1,414Models compared
74Technical specs tracked
104,636Data compared
3,572Expert reviews graded
4,462Video reviews graded
87Best-of lists read
27,012Owner comments read

How the processors score works

How the overall 0.0 – 10.0 score is determined for every product in Processors.

Overall score formula
Overall score (0–10)=Technical score × 35%+List score × 30%+Reviews score × 25%+Sentiment score × 10%

Every part gets a mark from 0 to 10 and the overall score is their weighted average, with this category's own weights shown below. A part this category has too little data for, or one we switched off for it, is left out and the other parts share its weight. A mark below the typical mark of this category can never lift a model above its technical score, and no score goes above 9.9.

Each category uses its own mix of these scores, set from how much data exists for it: the more expert reviews and best-of lists a category has, the more they count. This keeps the ranking as objective and balanced as possible. Why this mix: many expert tests and best-of lists exist for this category, so they count a lot next to the technical data.

Technical
score

35%

Every spec of the model is compared with the other models in this category and gets a mark from 0 to 10. The specs are grouped into 6 evaluation areas, and each area counts as much as it matters to buyers.

Calculation: the weighted sum of the 6 evaluation areas below.

List
score

30%

We read the best-of lists that test sites and magazines publish for this category and note which models they pick.

Calculation: a model picked by at least one list gets 8 to 10: the more lists pick it, the higher, compared with the model picked most often. A model in no list gets 7.5.

Reviews
score

25%

Every independent review of the model gets a grade from 1 to 10: the reviewer's own score when the page shows one (stars, x/10, test grade), otherwise a grade from the written verdict on a fixed scale.

Calculation: 80% the average grade and 20% how many reviews the model has (one review gives 5, a typical number 8, the most reviewed models 10). With only a few reviews the average is pulled toward the typical grade of this category, so one glowing review cannot carry a model. A model without reviews counts as a weaker reviewed model.

Sentiment
score

10%

We read what owners say in comments under video reviews and in forums, and sort each owner as happy, mixed or unhappy.

Calculation: needs 10+ owners from 4+ discussions. 80% how happy the owners are (as happy as usual gives 8, the happiest models 10) and 20% how many owners talk about the model. With few owners the happy share is pulled toward the typical share of this category, as if 6 typical owners were added. With fewer owners the model counts as a weaker model in this category.
Worked example (illustrative numbers)
  1. Technical score: a product scores 9.20 across all 6 technical areas.
  2. Expert reviews: 6 reviews averaging 9.1, pulled a little toward the typical grade, give a review mark of 8.7.
  3. Best-of lists: it appears in a good share of the best-of lists of this category: 8.5.
  4. Owner opinions: most owners are happy with it: 8.8.
  5. Overall score: (9.20 × 0.35) + (8.50 × 0.3) + (8.70 × 0.25) + (8.80 × 0.1) = 8.8 / 10.0

Evaluation areas

The technical score (35% of the overall score) is split into 6 areas. Each area has its own weight and its own set of specs.

Performance

60%

An evaluation of the processor’s computational performance, including core and thread resources, clock behavior, turbo and multiplier features, bus throughput, and benchmark results that reflect single-core, multi-core, and overclocked workloads.

When it matters: When raw speed, multitasking ability, and benchmark-level throughput will directly affect how well your system handles gaming, content creation, compiling, simulation, or other demanding workloads.

20 specs explained

Architecture

18%

A review of the processor’s internal silicon design, focusing on manufacturing node, transistor density, cache hierarchy, hybrid-core layout, die characteristics, foundry process, and microarchitectural details that influence efficiency and latency behavior.

When it matters: When you are comparing newer CPU designs where cache layout, process node, and microarchitecture can change latency, efficiency, and real-world responsiveness even between processors with similar headline specs.

12 specs explained

Memory & PCIe

10%

An examination of the processor’s platform I/O and memory subsystem, including supported DDR generation, channel layout, maximum capacity and bandwidth, ECC and memory overclocking support, PCIe version and lane count, and lane-splitting flexibility for storage or expansion devices.

