Which brands make the best cheap gaming CPUs?
The best cheap gaming CPU brands are as follows.
- Intel Overall score: 7.8 points
- AMD Overall score: 7.7 points
The best cheap CPUs for gaming are presented in the following list.
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a high-performance Zen 4 desktop processor featuring 12 cores, 24 threads, a 4.7 GHz base clock, and a...Read more
Reviewers praise strong productivity and single-core speed, but cooling is the main gripe and opinions on value are split.
Praised: Productivity performance (8 of 22), Overall performance (4 of 22), Generational improvement (4 of 22), Single-core performance (3 of 22), PCIe and storage (3 of 22)
Mixed views: Power consumption (7/6), Price and value (5/8), Rival chips (7/5)
Criticised: Cooler (7 of 22)
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a high-performance desktop processor from the Arrow Lake-S series featuring a hybrid architecture...Read more
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is a high-performance 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor based on the Zen 4 architecture and a 5nm...Read more
Praised for low power use, cool temperatures and a decent bundled cooler, though platform and memory issues draw complaints.
Praised: Power consumption (12 of 18), Overclocking (9 of 18), Temperatures (7 of 18), Bundled cooler (7 of 18)
Mixed views: Productivity performance (5/3), Overall performance (5/3), Price and value (5/3)
Criticised: Platform and memory (6 of 18), Multi-core performance (5 of 18), Clock speeds (3 of 18)
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the advanced Zen 5 architecture and a 4nm TSMC process...Read more
Reviewers praise its efficiency and cool running, but are disappointed by its gaming results and the small step up over the previous generation.
Praised: Power efficiency (20 of 31), Temperature (10 of 31), Single-core speed (5 of 31), OS and updates (3 of 31)
Mixed views: Application performance (10/6), Price and value (7/8), Overclocking and tuning (5/3)
Criticised: Gaming performance (17 of 31), Generational improvement (11 of 31), Cooler (8 of 31)
Compare
Why buy?
Why avoid?
Fourteen cores and a fast clock make the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K a practical pick for a mid-range gaming or office PC. Its boost...Read more
Cool, efficient and great for productivity, but gaming performance is weak and the dead-end socket is a real drawback.
Praised: Power consumption (10 of 18), Productivity performance (8 of 18), Temperatures and cooling (8 of 18), PCIe lanes (4 of 18), NPU (3 of 18), Clock speeds (3 of 18)
Mixed views: Memory (5/4)
Criticised: Gaming performance (11 of 18), Socket and motherboard (10 of 18), Thread count (4 of 18), Price and value (4 of 18), Generational gains (4 of 18)
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X is a mid-range desktop processor based on the 4nm Zen 5 architecture, featuring 6 cores, 12 threads, and a...Read more
Reviewers praise its power efficiency, but split on gaming and value, and find multi-core performance and the generational gain underwhelming.
Praised: Power efficiency (14 of 22), Platform and upgrades (7 of 22), Single-core speed (4 of 22)
Mixed views: Gaming performance (9/9), Generational gain (5/8), Price and value (5/6)
Criticised: Multi-core performance (6 of 22), BIOS and launch (4 of 22), Upcoming chips (3 of 22), Core count (3 of 22)
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600 is a mid-range desktop processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, featuring 6 cores and 12 threads with a...Read more
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14th Gen Raptor Lake Refresh processor featuring a hybrid architecture with 14 cores (6...Read more
Solid for gaming, but most reviewers see little improvement over its predecessor; opinions on value and power use are split.
Praised: Gaming performance (12 of 27), Memory and PCIe (7 of 27), Productivity performance (5 of 27), Clock speed (4 of 27), Testing methodology (3 of 27), Multi-core speed (3 of 27)
Mixed views: Socket and motherboard (7/9), Price and value (7/6), Power consumption (6/6)
Criticised: Generational gain (18 of 27), Rival chips (8 of 27)
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
Sixteen physical cores make the Intel Core i7-13700F a strong pick for heavy work like video editing and rendering. It scores...Read more
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
The Intel Core i9-12900K is a high-performance desktop processor from the Alder Lake generation featuring a hybrid architecture...Read more
Reviewers praise its gaming and raw speed, but it runs hot and draws a lot of power; opinions on value are split.
