Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Oppo Find X3 Lite (8GB + 128GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£190RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:6.43 inchesMain camera megapixels:64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP

Oppo Find X3 Lite (8GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5/10

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.2

Technical score

10%

8.5

User score

â–¼Worse than 59% of smartphones
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

â–²Better than 51%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

25%

6.0

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.4

Camera

15%

5.2

Display

15%

6.2

Battery

10%

7.5

Software

10%

7.5

Connectivity

4%

4.7

Audio

3%

5.9

Design

â–¼Worse than 64%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

8.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 81%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Oppo Find X3 Lite (8GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

25%

6.0

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.4

Camera

15%

5.2

Display

15%

6.2

Battery

10%

7.5

Software

10%

7.5

Connectivity

4%

4.7

Audio

3%

5.9

Design

6.2
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

8.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Oppo Find X3 Lite (8GB + 128GB) has a popularity of 8 points, which is higher than 75.3% of smartphones.
8.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

7.4
Brand name
Oppo
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G processor which is faster than processors in 51.5% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.6% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
8 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 28.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 30.4% of smartphones.
Internal storage
128 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is smaller than the storage of 61.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 28.4% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.4 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.4 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 36.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 13.4% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 11
Android version
Android 11
This smartphone runs Android version Android 11 which is older than that found in 80.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 8.5% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP which is higher than that of 80.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.6% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4 which is wider than that of 87.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
31.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 31.4 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 57.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.8% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.7 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.7 µm which is smaller than in 64.6% of smartphones and equal to the size in 10.4% of smartphones.
1.4 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.43 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.43 inches which is smaller than the screens of 85% of smartphones and equal to those of 1.5% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2400 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2400 px which is higher than that of 36.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 20.4% of smartphones.
Pixel density
410 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 410 ppi which is higher than that of 69.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is lower than in 65.4% of smartphones and equal to that in 18.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,300 mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,300 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 86.9% of smartphones and equal to those in 1% of smartphones.
Charging speed
65 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 65 W which is faster than in 65.2% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 2.6% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
159.1 mm
This smartphone has a height of 159.1 mm which is shorter than 83.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Width
73.4 mm
This smartphone has a width of 73.4 mm which is narrower than 87.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.9 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.9 mm which is thinner than 72.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 5% of smartphones.
Weight
172 g
This smartphone weighs 172 g which is lighter than 92.1% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.7% of smartphones.
Device volume
81,249 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 81,249 cm³ which is smaller than 92.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Show more

Oppo Find X3 Lite (8GB + 128GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 97% faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (65 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    65 W vs 33 W
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.
    3.1 vs 2
  • 33.3% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (8 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    8 W vs 6 W
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • 6.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Oppo Find X3 Lite
    the average smartphone
    Oppo Find X3 Lite (8GB + 128GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.54 vs 8).
    8.54 vs 8
  • 47.1% more popular
    Oppo Find X3 Lite (8GB + 128GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (8 vs 5.4).
    8 vs 5.44
  • 36.8% cheaper
    Oppo Find X3 Lite (8GB + 128GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£190 vs £260).
    £190 vs £260
  • 33.3% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (8 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    8 W vs 6 W
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (1x2.4 GHz & 1x2.2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    1x2.4 GHz & 1x2.2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.
    3.1 vs 2
  • 3.8% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (410 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    410 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 97% faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (65 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    65 W vs 33 W
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 12.3% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (172 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    172 g vs 196.2 g
  • 2.6 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (73.4 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    73.4 mm vs 76 mm
  • 4.5 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (159.1 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    159.1 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 0.4 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.9 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.9 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 16.9% smaller volume
    This smartphone has a smaller device volume than the average smartphone (81,249 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97,800 cm³.
    81,249 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 50% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • 21.1% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (750 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    750 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 14% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    4,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Lower IP rating
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP52 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP52 vs IP67
  • 50% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • 21.1% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (750 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    750 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 16.7% larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (7 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    7 nm vs 6 nm
  • 50% less L2 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L2 cache than the average smartphone (512 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average smartphone has an L2 cache of 1,024 KB.
    512 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 22.4% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 33.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (17 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    17 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 45.9% lower 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in the 3DMark Wild Life benchmark than the average smartphone (1,686 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115 in this benchmark.
    1,686 vs 3,115
  • 14.3% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 14 GB
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 11 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 11 vs Android 14
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • 0.1 µm smaller main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (0.7 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average smartphone has a pixel size of 0.8 µm.
    1.4 binned
    0.7 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 1.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (31.4 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    31.4 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.1 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.1 vs 5.2
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 0.24 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.4 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.43 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 25% lower touch sampling rate
    This smartphone has a lower touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (180 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average smartphone has a sampling rate of 240 Hz.
    180 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • 155.5 nits lower GSMArena max display brightness
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (738 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average smartphone scores 893.5 nits.
    738 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • 250 nits lower peak brightness
    This smartphone has a lower peak brightness than the average smartphone (750 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average smartphone peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    750 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 9.1% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (600 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    600 nits vs 660 nits
  • 14% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    4,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • Lower IP rating
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP52 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP52 vs IP67
  • 3 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2021 vs 2024). 3.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    March 2021
    2021 vs 2024
  • 10% lower French repairability index
    This smartphone has a lower French repairability index than the average smartphone (7.2 vs 8). The average smartphone scores 8.
    7.2 vs 8

