OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v3.0
Smartphones Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v3.0

DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra (20GB + 256GB) review: 196 specs compared

Avg. price:~£190RAM capacity:20 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:6.56 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP

DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra (20GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 196 technical specifications and 6 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra (20GB + 256GB)
6.1/10

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

35%

5.4

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.4

Reviews score

10%

5.4

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 96% of smartphones
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

â–¼Worse than 92%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

25%

5.4

Performance

18%

5.4

Camera

15%

3.9

Display

15%

5.3

Battery

10%

7.9

Software

10%

6.5

Connectivity

4%

1.0

Audio

3%

8.0

Design

â–¼Worse than 91%
5.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models

5.4

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.9

Average grade

20%

6.8

Popularity

Grades by review (6)
3 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 95%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • doogee-blade-10-ultra
  • doogee-blade-10-ultra
  • doogee-blade-10-ultra
  • doogee-blade-10-ultra
  • doogee-blade-10-ultra
  • doogee-blade-10-ultra
  • doogee-blade-10-ultra
  • doogee-blade-10-ultra
  • doogee-blade-10-ultra
doogee-blade-10-ultra
doogee-blade-10-ultra
doogee-blade-10-ultra
doogee-blade-10-ultra
doogee-blade-10-ultra
doogee-blade-10-ultra
doogee-blade-10-ultra
doogee-blade-10-ultra
doogee-blade-10-ultra
Where to buy
    N/A~ £190
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
20GB + 256GB36GB + 256GB

What reviewers say about the DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra (20GB + 256GB)

Based on 3 · 3

Reviewers like the compact size and rugged features, but performance splits opinion and low-light photos are weak.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra (20GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components:

25%

5.4

Performance

18%

5.4

Camera

15%

3.9

Display

15%

5.3

Battery

10%

7.9

Software

10%

6.5

Connectivity

4%

1.0

Audio

3%

8.0

Design

5.4
Reviews score
5.4
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components:

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

7.1
Processor model
Unisoc T606
This smartphone uses the Unisoc T606 processor model which is slower than processors in 84.8% of smartphones and equal to processors in 3.3% of smartphones.
Storage type
?
RAM capacity
20 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 20 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 96.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.7% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.4% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
1.6 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 1.6 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 95% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.5% of smartphones.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This smartphone runs Android, which is more mainstream than the system in 4.8% of smartphones and the same as in 95.2% of smartphones.
Android 14
Android version
Android 14
This smartphone runs Android version Android 14 which is newer than that found in 49.5% of smartphones and equal to that in 21% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not support direct OS updates. 20.1% of smartphones offer this.
Promised software updates
?
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone runs an open-source operating system. 5.2% of smartphones offer this.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
no
This smartphone does not have a multi-lens main camera. 93.8% of smartphones offer this.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP which is lower than that of 71.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.8% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
?
Main camera sensor area
?
Main camera pixel size
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <2 – >2
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.7% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.2% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
eSIM support
no
This smartphone does not have eSIM support. 19.9% of smartphones offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not have 5G connectivity. 66.7% of smartphones offer this.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Show more
Screen size
6.56 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.56 inches which is smaller than the screens of 72.3% of smartphones and equal to those of 3.9% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
720x 1612 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 720x1612 px which is lower than that of 78.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.3% of smartphones.
Pixel density
269 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 269 ppi which is lower than that of 79.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.4% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is lower than in 65.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 18.6% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,150 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,150 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 61.9% of smartphones and equal to those in 0.9% of smartphones.
Charging speed
18 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 18 W which is slower than in 76% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 11.7% of smartphones.
Fast charging
no
This smartphone does not support fast charging. 93.3% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.1% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
This smartphone does not have stereo speakers. 64.3% of smartphones offer this.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not have a headphone jack. 45.1% of smartphones offer this.
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone has 1 microphones, which is fewer than in 89.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 10.2% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not have an FM radio. 34.3% of smartphones offer this.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless Bluetooth audio. 12.5% of smartphones offer this.
Show more
Height
?
Width
?
Thickness
10.7 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 10.7 mm which is thicker than 89.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Weight
240 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 240 g which is heavier than 88.8% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.5% of smartphones.
Device volume
?
Show more
What reviewers say

DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra (20GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformanceSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 12 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (20 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    20 GB vs 8 GB
  • 2x more L2 cache
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1,024 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 3% larger battery capacity
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (5,150 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5,000 mAh.
    5,150 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 36.8% cheaper
    DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra (20GB + 256GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£190 vs £260).
    £190 vs £260
  • 36.8% cheaper
    DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra (20GB + 256GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£190 vs £260).
    £190 vs £260
  • 12 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (20 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    20 GB vs 8 GB
  • 2x more L2 cache
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1,024 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 3% larger battery capacity
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (5,150 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5,000 mAh.
    5,150 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Unisoc T606 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Unisoc T606 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 26.0% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models

    5.4

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.9

    Average grade

    20%

    6.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (6)
    3 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.4 vs 7.3
  • 2x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • No ultrawide rear camera
    This smartphone does not have an ultrawide rear camera, while the average smartphone does. 62.6% of smartphones offer this.
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.6% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 26.0% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models

