OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X review: 74 specs compared

Avg. price:~£260PassMark multi-core score:45312N. of physical cores:16CPU boost clock speed:4.9 GHzCPU socket:AM4TDP (Thermal design power):105 W

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Review: Compare 74 technical specifications, 42 expert and video reviews and 2 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

7.7/10

▲Better than 86% of processors

8.1

★Better than 90%

7.4

▲Better than 76%

8.6

★Better than 95%

7.4

★Better than 94%

7.4
Gaming
Gaming
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
7.1
PassMark single-core score
25.0%
6.8
Geekbench 6 single-core score
20.0%
7.8
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
7.0
L3 cache
8.0%
10
N. of physical cores
6.1
Video editing
Video editing
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
2.3
Geekbench 6 multi-core score
20.0%
10
N. of physical cores
20.0%
10
CPU threads
15.0%
7.0
L3 cache

Where to buy

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

What reviewers say about the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

Based on 10 · 23

Reviewers love its multi-core power and efficiency for heavy workloads, but find it overpriced, and opinions on gaming are split.

Praised

Mixed views

Criticised

Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

Based on 264 owners sharing their experience in online comments

52%positive19%mixed29%negative

Owners praise its work and gaming speed, while high temperatures and tuning instability frustrate many.

What owners like

Owners report all-core boosts around 4.4–4.5 GHz and Cinebench R23 scores near 29,000–30,000 once the chip is tuned, with some running it stable on modest voltages.39
Owners get better results by lowering voltage, for example 1.025–1.15 V at 4.0–4.4 GHz, which keeps the chip stable while improving scores and temperatures.36
Owners say tuning the offset or static voltage drops idle temperatures to around 36–45°C and keeps gaming loads well below the previous 70–90°C.21
Strong gaming performance and high frame rates14
Owners upgrading from older chips like the 2700X, 3700X, or FX-8350 say the 5950X is much faster in rendering, exports, and everyday multitasking.5
Owners say that with a negative voltage offset or a lower clock, the chip runs cooler and quieter while still performing well.3

What owners dislike

Runs hot at idle, in games, and under load36
Crashes, freezes, and system instability28
Owners on some motherboards, especially MSI and budget X570 boards, report Cinebench scores well below the expected 28,000–30,000 range and that the chip cannot hold its boost clocks.15
Owners say the chip gains little over the 5800X3D in gaming, and that its frame rates can trail Intel chips such as the 10900K at similar RAM speeds.10
Owners say stock and auto settings push voltage up to about 1.4–1.45 V, which drives idle temperatures up and can cause power-offs or instability.10
Owners find the BIOS settings confusing and some report worse performance after following overclock guides, since the options differ between motherboards.9

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

7.7

Show more

Hide

Platform

8.5

Show more

Hide

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

CPU architecture

Instruction sets

Show more

What reviewers say

Performance

7.8

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

PassMark multi-core score

Show more

What reviewers say

Architecture

7.2

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

7.2

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

N/A

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

Integrated graphics

4.0

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

N/A

Integrated GPU execution units

N/A

Integrated GPU base frequency

N/A

Integrated media encoders/decoders

N/A

Show more

Power & Thermal

4.9

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

?

Tau (power duration limit)

N/A

Configurable TDP

Show more

What reviewers say

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen 9 5950X better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

3.95x higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (45,312 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
45,312 vs 11,469
10 more CPU cores
This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (16 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
16 vs 6
3.65x better multi-core performance
This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (10,234 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
10,234 vs 2,804.5
12 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (16 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
16 vs 4
24 more CPU threads
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (32 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
32 vs 8
Higher base clock
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (16x3.4 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
16x3.4 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
7.11x larger L3 cache
This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (64 MB vs 9 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 9 MB.
64 MB vs 9 MB
8 more PCIe lanes
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
20 usable lanes
24 vs 16