When it matters: When system expandability, memory bandwidth, ECC support, storage speed, and GPU or add-in card connectivity are important for your build quality, upgrade path, or workstation stability.

12 specs explained

Power & Thermal

7%

A measurement of the processor’s power demands and thermal operating profile, considering rated TDP, sustained and boost power limits, configurable power behavior, cooling bundle, junction temperature ceiling, efficiency metrics, and thermal headroom under load.

When it matters: When cooling requirements, power draw, sustained boost behavior, and heat output will influence your case choice, PSU sizing, noise levels, electricity use, or long-session reliability.

8 specs explained

Platform

4%

An overview of the processor platform and compatibility scope, covering socket and chipset support, instruction sets, virtualization and security capabilities, release context, and core architectural standards that determine system fit and feature support.

When it matters: When you need a processor that fits the right motherboard ecosystem, supports the required instruction and security features, and stays compatible with your intended platform or deployment scenario.

14 specs explained

Integrated graphics

1%

An assessment of the processor’s built-in graphics capabilities, covering the presence and class of the integrated GPU, execution resources, graphics frequency, hardware media acceleration, and display support limits for monitor count and output resolution.

When it matters: When you want to run a system without a separate graphics card, need basic display output and media acceleration, or care about how many monitors and resolutions the processor can drive on its own.

7 specs explained

Processors specs explained

What each spec we compare means, when it matters to you, and how much it counts in the score. Product pages show the same explanations when you hover or tap a spec.

Performance

60% of the technical score · 20 specsPassMark multi-core score, Geekbench 6 multi-core score, N. of physical cores, PassMark single-core score and 16 more
Higher is betterGood value: >19000

What it is: A benchmark score that gives a broad idea of overall processor performance.

When it matters: When you want a quick overall performance comparison.

Higher is betterGood value: >8500

What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects multi-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.

When it matters: When you want a quick picture of multi-core speed in everyday mixed workloads, multitasking, and broadly optimized software.

Higher is betterGood value: 8+

What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.

When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Higher is betterGood value: >3200

What it is: A benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.

When it matters: When you care about responsiveness in lighter or older software.

Higher is betterGood value: >4700

What it is: A Cinebench R20 score that reflects how well the processor handles long, heavy rendering workloads across many cores.

When it matters: When you care about sustained multi-core performance in rendering, compiling, heavy creation work, or productivity workloads that use many threads.

Higher is betterGood value: >2000

What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects single-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.

When it matters: When you care about snappy everyday performance in lighter apps, browsing, office work, or tasks that do not scale well across many cores.

Higher is betterGood value: >4.7 GHzUnit: GHz

What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.

When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

CPU threads

HIGH priority
Higher is betterGood value: 16+

What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.

When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Performance cores

HIGH priority
Higher is betterGood value: 8+

What it is: The number of full-speed cores that handle the heaviest work, such as gaming, rendering and compiling.

When it matters: When you edit video, render 3D scenes or compile large projects on a desktop, where more cores finish jobs sooner.

Higher is betterGood value: >600

What it is: A Cinebench R20 benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.

When it matters: When you care about lighter workloads, interface responsiveness, or software that still depends heavily on one fast core.

CPU base clock speed

MEDIUM priority
Ranked by class

What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Blender bmw27 score

MEDIUM priority
Higher is betterGood value: >290

What it is: A Blender render result based on the BMW27 scene, used to show how quickly the processor can finish a heavy 3D rendering task.

When it matters: When rendering speed matters for 3D work, content creation, or other workloads that behave like long multi-core renders.

Higher is betterGood value: >1500

What it is: A Blender render result based on the Classroom scene, used to show how quickly the processor can complete a demanding rendering workload.

When it matters: When rendering speed matters for 3D work, content creation, or other workloads that behave like long multi-core renders.

Ranked by class

What it is: Whether the clock multiplier can be changed freely, so you can overclock the chip above its rated speed.

When it matters: When you want more speed from a gaming or desktop build and have a compatible motherboard and good cooling.

Multithreading

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: Whether each core can run two threads at once using simultaneous multithreading, which speeds up parallel workloads.