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
VoloKin Project
≈ estimated
16/10/2024
Hands-on review · battery, camera and performance tests
Verdict
Oppo Find X3 Lite is recommended for a compact flagship feel, though the speaker and some cameras fall short.
7.0
The HD Channel - Vlogs, Reviews & Stuff
≈ estimated
18/08/2021
Unboxing and review · zoom tests and sample photos
Verdict
Oppo Find X3 Lite is a good-value phone that does what it says, though it misses some features rivals offer.
9.0
Gareth Myles
≈ estimated
25/05/2021
Hands-on review · battery, calls and daily use
Verdict
Oppo Find X3 Lite is a very good phone with good value for money, and it is clearly recommended despite the missing microSD slot.
6.0
Lover Of Tech
≈ estimated
24/07/2021
Camera comparison · daylight, low light and video tests
Verdict
Oppo Find X3 Lite gets mixed results: it wins on some photo looks but falls clearly behind on video and low-light shots.
Overview video
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

techradar.com
09/04/2021
Full review · Mid-range phone
Verdict
The Oppo Find X3 Lite is a dependable mid-range phone with fast charging and a 90Hz screen, but nothing about it stands out.
techadvisor.com
17/04/2021
Full review · Mid-range test
Verdict
The Oppo Find X3 Lite is strong on fast charging, display and software, but its hit-and-miss camera holds it back.
remixmagazine.com
29/04/2021
Lifestyle test · Features and charging
Verdict
The Oppo Find X3 Lite is a stylish, fast-charging mid-range phone with extras like Dual-View video, suited to people who like to customise.
pocket-lint.com
09/05/2021
Full review · Solid mid-range build
Verdict
The Oppo Find X3 Lite is a solid mid-ranger with a quality build, a headphone jack and fast charging, but its camera is oversold.
dxomark.com
13/07/2021
Lab test · Camera tests
Verdict
The Oppo Find X3 Lite takes vivid, pleasant indoor photos, but its night shots, ultra-wide and zoom fall behind rivals in this lab test.
dxomark.com
11/10/2021
Lab test · Screen tests
Verdict
The Oppo Find X3 Lite has accurate touch and faithful colour indoors, but HDR video looks too contrasty and 60fps video drops frames.
itpro.com
17/11/2021
Lab test · Mid-range Android
Verdict
The Oppo Find X3 Lite is a sturdy, long-lasting mid-range phone with a smooth 90Hz screen and very fast charging, though its camera is inconsistent.
N
nextpit.com
11/03/2021
Summary of the review
reviews.org
22/05/2021
Hands-on review · Mid-range value
Verdict
The Oppo Find X3 Lite is a fast, long-lasting mid-ranger with an attractive 90Hz screen, but its macro lens is poor and it lacks wireless charging.
t3.com
31/05/2021
Full review · Budget Android phone
Verdict
The Oppo Find X3 Lite is a good-value budget phone with fast 65W charging and a sharp screen, though it cuts corners, with no wireless charging and quirky software.
futurefive.co.nz
10/05/2021
Hands-on review · Design and cameras
Verdict
The Oppo Find X3 Lite is a sleek mid-range phone with a bundled case, four rear cameras and very fast charging, though its storage cannot be expanded.
journaldugeek.com
16/04/2021
Full review · Well-rounded mid-ranger
Verdict
The Oppo Find X3 Lite is a well-rounded mid-range phone with a great screen and fast charging, though its algorithms over-sharpen some photos.
L
lesnumeriques.com
29/05/2021
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.fr
14/03/2021
Summary of the review
frandroid.com
25/01/2022
Full review · Camera tests
Verdict
The Oppo Find X3 Lite is a modest mid-range phone whose main camera performs well, though its ultra-wide and macro modes fall short.
lesmobiles.com
23/07/2021
Full review · Smooth everyday use
Verdict
The Oppo Find X3 Lite is a smooth, well-built phone with a 90Hz screen and fast charging, though it has no adaptive refresh rate and a mono speaker.
Q
quechoisir.org
21/05/2021
Summary of the review
geektest.fr
07/02/2022
Full review · Design and charging
Verdict
The Oppo Find X3 Lite is a slim, light phone with a smooth 90Hz screen and very fast charging, though it is best kept in a case.
presse-citron.net
05/05/2021
Full review · Everyday mid-range phone
Verdict
The Oppo Find X3 Lite is a balanced everyday phone with a bright 90Hz screen and strong main camera, held back by one speaker and fixed storage.
tomsguide.fr
20/05/2021
Full review · Camera and gaming
Verdict
The Oppo Find X3 Lite is a solid all-rounder for most tasks, with a sharp main camera, though its screen tints whites blue and heavy games drop frames.