28.4% higher review score
Reviews score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 95% of models
80%
8.3
Average grade
20%
9.7
Popularity
Grades by review (42)
19 reviews: 9 with a printed score, 10 estimated from the review. 23 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
8.6 vs 6.7
11.8% better value for money
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has better value for money than the average processor (8.15 vs 7.3).
8.15 vs 7.29

Modern CPU socket
This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (AM4 vs FP5).
AM4 vs FP5

3.95x higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (45,312 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
45,312 vs 11,469
10 more CPU cores
This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (16 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
16 vs 6
3.65x better multi-core performance
This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (10,234 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
10,234 vs 2,804.5
12 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (16 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
16 vs 4
24 more CPU threads
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (32 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
32 vs 8
Higher base clock
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (16x3.4 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
16x3.4 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
35.9% better single-core performance
This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,476 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
3,476 vs 2,558
Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
43.7% higher single-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,206 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
2,206 vs 1,535
11.4% higher boost clock
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (4.9 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
4.9 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
28.6% higher Cinebench R20 single-core score
This processor has a higher Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (630 vs 490). The average processor scores 490 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
630 vs 490

7.11x larger L3 cache
This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (64 MB vs 9 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 9 MB.
64 MB vs 9 MB
2.16x more L3 per core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (4 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
4 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
2.67x larger L2 cache
This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (8 MB vs 3 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 3 MB.
8 MB vs 3 MB
2.67x larger L1 cache
This processor has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (1,024 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
1,024 KB vs 384 KB
58.2% smaller die size
This processor has a lower die size than the average processor (74 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
74 mm² vs 177 mm²
More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Vermeer vs Kaby Lake).
Vermeer vs Kaby Lake
41.7% smaller process node
This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (7 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
7 nm vs 12 nm
More advanced foundry
This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 7 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
TSMC 7 nm vs Intel 14 nm

8 more PCIe lanes
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
20 usable lanes
24 vs 16
Newer PCIe version
This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3).
4 vs 3
Supports memory overclocking
This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.
2x more memory capacity
This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
128 GB vs 64 GB
Supports ECC memory
This processor supports ECC memory, while the average processor does not. 32% of processors support it.

10 °C lower CPU temperature
This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (90 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
90 °C vs 100 °C

Why is AMD Ryzen 9 5950X worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

57.7% lower multi-core score
This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (2,206 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
2,206 vs 5,209
No configurable TDP
This processor does not support configurable TDP, while the average processor does. 53.7% of processors support configurable TDP.
2.33x higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (105 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
105 W vs 45 W
10 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (90 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
90 °C vs 100 °C
2.33x higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (105 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
105 W vs 45 W
No integrated graphics
This processor does not include integrated graphics, while the average processor does. 85.4% of processors include integrated graphics.
5.1% lower list score
List score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (2)
List score: in 2 of 87 lists (2%)
7.4 vs 7.8
34.4% slower classroom rendering
This processor has a higher Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (223 vs 340.1). The average processor needs 340.075 for the Blender Classroom test.
223 vs 340.075

5.1% lower list score
List score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (2)
List score: in 2 of 87 lists (2%)
7.4 vs 7.8

Older TPM support
This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0

57.7% lower multi-core score
This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (2,206 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
2,206 vs 5,209
34.4% slower classroom rendering
This processor has a higher Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (223 vs 340.1). The average processor needs 340.075 for the Blender Classroom test.
223 vs 340.075

Limited PCIe bifurcation
This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4

No integrated graphics
This processor does not include integrated graphics, while the average processor does. 85.4% of processors include integrated graphics.

No configurable TDP
This processor does not support configurable TDP, while the average processor does. 53.7% of processors support configurable TDP.
2.33x higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (105 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
105 W vs 45 W
10 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (90 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
90 °C vs 100 °C
2.33x higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (105 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
105 W vs 45 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

4.0

Tech Ambrosia

≈ estimated

12/07/2021

Hands-on review · gaming, rendering and thermal tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is only worth it for very specific heavy workloads; most buyers should pick a cheaper 8-core chip.