When it matters: When you compile code, encode video or stream while gaming, since many threads run side by side.

Clock multiplier

LOW priority
Higher is betterGood value: >33

What it is: The ratio used to derive CPU frequency from the base clock.

When it matters: When you tune or compare overclocking behavior.

Ranked by class

What it is: Whether the processor can briefly exceed its base clock speed when power and temperature allow.

When it matters: When you open heavy apps or play games, where short bursts of extra speed make a noticeable difference.

Bus transfer rate

LOW priority
Higher is betterGood value: >=8 GT/sUnit: GT/s

What it is: The maximum data transfer rate supported by the processor's platform bus, usually shown in GT/s.

When it matters: When you are comparing older platform bandwidth limits rather than just raw CPU core performance.

Front-end width

LOW priority
Higher is betterGood value: 4

What it is: How many instructions the CPU front end can decode or dispatch per cycle at the architectural level.

When it matters: When you are comparing deeper architectural throughput rather than user-visible speed in normal buying decisions.

Turbo Core version

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: The generation of the boost technology that lets lightly loaded cores run faster than their base clock.

When it matters: When one or two demanding apps run alongside background tasks and you want the busiest cores to get extra speed.

Architecture

18% of the technical score · 12 specsMicroarchitecture codename, L2 cache, L3 cache, Semiconductor size and 8 more
Ranked by class

What it is: The internal core-design codename used for this processor generation.

When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs at a deeper design level and want to identify the exact architecture behind marketing names.

L2 cache

MEDIUM priority
Higher is betterGood value: >=6 MBUnit: MB

What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.

When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

L3 cache

MEDIUM priority
Higher is betterGood value: >=16 MBUnit: MB

What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.

When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Semiconductor size

MEDIUM priority
Lower is betterGood value: <10 nmUnit: nm

What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.

When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

L2 per core

LOW priority
Higher is betterGood value: >=1 MB/coreUnit: MB/core

What it is: The amount of L2 cache available to each CPU core.

When it matters: When you are comparing per-core cache resources in deeper architectural analysis.

L3 per core

LOW priority
Higher is betterGood value: >=2 MB/coreUnit: MB/core

What it is: The amount of L3 cache effectively available per CPU core.

When it matters: When you are comparing how much shared cache each core can draw on in deeper technical analysis.

L1 cache

LOW priority
Higher is betterGood value: >=512 KBUnit: KB

What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.

When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Die size

LOW priority
Lower is betterGood value: <150 mm²Unit: mm²

What it is: The physical area of the processor die, usually measured in square millimeters.

When it matters: When you are comparing chip scale, packaging density, or broader design differences rather than direct user-visible performance.

Ranked by class

What it is: A design that combines high-performance cores with smaller, energy-efficient cores on one chip.

When it matters: When a laptop or tablet needs to last all day on battery while still handling occasional heavy tasks.

3D V-Cache

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: Extra cache memory stacked on a separate layer above the cores, which keeps more game data close to the processor.

When it matters: When you play CPU-heavy games or run simulations that repeatedly reuse the same data.

Foundry

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.

When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

N. of transistors

LOW priority
Higher is betterGood value: >10 billionUnit: billion

What it is: The total number of transistors built into the processor chip.

When it matters: When you are comparing overall chip scale and design complexity rather than direct real-world speed.

Memory & PCIe

10% of the technical score · 12 specsPCIe version, PCIe lane count, DDR memory version, Maximum memory speed and 8 more

PCIe version

MEDIUM priority
Ranked by classGood value: 4.0

What it is: The newest PCIe generation the processor can use directly for graphics cards, SSDs, and other high-speed expansion devices.

When it matters: When you want support for newer GPUs or SSDs, or more bandwidth for high-speed expansion hardware.

PCIe lane count

LOW priority
Higher is betterGood value: >=20

What it is: The number of PCIe lanes provided directly by the processor.

When it matters: When you connect fast GPUs, SSDs, or expansion cards.

DDR memory version

LOW priority
Ranked by classGood value: DDR5

What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.

When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Higher is betterGood value: >=4800 MHzUnit: MHz

What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Higher is betterGood value: >75 GB/sUnit: GB/s

What it is: The maximum theoretical memory bandwidth the processor can support.

