Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (16GB + 256GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,670RAM capacity:16 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:8 inchesMain camera megapixels:48 MP & 10.8 MP & 10.5 MP

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (16GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (16GB + 256GB)
8.0/10

Overall score

Score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

8.0

Technical score

10%

7.8

User score

▲Better than 86% of smartphones
6.1

Value for money

Value for money
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

1.7

Price

▼Worse than 98%
8.0

Technical score

Technical score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

25%

8.2

Performance & Hardware

18%

8.1

Camera

15%

8.6

Display

15%

6.2

Battery

10%

9.0

Software

10%

8.8

Connectivity

4%

8.3

Audio

3%

6.7

Design

▲Better than 87%
7.8

User score

User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

8.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 75%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (16GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

25%

8.2

Performance & Hardware

18%

8.1

Camera

15%

8.6

Display

15%

6.2

Battery

10%

9.0

Software

10%

8.8

Connectivity

4%

8.3

Audio

3%

6.7

Design

8.0
User score
User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

8.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.8
Popularity
Popularity
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (16GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 8 points, which is higher than 75.3% of smartphones.
8.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

1.7

Price

6.1
Brand name
Google
Processor model
Google Tensor G4
This smartphone uses the Google Tensor G4 processor which is faster than processors in 83% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.4% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 16 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 83.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 12% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.3% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
3.1 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 3.1 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 79.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.6% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 14
Android version
Android 14
This smartphone runs Android version Android 14 which is newer than that found in 49.5% of smartphones and equal to that in 21% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
yes
This smartphone receives direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
48 MP & 10.8 MP & 10.5 MP
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 48 MP & 10.8 MP & 10.5 MP which is lower than that of 78.3% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/3.1
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/3.1 which is wider than that of 83.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
30.7 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 30.7 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 63.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 6.3% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
1.6 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
8 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 8 inches which is larger than the screens of 98.8% of smartphones and equal to those of 0.6% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
2076x 2152 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 2076x2152 px which is higher than that of 93.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Pixel density
373 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 373 ppi which is lower than that of 75.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,650 mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,650 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 76.2% of smartphones and equal to those in 0.1% of smartphones.
Charging speed
30 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 30 W which is slower than in 61.1% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 4.7% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
yes
This smartphone supports aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
155.2 mm
This smartphone has a height of 155.2 mm which is shorter than 90.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Width
150.2 mm
This smartphone has a width of 150.2 mm which is wider than 99.8% of smartphones.
Thickness
5.1 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 5.1 mm which is thinner than 99.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Weight
257 g
This smartphone weighs 257 g which is heavier than 90% of smartphones.
Device volume
116,250 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 116,250 cm³ which is larger than 86.4% of smartphones.
Show more

