Scored using Processors Methodology v3.0
Processors Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Processors Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Processors Methodology v3.0

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X review: 74 specs compared

Avg. price:~£240PassMark multi-core score:38933N. of physical cores:12CPU boost clock speed:4.8 GHzCPU socket:AM4TDP (Thermal design power):105 W

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X Review: Compare 74 technical specifications, 45 expert and video reviews and 5 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
8.3/10

Overall score

Score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

7.8

Technical score

25%

8.9

Reviews score

25%

8.2

List score

10%

9.8

Sentiment score

★Better than 98% of processors
8.6

Value for money

Value for money
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

Overall score

30%

9.3

Price

★Better than 98%
7.8

Technical score

Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

60%

8.4

Performance

18%

7.0

Architecture

10%

7.4

Memory & PCIe

7%

4.9

Power & Thermal

4%

8.6

Platform

1%

4.0

Integrated graphics

▲Better than 81%
8.9

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.6

Average grade

20%

9.8

Popularity

Grades by review (45)
27 reviews: 14 with a printed score, 13 estimated from the review. 18 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
★Better than 99%
8.2

List score

List score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (5)
List score: in 5 of 87 lists (6%)
★Better than 97%
  • amd-ryzen-9-5900x
  • amd-ryzen-9-5900x
amd-ryzen-9-5900x
amd-ryzen-9-5900x
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Based on 9 · 18

Reviewers praise strong gaming and productivity performance with fast single cores, but regret the missing cooler and split on the price.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Based on 204 owners sharing their experience in online comments

80%positive9%mixed11%negative

Owners praise its fast gaming and heavy workload performance, while high temperatures and occasional tuning instability are the main frustrations.

What owners dislike

  • Owners say stock settings often push the chip to 80–90°C under gaming or heavy loads, causing throttling, and that an AIO cooler alone may not keep temperatures down.24
  • Owners say automatic voltage settings caused WHEA errors, crashes, blue screens or shutdowns, and that a fixed voltage such as 1.25V or a change in motherboard SOC voltage fixed it.13
  • Owners say heavy undervolting or a fixed low clock lowers peak benchmark scores, such as Cinebench, by a noticeable amount.9
  • Owners say that with some setups, especially with CCD latency, the 5900X shows micro-stutter and frame-time spikes in games, and that limiting games to one CCD helped.7
  • Owners say the 5900X often performs about the same as the cheaper 5800X or 5600X in games, so gaming gains over those chips can be small.6
  • Owners say finding stable settings takes a lot of trial and error in the BIOS, and some settings that cool the chip cause instability or restarts.5

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Technical score
Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

8.4

Performance

18%

7.0

Architecture

10%

7.4

Memory & PCIe

7%

4.9

Power & Thermal

4%

8.6

Platform

1%

4.0

Integrated graphics

7.8
Reviews score
8.9
List score
8.2
Value for money
Value for money
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.3