When it matters: When memory-heavy workloads matter to you.

Higher is betterGood value: >=128 GBUnit: GB

What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Memory channels

LOW priority
Higher is betterGood value: 2

What it is: The number of memory channels the processor can use.

When it matters: When you care about memory bandwidth and platform capability.

Ranked by class

What it is: Allows RAM to run faster than its standard rated speed, for more memory bandwidth.

When it matters: When you pair the chip with a fast DDR5 kit and want extra frame rates or render speed from the memory.

Ranked by classGood value: >=5600 MHzUnit: MHz

What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.

When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Ranked by classGood value: >=5200 MHzUnit: MHz

What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.

When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

ECC memory support

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: Whether the processor can use error-correcting memory, which detects and fixes single-bit memory errors.

When it matters: When running a home server, storing important data on a workstation, or doing long calculations where a single bit flip would corrupt results.

Ranked by class

What it is: The supported ways PCIe lanes can be split across multiple slots or devices.

When it matters: When you plan multiple expansion cards or NVMe adapters.

Power & Thermal

7% of the technical score · 8 specsBase power (PL1), Boost power (PL2), Cooler included, Configurable TDP and 4 more

Base power (PL1)

LOW priority
Lower is betterGood value: <30 WUnit: W

What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.

When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Boost power (PL2)

LOW priority
Lower is betterGood value: <50 WUnit: W

What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.

When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Cooler included

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: A CPU cooler packed in the box with the processor, so you need not buy a separate cooler.

When it matters: When you are building a first PC on a budget and do not want to choose a cooler separately.

Configurable TDP

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: Lets the maker or user change the chip's power limit, trading peak performance against heat and noise.

When it matters: When you want to cap power draw in a small or quiet build, or raise it when you have a larger cooler.

Higher is betterGood value: >=100 °CUnit: °C

What it is: The highest junction temperature the chip is rated to reach before it throttles its clocks to protect itself.

When it matters: When the PC sits in a hot room or a small case with weak airflow, where a higher limit leaves more headroom under load.

CPU temperature

LOW priority
Lower is betterGood value: <100 °CUnit: °C

What it is: The reported operating temperature of the processor.

When it matters: When you monitor thermals, cooling, or system stability.

Lower is betterGood value: <30 WUnit: W

What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.

When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Lower is betterGood value: <=28 sUnit: seconds

What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.

When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Platform

4% of the technical score · 14 specsCPU architecture, Instruction sets, CPU socket, Chipset and 10 more

CPU architecture

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.

When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Instruction sets

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: The supported CPU instruction sets and extensions.

When it matters: When you run software that depends on specific CPU instructions.

CPU socket

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.

When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Chipset

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.

When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Ranked by class

What it is: Hardware extensions that let the processor run virtual machines with near-native speed.

When it matters: When you run a Linux or Windows virtual machine for development, or a Windows feature that needs a hypervisor.

Release date

LOW priority
Higher is betterGood value: >=2022

What it is: The launch date of the processor.

When it matters: When you want a newer platform or longer expected support life.

Ranked by class

What it is: The supported hardware security extensions provided by the processor.

When it matters: When you care about security, encryption, or enterprise features.

Ranked by class

What it is: The cryptographic algorithms the processor speeds up in dedicated hardware, such as AES encryption and SHA hashing.

When it matters: When encrypting a drive, running a VPN or serving many HTTPS connections, since hardware crypto cuts the processor load.

Processor type

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.

When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

EMMC version

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: The eMMC storage standard version the processor platform can work with, if that kind of storage is relevant to the device.

When it matters: When you are dealing with embedded or low-power systems that actually rely on eMMC storage instead of desktop-class SSDs.

Uses HMP

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: The scheduling method that lets the operating system place work across cores of different designs.

When it matters: When a phone or tablet runs many apps at once and the system must decide which core each one should use.

NX bit

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: A memory-protection feature that marks data areas as non-executable, which helps block some malware.

When it matters: When you browse the web, open downloads or install software from less familiar sources.