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Oppo Find X3 Lite (8GB + 128GB)

  • Blisteringly fast 65W wired charging (fully charges in around 35-40 minutes).
  • Vivid, bright, and smooth 90Hz AMOLED display with good color reproduction.
  • Sleek, slim, and lightweight design with a grippy matte finish that resists fingerprints.
  • Reliable and adequate performance for daily tasks and most mobile games, powered by the Snapdragon 765G processor with 5G support.
  • Good overall battery life, often lasting a full day or more with moderate use.
  • The main 64MP rear camera performs well in good lighting and has a capable night mode.
  • The software (ColorOS) is a clean and highly customizable Android skin with useful features like a 3.5mm headphone jack and dual SIM support.
  • Overall good value for money at its price point, offering many premium features.

What customers don't like about Oppo Find X3 Lite (8GB + 128GB)

  • The camera performance is considered average or underwhelming compared to some rivals, particularly the low-light and macro lenses.
  • Battery life can be disappointing with heavy 5G usage and is generally shorter than some competitors.
  • Lack of an official IP rating for water and dust resistance, a common trade-off at this price.
  • No wireless charging or expandable storage via a microSD card.
  • Performance can slow down during processor-intensive tasks or high-end gaming.
  • Software updates are limited (typically two major Android updates) and the software can have some minor bugs or UI issues according to some users.
  • Mono speaker setup is considered a drawback compared to stereo options on other phones.

Verdict

The Oppo Find X3 Lite is a 5G-ready mid-range smartphone featuring a 6.43-inch, 90Hz AMOLED display and powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G processor with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of non-expandable UFS 2.1 storage. A quad-camera setup on the rear is headlined by a 64MP main sensor, complemented by an 8MP ultra-wide, 2MP macro, and 2MP mono lens, while a 32MP camera handles selfies. Main pros include its exceptional 65W SuperVOOC 2.0 fast charging, which can reach 100% in approximately 35 minutes, a smooth 90Hz display, 5G connectivity, and the retention of a 3.5mm headphone jack. Cons often cited are an average camera performance in low light conditions, the lack of expandable storage (no microSD slot), no wireless charging support, and a plastic build with no official IP rating for water immersion.

Compare Oppo Find X3 Lite (8GB + 128GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oppo Find X3 Lite (8GB + 128GB) and other smartphones

No results found