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (16GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 5 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (5 x vs 0 x).
    5 x vs 0 x
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 3.29x higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (2172 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    2,172 nits vs 660 nits
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (2076x2152 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    2076x2152 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the agentic AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Gemini Nano with Multimodality, Pixel Screenshots, Call Notes, Gemini Live, Magic Editor, Circle to Search, Dual Screen Live Translate
    agentic vs fundamental
  • Direct OS updates
    This smartphone supports direct OS updates, the average smartphone does not. 20.6% of smartphones support this feature.
  • 46.3% more popular
    Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (16GB + 256GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (7.96 vs 5.4).
    7.96 vs 5.44
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 2.07x higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (1950 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    1,950 vs 942
  • 29.2% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 8x more L2 cache
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (8192 KB vs 1024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1024 KB.
    8,192 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 33.3% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (4 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    4 nm vs 6 nm
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (1x3.1 GHz & 3x2.6 GHz & 4x1.92 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    1x3.1 GHz & 3x2.6 GHz & 4x1.92 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • 2.12x higher PassMark benchmark
    This smartphone achieves a higher PassMark score than the average smartphone (9,298 vs 4,389). The average smartphone PassMark score is 4,389.
    9,298 vs 4,389
  • 23.4% higher PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 performance score than the average smartphone (13,303 vs 10,783). The average score is 10,783.
    13,303 vs 10,783
  • 82.8% higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (4,630 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in multi-core.
    4,630 vs 2,533
  • Better processor
    This smartphone features a better processor than the average smartphone (Google Tensor G4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Google Tensor G4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 3.5x more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (896 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    896 vs 256
  • 52.7% faster memory speed
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (4200 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2750 MHz memory speed.
    4,200 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 2.14x higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone performs better in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (2,620 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    2,620 vs 1,226
  • 14.3% higher maximum RAM
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    16 GB vs 14 GB
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the agentic AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Gemini Nano with Multimodality, Pixel Screenshots, Call Notes, Gemini Live, Magic Editor, Circle to Search, Dual Screen Live Translate
    agentic vs fundamental
  • Direct OS updates
    This smartphone supports direct OS updates, the average smartphone does not. 20.6% of smartphones support this feature.
  • 5 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (5 x vs 0 x).
    5 x vs 0 x
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Has a multi-lens front camera
    This smartphone features a multi-lens front camera, the average smartphone does not. 18% of smartphones have multiple front lenses.
  • Supports laser autofocus
    This smartphone features laser autofocus, the average smartphone does not. 21.4% of smartphones include laser AF.
  • Supports 360° panorama
    This smartphone can capture 360° panoramas, the average smartphone cannot. 25.2% of smartphones support 360° panoramas.
  • Better main camera video
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 22.60x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    2160x60 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This smartphone allows manual shutter speed control, the average smartphone does not. 29.8% of smartphones include this.
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/3.1 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/3.1 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Has 3D facial recognition
    This smartphone features 3D facial recognition, the average smartphone does not. 4.3% of smartphones support 3D face unlock.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.2 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.0.
    3.2 vs 2.0
  • Supports satellite SOS
    This smartphone supports satellite SOS functionality, the average smartphone does not. 8.1% of smartphones offer satellite emergency services.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.3 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.3 vs 5.2
  • 3.29x higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (2172 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    2,172 nits vs 660 nits
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (2076x2152 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    2076x2152 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 1.33 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (8 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    8 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 1,700 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (2700 nits vs 1000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    2,700 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Better display glass type
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Has a secondary display
    This smartphone features a secondary display, the average smartphone does not. 6.7% of smartphones include a secondary screen.
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This smartphone has a higher contrast ratio than the average smartphone (2000000:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone contrast ratio is 1000000:1.
    AMOLED/OLED displays have an effectively infinite contrast ratio
    2,000,000:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Supports aptX Lossless
    This smartphone supports aptX Lossless, the average smartphone does not. 12.9% of smartphones include aptX Lossless support.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • 3.2 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (5.1 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    5.1 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 8.4 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (155.2 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    155.2 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Is designed for seniors
    This smartphone is designed specifically for seniors, the average smartphone is not. 17% of smartphones are senior-friendly.
  • Is foldable
    This smartphone is foldable, the average smartphone is not. 3.9% of smartphones are foldable devices.
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (48 MP & 10.8 MP & 10.5 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    48 MP & 10.8 MP & 10.5 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 62.5% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (7.5 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    7.5 W vs 20 W
  • Lower GSMArena battery life score
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena battery life score than the average smartphone (11:54 hour/s vs 13:30 hour/s). The average smartphone scores 13:30 hour/s.
    11:54 hour/s vs 13:30 hour/s
  • 78.9% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (5.4 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    5.4 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 31% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (257 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    257 g vs 196.2 g
  • 5.6% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (373 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    373 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 6.42x more expensive
    Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (16GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£1,670 vs £260).
    £1,670 vs £260
  • 20.1% worse value for money
    Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (16GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.11 vs 7.3).
    6.11 vs 7.34
  • 2.3% lower user score
    User score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
    the average smartphone
    Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (16GB + 256GB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.82 vs 8.000).
    7.82 vs 8
  • 78.9% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (5.4 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    5.4 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 1.1% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (940 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    940 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (48 MP & 10.8 MP & 10.5 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    48 MP & 10.8 MP & 10.5 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 4.1% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (30.7 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    30.7 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (10 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    10 MP vs 16 MP
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 5.6% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (373 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    373 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 62.5% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (7.5 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    7.5 W vs 20 W
  • Lower GSMArena battery life score
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena battery life score than the average smartphone (11:54 hour/s vs 13:30 hour/s). The average smartphone scores 13:30 hour/s.
    11:54 hour/s vs 13:30 hour/s
  • 7% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4650 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,650 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 9.1% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (30 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    30 W vs 33 W
  • 31% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (257 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    257 g vs 196.2 g
  • 74.2 mm wider
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (150.2 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    150.2 mm vs 76 mm
  • 18.9% larger volume
    This smartphone has a larger volume than the average smartphone (116250 cm³ vs 97800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97800 cm³.
    116,250 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