9.0

GGZII

≈ estimated

02/07/2021

Hands-on review · streaming use and CPU benchmark tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is expensive, but it is an excellent streaming chip for enthusiasts; recommended, though overkill for many.

9.5

Nicolas11x12 English

≈ estimated

09/01/2021

Hands-on review · clock speeds, gaming and productivity tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has few drawbacks and is very power-efficient for a 16-core CPU, though its price is steep.

8.0

That Random Geeky Guy

≈ estimated

12/12/2020

Upgrade walkthrough · installation and Cinebench R23 test

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X shows impressive Cinebench gains over the previous chip and installs easily; overclocking comes in a later video.

7.0

Level1Techs

≈ estimated

10/12/2020

Hands-on review · benchmarks and 5900X comparison

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is great for heavy multi-core workloads like VMs, but the 5900X is the better buy for most.

9.5

CrazyTechLab

≈ estimated

12/11/2020

Full review · performance tests and gaming

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has no real compromises, excelling at both gaming and content creation, and it is worth the money.

8.0

eTeknix

≈ estimated

12/11/2020

Hands-on review · benchmarks and overclocking tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X suits rendering and 3D work best; it is a pricey choice, while the 5800X is the sweet spot.

8.0

Hardware Canucks

≈ estimated

08/11/2020

Hands-on review · gaming and productivity benchmarks

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X excels at multi-threaded productivity, but most people should not buy it as a pure gaming CPU.

9.0

Hardware Unboxed

≈ estimated

05/11/2020

Benchmark review · gaming and productivity tests

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X costs more than its predecessor but is the best high-end chip for productivity and gaming, though upgrading from the 3950X isn't worth it.

9.5

KitGuruTech

≈ estimated

05/11/2020

Hands-on review · benchmarks, overclocking and gaming tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is an excellent chip with no clear weaknesses, and the first pick for top-tier performance.

9.0

Tech Notice

≈ estimated

14/10/2021

Comparison · creator workloads and cooling tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is the best in its class, but only worth the extra cost if you multitask heavily or render complex codecs.

9.0

Digit

≈ estimated

24/12/2020

Build showcase · editing, rendering and gaming tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with the Radeon 6800 XT is a strong pick for creators.

More graded video reviews (2)

creator’s own scoreestimated by us

GucksTV · 03/11/2021

Hands-on review · gaming benchmarks and cooling tests

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is extremely powerful for heavy workloads, but not worth the premium for gaming.

Likes

Efficient and very fast in compute-heavy benchmarks
Surprisingly easy to cool with a 360mm water loop
Strong results for rendering, encoding and streaming

Dislikes

Gaming performance barely better than the 5600X
Price premium is hard to justify for gaming
Price rose sharply after launch
Not a future-proof choice for gaming

Tastatursportfreunde · 30/01/2021

Hands-on review · application, gaming and stress benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is outstanding for applications and a clear step up from its predecessor, but it needs strong cooling and is pricey.

Likes

Clearly faster than the 3950X in application benchmarks
Up to 50 percent more FPS in some games, tested at low settings
Smart Access Memory boosts performance with Radeon 6000 GPUs

Dislikes

Needs a high-end custom water cooler under heavy load
Expensive, and street prices sit well above list price
For gaming alone, cheaper eight-core chips perform about as well

Thomas Klinder · 24/01/2021

Hands-on test · overclocking results and recommendation

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X already performs strongly at stock, so overclocking adds little for gaming.

Likes

Strong performance at stock settings
Stable at 4.5 GHz all-core during long tests
Good multi-core scores after tuning

Dislikes

Overclocking adds little benefit in games
Higher voltage and heat when pushed further
Single-core clock tops out near 4.9 GHz despite higher limits

Nicolas11x12 Deutsch · 09/01/2021

Hands-on review · benchmarks, clocks and power tests

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has few real drawbacks: it is a top-tier chip for work and gaming, though its price is high.

