OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X review: 74 specs compared

Avg. price:~£260PassMark multi-core score:51283N. of physical cores:12CPU boost clock speed:5.6 GHzCPU socket:AM5TDP (Thermal design power):170 W

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Review: Compare 74 technical specifications, 41 expert and video reviews and 4 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

8.4/10

★Better than 99% of processors

8.6

★Better than 98%

8.6

★Better than 95%

8.4

▲Better than 89%

8.2

★Better than 96%

8.8
Gaming
Gaming
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
9.0
PassMark single-core score
25.0%
9.2
Geekbench 6 single-core score
20.0%
10
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
7.0
L3 cache
8.0%
7.4
N. of physical cores
9.0
Video editing
Video editing
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
10
Geekbench 6 multi-core score
20.0%
7.4
N. of physical cores
20.0%
10
CPU threads
15.0%
7.0
L3 cache

Where to buy

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

What reviewers say about the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

Based on 11 · 11

Reviewers praise strong productivity and single-core speed, but cooling is the main gripe and opinions on value are split.

Praised

Mixed views

Criticised

Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

Based on 150 owners sharing their experience in online comments

64%positive8%mixed28%negative

Owners praise the fast, efficient performance and value, while high temperatures and occasional stability problems remain the biggest frustrations.

What owners like

Owners using a Curve Optimizer offset of about -20 to -30 report peak temperatures dropping from around 95°C to the mid-70s or low 80s.46
Owners say it handles gaming and heavy work such as rendering, video editing and multitasking, and that light undervolting keeps near-stock speed.32
Owners using Curve Optimizer around -30 and an 80°C limit report about 5.3 to 5.5 GHz all-core and higher Cinebench scores than stock.18
Owners say it often costs less than comparable Intel chips and sells in bundles with a motherboard and memory at a lower combined price.12
Owners report stable all-core clocks around 5.0 to 5.4 GHz after manual voltage or Curve Optimizer tuning, some running for days under games and benchmarks.8
Eco Mode at 105W with a Curve Optimizer of -20 to -28 keeps almost stock performance while cutting power use noticeably.7
Owners say the 12 cores handle heavy multitasking such as compiling code, rendering, video editing and music production.6
Owners expect the AM5 platform to last, with the 12 cores seen as future-proof for more demanding games and creative work.4
After undervolting, owners say fans stay quiet in games and light use, since the chip runs much cooler at idle and under load.3

What owners dislike

Stock settings often reach about 95°C under heavy load, and some owners see 85°C or more in long productivity runs and demanding games.28
Aggressive Curve Optimizer or Eco Mode settings have caused owners' PCs to fail to boot, restart after hours, or show blue screens.12
Some owners see low GPU usage in certain games, such as Spider-Man Miles Morales, and say the chip can hold back fast graphics cards.8
Owners report board-specific issues, such as BIOS updates changing auto voltage, missing thermal-limit or voltage-offset options, and slow boots.7
Simply opening apps or browsing makes the cores boost suddenly, lifting temperatures and making fans ramp up, even when the PC is mostly idle.6
Fixed-voltage undervolting cut Cinebench scores by about 5 to 10 percent in some owners' tests, even as temperatures dropped.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

8.4

Show more

Hide

Platform

8.8

Show more

Hide

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

CPU architecture

Instruction sets

Show more

Performance

9.2

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

PassMark multi-core score

Show more

What reviewers say

Architecture

7.8

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

8.7

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

What reviewers say

Integrated graphics

7.7

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

Integrated GPU execution units

Integrated GPU base frequency

Integrated media encoders/decoders

Show more

Power & Thermal

5.4

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

?

