a less powerful chipset compared to non-folding phones in the same price bracket, and a hinge design that still primarily requires two hands to open.

Compare Motorola Razr 50 (8GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Motorola Razr 50 (8GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found