Likes

Gaming performance roughly on par with Intel
Very strong productivity performance across the board
Efficient power use even with Precision Boost Overdrive disabled
Moderate temperatures under a water cooler, around 65 degrees

Dislikes

High price at the time of testing
Overkill for lighter workloads and mainstream use

Der Grilljunky · 04/12/2020

Build log · CPU install, BIOS setup and benchmarks

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X left me satisfied overall: rendering is about nine minutes faster, though benchmark gains were smaller than hoped.

Likes

Rendering about nine minutes faster than the previous CPU
Uses less system memory during rendering than the old processor

Dislikes

Benchmark gains smaller than hoped
BIOS settings on the ASUS board are hard to find and understand

Ryan TM · 20/07/2021

Build showcase · temperature and overclocking tests

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X performs excellently, and a single 360mm radiator handles both the CPU and GPU well.

Likes

Temperatures stay stable under load
Excellent performance
Neatly finished custom cooling loop

Dislikes

Only one 360mm radiator cools both CPU and GPU
No extra case fan beyond the radiator fans

NinTech · 25/05/2025

Hands-on review · 14 games and productivity tests

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is an excellent upgrade for existing AM4 owners, but not the best choice for a new build.

Likes

Strong multi-threaded productivity performance
Solid upgrade path for existing AM4 systems
Performs well at 4.6 GHz all-core when overclocked

Dislikes

Poor choice for a complete PC built from scratch
Built on an aging AM4 platform
Cheaper chips like the 5700X3D are better for gaming

Il punto di G. · 31/05/2021

Hands-on review · gaming, productivity and overclocking tests

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X only makes sense for professionals who multitask heavily; most buyers should choose the 5900X.

Likes

Strong performance for heavy content creation
Reaches 5 GHz easily when overclocked
No obvious weak spot in any performance area

Dislikes

Gaming is weaker than the 12-core 5900X
Price is hard to justify against cheaper chips
Runs hot, around 80 °C under Cinebench

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0

techspot.com

✓ explicit

05/11/2020

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Review - TechSpot

Benchmark review · Gaming and productivity

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is the fastest chip for core-heavy productivity, but it is overkill for gaming because the cheaper 5900X and 5800X perform nearly the same.

8.0

pcmag.com

✓ explicit

28/12/2020

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Review - PCMag

Lab test · 16-core desktop CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core chip that beats Intel's Core i9-10980XE in nearly every productivity test, which makes it well suited to heavy content creation and rendering.

9.0

hardwarecanucks.com

✓ explicit

08/11/2020

It's a BEAST - AMD Ryzen 9 5950X CPU Review

Hands-on review · Workstation CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core chip that excels at compiling code and multi-threaded rendering, but it is not the best choice for pure gaming.

9.5

hothardware.com

✓ explicit

05/11/2020

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X And 5900X CPU Review: Zen 3 Dominates

Architecture deep dive · Desktop CPU

Verdict

The Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core flagship with more work per clock and a larger shared cache, but 300-series motherboards cannot run it.

9.0

tomshardware.com

✓ explicit

26/11/2020

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and 5900X Review: Zen 3 Breaks the 5 GHz Barrier

Lab review · Zen 3 desktop CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is the fastest desktop chip for productivity and 1080p gaming, but it ships without a cooler or integrated graphics.

8.0

uk.pcmag.com

✓ explicit

28/12/2020

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - Review 2020 - PCMag UK

Benchmark review · Content creation CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core chip for heavy content work that beats Intel's 18-core i9-10980XE in most tests while drawing less power.

9.0

windowscentral.com

≈ estimated

21/01/2021

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X review: This monstrous CPU is overkill for

Hands-on review · High-end CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is AMD's fastest non-Threadripper chip, overkill for most gamers but a good fit for creators and heavy multitaskers.