Tau (power duration limit)

N/A

Configurable TDP

Show more

What reviewers say

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen 9 7900X better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

4.47x higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (51,283 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
51,283 vs 11,469
3.5x higher multi-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (18,235 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
18,235 vs 5,209
5.2x better multi-core performance
This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (14,575 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
14,575 vs 2,804.5
65.3% better single-core performance
This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (4,229 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
4,229 vs 2,558
91.8% higher single-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,944 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
2,944 vs 1,535
8 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (12 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
12 vs 4
27.3% higher boost clock
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5.6 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
5.6 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
16 more CPU threads
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (24 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
24 vs 8

25.4% higher review score
Reviews score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 89% of models
80%
8.1
Average grade
20%
9.7
Popularity
Grades by review (41)
26 reviews: 18 with a printed score, 8 estimated from the review. 15 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
8.4 vs 6.7
18.5% better value for money
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X has better value for money than the average processor (8.64 vs 7.3).
8.64 vs 7.29
15.3% higher sentiment score
8.3 vs 7.2
5.1% higher list score
List score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (4)
List score: in 4 of 87 lists (5%)
8.2 vs 7.8

Modern CPU socket
This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (AM5 vs FP5).
AM5 vs FP5

4.47x higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (51,283 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
51,283 vs 11,469
3.5x higher multi-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (18,235 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
18,235 vs 5,209
5.2x better multi-core performance
This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (14,575 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
14,575 vs 2,804.5
65.3% better single-core performance
This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (4,229 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
4,229 vs 2,558
91.8% higher single-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,944 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
2,944 vs 1,535
27.3% higher boost clock
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5.6 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
5.6 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
8 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (12 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
12 vs 4
16 more CPU threads
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (24 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
24 vs 8
6 more CPU cores
This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (12 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
12 vs 6
Higher base clock
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (12x4.7 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
12x4.7 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
57.1% higher Cinebench R20 single-core score
This processor has a higher Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (770 vs 490). The average processor scores 490 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
770 vs 490
Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
19 higher clock multiplier
This processor has a higher clock multiplier than the average processor (47 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
47 vs 28

More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Raphael vs Kaby Lake).
Raphael vs Kaby Lake
7.11x larger L3 cache
This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (64 MB vs 9 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 9 MB.
64 MB vs 9 MB
4x larger L2 cache
This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (12 MB vs 3 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 3 MB.
12 MB vs 3 MB
2.88x more L3 per core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (5.3 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
5.33 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
58.3% smaller process node
This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (5 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
5 nm vs 12 nm
More advanced foundry
This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 5 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
TSMC 5 nm vs Intel 14 nm
2x more L2 per core
This processor has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
2x larger L1 cache
This processor has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (768 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
768 KB vs 384 KB
2.65x more transistors
This processor has more transistors than the average processor (13.1 billion vs 4.95 billion). The average processor has 4.95 billion transistors.
13.14 billion vs 4.95 billion

12 more PCIe lanes
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (28 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
28 vs 16
Newer PCIe version
This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (5 vs 3).
5 vs 3
Supports memory overclocking
This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.
77.4% higher memory bandwidth
This processor has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (83.2 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s.
83.2 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s
Newer DDR support
This processor supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR5 vs DDR4).
DDR5 vs DDR4
2x more memory capacity
This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
128 GB vs 64 GB
62.5% higher memory speed
This processor has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (5,200 MHz vs 3,200 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 3,200 MHz.
5,200 MHz vs 3,200 MHz
Supports ECC memory
This processor supports ECC memory, while the average processor does not. 32% of processors support it.
Higher JEDEC memory speed
This processor has a higher JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR5-5200 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
DDR5-5,200 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz

Better integrated GPU
This processor uses a better integrated GPU than the average processor (AMD Radeon Graphics vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
AMD Radeon Graphics vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
1 more supported displays
This processor has more supported displays than the average processor (4 vs 3). The average processor supports 3 displays.
4 vs 3

5 °C lower CPU temperature
This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C

Why is AMD Ryzen 9 7900X worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