Overall score

30%

9.3

Price

8.6
Processor type
desktop
This processor belongs to the desktop processor class, which is more advanced than that of 54.7% of processors and equal to that of 39.5% of processors.
CPU socket
AM4
This processor uses the AM4 CPU socket, which is newer than that of 75.1% of processors and equal to that of 9.4% of processors.
Chipset
X570, B550, A520, X470, B450
This processor supports X570, B550, A520, X470, B450 chipsets, which is broader compatibility than 68.2% of processors and equal to that of 1.5% of processors.
CPU architecture
x86-64
This processor uses the x86-64 architecture, which is more advanced than that of 1.8% of processors and equal to that of 98.2% of processors.
Instruction sets
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V
This processor supports MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V instruction sets, which is broader support than 67.3% of processors and equal to that of 1.4% of processors.
Show more
What reviewers say
N. of physical cores
12
This processor has 12 CPU cores, which is more than 79.9% of processors and equal to 5.7% of processors.
CPU threads
24
This processor offers 24 CPU threads, which is more than 89.7% of processors and equal to 4.4% of processors.
CPU boost clock speed
4.8 GHz
This processor reaches a boost clock of 4.8 GHz which is higher than that of 69.2% of processors and equal to that of 4.4% of processors.
CPU base clock speed
12x 3.7 GHz
This processor has a base clock of 12x3.7 GHz which is higher than that of 93.3% of processors and equal to that of 0.1% of processors.
PassMark multi-core score
38,933
This processor scores 38,933 in PassMark, which is higher than 91.8% of processors.
Show more
What reviewers say
Semiconductor size
7 nm
This processor uses a 7 nm process node, which is more advanced than that of 70.4% of processors and equal to that of 10.5% of processors.
Foundry
TSMC 7 nm
This processor is built on the TSMC 7 nm foundry process, which is more advanced than that of 55.6% of processors and equal to that of 9.2% of processors.
L3 cache
64 MB
This processor has an L3 cache of 64 MB which is larger than that of 94.5% of processors and equal to that of 2.8% of processors.
L2 cache
6 MB
This processor has an L2 cache of 6 MB which is larger than that of 65.6% of processors and equal to that of 3.9% of processors.
L1 cache
768 KB
This processor has an L1 cache of 768 KB which is larger than that of 77.6% of processors and equal to that of 3.3% of processors.
Show more
DDR memory version
DDR4
This processor supports DDR DDR4, which is newer than that of 25.2% of processors and equal to that of 31.1% of processors.
Maximum memory speed
3,200 MHz
This processor supports memory speeds up to 3,200 MHz, which is higher than that of 49.8% of processors and equal to 8.5% of processors.
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
DDR5-4800 MHz
This processor supports JEDEC memory speeds up to DDR5-4800 MHz, which is higher than that of 62.3% of processors and equal to 6.7% of processors.
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
?
Maximum memory capacity
128 GB
This processor supports up to 128 GB of memory, which is more than 59.3% of processors and equal to 22.8% of processors.
Show more
Integrated graphics
no
This processor does not include integrated graphics. 85.4% of processors offer this.
Integrated GPU model
N/A
Integrated GPU execution units
N/A
Integrated GPU base frequency
N/A
Integrated media encoders/decoders
N/A
Show more
TDP (Thermal design power)
105 W
This processor has a TDP of 105 W which is higher than that of 89.7% of processors and equal to that of 1% of processors.
Base power (PL1)
105 W
This processor has a base power of 105 W which is higher than that of 89.9% of processors and equal to that of 1% of processors.
Boost power (PL2)
?
Tau (power duration limit)
N/A
Configurable TDP
no
This processor does not support configurable TDP. 53.7% of processors offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X vs the average processor

246810TotalPlatformPerformanceArchitectureMemory & PCIeIntegrated graphicsPower & Thermal
  • 3.39x higher PassMark score
    This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (38,933 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
    38,933 vs 11,469
  • 2.4x higher multi-core score
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (12,488 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    12,488 vs 5,209
  • 3x better multi-core performance
    This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (8,414 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
    8,414 vs 2,804.5
  • 8 more performance cores
    This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (12 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
    12 vs 4
  • 16 more CPU threads
    This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (24 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    24 vs 8
  • 6 more CPU cores
    This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (12 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    12 vs 6
  • 7.11x larger L3 cache
    This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (64 MB vs 9 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 9 MB.
    64 MB vs 9 MB
  • Higher base clock
    This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (12x3.7 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
    12x3.7 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
  • 32.8% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.6