8.0

hwcooling.net

≈ estimated

16/07/2021

Test of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X processor: 32 threads on AM4

Platform analysis · AM4 workstation CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is the top AM4 chip with 16 cores and no direct Intel rival, and it suits high-end gaming and workstations that need no quad-channel memory.

9.0

notebookcheck.com

≈ estimated

22/11/2020

Vermeer Redux: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review

Benchmark tests · Desktop CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X tops most multi-core benchmarks, while its single-core speed is about the same as the 5900X's.

8.0

chip.de

✓ explicit

20/07/2021

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Review

Lab test · Enthusiast desktop CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X runs 16 cores on a standard AM4 board, beating Threadripper in games but trailing it in heavy multi-core work.

9.5

pcmasters.de

≈ estimated

05/11/2020

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Review - PC Masters

Benchmark test · Desktop CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X beats the Core i9-10900K in productivity while drawing about 40W less at the wall, making it a strong all-round chip.

9.6

geeknetic.es

✓ explicit

05/11/2020

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Review [Full Analysis]

Lab test · Desktop CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is AMD's top Ryzen 5000 chip, with 16 cores, fast single-core turbo and modest power use, though it runs slightly hotter than the 5900X.

9.4

profesionalreview.com

✓ explicit

11/11/2020

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Review (Complete Analysis)

Benchmark review · Desktop CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is aimed at content creators and heavy multitaskers, but gamers get better frame rates from the 5900X and 5600X.

9.0

gamecored.com

≈ estimated

29/01/2021

AMD Ryzen 9 5950x - Review

Hands-on review · Overclock testing

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a strong multi-core chip whose Precision Boost Overdrive adds about 13% multi-core speed with little single-core loss, but draws a lot of power.

9.5

hwupgrade.it

≈ estimated

05/11/2020

Ryzen 9 5950X and Ryzen 9 5900X Review: With Zen 3, AMD wins in gaming too

Benchmark review · Desktop CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core chip that beats Intel in both multi-core work and gaming, though it ships without a cooler.

9.0

tech.everyeye.it

≈ estimated

12/11/2020

Ryzen 9 5950X and Ryzen 5 5600X Review: Zen 3 Strikes Again

Benchmark review · Multi-core CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is the strongest consumer chip for multi-core work and content creation, but for gaming alone its extra cores go to waste.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

Elite multi-threaded performance for content creation, 3D rendering, and code compilation
Exceptional power efficiency with a relatively low 105W TDP
Compatible with existing AM4 motherboards (500-series and select 400-series)
Significant IPC and single-core performance gains over the previous generation
Strong gaming performance that matches or exceeds contemporary competitors
High boost clock speeds, often reaching up to 5GHz

What customers don't like about AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

High MSRP ($799 at launch) makes it overkill for pure gaming compared to Ryzen 5 or 7
Does not include a stock thermal cooler in the box
Can run quite hot under heavy multi-threaded loads, requiring high-end cooling solutions
Overclocking headroom is limited as the chip is pushed near its limits out of the box
Lightly threaded performance in some older esports titles can be slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X
Early supply issues led to scalping and availability challenges

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a high-performance desktop processor based on the 7nm Zen 3 architecture, featuring 16 cores and 32 threads with a 3.4 GHz base clock and a max boost clock of up to 4.9 GHz. It is equipped with a massive 72MB of combined L2 and L3 cache and maintains a relatively efficient 105W TDP. Main pros include its best-in-class multi-threaded performance for content creation, significant IPC improvements over the previous generation, and compatibility with the AM4 socket (500-series chipsets). However, its primary cons are the high launch price, the lack of an included thermal solution, and the fact that its extensive core count offers diminishing returns for pure gaming compared to more affordable Ryzen 5000 series models.

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Processors

Intel Core i7-12700

Processors

Intel Core i9-12900K

Processors

Intel Core i7-13700F

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Processors

Intel Core i7-12700K

Processors

Intel Core i5-13500

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare AMD Ryzen 9 5950X with other processors

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and other processors

No results found