3.78x higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (170 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
170 W vs 45 W
49.2% larger die size
This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (264 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
264 mm² vs 177 mm²
Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, Secure Processor, Shadow Stack, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, SHA, Secure Processor, Shadow Stack, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
3.78x higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (170 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
170 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
91.7% fewer GPU execution units
This processor has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (2 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
2 vs 24
Older TPM support
This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0

Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, Secure Processor, Shadow Stack, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, SHA, Secure Processor, Shadow Stack, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
Older TPM support
This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0

49.2% larger die size
This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (264 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
264 mm² vs 177 mm²

91.7% fewer GPU execution units
This processor has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (2 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
2 vs 24

3.78x higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (170 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
170 W vs 45 W
3.78x higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (170 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
170 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0

ProYamYamPC

≈ estimated

22/02/2025

Switch review · daily use and power-limit tuning

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a welcome return to AMD: snappier than the old Intel chip, apart from an Ethernet driver problem.

8.0

KitGuruTech

≈ estimated

18/11/2022

Full review · benchmarks, power, overclocking and value

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a solid processor with excellent performance, but Intel's cheaper rival makes the price harder to justify.

7.0

Nicolas11x12 English

≈ estimated

10/11/2022

Hands-on review · benchmarks, temperature and power tests

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is better value than the 7950X for many users, but it is not a clear all-round pick.

7.0

The Tech Tank

≈ estimated

05/11/2022

Hands-on review · productivity and gaming benchmarks

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a very fast chip, but its total cost makes it hard to recommend right now.

9.0

PC Crazy

≈ estimated

23/10/2022

Benchmark review · gaming, synthetic tests and thermals

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X offers strong multi-core gains and better value than the 12900K, with acceptable thermals.

5.0

Hardware Unboxed

≈ estimated

29/09/2022

Hands-on review · productivity, gaming and value tests

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is overpriced for what it delivers, so the 7950X or 7700X makes more sense for most buyers.

9.0

STS

≈ estimated

28/09/2022

Hands-on review · benchmarks and Eco Mode power tests

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a powerful all-round workhorse that Eco Mode makes more practical, though its premium price remains.

9.0

eTeknix

≈ estimated

26/09/2022

Hands-on review · benchmarks, gaming and temperature tests

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a clear choice for high performance and value, though its launch price is relatively high.

9.0

Gear Seekers

≈ estimated

26/09/2022

Gaming PC build · benchmark tests

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X performs quite well, and the platform should improve as BIOS updates arrive.

8.0

Unpacked Technologies

≈ estimated

13/10/2024

First look · unboxing and packaging

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is worth buying for high-end builds, especially on sale, though only unboxing is shown.

Overview video

Not graded

Nicolas11x12 Deutsch · 10/11/2022

Hands-on review · productivity and gaming benchmarks, power and temperatures

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a top enthusiast CPU for work and gaming, but heat and idle power hold it back.

Likes

Good balance between productivity and gaming
Lower idle power than the 7950X
More performance than a 12900K, with slightly lower load power

Dislikes

Reaches about 90°C at full load
Idle power draw is still high for an enthusiast chip
Too expensive for a pure gaming build

Gameit ES · 03/02/2023

Hands-on review · temperatures, cooling and synthetic tests

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is strongly recommended for content creators and heavy workloads, though it needs a high-end 360mm liquid cooler.

Likes

Strong performance for content creation and heavy tasks
Runs cooler than the 7950X and is easier to power
Good value for its performance level
Solid temperatures with a high-end 360mm cooler

Dislikes

Less suited to gaming than the 7700X
Needs a high-end 360mm liquid cooler to reach full performance
A mid-range cooler takes about 25% off its performance

RinconStiff · 10/11/2022

Hands-on review · gaming and workstation benchmarks, temperatures

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is excellent for heavy work and gaming, though a Ryzen 5 is the smarter buy for gaming alone.