    Average grade

    20%

    9.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (45)
    27 reviews: 14 with a printed score, 13 estimated from the review. 18 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.9 vs 6.7
  • 36.1% higher sentiment score
    9.8 vs 7.2
  • 18.3% better value for money
    AMD Ryzen 9 5900X has better value for money than the average processor (8.62 vs 7.3).
    8.62 vs 7.29
  • 5.1% higher list score
    List score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (5)
    List score: in 5 of 87 lists (6%)
    8.2 vs 7.8
  • Modern CPU socket
    This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (AM4 vs FP5).
    AM4 vs FP5
  • 3.39x higher PassMark score
    This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (38,933 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
    38,933 vs 11,469
  • 2.4x higher multi-core score
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (12,488 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    12,488 vs 5,209
  • 3x better multi-core performance
    This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (8,414 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
    8,414 vs 2,804.5
  • 8 more performance cores
    This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (12 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
    12 vs 4
  • 16 more CPU threads
    This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (24 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    24 vs 8
  • 6 more CPU cores
    This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (12 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    12 vs 6
  • Higher base clock
    This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (12x3.7 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
    12x3.7 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
  • 35.5% better single-core performance
    This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,467 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
    3,467 vs 2,558
  • Unlocked for overclocking
    This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
  • 43.3% higher single-core score
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,199 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    2,199 vs 1,535
  • 9.1% higher boost clock
    This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (4.8 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
    4.8 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
  • 28.8% higher Cinebench R20 single-core score
    This processor has a higher Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (631 vs 490). The average processor scores 490 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
    631 vs 490
  • 2x higher bus transfer rate
    This processor has a higher bus transfer rate than the average processor (16 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
    16 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
  • 7.11x larger L3 cache
    This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (64 MB vs 9 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 9 MB.
    64 MB vs 9 MB
  • 2.88x more L3 per core
    This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (5.3 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
    5.33 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
  • 58.2% smaller die size
    This processor has a lower die size than the average processor (74 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    74 mm² vs 177 mm²
  • More advanced microarchitecture
    This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Vermeer vs Kaby Lake).
    Vermeer vs Kaby Lake
  • 41.7% smaller process node
    This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (7 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    7 nm vs 12 nm
  • 2x larger L1 cache
    This processor has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (768 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
    768 KB vs 384 KB
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (6 MB vs 3 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 3 MB.
    6 MB vs 3 MB
  • More advanced foundry
    This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 7 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
    TSMC 7 nm vs Intel 14 nm
  • 8 more PCIe lanes
    This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
    20 usable lanes
    24 vs 16
  • Newer PCIe version
    This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • Supports memory overclocking
    This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.
  • 2x more memory capacity
    This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • Supports ECC memory
    This processor supports ECC memory, while the average processor does not. 32% of processors support it.
  • 10 °C lower CPU temperature
    This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (90 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
    90 °C vs 100 °C
  • No configurable TDP
    This processor does not support configurable TDP, while the average processor does. 53.7% of processors support configurable TDP.
  • 75.6% slower Blender rendering
    This processor has a higher Blender BMW27 render time than the average processor (97 vs 398). The average processor needs 398.015 for the Blender BMW27 test.
    97 vs 398.015
  • 2.33x higher base power
    This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (105 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    105 W vs 45 W
  • 10 °C lower temperature limit
    This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (90 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
    90 °C vs 100 °C
  • 2.33x higher TDP
    This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (105 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    105 W vs 45 W
  • No integrated graphics
    This processor does not include integrated graphics, while the average processor does. 85.4% of processors include integrated graphics.
  • Limited PCIe bifurcation
    This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
    x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4
  • Older TPM support
    This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
    fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0
  • Older TPM support
    This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
    fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0
  • 75.6% slower Blender rendering
    This processor has a higher Blender BMW27 render time than the average processor (97 vs 398). The average processor needs 398.015 for the Blender BMW27 test.
    97 vs 398.015
  • Limited PCIe bifurcation
    This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
    x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4
  • No integrated graphics
    This processor does not include integrated graphics, while the average processor does. 85.4% of processors include integrated graphics.
  • No configurable TDP
    This processor does not support configurable TDP, while the average processor does. 53.7% of processors support configurable TDP.
  • 2.33x higher base power
    This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (105 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    105 W vs 45 W
  • 10 °C lower temperature limit