M
markellisreviews.com
14/09/2024
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
16/09/2024
Summary of the review
D
digitaltrends.com
23/09/2024
Summary of the review
T
theguardian.com
12/09/2024
Summary of the review
A
androidheadlines.com
03/09/2024
Summary of the review
M
moorinsightsstrategy.com
18/02/2025
Summary of the review
F
forbes.com
03/02/2025
Summary of the review
B
businessinsider.com
09/01/2025
Summary of the review
P
phonearena.com
31/12/2024
Summary of the review
H
hothardware.com
27/12/2024
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
11/10/2024
Summary of the review
D
droid-life.com
26/09/2024
Summary of the review
M
macsources.com
05/09/2024
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
03/09/2024
Summary of the review
T
techgoondu.com
23/09/2024
Summary of the review
T
twentyfirsttech.com
30/09/2024
Summary of the review
G
gizmodo.com
03/09/2024
Summary of the review
J
journaldugeek.com
03/09/2024
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
03/09/2024
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
20/01/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (16GB + 256GB)

  • Improved design that is thinner and lighter than its predecessor, feeling more like a regular phone when closed.
  • Excellent, very bright internal and external OLED displays, making them easy to use in direct sunlight.
  • Solid battery life that can last a full day or more with typical use.
  • Class-leading cameras for a foldable phone, including a capable 5x optical telephoto lens and useful AI photography features like 'Made You Look' and 'Add Me'.
  • Good performance for daily tasks and multitasking, powered by the efficient Tensor G4 chip and 16GB of RAM.
  • Durable build with an IPX8 water resistance rating and Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the cover screen and back.
  • Offers a seamless phone-to-tablet experience, ideal for multitasking with split-screen app pairs.
  • Guaranteed seven years of software and security updates.
  • Clean, stock Android experience that is easy to navigate.

What we don't like about Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (16GB + 256GB)

  • Extremely expensive price point.
  • Very slow wired and wireless charging speeds compared to competitors.
  • Software is not as optimized for the larger, foldable display as some rival brands, with fewer power-user features.
  • Inner screen is less durable than the outer glass and more prone to damage from drops or hard pressure.
  • Heavier and bulkier than a standard non-folding phone.
  • Inner display's nearly square aspect ratio results in black bars when watching most widescreen video content.
  • Lacks an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor, relying on a less secure 2D face unlock and a side-mounted capacitive sensor.
  • Performance in graphics-intensive tasks and high-end gaming falls short of rivals using Qualcomm's top-tier chipsets.

Verdict

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a premium foldable smartphone featuring 16GB of RAM and 256GB of UFS 3.1 storage, powered by the Google Tensor G4 chip. Main characteristics include a sleek, thinner design with an 8-inch internal 1-120Hz LTPO Super Actua display and a 6.3-inch 60-120Hz Actua cover display, both offering a high peak brightness of 2,700 nits. A triple rear camera system (48MP main, 10.5MP ultrawide, 10.8MP 5x optical telephoto) provides excellent photo quality and AI-driven editing features. Pros are its impressive screen quality, generous 7 years of OS and security updates, and a competitive IPX8 water resistance rating. Cons include the Tensor G4 processor being less powerful in raw benchmarks compared to some rivals, a side-mounted fingerprint sensor instead of an ultrasonic one, and relatively slow wired (45W) and inconvenient wireless charging speeds.

Compare Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (16GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (16GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found