Praised: Gaming performance (23 of 36), Processing speed (16 of 36), Overall performance (14 of 36), Content creation (11 of 36), Intel vs AMD (7 of 36), Hybrid cores (6 of 36)
Mixed views: Price and value (10/10)
Criticised: Heat and cooling (20 of 36), Power consumption (18 of 36), DDR5 memory (11 of 36), Software and Windows (7 of 36), Platform and motherboard (7 of 36)
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the 5nm Zen 4 architecture, featuring a 3.8 GHz base...Read more
Reviewers agree it runs cool and frugal with solid gaming, but multi-threaded performance lags behind expectations.
Praised: Power consumption (9 of 15), Cooling (7 of 15), Gaming performance (6 of 15), Price (4 of 15)
Mixed views: Overclocking (5/4)
Criticised: Multi-threaded performance (7 of 15), Overall performance (5 of 15)
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is a high-performance desktop processor based on the 5nm Zen 4 architecture, featuring 6 cores and 12...Read more
Reviewers praise its strong gaming and high clock speeds, but the costly platform and hot temperatures are the main drawbacks.
Praised: Gaming performance (22 of 33), Power consumption (12 of 33), Clock speed (9 of 33), Overall performance (9 of 33), Upgrade path (8 of 33), Single-core performance (6 of 33)
Mixed views: Price and value (9/8), Integrated graphics (8/5)
Criticised: Platform cost (16 of 33), Temperatures (13 of 33), Multi-core and productivity (12 of 33), Cooler (9 of 33)
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
Sixteen cores, split into eight fast ones and eight efficient ones, let the Intel Core i9-12900F handle a lot at once. Its...Read more
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
The Intel Core i5-13600K is a high-performance 13th-gen Raptor Lake processor featuring 14 cores (6 Performance-cores and 8...Read more
A strong gaming and all-round performer, but it draws a lot of power and runs warm; opinions on value are split.
Praised: Gaming performance (28 of 42), Overall performance (14 of 42), Multi-core performance (12 of 42), Multitasking (7 of 42), Platform compatibility (7 of 42), Productivity and creative work (7 of 42)
Mixed views: Price and value (17/11), Upgrade value (6/10), Memory support (6/4)
Criticised: Power draw (27 of 42), Temperature and cooling (18 of 42), Platform cost (8 of 42)
Compare
Why buy?
Why avoid?
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is a high-performance 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the efficient Zen 4 'Raphael'...Read more
Compare
Why buy?
Why avoid?
The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 13th-generation Raptor Lake desktop processor featuring 14 cores (6 Performance-cores and 8...Read more
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
The Intel Core i7-12700K is a high-performance 12th Gen Alder Lake desktop processor featuring a hybrid architecture with 12...Read more
Reviewers praise strong gaming and multi-threaded performance, but complain about high power draw and demanding cooling needs.
Praised: Gaming performance (10 of 17), Multi-threaded performance (8 of 17), Overall performance (6 of 17), Memory support (6 of 17), Core design (5 of 17)
Mixed views: Overclocking (6/4), Price and value (4/5)
Criticised: Power consumption (11 of 17), Cooling (7 of 17), Platform compatibility (4 of 17)
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a Zen 4 architecture desktop processor featuring 6 cores and 12 threads with a 3.8 GHz base clock and a...Read more
Reviewers like its gaming speed and low power draw, but many feel it's overpriced and weak in multi-core work.
Praised: Gaming performance (9 of 17), Power consumption (7 of 17), Upgrade path (4 of 17), Single-core speed (3 of 17)
Mixed views: Cooling (6/5), Overall performance (5/5), Overclocking (3/4)
Criticised: Price (6 of 17), Multi-core performance (4 of 17)
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
Power is the catch with the Intel Core i7-12700KF, which draws 125 W base and 190 W at boost, so a good cooler and power supply...Read more
Compare

Why buy?
Why avoid?
The Intel Core i5-14600T is a low-power, 14th-generation Raptor Lake Refresh desktop processor featuring a hybrid architecture...Read more
Audited using multi-parameter algorithmic scoring, verified specs, and grades from independent expert reviews.
The best cheap CPU for gaming overall is AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, with an overall score of 8.41 points, 12 cores, a boost clock of up to 5.6 GHz, and a price of around £260.