    This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (90 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
    90 °C vs 100 °C
  • 2.33x higher TDP
    This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (105 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    105 W vs 45 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
Josh Fox Tech
≈ estimated
13/10/2023
Hands-on benchmark review · gaming tests at 1080p and 1440p
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is not ideal for gaming with an RTX 4090, but it is still a solid productivity chip and AM4 upgrade.
9.0
Lawrence Harris
≈ estimated
30/07/2022
Hands-on review · synthetic and gaming benchmarks, buying advice
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a strong AM4 upgrade right now, though it will start to age within a few years.
9.0
Yousuf Vilayat
≈ estimated
10/02/2021
Review · gaming test bench and feature overview
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a strong gaming and productivity CPU, worth buying when the price is right and it is in stock.
9.0
Tech Teardown
≈ estimated
09/11/2020
Hands-on review · gaming and production benchmarks compared with the previous generation
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a big upgrade for new builds and production, but a weak step for current 3900X owners gaming at 1440p.
9.5
Hardware Unboxed
≈ estimated
06/11/2020
Benchmark review · gaming, application and overclocking tests
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a strong chip that will likely age better than Intel's 10900K.
9.5
Paul's Hardware
≈ estimated
05/11/2020
Launch review · gaming and compute benchmarks vs Intel i9-10900K
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is the clear pick for gaming and multithreaded work, though it costs slightly more than the 3900X.
9.0
ThinkComputers
≈ estimated
05/11/2020
Launch review · benchmarks, gaming and overclocking tests
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a strong upgrade for older systems, with big gaming and single-core gains, though pricier than its predecessor.
9.0
Tech Critter
≈ estimated
05/11/2020
Hands-on review · performance, thermals and overclocking tests
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a big step up from Zen+ and a worthy upgrade, though newer motherboards are recommended over 400-series boards.
9.0
Gamers Nexus
≈ estimated
05/11/2020
Full benchmark review · gaming, workstation and power tests
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a cheaper route than the 5950X, but it draws more power.
9.0
Coreteks
≈ estimated
05/11/2020
Hands-on review · gaming and productivity charts, value for money
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a great chip that justifies its higher price, despite some BIOS overclocking quirks.
Not graded
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
05/11/2020
Lab test · Intel comparison
Verdict
The Ryzen 9 5900X beats Intel's Core i9-10900K in every test, but older AM4 boards need a beta BIOS and no cooler is included.
9.0
digitalfoundry.net
≈ estimated
08/11/2020
Hands-on test · Gaming benchmarks
Verdict
The Ryzen 9 5900X now matches Intel on single-core speed, making it a strong gaming chip, though it still sometimes has to cross the slow Infinity Fabric link.
9.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
04/05/2021
Hands-on test · Desktop CPU
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is the best gaming processor in this line-up, with the largest single-core gain in years, and it works in existing X570 boards.
8.0
rockpapershotgun.com
≈ estimated
05/11/2020
Hands-on test · Gaming benchmarks
Verdict
The Ryzen 9 5900X is the fastest gaming processor tested, but for gaming alone, the Ryzen 5 5600X delivers nearly the same frame rates.
9.0
tomshardware.com
✓ explicit
26/11/2020
Full review · Zen 3 desktop CPU
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is the best gaming choice among the Zen 3 chips, beating Intel's overclocked Core i9-10900K at 1080p, though it has no integrated graphics.
9.5
techspot.com
✓ explicit
06/11/2020
Lab test · Gaming and power
Verdict
The Ryzen 9 5900X matches the Core i9-10900K in games, pulls clearly ahead in heavy multi-core work and draws about 23% less total system power.
9.0
kitguru.net
✓ explicit
05/11/2020
Hands-on review · Clock speeds
Verdict
The Ryzen 9 5900X is a 12-core chip that hits 4.9GHz on light loads and runs about 4.4GHz on all cores at stock.
8.0
pcguide.com
✓ explicit
08/03/2024
Retrospective review · AM4 desktop CPU
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X remains a strong AM4 choice in 2025 for gaming and multitasking, but it lacks DDR5 memory and PCIe 5.0 SSD support.
9.0
computerbase.de
≈ estimated
05/11/2020
Lab test · Zen 3 benchmarks
Verdict
The Ryzen 9 5900X has 12 cores, boosts to 4.8 GHz and beats Intel Core chips in games, but clock gains over the last generation are modest.
10
chip.de
✓ explicit
05/11/2020
Lab test · Performance and power
Verdict
The Ryzen 9 5900X is a fast 12-core chip for work and games that uses modest power, but it ships without a cooler.
7.0
lesnumeriques.com
✓ explicit
05/11/2020
Brief review · Apps and gaming
Verdict
The Ryzen 9 5900X is a 12-core, 24-thread chip that suits both content creators and gamers, and keeps power draw in check.
8.0
tomsguide.fr
✓ explicit
05/11/2020
Lab test · Zen 3 architecture
Verdict
The Ryzen 9 5900X offers up to 19% more speed per clock and a 4.8 GHz boost, but its two chiplets may add delay in some games.
9.0
clubic.com
✓ explicit
15/11/2020
Lab test · Desktop processor
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a 12-core desktop chip with the Zen 3 redesign, and B450 and X570 boards can run it after a BIOS update.
8.0
hardwarecooking.fr
≈ estimated
14/07/2021
Full review · Mainstream desktop CPU
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a 12-core AM4 chip that fits boards from B450 to X570, though PCIe 4.0 SSD speeds need an X570 board.
9.4
profesionalreview.com
✓ explicit
05 de noviembre de 2020
Benchmark test · Overclocking
Verdict
The Ryzen 9 5900X is the best mainstream chip for rendering and beats Intel's i9-10900K in most games at 1080p, but gains little from overclocking.
9.8
geeknetic.es
✓ explicit
05 de noviembre de 2020
Hands-on test · Architecture review
Verdict
The Ryzen 9 5900X runs 12 cores at 4.6 GHz all-core and 4.9 GHz single-core, stays under 60°C at full load, but overclocking gains are small.
9.0
razorman.net
≈ estimated
03/03/2021
Hands-on review · Overclock and temperatures
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a 12-core chip about 20 percent faster than the 3900X, though it needs a strong cooler and good power circuitry.
9.0
hwupgrade.it
≈ estimated
05/11/2020
Lab test · Gaming and architecture
Verdict
The Ryzen 9 5900X gains up to 19% more speed per clock from Zen 3, helping games, but older AM4 boards need a beta BIOS.
8.0
lucascalvi.it
≈ estimated
15/05/2021
Hands-on test · Build and overclock
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X handles gaming and workstation work well, though heat, the missing cooler and no integrated graphics hold it back.
9.0
ct.nl
≈ estimated
13/05/2021
Comparison test · 5900X vs 5950X
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is the sensible pick for most demanding users, since it is slightly faster in games, while the 5950X only pays off in heavily multithreaded work.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