Likes

Strong performance in heavy work and multitasking
Excellent frame rates in demanding games
Temperatures stay reasonable on a budget liquid cooler

Dislikes

Overkill for gaming, where a Ryzen 5 is enough
Full-load temperatures climb to about 85°C

Sara's Tech · 26/09/2022

Hands-on review · 7700X vs 7900X benchmarks and platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X lives up to its promises, but waiting a few weeks before buying is the safer choice.

Likes

Up to 30% more performance than the previous generation
Strongest single-core performance on the market
Platform support promised until at least 2025

Dislikes

Pricey DDR5 motherboards and memory push up the total cost
Possible early issues on a brand-new platform
Intel's upcoming launch makes the buying decision less clear

Prodigeek · 30/09/2022

Comparison review · benchmarks, temperatures and platform cost

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is solid for demanding productivity, but high platform costs and a modest generational gain make it hard to recommend now.

Likes

Picked for its strong performance across many productivity workloads
A decent generation overall
AM5 platform expected to receive future CPU upgrades

Dislikes

Results fall short of what a new generation should deliver
Platform costs are high for the performance gained
Two years of upgrade runway feels short for the price

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0

pcmag.com

✓ explicit

26/04/2023

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Review - PCMag

Lab test · Versus the 7950X

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core chip that comes close to the 7950X in lightly threaded tasks, though its 170W power rating is high.

9.0

hwbusters.com

≈ estimated

20/01/2023

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X CPU Review: The Game Changer!

Lab test · Power and thermals

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a fast 12-core chip for heavy tasks, but it runs hot and needs strong cooling.

7.5

kitguru.net

✓ explicit

23/11/2022

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X CPU Review - KitGuru

Benchmark review · Mixed workloads

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X handles mixed gaming and productivity well in Eco Mode, but it runs hot and draws heavy power at stock settings.

6.0

tomshardware.com

✓ explicit

19/10/2022

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Review: Zen 4 Has a Pricing Problem

Benchmark review · Gaming focus

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a big leap over the 5900X and rivals the 7950X in games, but the Ryzen 5 7600X nearly matches it for gaming alone.

9.0

windowscentral.com

✓ explicit

17/10/2022

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and 7950X review - Windows Central

Benchmark review · Zen 4 flagship

Verdict

The Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread chip that delivers strong gaming and multi-core speed, but its 170W power draw and AM5 board requirement are drawbacks.

8.0

techspot.com

✓ explicit

04/10/2022

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X vs. Intel Core i9-12900K - TechSpot

Benchmark review · Intel comparison

Verdict

The Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core chip that beats the Core i9-12900K in most productivity tests, but trails it in Cyberpunk 2077 and Spider-Man Remastered.

9.5

tweaktown.com

✓ explicit

26/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X "Zen 4" CPU Review - TweakTown Would you like to compare the performance benchmarks of the 7900X against its successor or the latest...

Benchmark review · Zen 4 launch

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X suits enthusiasts and gamers who want top speed, but it runs hot and ships without a cooler.

9.0

trustedreviews.com

✓ explicit

26/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Review - Trusted Reviews

Benchmark review · Gaming and power

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a strong all-round chip for heavy multi-core work and gaming, but it runs hot and needs a high-end cooler.

7.5

kitguru.net

✓ explicit

23/11/2022

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X CPU Review - KitGuru

Video review · CPU benchmarks

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core chip for buyers ready to switch fully to the AM5 platform, which brings PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 memory.

9.0

pcguide.com

✓ explicit

24/04/2024

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X review – Is it worth it? - PC Guide

Hands-on test · Rendering and encoding

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X excels at rendering and video encoding, a strong pick for productivity-focused builds on the AM5 platform.

9.0

chip.de

✓ explicit

26/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Review

Lab test · Platform and heat

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X beats its predecessor in every CPU benchmark, but it runs close to its heat limit and needs the new AM5 platform.

10

lesnumeriques.com

✓ explicit

02/11/2022

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Review: A CPU Built for Gaming and Creativity

Lab test · Apps and gaming

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is strong in applications and games, and its Eco Mode keeps power draw in check, but it runs hot unless you enable it.