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a high-performance Zen 4 desktop processor featuring 12 cores, 24 threads, a 4.7 GHz base clock, and a 5.6 GHz max boost frequency. Built on a 5nm process for the AM5 socket, it includes 76MB of total cache (64MB L3), supports DDR5-5200 memory, and provides 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes alongside integrated Radeon graphics.
Best value alternative: AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, with an overall score of 8.56 points, 6 cores, a boost clock of up to 5.4 GHz, and a price of around £180.

The models in this guide named most often in “best processors” lists on other review sites.
Share of the lists each model could appear in since its release (models with at least 10 such lists).
The best cheap gaming CPU brands are as follows.
Cheap gaming CPUs cost between £90 and £170 depending on the model and generation.
At this price range, you usually get entry-level Intel Core i3 or AMD Ryzen 3 processors, which are designed for budget systems but still handle modern games at lower settings. These CPUs focus on a balance between price and performance, so they trade higher core counts and advanced features for affordable pricing.
Some models closer to £170 can include more threads or higher boost clock speeds, which improve performance in newer games that use multiple cores.
The following chart shows how cheap gaming CPUs are distributed by price.
[vertical-chart-08799511889743583142140501457013204548511603863947]Cheap gaming CPUs have between 4 and 6 cores and usually 8 to 12 threads.
Entry-level models sit at 4 cores with 8 threads, while stronger budget options go up to 6 cores with 12 threads, which helps in modern games and multitasking.
This range means that most cheap gaming CPUs can handle popular titles smoothly and also run background applications at the same time. A 4-core 8-thread CPU can manage lighter or older games, but modern releases often use more threads, so 6-core 12-thread CPUs perform better in heavier workloads.
The following chart compares the number of physical cores in cheap gaming CPUs.
[vertical-chart-14285854666642524364068329894320053636212850796158]Cheap gaming CPUs reach clock speeds between 3.0 GHz and 4.5 GHz, depending on the model and generation.
Base clocks usually stay in the 3.0–3.6 GHz range, while turbo boost can raise speeds to around 4.0–4.5 GHz. These numbers vary by brand and architecture, since newer chips often achieve higher boost speeds with lower power usage.
Clock speed affects how fast a processor executes instructions, so higher boost speeds help games run smoother, especially in titles that rely heavily on single-core performance.
The chart below shows the boost clock distribution of cheap gaming CPUs.
[vertical-chart-14671605921509850542105375338303830412493654151790]Only some cheap gaming CPUs support overclocking. Processors with a “K” or “KF” suffix in their name unlock the multiplier, so users can raise the clock speed beyond the base specifications. Intel also sells “X” series CPUs that support overclocking, but entry-level models without these suffixes do not.
Overclocking also requires the right chipset, as Intel Z-series motherboards enable it, while H-series and B-series do not. Cheap CPUs usually ship with limited thermal capacity, so even if the model supports overclocking, the performance gain can be small compared to higher-end processors.
Extra cooling and stable power delivery are necessary because higher speeds increase heat and energy demand, and without proper hardware the system can become unstable.
Cheap gaming CPUs use between 35 W and 65 W in most cases, although some higher-end budget models can reach 95 W.
The power rating usually depends on the number of cores and the base clock speed, as higher performance parts consume more energy. Intel Core i3 processors and AMD Ryzen 3 processors often fall into the lower range, while unlocked or higher clocked models sit closer to the upper range.
The stated power, called TDP (thermal design power), shows the heat a processor generates under standard load, but real power draw can be higher under heavy gaming or stress tests. A cheap CPU with 4 to 6 cores and moderate clock speeds usually stays close to its TDP value, while turbo boost modes can temporarily raise consumption.
Cheap gaming CPUs work with both DDR4 and DDR5, but compatibility depends on the specific processor generation and socket type.
Budget-friendly processors like Intel's 12th generation Core i3 and i5 CPUs (LGA 1700) support DDR5 memory, while older generations such as 10th and 11th gen Intel processors (LGA 1200) only work with DDR4. AMD's budget Ryzen 5000 series processors (AM4 socket) support DDR4 exclusively, but the newer Ryzen 7000 series budget options (AM5 socket) require DDR5 memory.