  • Exceptional multi-threaded performance for content creation and workstation tasks
  • Significant 19% IPC (Instructions Per Clock) improvement over the previous generation
  • Excellent for gaming, rivaling or beating high-end Intel competitors like the i9-10900K
  • Highly power efficient with a relatively low 105W TDP
  • Compatible with the established AM4 socket, allowing for easy motherboard upgrades
  • Supports PCIe 4.0 for faster SSD and GPU data transfer rates
  • Great value for money, especially in professional workloads

What customers don't like about AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

  • Does not include a bundled CPU cooler in the box
  • Tends to run hot under heavy loads, requiring a high-quality aftermarket cooling solution
  • Expensive choice if the primary use is only for gaming
  • Performance in pure gaming is outperformed by the specialized Ryzen 7 5800X3D
  • The AM4 platform is considered a 'dead end' with no further CPU upgrade paths
  • Lacks support for newer technologies like DDR5 RAM and PCIe 5.0

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a high-performance desktop processor based on the 7nm Zen 3 architecture, featuring 12 cores and 24 threads with a base clock speed of 3.7 GHz and a maximum boost clock of up to 4.8 GHz. It is equipped with a substantial 64MB of L3 cache and supports DDR4 memory up to 3200 MHz and PCIe 4.0, all within a 105W TDP. Main characteristics include its exceptional multi-threaded performance and significant IPC gains that make it a powerhouse for both high-refresh-rate gaming and intensive productivity tasks like 3D rendering or video editing. Its primary pros are its compatibility with existing AM4 motherboards as a drop-in upgrade and its impressive energy efficiency compared to competitors. However, some cons include the lack of an included thermal solution, necessitating an aftermarket cooler, and the fact that the AM4 platform has reached the end of its life cycle, offering no future upgrade path to newer DDR5-based systems.

Compare AMD Ryzen 9 5900X with other processors

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and other processors

No results found