Supports 64-bit

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: Whether the processor can run 64-bit instructions, which lets software address far more than 4 GB of memory.

When it matters: When installing a 64-bit operating system or running programs that need more than 4 GB of RAM.

TPM type

LOW priority
Ranked by class

What it is: The kind of TPM security support associated with the processor or its platform.

When it matters: When operating-system requirements, device encryption, enterprise security, or platform trust features matter.

Integrated graphics

1% of the technical score · 7 specsIntegrated GPU model, Integrated graphics, Integrated media encoders/decoders, Integrated GPU execution units and 3 more
Ranked by class

What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.

When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Ranked by class

What it is: A graphics unit built into the same chip, able to drive a screen without a separate graphics card.

When it matters: When building a budget or home-office PC with no discrete graphics card, or when a graphics card has failed.

Ranked by class

What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.

When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Higher is betterGood value: >=24

What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.

When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Higher is betterGood value: >=350 MHzUnit: MHz

What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.

When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Higher is betterGood value: 4

What it is: The maximum number of displays the processor can drive at once.

When it matters: When you plan a multi-monitor setup with integrated graphics.

Ranked by classGood value: 7680x4320

What it is: The highest display resolution officially supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you want support for high-resolution monitors or TVs.

Other specs we list

shown on product pages, not part of the score · 1 specsBrand name

What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.

When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Specs with the biggest impact on the score

The 10 specs that move the technical score the most. Impact = share within its area × the area's weight.

  1. 1
    PassMark multi-core scorePerformanceGood value: >19000
    8.4%
  2. 2
    Geekbench 6 multi-core scorePerformanceGood value: >8500
    8.4%
  3. 3
    N. of physical coresPerformanceGood value: 8+
    6.6%
  4. 4
    PassMark single-core scorePerformanceGood value: >3200
    6%
  5. 55.9%
  6. 6
    Cinebench R20 multi-core scorePerformanceGood value: >4700
    5.4%
  7. 7
    Geekbench 6 single-core scorePerformanceGood value: >2000
    5.4%
  8. 8
    CPU boost clock speedPerformanceGood value: >4.7 GHz
    4.2%
  9. 9
    CPU threadsPerformanceGood value: 16+
    3%
  10. 10
    Performance coresPerformanceGood value: 8+
    3%

How we use expert reviews

Which reviews count and how their grades become the review score.

What counts as a review

Only independent reviews of that exact model: test sites, magazines and video reviewers in 6 languages. Retailer pages, brand-paid content, pure list pages and pages without a verdict are left out.

Online user ratings are no longer in the score

Since version 2.0, online user ratings no longer count towards the overall score in this category, and graded video reviews count next to written tests. Expert reviews compare models side by side and are harder to game than online user ratings.

Version changelog

Record of test methodology updates and algorithm revisions.

Version 3.0CurrentOctober 23, 2026

Weighted marks: technical score 35%, list score 30%, reviews score 25%, sentiment score 10%

  • The review score replaces the old user score from online ratings: grades from independent test sites and video reviewers.
  • Methodology v3.0: every part gets a mark from 0 to 10; the overall score is the weighted average of technical score, reviews, best-of lists, sentiment score and user score.
  • The weights are set for each category from how much data it has; this category's weights are shown above.
  • Graded video reviews count in the review score: two full video tests weigh as much as one written test.
  • A weak mark can never lift a model above its technical score; no score goes above 9.9; a model without reviews counts as a weaker reviewed model.
  • Leading test sites count more than small blogs; full tests count more than short reviews and videos.
Version 1.0PreviousFebruary 13, 2026

Processors Testing & Scoring Methodology

  • Established core evaluation criteria and weighted attribute scoring model for Processors.
  • Implemented automated multi-locale review aggregation and logarithmic popularity score normalization.
  • Calibrated technical performance benchmarks and quality-to-price ratio calculation.
  • Activated expert review synthesis and automated pros/cons feature extraction.

Our unbiased guarantee

Every ranking on Frontum is strictly algorithmic. We never accept paid product placements, sponsored rankings, or free manufacturer review units.

Explore tested processors