8.0

clubic.com

✓ explicit

18/10/2022

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Review: A 'Wingman' that makes Zen 4 shine even brighter

Lab test · App and gaming

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a strong all-round chip, close to the 16-core 7950X in apps, but Intel still leads in 3DMark and Red Dead Redemption II.

9.0

gameit.es

≈ estimated

04/02/2023

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X: Full Review

Benchmark review · Model comparison

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core chip for buyers who want more power than the 7700X without the extremes of the 7950X.

9.4

profesionalreview.com

✓ explicit

04/10/2022

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Review (Complete Analysis)

Lab test · Overclocking and heat

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is an excellent workstation chip for rendering, video and AI work, but it runs very hot and gains little from overclocking.

9.6

geeknetic.es

✓ explicit

23 de noviembre de 2022

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Review [Full Analysis]

Lab test · Platform features

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X remains a capable 12-core AM5 chip with 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes, though newer Ryzen 9 models are now arriving.

8.0

bloghtpc.com

≈ estimated

01/06/2024

Análisis AMD Ryzen 9 7900X "Reduciendo temperatura y consumo"

Hands-on test · Power tuning

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X runs cooler and draws less power when its power limit is lowered, though air cooling still struggles with its heat.

8.0

thegamesmachine.it

✓ explicit

15/11/2022

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Review - The Games Machine

Lab test · Cooling and benchmarks

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is fast and built for future upgrades, but it runs very hot and needs a good liquid cooler plus DDR5 memory.

9.0

smartworld.it

≈ estimated

19/12/2022

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X recensione: il top gamma per il popolo

Hands-on test · Productivity and gaming

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a productivity and gaming chip close to the top models, but it runs near its heat limit and needs a strong cooler.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

Excellent multi-threaded performance, making it a powerhouse for professional content creation, video rendering, and 3D animation
Strong single-core performance and high boost clocks (up to 5.6GHz) that deliver a top-tier gaming experience
Future-proof AM5 platform with support for the latest technologies, including DDR5 memory and PCIe 5.0
Great value for mixed workloads, offering workstation-class performance at a significantly lower price than the flagship 7950X
Support for AVX-512 and AI instruction sets, which benefits specific professional software and emulation
Includes an integrated RDNA 2 GPU, which is useful for basic display output and troubleshooting

What customers don't like about AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

Runs very hot under heavy loads, often reaching its 95°C target temperature by design, requiring high-end liquid cooling
High power consumption, with peak package power reaching up to 230W during intense multi-core tasks
No stock cooler included in the box, adding to the overall build cost for a necessary third-party solution
Diminishing returns for pure gaming, as cheaper 8-core or X3D models often provide similar or better gaming performance
Platform entry cost is high due to the mandatory requirement for more expensive DDR5 RAM and AM5 motherboards
Slightly awkward market positioning between the more affordable Ryzen 7 models and the significantly more powerful 7950X

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a high-performance Zen 4 desktop processor featuring 12 cores, 24 threads, a 4.7 GHz base clock, and a 5.6 GHz max boost frequency. Built on a 5nm process for the AM5 socket, it includes 76MB of total cache (64MB L3), supports DDR5-5200 memory, and provides 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes alongside integrated Radeon graphics. Its primary strengths are exceptional multi-threaded productivity for 4K video editing or rendering and strong single-core gaming performance with future-proof platform longevity. However, it lacks a bundled cooler, has a high 170W TDP that leads to significant heat (up to 95°C) requiring premium cooling, and faces stiff competition from cheaper alternatives that offer similar gaming results.

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Processors

Intel Core i7-12700

Processors

Intel Core i9-12900K

Processors

Intel Core i7-13700F

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Processors

Intel Core i7-12700K

Processors

Intel Core i5-13500

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare AMD Ryzen 9 7900X with other processors

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and other processors

No results found