    5.4

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.9

    Average grade

    20%

    6.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (6)
    3 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.4 vs 7.3
  • 30.8% lower sentiment score
    5.4 vs 7.8
  • 7.9% worse value for money
    DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra (20GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (7.1 vs 7.7).
    7.1 vs 7.66
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Unisoc T606 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Unisoc T606 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 2x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • 66.7% higher TDP (less efficient)
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (10 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    10 W vs 6 W
  • 31.6% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (650 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    650 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 60.6% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (371 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    371 vs 942
  • 33.3% lower CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (1.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    1.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 75% less L3 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (1,024 KB vs 4,096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4,096 KB.
    1,024 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 41.8% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1,600 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 50% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (12.8 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    12.8 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 45.1% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (1,391 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    1,391 vs 2,533
  • Lower CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x1.6 GHz & 6x1.6 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x1.6 GHz & 6x1.6 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 1 fewer memory channels
    This smartphone supports fewer memory channels than the average smartphone (1 vs 2). The average smartphone supports 2 channels.
    1 vs 2
  • Lacks focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.8% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 58.3% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • Lacks instant markup
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.5% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 52.5% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • No ultrawide rear camera
    This smartphone does not have an ultrawide rear camera, while the average smartphone does. 62.6% of smartphones offer this.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Single-lens main camera
    This smartphone has a single-lens main camera, while the average smartphone has a multi-lens setup. 93.7% of smartphones use multiple lenses.
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (8 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    8 MP vs 16 MP
  • No slow-motion recording
    This smartphone does not support slow-motion recording, the average smartphone does. 90.4% of smartphones offer slow-mo features.
  • No timelapse video
    This smartphone does not support timelapse video, the average smartphone does. 92.5% of smartphones include timelapse modes.
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.6% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5 vs 5.2
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 31.9% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (269 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    269 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 47% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (350 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    350 nits vs 660 nits
  • 600 nits lower peak brightness
    This smartphone has a lower peak brightness than the average smartphone (400 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average smartphone peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    400 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • Lower screen resolution
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (720x1612 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    720x1612 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This smartphone has a lower contrast ratio than the average smartphone (1500:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone has a contrast ratio of 1000000:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • 0.11 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.6 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.56 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • No fast charging support
    This smartphone does not support fast charging, the average smartphone does. 93.2% of smartphones feature fast charging.
  • 45.5% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (18 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    18 W vs 33 W
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.3% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.1% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.2% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • 1 fewer microphone/s
    This smartphone has fewer microphones than the average smartphone (1 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 22.3% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (240 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    240 g vs 196.2 g
  • 2.4 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (10.7 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    10.7 mm vs 8.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
H2TechVideos
≈ estimated
26/08/2024
First look · unboxing, setup and quick feature tour
Verdict
DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra suits tough work and clumsy users, and is worth grabbing while the deal lasts.
Brand video
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.3
itc.ua
✓ explicit
21/03/2025
Hands-on review · Budget rugged phone
Verdict
The DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra is a slim, affordable rugged phone with clean Android 14 and a cool-running chip, but its weak sound and small battery hold it back.
8.0
ibtimes.co.uk
≈ estimated
03/02/2026
Review · Rugged smartphone
Verdict
The DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra is a slim rugged phone with good battery life and storage, but its display and night photos are only reasonable.
7.3
itc.ua
✓ explicit
21/03/2025
Hands-on test · Budget rugged phone
Verdict
The DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra is a thin, budget rugged phone with pure Android 14 and a cool-running chip, though its weak speaker and small battery disappoint.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra (20GB + 256GB)

  • Exceptionally thin and lightweight design (10.7mm) for a rugged device
  • High durability with IP68, IP69K, and MIL-STD-810H certifications
  • Clean Android 14 operating system with no pre-installed bloatware or ads
  • Smooth 90Hz refresh rate on the 6.56-inch HD+ IPS display
  • Generous 256GB internal storage with support for up to 1TB microSD expansion
  • Adequate battery life for daily use, despite the slim profile sacrificing some capacity

What customers don't like about DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra (20GB + 256GB)

  • Mediocre single-speaker audio quality described as 'deaf' or having an echo
  • Weak Unisoc T606 processor that struggles with high-end gaming and heavy multitasking
  • Lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack despite some initial marketing suggestions
  • Poor low-light camera performance with significant digital noise
  • Slow 10W charging speed for a 5150mAh battery
  • Display viewing angles can cause the screen to dim

Verdict

The Doogee Blade 10 Ultra is a rugged 4G smartphone running Android 14, featuring a slim 10.7mm body that is IP68/IP69K and MIL-STD-810H certified for water, dust, and shock resistance. Key specifications include a 6.56-inch HD+ IPS display with a 90Hz refresh rate, 20GB of RAM (8GB physical plus 12GB virtual expansion) and 256GB of internal storage expandable up to 1TB, powered by an octa-core Unisoc T606 processor. It is equipped with a 50MP AI main camera and an 8MP front camera, a 5150mAh battery with 10W charging, NFC, and a side-mounted fingerprint sensor. Pros are its durable yet lightweight design for a rugged phone, ample memory, and clean Android experience. Cons include a relatively low 720p display resolution, a single, mediocre-quality speaker, and the important caveat that it does not support Verizon or AT T networks.

Compare DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra (20GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra (20GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found